Connect with us

Published

on

Solar energy has officially claimed the title of the world’s most affordable source of electricity. According to new research from the University of Surrey’s Advanced Technology Institute (ATI), solar power now costs as little as £0.02 per kilowatt-hour in the sunniest regions.

The study, published in Energy and Environmental Materials, highlights how solar photovoltaic (PV) technology has transformed from a niche innovation into the backbone of the global clean energy revolution.

As countries race to cut carbon emissions and combat climate change, the rapidly falling cost of solar power is unlocking access to clean energy on an unprecedented scale.

Solar Becomes the Cornerstone of a Low-Carbon Future

Professor Ravi Silva, co-author of the study and Director of the ATI, emphasized that even in less sunny nations like the UK, solar power has become the most cost-effective option for large-scale generation.

He precisely noted,

“Even here in the UK, a country that sits 50 degrees north of the equator, solar is the cheapest option for large-scale energy generation. Globally, the total amount of solar power installed passed 1.5 terawatts in 2024 – twice as much as in 2020 and enough to power hundreds of millions of homes. Simply put, this technology is no longer a moonshot prospect but a foundational part of the resilient, low-carbon energy future that we all want to bring to reality.” 

This milestone shows that solar energy is no longer experimental. It’s a proven cornerstone of the low-carbon future the world is building toward.

Alongside solar, the cost of lithium-ion batteries—key to storing renewable power—has dropped by a staggering 89% since 2010. This sharp decline has made solar-plus-storage systems a competitive alternative to conventional gas-fired power plants.

Solar panel price

Global Solar Costs Fall Over 80% in a Decade

According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), the global weighted-average levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for utility-scale solar PV dropped by over 80% between 2010 and 2023. In sun-rich regions, it now costs as little as $0.03 per kilowatt-hour—making it the cheapest source of new electricity generation worldwide.

This steep decline stems from a mix of technological, economic, and policy factors. Breakthroughs in solar cell efficiency, bifacial modules, and tracking systems have dramatically boosted energy output.

Also, competitive auctions and long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) have made solar development more transparent and efficient. Industry experience has also cut costs for installation and maintenance.

Today, solar PV is cheaper than coal, gas, and even wind in many markets, shifting the question from “Why choose renewables?” to “How fast can we deploy them?”

Levelized Cost of Energy Comparison—New Build Renewable Generation

Cost of renewable solar
Source: Lazards Report

China’s Role in Falling Clean Energy Costs

Meanwhile, bigger economies, especially from large-scale manufacturing in China, have lowered hardware and installation costs.

Bloomberg also expects the cost of clean energy technologies, i.e., solar, wind, and battery storage, to drop further in 2025. It could be falling 2–11% and breaking last year’s records. In almost every part of the world, new solar and wind farms are now cheaper to build and operate than new coal or gas plants

Significantly, China’s overcapacity in clean tech has led some countries to impose import tariffs, temporarily slowing cost declines. Still, BNEF expects levelized costs for clean energy to fall 22–49% by 2035, keeping renewables on track for long-term growth.

  • Battery storage costs dropped a third in 2024 to $104/MWh, driven by oversupply from slower EV sales, with prices expected to cross $100/MWh in 2025.
  • Fixed-axis solar farms fell 21% globally, while wind and solar generation costs are projected to decline another 4% and 2%. It ensures clean energy remains cheaper than fossil fuels.
clean energy costs solar
Source: Bloomberg

Storage Revolution: Solar Power Around the Clock

The global energy storage boom has turned solar from an intermittent resource into a 24-hour power solution. It’s because of the massive cost reductions in batteries, solar-plus-storage systems can now compete head-to-head with gas-fired plants.

However, challenges remain in connecting large volumes of solar power to existing grids. Regions like California and China have already experienced energy curtailment due to grid congestion when solar output exceeds demand.

Dr. Ehsan Rezaee, co-author of the University of Surrey study, noted that “smart grids, artificial intelligence forecasting, and stronger regional interconnections will be essential to maintain power system stability as renewable adoption grows.”

Global Policy Boosts vs. U.S. Uncertainty

Supportive policy frameworks are key to sustaining solar’s momentum. In Europe, the Green Deal and RePowerEU initiatives have simplified permitting and set aggressive renewable targets.

India’s Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme, meanwhile, is strengthening local solar manufacturing to reduce dependence on imports. These measures are not only cutting carbon emissions but also advancing energy security, job creation, and economic growth.

International partnerships, such as the International Solar Alliance (ISA), continue to drive collaboration, knowledge exchange, and capacity building, particularly in developing nations that stand to benefit most from affordable solar energy.

OBBBA: Dimming the Sunshine 

However, the story is slightly different in the U.S. In July 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which speeds up the phase-out or early termination of most renewable energy tax credits and clean energy incentives established under the IRA.

As a result, U.S. clean energy incentives are being rapidly scaled back, with many tax credits set to expire or face new restrictions and deadlines, creating significant uncertainty for investors and project developers.

Breakthrough Technologies Drive the Next Wave

Solar technology innovation is accelerating at record speed. Researchers at the University of Sydney recently achieved a world-first breakthrough with a 16 cm² triple-junction perovskite solar cell delivering 23.3% efficiency for large-area devices. A smaller version reached 27.06% efficiency—the highest globally—and retained 95% performance after 400 hours of continuous operation.

Perovskite solar cells could revolutionize the market by boosting energy output by up to 50% without expanding land use. They can be made as thin, flexible films at lower temperatures than traditional silicon panels, cutting production costs significantly. Over the past decade, perovskite efficiency has soared from 3% to over 25%, with tandem cells poised to exceed 30%. These innovations will further drive down solar costs and expand applications across rooftops, vehicles, and portable systems.

Solar Dominates Future Renewable Growth

The International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that global renewable capacity will double by 2030—adding 4,600 gigawatts (GW), equivalent to the combined power generation capacity of China, the EU, and Japan.

  • Solar PV will account for nearly 80% of this growth, followed by wind, hydropower, and bioenergy.
solar energy
Source: IEA

According to DNV’s latest Energy Transition Outlook, global solar capacity is expected to surpass 3,000 GW by the end of 2025, with China holding 47% and Europe 20%. It further highlights:

  • Solar already generates about 10% of the world’s electricity and is projected to reach 20% by 2029 and 40% by 2045.
  • Behind-the-meter (BTM) solar used by households and businesses is also on the rise and is expected to make up 30% of total solar generation by 2060.
  • Wind power is projected to nearly double to over 2,000 GW by 2030, but solar remains the lowest-cost option in most markets.

India is emerging as the second-fastest renewables market after China, advancing its 2030 targets. Expanded auctions and rapid rooftop solar growth contribute to the solar boom.

However, the world still falls short of the COP28 goal to triple renewable capacity by 2030, achieving about a 2.6-fold increase from 2022 levels. Closing this gap will require continued investment, innovation, and political will.

Building a Resilient Solar Future

As solar continues to dominate the global energy landscape, integration challenges must not be ignored. Expanding transmission networks, deploying digital grid management tools, and investing in advanced materials will be crucial.

Professor Silva emphasizes that sustained policy backing and continued innovation will determine how quickly the world transitions to a clean, resilient energy future.

The Renewable Energy Institute applauds solar’s rise as the cheapest source of electricity and continues to provide accredited training to build the skills needed to sustain this momentum.

Thus, from record-low costs to record-breaking efficiency, solar energy is reshaping the global energy system faster than anyone imagined. Its combination of affordability, scalability, and innovation is driving the clean energy transition forward.

The question now isn’t if solar will dominate, but how quickly the world can harness its full potential.

The post Solar Now the World’s Cheapest Energy, Powering the Clean Transition appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD

Published

on

For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable

Published

on

A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Why Conventional Carbon Offsets Are Losing Boardroom Credibility

Published

on

What replaced the cheap REDD credit on the boardroom slide deck, and why procurement is leading the rewrite.

Three years ago, a corporate slide showing a portfolio of cheap REDD+ credits could carry a board meeting. The number was big, the price was low, and the press release wrote itself. Today, that same slide gets sent back with questions. The questions are uncomfortable, the answers are unclear, and your general counsel is suddenly in the room.

Conventional carbon offsets are not dead. The voluntary carbon market retired 202 million tonnes in 2025, and the Morgan Stanley Institute for Sustainable Investing survey published in January 2026 confirmed that interest from corporate buyers remains substantial. What changed is the credibility threshold. The integrity floor has risen, the disclosure scrutiny has tightened, and the buyer profile has shifted. This article tracks what changed, what sophisticated buyers now ask before signing, and what serious corporates are putting on the board slide instead.

What boards used to buy, and why it stopped working

The 2020 to 2022 model was simple: buy a large tranche of avoidance credits at low single-digit prices, retire them against the company footprint, announce the carbon-neutral claim, and move on. Most of those credits came from REDD+ projects, renewable energy installations in countries where the renewable energy was already economic, or methane projects with thin documentation.

Several things broke that model. Academic research published in 2023, including a widely cited Science paper, found that the majority of REDD+ credits issued under the most common methodologies did not represent additional reductions when tested against rigorous counterfactuals. The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative published its Claims Code of Practice, which sets requirements for what companies can credibly claim from credit use. The European Union finalised its Green Claims Directive, restricting how companies can describe products as climate-neutral. France’s Décret 2022-539 already restricts carbon neutrality advertising. California’s AB 1305 imposes disclosure requirements on any company making net-zero or carbon-neutral claims while doing business in the state.

The collective effect: the cheap credit no longer buys the announcement, and the announcement now carries litigation risk.

The integrity reset: ICVCM, VCMI, and what changed

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market published the Core Carbon Principles in 2023 and began assessing methodologies against them in 2024. The first methodologies received the CCP label later that year. The point of the label is to give corporate buyers a defensible quality screen they can cite in disclosure.

The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative complements this on the demand side. Its Claims Code of Practice defines what a buyer can say (Silver, Gold, or Platinum claims, with associated requirements) based on the quality of credits used and the underlying decarbonisation strategy. Together, CCP and VCMI build a quality stack: CCP on the supply, VCMI on the claim, with the science-based target sitting underneath both.

The reset is not a ban on offsets. It is a ratchet. Credits that meet the new bar continue to clear; credits that do not, do not. The Morgan Stanley survey found that 61% of current buyers like the CCP label concept but that supply of labelled credits remains limited. That supply constraint is now visible in pricing.

What sophisticated buyers ask before they sign

The questions on the procurement scorecard have changed. A 2022 buyer might have asked about price, vintage, and project type. A 2026 buyer asks five different questions before any of those.

  • What does the counterfactual look like, and who validated it.
  • What is the permanence regime, and what is the buffer pool exposure.
  • What is the leakage risk, and how is it mitigated.
  • What rating has the project received from the independent ratings agencies (Sylvera, BeZero, Calyx Global), and what was the rationale.
  • What is the documentation discipline that survives an audit four years from now when the procurement team that signed the contract has moved on.

If the vendor cannot answer those five questions on a first call, the conversation ends. Conversely, if the vendor can answer them with documented specificity, the conversation often expands beyond a single transaction toward a multi-year engagement.

Where this leaves your near-term commitments

You probably have near-term commitments that pre-date the integrity reset. Public targets to be carbon neutral by 2025 or 2030. Product-level claims that ran in last year’s marketing. Disclosed reduction trajectories that assumed continued access to cheap credits.

You have three workable paths. The first is to re-baseline your strategy, replacing the most exposed credits with higher-quality alternatives and adjusting the public language to match what you can defend. The second is to shift the underlying spend from offsetting outside your value chain to investing inside your value chain, where reductions count against Scope 3 directly and the audit trail is cleaner. The third is to keep the strategy and absorb the risk, which is increasingly the most expensive option once you price in litigation, restatement, and reputational exposure.

Most serious buyers are choosing the second path. It moves the carbon spend from a compliance cost to a procurement and resilience investment, and it removes the central failure point of the legacy model: the disconnect between where the emissions occurred and where the reductions sat. Nature-based supply chain investments, structured under the GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard and aligned to the SBTi FLAG Guidance, are the asset class that fits this brief. They generate inventory-grade reductions, they produce audit-grade documentation, and they survive the new claim restrictions because the carbon math sits inside the value chain that the disclosure already covers.

If you are reassessing a carbon strategy under the new integrity bar, or rebuilding a board narrative that has to survive a more skeptical audience, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help. The Dual-Value Model gives you a defensible alternative to legacy offset purchases, with the documentation and operational integration that survives the procurement scorecard and the audit. Schedule a consultation.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com