Connect with us

Published

on

It’s been less than six months since countries struck a historic deal to “transition away from fossil fuels” after bitter fights and sleepless nights at COP28. But, in Bonn right now, discussions on what to do next about the biggest culprit of climate change seem to have largely disappeared from the agenda.

“It’s really jarring to see how quiet the conversation on fossil fuels has gone,” said Tom Evans, a senior policy advisor at E3G, adding that the trouble is this issue “doesn’t have a clear home at the UNFCCC right now”.

Last week negotiators clashed over whether that space should be the newly-created “UAE Dialogue” on implementing the outcomes of the Global Stocktake – the centrepiece of the Dubai climate summit.

Developed countries thought so and argued that talks should consider all elements of the global stocktake, including mitigation. But the Like-Minded Group of Developing Countries (LMDCs), which includes China, Saudi Arabia and India, retorted that the focus should be exclusively on finance and means of implementation. Small island states and the AILAC coalition of Latin American countries took the middle ground, pushing for discussions on all outcomes with a special focus on finance, according to observers and a summary of the discussions by the Earth Negotiations Bulletin.

Pending an agreement on that front, developed countries believe the mitigation work programme – a track set up at COP26 – is the only other natural forum to wrangle over emission-cutting measures.But negotiators there have failed to even agree on what should or should not be discussed.

An EU negotiator told Climate Home attempts to start a conversation on the way forward continue to be blocked by the LMDCs, with China and Saudi Arabia “the most vocal” among them. “The reason is that they fear this would put pressure on them to keep moving away from fossil fuels,” the EU delegate added.

The LMDCs argued that discussions over how to follow up on the COP28 agreement on fossil fuels are outside the mandate of the mitigation work programme. They have also hit back at rich nations accusing them of not doing enough to cut emissions.

Speaking on behalf of the group at a session hosted by the COP29 Presidency, the Bolivian negotiator said developed countries should be required to get to net zero by 2030. “The Annex 1 countries’ pathway to achieve net zero by 2050 does not contribute to solving the climate crisis, it is leading the world to a catastrophe,” he added.

In his intervention, the head of the EU delegation urged the COP28 and COP29 presidencies to “break the deadlock” on mitigation. “What are we waiting for?” he cried.

Shortly before, Yalchin Rafiyev, the lead negotiator for Azerbaijan’s COP29 presidency, had outlined his vision for the summit. The 1,918-word-long speech did not mention fossil fuels once.


As the negotiations focus on Loss and Damage, members of civil society demonstrate in the corridors calling for polluters to pay up. (Photo: Kiara Worth/IISD ENB)

Go slow on finance 

Monday’s session on finance ended with concerns from both the Arab Group and the US that the current text collating views on the new climate finance goal (known as the NCQG) is “unbalanced” and may not produce an outcome that is “fit for purpose” by the end of the Bonn talks on Thursday. The NCCQ is due to be agreed at COP29 in Baku in November.

The 35-page “informal paper” – from which an actual negotiating text needs to emerge – is a hotch-potch of views on what the post-2025 goal should look like (a single target for public finance from rich nations or a multi-layered target with a range of goals covering various sources and purposes); who should contribute (only developed countries or a wider pool, even mentioning countries with a space programme!); and how much money (no quantified amount, a percentage of gross national income, or about $1 trillion a year). And that’s only a taster of what’s in the document…

One major sticking point for the Arab Group on Monday wasthe lack of negotiations so far on the size – “quantum” – of the NCQG (it wants an annual $1.1 trillion plus arrears from the existing $100 billion goal). Its negotiator expressed disappointment that everything else is being discussed in Bonn apart from that.

As the session came to the end of its allotted two hours, a long list of 23 delegations had yet to take the floor, including the European Union, the UK, China, Japan, Bolivia, South Africa and many African countries. It’s going to be a tough task getting through them in the last slot this afternoon – and with just three days left when will the real horse-trading start?

Iskander Erzini Vernoit, founding director of the Imal Initiative for Climate & Development, a Morocco-based think-tank, told journalists on Tuesday finance talks in Bonn had “not advanced significantly beyond where we started”, with the text going no further in resolving the fundamental debates. The way forward to Baku on the NCQG is “murky”, he warned.


World Bank greenlights role in L&D Fund 

On Monday, the World Bank’s board approved the bank’s role as trustee and host of the secretariat for the new “Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage” for an interim period of four years. This is a procedural step – which had to be taken before a deadline of June 12 – on the road to getting the UN-agreed fund up and running this year.

In a short statement announcing the decision, the bank stressed that the fund’s independent board will determine “key priorities, including financing decisions, eligibility criteria, and risk management policies”. The bank also made clear that it won’t play a role in raising money for the fund or deciding how to spend its so-far meagre resources.

Climate activist and loss and damage expert Harjeet Singh said the next step is to push on with setting up the fund’s secretariat, including appointing an executive director. The World Bank must facilitate the receipt of pledged funds while the fund’s board (which next meets in July) needs to adopt key policy decisions to enable earliest possible disbursement to affected countries, he said.

“It is crucial that the success of the Loss and Damage Fund is measured by how quickly and adequately those facing the harsh realities of the climate emergency receive support for recovery,” he told Climate Home.

At COP28, countries – including the host nation UAE – pledged close to $700 million for the new fund, but substantive discussions about how to mobilise the amounts needed to cover fast-rising losses from extreme weather and rising seas have yet to take place.

In Bonn, climate justice activists are lobbying hard for the L&D Fund to receive finance under the new post-2025 goal. But developed countries are pushing back, saying there is no basis for this under the Paris Agreement, which refers to them providing financial resources only for mitigation (measures to reduce emissions) and adaptation to climate impacts.

The post Bonn bulletin: Fossil fuel transition left homeless appeared first on Climate Home News.

Bonn bulletin: Fossil fuel transition left homeless

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Top green jet fuel producer linked to suspect waste-oil supply chain

Published

on

The world’s largest producer of renewable fuel for planes, Neste, is sourcing key ingredients for its “green” fuel from an opaque supply chain that enables fresh palm oil to be passed off as waste, highlighting a global problem facing the aviation industry.

Many governments and airlines are pinning their hopes for more climate-friendly flying on sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Finnish biofuels giant Neste says it makes SAF with 100% “renewable waste and residue raw material”, such as animal fat and used cooking oil (UCO).

But Climate Home News and Swedish broadcaster SVT found that Neste’s biggest Malaysian supplier of UCO accepted fresh palm oil during a public drive intended to collect waste oil, without asking questions or carrying out checks.

Our investigation did not uncover direct evidence that this or other virgin palm oil has been used by Neste to produce SAF. But industry experts say that, once oil supplies are mixed at source, it is hard for refiners to keep it out of their supply chain.

Neste indicated it would look into our findings, adding that it is currently not aware of any verified cases of fraud that are directly connected to its raw material sourcing.

Planet-heating palm oil

Mounting evidence of widespread fraud risks in the SAF supply chain raises doubts about the climate benefits of the aviation sector’s main green strategy for the years ahead, analysts say.

Palm oil that has not been used for cooking or frying is not permitted under rules on which raw materials can be made into SAF supplied in Europe, Neste’s largest market, because of its links to deforestation.

The clearing of forests for palm oil plantations in Southeast Asia and beyond has long been associated with the loss of carbon-storing jungle, posing a threat to efforts to tackle planet-heating emissions and protect endangered wildlife.

Analysis of Malaysian custom records indicates that Neste sourced around 250,000 tonnes of UCO from Malaysia in 2024. That is more than double the total amount collected in the country annually, according to estimates published by Brussels-based NGO Transport and Environment (T&E). Discrepancies like these have fuelled suspicions about what UCO shipments from Malaysia contain.

Oil collected by Neste’s supplier Evergreen Feed & Oil in Melaka. Photo: SVT

Oil collected by Neste’s supplier Evergreen Feed & Oil in Melaka. Photo: SVT

A former director at Neste, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Climate Home News that, while the Finnish firm is a highly professional operator, no fuel producer can claim with 100% certainty that its supply chain does not include virgin palm oil or mislabelled raw materials due to the complexity of the sector and weak enforcement by regulators.

The findings add to questions about the integrity of green jet fuel after an investigation by Climate Home News and The Straits Times last year uncovered similar flaws in the supply chain. With more countries mandating the use of small but growing amounts of SAF, and fuel producers scrambling for limited raw materials, barely used and virgin palm oil is being passed off as UCO to traders, industry sources told us.

‘Very high’ fraud incidence

Demand for SAF has surged as governments and airlines promise to cut emissions from a sector with few low-carbon alternatives. Its backers say SAF can reduce planet-heating emissions by up to 80% over kerosene jet fuel when made with waste materials like used cooking oil that do not take up land for food crops or drive deforestation.

But the growing gap between what the world’s kitchens and food factories can realistically provide and what the aviation industry requires has created a clear incentive for fraud.

Is the world’s big idea for greener air travel a flight of fancy?

That holds true in Malaysia, a key sourcing country for SAF suppliers like Neste, where government-subsidised palm oil for cooking can be bought cheaply and then sold on for a higher price as UCO. For that reason, there are additional requirements that the oil should not be deliberately contaminated or manipulated for profit.

“The opportunity, or incidents, of fraud is very high,” Vasu R Vasuthewan, former Malaysia head for the ISCC, a global biofuels certification body, told The Straits Times last year.

No questions asked

On a Saturday in mid-January, dozens of people arrive at the central square in the historic city of Melaka carrying plastic bottles of all shapes and sizes filled with cooking oil.

A banner above a stall advertises a public collection drive organised by Evergreen Oil & Feed, Malaysia’s largest supplier of UCO to Neste and a provider to other multinational fuel companies, including Repsol and Shell.

The idea is simple: individuals bring used cooking oil from home and receive 3 Malaysian ringgit per litre, the equivalent of about $0.65.

Among those bringing greasy containers that morning is an undercover reporter sent by SVT to put the system to the test. She carries a transparent plastic jerry can. Inside it is not waste oil from a kitchen, but fresh palm oil she had poured into the container earlier that day.

The journalist steps forward and hands the jerry can to a volunteer. Without asking any questions about the oil’s origin or contents, the volunteer places it on a scale and notes the weight. He then unscrews the cap and pours the liquid into a large plastic drum, mixing it with oil brought in by other members of the public.

An undercover reporter supplies fresh palm oil as used cooking oil without any checks. Credit: SVT Vetenskapens värld – När kan jag flyga grönt? | SVT Play

Afterwards, the reporter walks to a nearby table where another volunteer asks her to fill out a simple form before receiving payment for the oil. She writes down a fake name and phone number. No verification is requested, and the cash changes hands.

The blue plastic drum is sealed and loaded onto the back of a truck, which will transport the batch to Evergreen Oil & Feed’s processing facility on the outskirts of Melaka. There, the oil will enter the industrial supply chain that feeds the global market for “waste-based” biofuels, including SAF.

Checks intended to catch fraud

Evergreen Oil & Feed did not reply to a request for comment on what happened at its UCO collection in January. In May 2025, the company’s owner CK Lau told The Straits Times that the firm follows the “proper processes” in its collection based on requirements established by International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC), the leading certification scheme recognised by the European Commission.

Carl Nyberg, senior vice president for renewable products at Neste, said in an interview with SVT that ensuring the traceability and integrity of the raw materials used in the production of green fuels is of utmost importance for the Finnish firm.

“If we receive concerns or hints that there are anomalies or suspicions around the raw materials we receive, we go in and investigate and then we stop the supplies from such suppliers,” he added.

Neste’s Carl Nyberg watches the footage of the waste oil collection in Melaka. Credit: SVT Vetenskapens värld – När kan jag flyga grönt? | SVT Play

Neste’s Carl Nyberg watches the footage of the waste oil collection in Melaka. Credit: SVT Vetenskapens värld – När kan jag flyga grönt? | SVT Play

After watching the footage of the oil collection in Melaka, Nyberg said Neste would “take this on board and dig a bit deeper” to understand the background. “Our objective is, of course, to ensure that we have suppliers that are behaving correctly, delivering the feedstocks that they have promised to deliver us, as we have in the contract,” he added.

A Neste spokesperson later added in a statement that each raw material shipment may undergo additional checks, including “advanced laboratory testing” performed at the company’s own facilities. “Based on the results of analyses on the raw materials we have received, we have not received raw material cargoes with typical profiles of crude palm oil,” they added.

Neste exports outweigh collection

As Neste’s largest provider of UCO in Malaysia, Evergreen Oil & Feed supplied the Finnish giant with more than 50,000 tonnes of the raw material – enough to fill 20 Olympic-sized swimming pools – in the first half of 2025, according to customs data obtained by SVT.

In total, Neste sourced around 250,000 tonnes of UCO from all the Malaysian traders it dealt with in 2024, the data showed.

However, only 100,000 tonnes of UCO are estimated to be collected annually in Malaysia, according to a 2024 analysis by consultancy Stratas Advisors for T&E. “Our suspicion is that not all of these volumes are legit waste oils, suggesting that some of them could be [virgin] palm oil,” said Simon Suzan, a data analyst at T&E.

Explainer: What is Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)?

Under the current system, the entire SAF supply chain largely relies on a long paper trail rooted in self-declarations submitted by restaurants, factories and households providing the UCO, alongside sporadic inspections at the points where the raw material is collected.

In Europe, the verification of green fuel supply chains largely rests on certification systems like ISCC, which is led by the biofuels industry and, according to one source, enjoys “a kind of monopoly” in the sector. The body issues sustainability certificates to commodities traders and fuel suppliers.

ISCC says its certification process supports “sustainable, fully traceable, deforestation-free and climate-friendly supply chains”. But the certifier has come under frequent criticism from campaigners and researchers, who argue that its auditing system relies heavily on company-provided data and can struggle to detect fraud in complex global supply chains.

Watch the full Swedish documentary, “When can I fly green?”, on SVT Play

The problems in Malaysia are not isolated. A separate investigation by AFP and SourceMaterial recently found that Indonesian companies targeted in a palm oil fraud probe had supplied European firms including Neste and Eni.

In February, Indonesian police detained 11 people over suspicions that local companies had conspired with government officials to pass off palm oil as a waste byproduct called palm oil mill effluent (POME), including by offering bribes.

Neste said it had instructed its supplier to exclude the implicated Indonesian companies from its supply chain after the investigation became public. Analysis of periodic samples from shipments between 2023 and 2025 were “consistent with palm-derived waste”, not palm oil, it added. There is no suggestion that Neste had any knowledge of, or involvement in, the alleged Indonesian fraud.

EU ‘not happy’ about fraud risks

Neste turns the raw materials it buys from Southeast Asia and other regions into renewable fuels at its refineries in Singapore, the Netherlands and Finland.

Last year, the company sold nearly three-quarters of its renewable fuels, including SAF, in Europe, where green fuels are central to efforts to reduce the climate impact of aviation. The European Union, alongside the UK, introduced the world’s first SAF mandates in January 2025, requiring fuel suppliers to blend at least 2% SAF with conventional kerosene.

Anna-Kaisa Itkonen, EU spokesperson for climate and energy, said the European Commission is “of course not happy” about the risk of virgin palm oil contaminating the SAF supply chain.

“This was not the purpose when we started the policy and when we wanted to create this global wake-up call of greening aviation,” she added in an interview with SVT. “It undermines the policy because it is basically [de]frauding those who are complying with the rules.”

    Itkonen said the European Commission is doing the best it can within its remit, but enforcement is up to individual member states. “We also have the possibility to make these rules more stringent and look into them and revise them,” she added.

    Even if regulation is tightened, ensuring fraud-free SAF supplies will not be an easy task, industry insiders warn.

    The former Neste director told Climate Home News that, with poor enforcement of the rules especially in source countries, complete control of the supply chain is practically impossible for companies handling enormous volumes of raw materials, like the Finnish firm.

    “I don’t think anyone can say 100% putting their hand on a Bible,” the ex-employee added when asked whether Neste could confidently claim no virgin palm oil enters its SAF supply chain.

    “The market needs a level playing field. If Neste rejects questionable supply, competitors will accept it. It’s a market-wide problem of fraudulent feedstocks.”

    The post Top green jet fuel producer linked to suspect waste-oil supply chain appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Top green jet fuel producer linked to suspect waste-oil supply chain

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    New York’s Governor Pushes to Delay a Key Portion of the State’s Climate Law

    Published

    on

    Kathy Hochul wants to set a new timeline for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. State lawmakers and environmental advocates are pushing back.

    New York Gov. Kathy Hochul announced plans to roll back parts of the state’s Climate Act, which established aggressive targets for reducing greenhouse gas pollution.

    New York’s Governor Pushes to Delay a Key Portion of the State’s Climate Law

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Susan Collins and Climate Change: ‘The Silence is Deafening’

    Published

    on

    Seeking a sixth term, the Maine senator’s passivity in the face of executive branch power grabs undermines her greatest electoral strength, as much as it does climate action.

    Last August, when reports emerged that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) planned to cancel $7 billion in grants for solar panels for low-income households, including an estimated 20,000 households in Maine, Sen. Susan Collins seemed to defend the move.

    Susan Collins and Climate Change: ‘The Silence is Deafening’

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com