This post is the last blog of the GAME 2025 project. Unfortunately, it was delayed by several months (the project ended in December 2025), but it was not forgotten. Read now about the extraordinary and dramatic experiences that Andrea and Sarah made in Cabo Verde in 2025.
In April 2025, GAME returned once again to the islands of Cabo Verde, this time with Andrea (Technical University of the Atlantic, Cabo Verde) and Sarah (University of Potsdam, Germany). As in previous years, we were exploring the influence of artificial light at night (ALAN) on coastal organisms. The project in 2025 was supposed to bring more knowledge about its influence on the growth of marine epiphytes.
Cabo Verde comprises 10 main islands and a few islets, which are lined up in an arc in the Northern Atlantic. The archipelago was formed by underwater volcanoes that started to emerge from the depths of the ocean about 20 million years ago. The islands are characterized by a dry landscape that has arid and poorly permeable soils, which are almost infertile, and by rainfalls that do not appear every year. Hence, the inhabitants of the archipelago always found their greatest wealth in the sea. As the westernmost African country, its isolation has led to the evolution of marine species that are unique to the islands, while other species that arrived from elsewhere found favourable conditions here. As a relatively young nation, Cabo Verde has yet to explore much of its biodiversity, as well as the marine ecosystems in its waters. Partnerships between Cabo Verde and Germany, which result in projects such as the one we are participating in in the framework of GAME, are always celebrated as they contribute to the scientific enrichment of the country.
Our project was conducted in collaboration with the OSCM (Ocean Science Center Mindelo). The center is, on the one hand, linked to GEOMAR (GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel) in Germany and, on the other hand, to IMar (Instituto do Mar) in Cabo Verde. It is dedicated to oceanographic observations and research, and also acts as a connection point for common research activities and the exchange between international scientific institutions. Laboratory work can, for instance, be carried out by using the center facilities and the available equipment. Our experiment, however, was conducted in the field, because of the need for a constant supply with seaweed spores that mediated the colonization of the substrates we provided by epiphytes.
To meet the specific requirements of our study, Porto Grande Bay, more specifically the Mindelo Marina, was chosen as the study site. As its name suggests, this bay is one of the largest in Cabo Verde, and it is located in the northwest of the island of São Vicente. Its calm and shallow waters made it the ideal site for the study we were planning. Except for the intense sun and very strong wind that we felt during the first months of our field work, the place was one of the most interesting and dynamic ones in Mindelo. We spent our days on pontoon B, in front of the Marina Bistro bar, working from morning to night.
In the mornings, we could smell the aroma of stewed “catchupa” and of the seafood that was served there. In the afternoons, the atmosphere was enlivened by the most famous pop songs played at the Ponte d’Água Hotel. Whenever a familiar song came on, we couldn’t resist singing along: “Kiss me hard before you go, Summertime sadness…” At dawn, everything then became calmer. The water was still, and under the lights of the pier, fish swam in circles and created a silent spectacle. Furthermore, in the months before the nesting season in Cabo Verde, it was common to see sea turtles coming to the surface to breathe. Unfortunately, they were so fast that it was almost impossible to get a photo. So fast that Sarah rarely managed to see them. If it were a game, the score would be: Cabo Verde 7 x 1 Germany.
During our work, we met people, both local and from other countries, who were friendly and willing to help, whether with a screwdriver, a tape measure, or a kayak. They were teaching us how to tie a knot, they took photos and videos of us, were giving us ideas and suggestions, or simply provided us company. However, there were also plenty of curious onlookers, mainly elderly tourists who came from the bar-bistro over to the pier, and were interested in what we were doing.
We started our work with one of the biggest challenges of the project: finding a macroalga that could be suitable for the experiment. This alga would needed to have a leathery texture, a flat and broad surface, and should inhabit the subtidal. This was no easy task for us, because although Cabo Verde has a rich marine biodiversity, the biomass of macroalgal species is limited by the nutrient deficiency in the oligotrophic waters of the archipelago. Hence, macroalgae can only be found in small quantities. Furthermore, as it is a tropical country, this task was further complicated by the fact that the waters are warm and shallow, and such conditions mainly favour encrusting and filamentous macroalgae. We began our endeavor by searching online for inventory lists of marine macroalgae on the island of São Vicente, but this was without success. We then invested in more practical approaches, such as diving and snorkeling. We went to the Laginha Coral Cove accompanied by Professor Guilherme, who is a marine biology enthusiast. There, we found two species of macroalgae, both potentially invasive and possibly belonging to the genus Grateloupia, which were qualified to serve as “living substrates” in our experiment.
We collected several specimens of the two species to hang them into the harbour in Mindelo for a pilot study. This was to test if epiphytes would settle on the macroalgae and whether the macroalgae themselves would survive the conditions in the harbour.
Both species made it into the final round. One of them had the perfect shape, but it was far too rare for our needs, while the other candidate was much more abundant. So, we focused on the second one. A further problem we faced was that the macroalgae we worked with had not been scientifically described for Cabo Verde. This meant that there was no literature that we could have consulted to learn about morphological or physiological traits. Furthermore, we had no idea how the algae would performed at different water depths or during low tide when exposed to air.
After some weeks, however, it became clear that our chosen species were rather trapping sediment on their surface than hosting a healthy community of epiphytes. Actually, even under the microscope, sediment and epiphytes were almost impossible to separate. Our supervisor, Corrine Almeida, suspected that the algae’s branched structure made it a natural sediment trap and this was not ideal for our purposes.
Given the high sediment load and the generally murky water in the harbour, we realized that we needed a new plan. We revisited the idea of using our first, more promising species, but after extensive searching, we had to admit that there simply were not enough specimens.
Due to this problem, we were unable to continue with the experiment, but the GAME programme coordinator, Mark, came up with a suggestion. The idea was to replace the living substrate with an artificial material that could, at least partly, simulate the traits of macroalgae, such as a flexible structure. Initially, we thought of using PVC tarpaulin, but this material has high chemical concentrations, which could affect the attachment of epiphytes. We continued searching in Mindelo until we finally found a silicone cooking mat in a Chinese store. The material was thin and malleable, requiring only to be soaked in drinking water for a few days to make its surface rougher. We bought eight green ones, which, after soaking, were cut into pieces that had the same size as the PVC plates.
For building the set up, we unpacked some materials that were left behind at OSCM by previous GAME teams, tested the LEDs, and cleaned the frames. One frame needed patching, while we built another one from the scratch. Mindelo does not have a giant all-in-one hardware store like the ones you can find in Germany – instead, you need to visit several smaller shops, while explaining every time at the counter what excatly you need. If they do not have it, they’ll usually send you to another store that might have it. After a few visits, the shopkeepers start to recognize you and let you rummage around in their storage rooms to find suitable alternatives.
We brought PVC panels from Germany and hand-cut them into 5 × 12 cm pieces. For the frames, we glued PVC pipes together and used thin ropes to create the inner structure. The panels were then attached to the ropes with cable ties, while the fake algae were sewed onto them with needle and thread.
We then installed the lighting system with the help of Eder, who is a technician at OSCM. All electronics were kept in waterproof dry boxes, and we built wooden arms with metal brackets to hold them in their place on the pontoon. We aimed to create similar light fields for both of our frames: Andrea’s with an intensity of 10–20 lux, while Sarah’s had 20–30 lux. After some trial and error, we managed to tune the LEDs perfectly.
However, the real challenge in June was not the construction – it was the wind. With daily gusts of 25–40 km/h, anything lightweight was instantly blown away and we are proud to say that we only lost one measuring tape to the sea. Along the way, we pulled plenty of harbour trash from the water, but also some unusual finds – like a fully inflated unicorn float. We even managed to recover the lid of our dry box from the seafloor, along with a couple of our caps. Hats, in fact, did not stand a chance in the winds of June and keeping them on our heads required constant hand support, so we eventually gave up.
By early July, just in time for our first experiment, the weather turned calmer. This made deploying the frames with our kayak much easier. Earlier, any pause in paddling would have sent us drifting straight back to the pontoon. The kayak also came in handy for measuring the water depth at the experimental site and for adjusting our mooring lines.
In this moment, we were optimistic: The project was starting to get on track. It seemed that we could finally switch on the autopilot and continue the work as outlined in the GAME 2025 manual. However, first we had to test the different steps of the analytical processes in the laboratory. We collected some of the fake algae that we had placed on the frames as backups in case of losses, put them in freezer bags and packed the freezer bags in larger black bags that we filled with ice and transported them to the laboratory. The first step, i.e. scraping the epiphytes from the substrates, went well, but a problem emerged when we tried to perform vacuum filtration. For this, the suspension of seawater, epiphytes, and sediment was poured into the funnel of the filtration unit, and the device was turned on. After a considerable amount of time, we could see that the volume in the funnel had not changed, because the sediment had clogged the flow of water through the filter. We were once again faced with a new impasse, and this one required a solution within a week. This was because the first experiment had already been running for more than seven days and could only continue for one more week. We tried decanting, but the epiphytes and sediment settled at a similar rate at the bottom of the beaker, making it difficult to separate them. Then we tried sieving through different sized meshes, but in doing so we lost a lot of biomass, what would have compromised our results. We also tried a method involving aliquots, which could have worked, but it took too long to test it a second time.
With no time left, we decided to remove the filtration step and to leave the sediment in our samples, as we simply could not get rid of it. Hence, the freezer bags were already drained at the study site. In the laboratory, the epiphytes were scraped off and directly transferred to test tubes, which were then filled up with ethanol. This method proved to be successful as we obtained chlorophyll a concentrations that were similar to those of the other GAME teams. For the biomass samples, a similar method was used, but their processing required the use of a muffle oven to obtain the ash-free dry weight. As none of the institutions here in Mindelo have such equipment, the samples were transported to Germany to muffle them at GEOMAR.
At this point, we were already thinking about what aspects could be improved in our second experiment, which was already underway. Furthermore, Sarah recently completed her first dive, spotting a nurse shark, plenty of fish, and sea turtles. She was hoping to spend more evenings at the beach in the coming weeks, playing volleyball and enjoying live music, especially during the Baía das Gatas Festival—one of the largest festivals in the country—which was approaching. In the words of our advisor, “The project is now running smoothly.” However, no one expected that in August a country that rarely receives rain throughout the year would be shaken by the biggest storm in living memory.
In the early hours of August 11th, storm Erin arrived without warning, causing material losses and, sadly, claiming the lives of nine people on the island of São Vicente. During the night, the scene was one of horror, with streets turned into rivers, lightning illuminating the entire city, and people desperately fighting for their lives and those of their loved ones as rainwater flooded their homes. In the morning, it was then possible to get a real sense of what had happened. Buildings had been knocked down, cars carried out to sea, shops destroyed, all caused by the force of the rainwater. The Mindelo micro-watershed, characterized by a mountainous terrain and a rugged topography, allowed the rainwater that fell on the city to flush to Porto Grande Bay, resulting in an exacerbated discharge of muddy water accompanied by trash. Experiment 2, which had already been in the water for a week, was canceled as the conditions in the bay no longer met the requirements for conducting an experiment. Square kilometers of water that had been crystal clear had turned brown and opaque, and we had no idea how long these conditions would last.
Soon after the storm, it was decided that the team would split up: Sarah would go to Finland to continue her project with the GAME team there, and Andrea would stay here to continue as soon as conditions had improved. A month passed, and the bay was slowly returning to its normal colour, but then another rain came and turned it brown again. Then it was too late to repeat experiment 2. But all is not lost. In January 2026, after we had completed the last phase of the project at GEOMAR in Kiel, Andrea considered to continue with the experimental work. At this time, the rainy season in Cabo Verde was over, and the water was still at mild temperatures.
The unforgettable catastrophe of August 11th 2025 in São Vicente allowed us to speculate on the origin of the mud/sediment that affected our experiment. The sediment that accumulated on the substrates probably came from the muddy water that floods Porto Grande Bay every year during the rainy season. Somehow—possibly due to the regular entry and exit of ferries from the port—the sediment gets resuspended frequently and travels through the water column by the forces of tidal currents and others. At least one riddle was solved.
Have you ever seen a sleek, brown-and-white bird hover above the ocean, fold its wings and drop into the water like a cannonball, only to surface seconds later with a fish in its grip? If so, you have probably seen an osprey.
A water-loving bird of prey
Ospreys are birds of prey, also known as raptors. Birds of prey are carnivorous predators that actively hunt and feed on other animals. However, unlike most birds of prey, the osprey’s diet consists of approximately 99% live fish, including catfish, trout and mackerel. Because of their feeding habits, ospreys, also called sea hawks, have unique traits that make them elite hunters of the sea.
Structure and hunting
When ospreys spot a fish, they dive from nearly 100 feet in the air. During the dive, they close their nostrils, called nares, to prevent water from entering.
Ospreys are the only birds of prey that can dive feet-first into water, allowing them to form a streamlined shape that helps them pierce the surface and protect their heads. Their dense, oily feathers act like a wetsuit, keeping them water-resistant during dives.
Once they make contact with prey, they use their reversible outer toes and barbed foot pads, called spicules, to grip the slippery scales of the fish.
After securing their catch, ospreys use their nearly six-foot wingspan to generate the lift needed to carry fish that can weigh nearly as much as they do out of the water.
Finally, once airborne, the osprey rotates the fish to point headfirst, an aerodynamic adjustment that reduces wind resistance on the flight back to the nest.
Get Ocean Updates in Your Inbox
Sign up with your email and never miss an update.
Habitat and breeding
Because of their dependence on fish, ospreys always live within sight of water. They typically build their nests atop dead trees or man-made structures along harbors and bays, such as channel markers, duck blinds and utility poles.
Both parents help construct the nest. These large structures, sometimes exceeding 300 pounds, are built with sticks and lined with materials like moss and seaweed.
Ospreys breed across every continent except Antarctica, inhabiting ocean coastlines, saltwater marshes, lagoons, estuaries, river mouths and even coral reefs.
Osprey pairs incubate an average of three eggs for roughly one month before they hatch. Chicks then remain in the nest for about 55 days before fledging, the stage in a bird’s life when it develops its feathers and wings enough to leave the nest and fly for the first time.
Why are ospreys important for our ocean?
Ospreys serve as living indicators of ocean health. Because they sit at the top of the marine food chain, they are highly sensitive to pollution and changes in fish populations. A decline in osprey nesting success can signal pollution, overfishing or habitat degradation.
That is why at Ocean Conservancy, we are working to address the ocean’s biggest threats, from plastic pollution to the climate crisis. But we cannot do this work alone. We need advocates like you to protect ospreys and all marine wildlife. Please take action and help us defend our ocean today.
The post Osprey: The Ocean’s Most Specialized Bird of Prey appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.
Für mich ist es meine erste Seereise, das erste Mal länger als nur einen Tag auf dem Meer. Und ja, die Labradorsee ist vielleicht nicht unbedingt der einfachste Ort für den Einstieg. Wie viele andere wurde ich in der ersten Nacht ordentlich seekrank. Die starken Bewegungen der Maria S. Merian bei diesen rauen Bedingungen waren anfangs wirklich herausfordernd. Doch nach ein paar anstrengenden Stunden, viel Schlaf und einigen wetterbedingten Arbeitspausen gewöhnte man sich langsam an das ständige Schaukeln und der Bord Alltag konnte beginnen.
Wie beschreibt man das Leben auf einem Forschungsschiff für jemanden, der das noch nie erlebt hat?
Grundlegendes zuerst – das tägliche Leben an Bord:
Essen:
Für Verpflegung ist bestens gesorgt: Frühstück gibt es um 7:30 Uhr, Mittagessen um 11:30 Uhr und Abendessen bereits um 17:30 Uhr. Zusätzlich steht rund um die Uhr ein kleiner Kühlschrank mit Snacks bereit, niemand muss hier hungrig bleiben.
Schlaf:
Guter Schlaf ist zwar nicht immer garantiert, aber man lernt schnell, sich anzupassen. Die meisten Wissenschaftler schlafen in Zweierkabinen mit eigener Nasszelle. Wer Nachtschicht hat, lebt ohnehin in einem anderen Rhythmus. Ein hilfreicher Tipp von einem erfahrenen Seebären: Einfach eine Decke unter eine Seite der Matratze legen, um eine kleine Kuhle zu formen so rollt man nicht ständig hin und her. Mein persönlicher Trick: auf dem Bauch schlafen und sich mit Ellbogen und Knien stabilisieren. So kann man selbst bei starkem Seegang und 11 Windstärken erstaunlich gut schlafen, fast „wie in Mamas Arm“, wie Sascha sagen würde.
Freizeit an Bord:
Allein ist man hier selten, und das ist auch gut so. In den Laboren ist eigentlich immer etwas los, besonders im CTD-Labor, das schnell zum sozialen Mittelpunkt wird. Unser Fahrtleiter Fehmi hat sich vorgenommen, einen neuen CTD-Rekord aufzustellen, was uns viel Zeit dort verbringen lässt, zur Freude der einen und zur Herausforderung für unsere Chemiker.
Abends trifft man sich häufig im Hangar oder in der Messe, um gemeinsam den Tag mit einem Feierabendgetränk ausklingen zu lassen. Ein Highlight ist unser „Echtzeit-Werwolf“-Spiel: Vor ein paar Tagen wurden die Rollen verteilt, und seitdem wird jede Nacht jemand „eliminiert“. Tagsüber wird dann gemeinsam diskutiert und abgestimmt. Aktuell schlagen sich die „Schiffbewohner“ ziemlich gut – nach drei Tagen sind bereits drei Werwölfe enttarnt. Wir bleiben gespannt für wen es heute der letzte Sonnenaufgang war.
Sport und Ausgleich:
Wer sich bewegen möchte, kann den kleinen Sportraum Richtung Bug nutzen, ausgestattet mit Gewichten, Fahrrad, Rudergerät und sogar einem Laufband (auch wenn das bei Seegang durchaus Mut erfordert). Alle drei Tage gibt es außerdem ein Zirkeltraining unter Anleitung von Sven, unserem Chief Engineer. Danach lädt die Sauna zur wohlverdienten Entspannung ein.
Arbeiten auf dem Schiff:
Auch wenn man es sich anders vorstellt: Den Großteil der Zeit verbringt man tatsächlich im Inneren des Schiffs. Das liegt vor allem an den oft rauen Wetterbedingungen. Gearbeitet wird in verschiedenen Laboren oder, wenn möglich, an Deck zum Auswerfen und Einholen der Verankerungen sowie Gliedern.
Im Chemielabor werden Proben analysiert, während in anderen Bereichen Geräte vorbereitet, Daten ausgewertet und die nächsten Schritte geplant werden. Ein zentraler Bestandteil ist die Arbeit mit der CTD, also das Messen von Leitfähigkeit, Temperatur und Tiefe im Wasser.
Natürlich läuft nicht immer alles reibungslos. Wenn beim Aussetzen einer Verankerung ein Gerät nicht funktioniert, muss die gesamte Konstruktion wieder eingeholt, repariert und neu ausgebracht werden. In solchen Momenten ist gute Stimmung entscheidend, meine Empfehlung: einfach mal spontan Macarena tanzen. Das kann Wunder bewirken.
Trotz der intensiven Arbeit ist es genau diese Mischung aus Teamarbeit, gemeinsamen Herausforderungen und spontanen Momenten, die das Leben an Bord so besonders macht. Das gemeinsame Rätseln im CTD-Labor und die Planung unter wechselnden Wetterbedingungen, all das schweißt zusammen.
Nach drei Wochen wird das Schiff mehr als nur ein Arbeitsplatz, es wird zu einem kleinen, schwimmenden Zuhause auf Zeit.
Life and Work on Board a Research Vessel
This is my (Julia Pelle) first sea voyage, my first time spending more than just a day out on the ocean. And yes, the Labrador Sea might not be the easiest place to start. Like many others, I got properly seasick on the first night. The movement of the Maria S. Merian in such rough conditions were definitely challenging at first. But after a few exhausting hours, plenty of sleep, and some weather-related work delays, I gradually got used to the constant motion. Just like that, everyday life on board began.
So how do you describe life on a research vessel to someone who has never experienced it?
Let’s start with the basics, the daily routine on board:
Food:
Catering is excellent: breakfast is served at 7:30 a.m., lunch at 11:30 a.m., and dinner as early as 5:30 p.m. In addition, there is a small fridge stocked with snacks available 24/7 so no one goes hungry.
Sleep:
Good sleep is not always guaranteed, but you quickly learn to adapt. Most scientists share double cabins with a shared bathroom. Those on night shifts naturally switch their day and night. A helpful tip from an experienced sailor: place a blanket under one side of your mattress to create a small dip this helps keep you from rolling around. My personal trick is to sleep on my stomach and stabilize myself with elbows and knees. That way, even in strong winds and heavy seas, I can sleep surprisingly well almost “like being held by your mom,” as Sascha would say.
Free time on board:
You are rarely alone here and that’s a good thing. There is almost always something going on in the labs, especially in the CTD lab, which quickly becomes a social hub. Our chief scientist, Fehmi, is aiming to break a new CTD record, which means we spend a lot of time there to the delight of some and the challenge of our chemists.
In the evenings, people often gather in the hangar or the mess room to wind down with a drink after work. One highlight is our “real-time Werewolf” game: roles were assigned a few days ago, and since then, one person is “eliminated” each night. During the day, everyone debates and votes. So far, the “ship community” is doing quite well after three days, three werewolves have already been identified. We’re curious to see for whom today’s sunrise will be the last.
Sports and relaxation:
For those who want to stay active, there is a small gym near the bow, equipped with weights, a bike, a rowing machine, and even a treadmill though using it in rough seas requires a bit of courage. Every three days, there is also a circuit training session led by Sven, our Chief Engineer. Afterwards, the sauna offers a perfect way to relax.
Working on the ship:
Even though you might imagine otherwise, most of the time is actually spent inside the ship, mainly due to the often harsh weather conditions. Work takes place in various laboratories or, when possible, on deck deploying and recovering moorings and equipment.
In the chemistry lab, samples are processed, while in other labs instruments are prepared, data is analysed, and plans for the coming days are made. A central part of the work is the CTD, which measures conductivity, temperature, and depth in the water.
Of course, things don’t always go smoothly. If a device fails while deploying a mooring, the entire setup has to be recovered, repaired, and redeployed. In moments like these, keeping a good mood is essential my recommendation: just dance the Macarena. It works surprisingly well.
Despite the demanding workload, it is exactly this mix of teamwork, shared challenges, and spontaneous moments that makes life on board so special. Figuring things out together in the CTD lab and planning around constantly changing weather conditions. All of this brings people closer together.
After three weeks, the ship becomes more than just a workplace it turns into a small, floating home.
English version below
Für viele Menschen war es schwer zu verstehen, warum man im Frühjahr so weit nach Norden in die Labradorsee reist, um dort Forschung zu betreiben. Das Leben an Bord ist anstrengend und wird durch die harschen und schnell wechselnden Wetterbedingungen zusätzlich erschwert, was besonders den Einsatz unserer Forschungsgeräte kompliziert macht.
Worum geht es also bei unserer Expedition?
Diese Forschungsreise verfolgt zwei Hauptziele: die Untersuchung kleinräumiger Strukturen im Ozean und die Beobachtung großräumiger Meeresströmungen.
In den letzten Jahren haben Wissenschaftler erkannt, dass kleinräumige Strukturen im Ozean, wie Wirbel und Fronten, eine sehr wichtige Rolle spielen. Sie können starke Veränderungen in Temperatur und Salzgehalt verursachen, aber auch in anderen Eigenschaften wie Chlorophyll und dem Export von Kohlenstoff. Während dieser Fahrt nutzen wir eine Reihe von Instrumenten, um diese Strukturen detailliert zu beobachten und besser zu verstehen, wie sie funktionieren.
Das zweite Ziel besteht darin zu untersuchen, wie sich die Meeresströmungen im Atlantik im Laufe der Zeit verändern. Ein zentraler Bestandteil davon sind Langzeitbeobachtungen am 53°N-Observatorium. Dort betreiben wir sieben Verankerungen, lange Kabel, die am Meeresboden befestigt und mit Instrumenten ausgestattet sind, welche Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Sauerstoff und Strömungsgeschwindigkeit messen. Alle zwei Jahre bergen wir diese Verankerungen, sammeln die Daten ein und setzen sie anschließend erneut aus, damit die Messungen fortgeführt werden können.
Eine solche Expedition benötigt lange Vorbereitungszeit und einiges an Organisation auf See, deshalb habe ich unserem Chef-Wissenschaftler einige Fragen gestellt:
Wann haben die Vorbereitungen für die Expedition begonnen? Und wie lief das ab?
Der Antrag für diese Forschungsreise wurde bereits 2023 eingereicht. Darin wurden die Motivation, die Forschungsfragen und der Plan beschrieben, die Reise 2025 durchzuführen. Letztendlich wurde sie dann für 2026 angesetzt.
Die detaillierten Vorbereitungen begannen ungefähr ein Jahr im Voraus, also etwa im April 2025. Die Planung einer Forschungsreise umfasst mehrere Schritte. Wir müssen die Logistik organisieren, entscheiden, wer Teil des wissenschaftlichen Teams sein wird, und die wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten planen, die wir durchführen möchten. Und natürlich gehört auch eine ganze Menge Papierkram dazu 
Wann entstand die Idee, die Expedition im Frühling und nicht wie üblich im Sommer durchzuführen?
Die Idee entstand bei einem Projektantrag, den ich 2022 geschrieben habe. Er beinhaltete eine Forschungsfahrt zur Untersuchung kleinräumiger Ozeanstrukturen und ihrer Verbindung zur Frühjahrsblüte in der Labradorsee. Da wir speziell an der Frühjahrsblüte interessiert waren, war es wichtig, zu dieser Jahreszeit hier zu sein.
Das bedeutete, die Reise im Frühling zu planen, obwohl uns bewusst war, dass die Bedingungen schwieriger sein können als im Sommer. Aber wenn ich es noch einmal machen müsste, würde ich vorher einen Wetterbericht suchen, der einen deutlich ruhigeren März und April verspricht.
Was findest Du daran am interessantesten?
Hier draußen mitten im Ozean zu sein und die Daten, die wir sammeln, in Echtzeit zu betrachten. Es hat etwas ganz Besonderes, wenn die Messungen hereinkommen und man weiß, dass man den Ozean genau in diesem Moment beobachtet.
Wie werden die Entscheidungen zwischen Dir und dem Kapitän getroffen – in Bezug auf Wetter, Forschung und Sicherheit? Wann treffen Ihr euch? Und wie oft?
Von Anfang an haben wir vereinbart, etwa 36 Stunden im Voraus zu planen, angesichts des Umfangs der Arbeiten und der oft schwierigen Wetterbedingungen. Falls nötig, passen wir den Plan anschließend an.
Wir treffen uns jeden Morgen, ohne feste Uhrzeit, um gemeinsam den Wetterbericht anzuschauen und zu entscheiden, was machbar ist und was nicht. Bisher hat dieses Vorgehen sehr gut funktioniert. Gelegentlich mussten wir Arbeiten kurzfristig abbrechen, aber wir konnten uns immer anpassen, ohne viel wertvolle Forschungszeit zu verlieren.
Läuft die Expedition bisher wie geplant? Falls nicht, worin unterscheidet sie sich?
Die Daten, die wir bisher gesammelt haben, haben meine Erwartungen bereits übertroffen besonders angesichts der schwierigen Wetterbedingungen. Wir konnten sehr viel erreichen, und das liegt vor allem an der hervorragenden Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Schiffscrew und dem wissenschaftlichen Team an Bord.
Alle waren sehr flexibel und unterstützend, was es uns ermöglicht hat, uns schnell anzupassen und die verfügbare Zeit bestmöglich zu nutzen.
Tipp Nummer 1 für die Arbeit bei 10 Beaufort und 6 Meter hohen Wellen?
Immer eine Hand fürs Schiff und eine für die Wissenschaft
MSM142 – Who are we and why are we here in spring
For many people, it was difficult to understand why one would travel so far north to the Labrador Sea in spring to conduct research. Life on board is exhausting and made more challenging by harsh and rapidly changing weather conditions, which especially complicate the deployment of our research equipment.
So what is our cruise about?
This research cruise has two main goals: studying small-scale ocean features and monitoring large-scale ocean currents.
In recent years, scientists have realised that small-scale features in the ocean such as eddies and fronts play a very important role. They can create strong changes in temperature, salinity, and also in other properties like chlorophyll and carbon export. During this cruise, we use a range of instruments to observe these features in detail so we can better understand how they work.
The second goal is to study how ocean currents in the Atlantic are changing over time. A key part of this is long-term observations at the 53°N observatory. There, we maintain seven moorings long cables anchored to the seafloor and equipped with instruments that measure temperature, salinity, oxygen, and current velocity. Every two years, we recover these moorings to collect the data and then redeploy them to continue the measurements.
Such a cruise needs a long time of preparation and organisation during the cruise, so I asked our Chef Scientist a few questions:
When did you start preparing for the cruise? And how was that going?
The proposal for this cruise was submitted in 2023, which includes motivation and the research questions, with the plan to carry it out in 2025. In the end, it was scheduled for 2026. The detailed preparation really started about a year in advance, around April 2025.
Planning a research cruise involves several steps. We have to organise the logistics, decide who will be part of the science team, and plan the scientific work we want to carry out. And, of course… quite a bit of paperwork
When did you come up with the idea to have the cruise in spring, and not as usually in summer?
The idea goes back to a proposal I was writing in 2022. It included a cruise to study small-scale ocean features and how they are connected to the spring bloom in the Labrador Sea.
Since we were specifically interested in the spring bloom, it was important to be here at that time of year. That meant planning the cruise in spring, even though we knew that the conditions can be more challenging than in summer. But if I would have to do it again, I would look in the weather forecast in advance for a much calmer March and April.
What do you find the most interesting about it?
Being here, in the middle of the ocean, and looking in real-time at the data we are collecting. There is something quite special about the measurements coming in and knowing you are observing the ocean as it happens.
How are the decisions made between you and the captain, in terms of weather, research and safety? When do you meet? And how often?
From the beginning, we agreed to plan about 36 hours ahead, given the scope of the work and the often-challenging weather conditions. We then adjust the plan if needed.
We meet every morning, without a fixed time, to look at the weather forecast and decide together what can be done or not.
So far, this approach has worked very well. We have occasionally had to stop operations at short notice, but we have always managed to adapt without losing much valuable science time.
Is the cruise as you have planned it so far? If not, how does it differ?
The data we’ve collected so far has already exceeded my expectations, especially given the challenging weather conditions. We’ve been able to achieve a lot, and this is mainly thanks to the excellent collaboration between the ship’s crew and the scientific team on board.
Everyone has been very flexible and supportive, which has allowed us to adapt quickly and make the most of the time available.
Number 1 Tipp for working at 10bft and 6 meters waves?
Always keep one hand for the ship, and one for the science
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测