Stellantis, one of Europe’s largest car manufacturers, has announced plans to continue purchasing carbon dioxide (CO₂) emission credits from Tesla in 2025. This decision comes after new EU rules: Starting in 2025, automakers can average their emissions over three years, until 2027.
This policy change gives automakers more flexibility to meet emission targets. However, Stellantis is still committed to using Tesla’s carbon credits to meet environmental standards.
The decision shows the challenges of moving to electric vehicles (EVs) and highlights the need to balance rules with business plans.
Understanding Carbon Emission Credits
CO₂ emission credits are an essential part of emissions reduction policies. Governments limit how much CO₂ companies can release. This is especially important in transportation, where emissions are a big worry.
A company that emits less than its limit earns carbon credits. These credits can be sold to companies that exceed their allowances.
For automakers, this system encourages investment in cleaner technologies. Slow-moving companies must either pay fines for high emissions or buy credits from automakers with extra.
Tesla, which produces only electric vehicles and has low emissions, generates excess credits that it sells to other automakers, including Stellantis.
Since 2019, Tesla has made about $10 billion by selling carbon credits, which has become a major source of income. This financial benefit lets Tesla invest in new technology, research, and production and helps strengthen its position in the EV market.

Stellantis’ Strategy: A Temporary Fix or Long-Term Dependence?
Stellantis depends on emission credits. This shows the challenges it has in meeting EU emission standards. In 2025, Stellantis’ EV sales in Europe accounted for just 14% of its total sales—well below the EU’s target of 21% for that year.
The company is investing in EV production. However, it hasn’t met the EU regulations yet. To comply, it will need to buy credits.
Jean-Philippe Imparato, head of European operations at Stellantis, said, “I’ll use everything.” This shows that the company is fully committed to meeting emission rules.
Stellantis is working hard to boost its EV production. However, it still needs Tesla’s credits to keep going. Imparato further added:
“The 2027 extension ‘gives us some breathing space, but does not provide a solution.”
The automaker has announced plans to ramp up hybrid and electric vehicle production. A new hybrid version of the Fiat 500 will begin production at Stellantis’ Mirafiori plant in Turin, Italy, in November 2025.
The company aims to produce 130,000 units per year, including both hybrid and fully electric versions. This move is part of a two-part strategy. It aims to ensure quick regulatory compliance and invest in EV technology for the future.
Stellantis’ Long-Term Plans
While Stellantis is purchasing carbon credits in 2025, it is also taking steps to strengthen its EV strategy. The company announced investments in battery production and EV infrastructure. These will help reduce its reliance on emission credits in the future.
One of Stellantis’ key initiatives is its plan to expand its electric vehicle lineup. The company is focusing on developing new battery technologies to improve efficiency and lower costs.
Stellantis Roll Out of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs)

The European carmaker is also looking for partnerships with battery makers and energy firms. This will help improve its EV supply chain. All these are part of the automaker’s goal to reach net-zero emissions by 2038.
- RELATED: Stellantis Secures $7.5B Loan from U.S. Gov’t for EV Battery Plants: A Push For Its Net Zero Drive
In the next few years, Stellantis plans to boost its EV sales. This will help cut down on buying carbon credits from other companies. The company is focusing on hybrid and fully electric models. This way, it can gradually transition to meet market demand and follow regulatory rules.
European Union’s Emission Regulations
The European Union has strict emissions regulations. These rules aim to encourage automakers to reduce carbon emissions. Automakers must meet specific fleet-wide CO₂ emission targets, which become stricter over time.
Initially, car manufacturers were required to meet individual targets by 2025. In response to industry concerns, the EU extended the compliance period. Now, automakers can meet targets by averaging their emissions from 2025 to 2027.
This change gives automakers more flexibility. It also allows them time to adjust their production plans. However, it does not remove the requirement to meet strict emission targets in the long term.
Stellantis will keep buying Tesla’s carbon credits, even with the compliance extension. This shows the company views these credits as a needed short-term fix while it aims for a more sustainable future.
Industry Perspectives on Compliance and Credit Purchases
The EU’s extension of the compliance period has sparked debate within the auto industry. Some automakers view it as a necessary adjustment that allows them time to scale up EV production without facing immediate financial penalties. Others argue that it could slow the transition to EVs by reducing the pressure on automakers to meet strict deadlines.
Environmental organizations have also raised concerns about the impact of the extension. They say that giving automakers more time to follow regulations might slow down the move to lower emissions. This could hurt efforts to reduce climate change effects.
However, automakers like Stellantis see the extension as a way to balance business sustainability with regulatory requirements.
The company’s decision to continue buying CO₂ credits from Tesla in 2025 highlights the challenges automakers face in meeting stringent emissions targets. The EU’s compliance extension gives temporary relief.
- READ MORE: EU’s 2025 Emission Rules Led Tesla and Mercedes to Pool Carbon Credits to Avoid $15.6 Billion Fine
The post Why Stellantis Still Needs Tesla’s Carbon Credits in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


