Connect with us

Published

on

As governments head to a major UN ocean conference next week, the race is on to get enough countries to ratify an international treaty seen as crucial to meeting a goal of protecting 30% of the world’s seas by 2030 so that it can take effect within two years of its adoption in 2023.

So far, of the 60 states needed for that to happen, only 29 have ratified the agreement, known as the High Seas Treaty but formally titled Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ). The treaty aims to create rules for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) in international waters.

Establishing those MPAs is seen as key to conserving 30% of the world’s land and sea ecosystems by the end of this decade, as countries pledged to do at talks in Montreal in 2022. Experts say MPAs can also help oceans recover their ability to store planet-heating carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the atmosphere, which has been weakening in the past two decades.

According to the UN, the world’s ocean absorbs 30% of all CO2 emissions and captures 90% of the excess heat generated by these emissions, serving as a vital buffer against the impacts of climate change. However, rising greenhouse gas emissions have affected the health of the ocean by warming and acidifying seawater – in turn harming biodiversity and and reducing the ocean’s ability to absorb CO2.

Back when the High Seas Treaty was adopted, countries set a political target for it to enter into force within two years, in time for the third UN Ocean Conference (UNOC), which begins on June 9.

As the number of new ratifications has picked up pace in recent months, experts said they hope the UN conference in the French city of Nice can provide momentum to achieve the 60 countries required. Once that threshold has been reached, the treaty will enter into force 120 days later.

“I’ll be realistic and not say that we’ll definitely get there at UNOC – but I think we’ll certainly get some of the way,” Angelique Pouponneau, advisor to the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), told journalists. “With the UN General Assembly just a few months later, I think it looks very promising.”

Brazil’s new funding initiative can help bring rainforests back from the brink – if done right

Islands among early adopters

The first movers that have already ratified the treaty include small island states like Palau and Seychelles, both co-chairs of a high-ambition coalition for the agreement, as well as six EU member countries including France, Portugal and Spain. Another 87 states have signed up to the treaty without ratifying it in national legislation, meaning they are not bound by it.

Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance, a coalition of campaign groups following the treaty process, said that “many governments are going through last-minute efforts for parliamentary approvals or cabinet and ministry approvals”, adding that she hoped up to 20 new ratifications would be announced in the coming days.

The High Seas Treaty, once in effect, would provide a legal path for establishing Marine Protected Areas, as well as requiring environmental impact assessments for economic activities in international waters. But deep-sea mining for minerals – which scientists fear could significantly impact the ocean floor and its ecosystems – is exempt because it is already regulated separately by the International Seabed Authority.

A 2024 report by a group of NGOs and funders shows that currently about 8% of the ocean is covered by some level of protection, but only 2.8% is “effectively” protected, meaning there are rules and controls in place to prevent harmful activities.

As EU acts to stop greenwash, funds drop climate claims from their names

“Weak” declaration

At the upcoming UN Ocean Conference, countries are set to adopt a political declaration which calls on governments to step up their efforts to “defend ocean ecosystems”. The declaration also “encourages” countries to ratify the High Seas Treaty.

But campaign groups have criticised it as tame on a number of issues, including a lack of urgency in calling for treaty ratification, “pitifully weak” language on deep-sea mining and scant new financial commitments.

“The UN Ocean Conference was supposed to be the moment when governments turned the tide, and showcased genuine progress,” said Megan Randles, Greenpeace’s head of delegation for UNOC. “Instead, we are handed a weak political declaration with glaring omissions.”

On finance, the declaration recognises the role of “blue bonds” – debt instruments allowing governments to raise funds for marine projects – and also calls for accelerating blended finance and private finance towards ocean conservation. But it falls short of setting specific financial targets.

A new report launched this week by a coalition of nature NGOs and funders – among them Bloomberg Ocean Fund, Campaign for Nature and WWF – warns that, while $1.2 billion a year currently flows to ocean protection efforts, actual needs reach $15.8 billion annually.

Stronger links with climate action

The UNOC declaration also avoids any mention of the role of fossil fuels in driving climate change, and does not include an existing global commitment, made at UN climate talks, to “transition away” from fossil fuels in energy systems, which campaigners have urged for.

The World Resources Institute, a US-based think-tank, has also urged countries to use the Nice conference to commit to including ocean-based measures to cut emissions and adapt to a warmer world in their next round of national climate plans (NDCs) due this year.

So far such measures have been largely absent from the NDCs, WRI said this week, calling on UNOC to send a clear message to November’s COP30 climate summit in Brazil around the need to change this if global climate goals are to be met.

WRI cited research from the High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy showing that ocean-based climate solutions – including offshore renewable energy, sustainable shipping, and protection and restoration of “blue carbon” ecosystems like mangroves and seagrass – could deliver up to 35% of the emissions reductions needed by 2050 to keep global temperature rise below 1.5C.

The post Treaty to protect seas short on support ahead of UN ocean conference appeared first on Climate Home News.

Treaty to protect seas short on support ahead of UN ocean conference

Continue Reading

Climate Change

What’s on the climate calendar for November 2026?

Published

on

This is a republication of November’s edition of The Climate Agenda – a subscriber-only newsletter designed to keep you informed of the key events, negotiations and announcements happening every month. If you want to receive The Climate Agenda straight to your inbox at the start of each month, sign up as a subscriber today.

COP31 begins in one week, and we’ll have five specialist reporters on the ground in Antalya, Türkiye, bringing you every development as it happens. From the negotiations to leaders’ speeches and side events, we’ll be there to dissect what it all means for international climate policy on electrification, just transition, adaptation finance and much more.

Here’s what you need to know for November, why it matters and what to expect.



US midterm elections

Tuesday 3 November – United States

The geopolitical highlight for the first week of November is the US midterm elections, which will show whether American voters are in any mood to forgive President Donald Trump for failing to bring down the cost of living. From an energy perspective, his pro-oil and gas stance hasn’t led to cheaper prices for consumers, pushed up by the US-instigated Iran conflict. And his diesel deal with Russia won’t yet have made a difference at the pump.

The key issue for climate and energy policy is whether the Republicans hold onto their governing trifecta. If so, then expect continued dismantling of regulations that protect the environment, as well as strong backing for fossil fuel production. If the Democrats regain control of Congress, which polls suggest is possible, it could trigger a push to restore Biden-era clean energy tax credits, and support states wanting to restart mothballed wind and solar projects.

Data centres have been a hot-wire issue, with growing community opposition to their expansion – partly due to concerns over rising utility bills as the facilities gobble power. Whether Republicans or Democrats win Congress, both are likely to make tech firms pay for the extra electricity production they need, with the latter favouring renewable sources.

Governor races are also taking place in key states for climate issues, including Democrat-run California, which has used the courts to fight Trump’s attacks on clean energy.

Read more: National climate plans now promise half the emission cuts expected by UN

Read more: The more Europe relies on the US for energy, the more it’s vulnerable to pressure by Trump

Brazilian President Lula da Silva, speaks next to the COP30 President and COP 30 CEO during the 30th Conference of the Parties (COP30) in Belem, Brazil on November 19, 2025. (Photo by Ueslei Marcelino/COP30)

Brazilian President Lula da Silva, speaks next to the COP30 President and COP 30 CEO during the 30th Conference of the Parties (COP30) in Belem, Brazil on November 19, 2025. (Photo by Ueslei Marcelino/COP30)

COP30 Deforestation and Fossil Fuel Transition Roadmaps

Tuesday 3 November – Brazil

Brazil is set to unveil two global roadmaps: one for transitioning away from fossil fuels, the other for ending deforestation.

The COP30 presidency promised them in the dying hours of the Belém summit last November as a last-minute fix to break a political impasse. Since then, it has been consulting with countries, experts and campaigners around the world to gather ideas and sketch out the elements to include in these blueprints.

Don’t expect the roadmaps to offer any new global targets or give direct instructions on what countries must do, either to cut fossil fuel production and consumption or better protect forests. Rather, Brazil has said the documents will identify barriers and priority actions, highlight existing mechanisms and present a range of options that can be adapted to different national contexts.

It remains unclear what will happen with the reports once they are delivered on Tuesday. At the Bonn talks last June, a group of European and small island nations called for the roadmaps to be brought into the official negotiations, warning that a one-off report won’t cut it. But such efforts would undoubtedly face stiff opposition from fossil fuel-producing nations that objected to drafting the energy transition roadmap within the formal UN process last year.

Read more: European, island states seek clear future for global roadmap to cut fossil fuels

Read more: COP30 roadmap to end deforestation will invite countries to draft domestic plans

Read more: What we need to see in the roadmap to transition away from fossil fuels

Leaders will visit a Green Climate Fund-backed coastal resilience project in Tuvalu during the Pre-COP31 meeting in the Pacific. (Photo courtesy of the Australia-Pacific Partnership for COP31)

Leaders will visit a Green Climate Fund-backed coastal resilience project in Tuvalu during the Pre-COP31 meeting in the Pacific. (Photo courtesy of the Australia-Pacific Partnership for COP31)

UNEP Adaptation Gap Report

Wednesday 4 November – Nairobi, Kenya

The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) will publish its annual assessment of how well the world is planning, implementing and – crucially – financing measures to cope with worsening climate impacts.

Past editions have made for grim reading. Last year’s report warned of a widening gap between what developing countries need for adaptation and what they can access. It estimated they will need $310–365 billion a year by 2035, which is 12 to 14 times current international flows. The report also found that a goal of doubling international public adaptation finance by 2025 was likely to have been missed.

This year’s edition will be closely watched with adaptation expected to be a big-ticket item at COP31. Governments are likely to discuss the specifics of a commitment to triple adaptation finance for developing nations by 2035, agreed at COP30 last year – particularly what the baseline for that pledge is. Negotiators will be debating how to track progress against the 59 indicators of the Global Goal on Adaptation.

Read more: Editor’s Desk: Nepal’s disaster has laid bare the world’s adaptation accountability gap

Read more: Bonn climate talks end in “gridlock” on adaptation and emissions-cutting

Read more: New data shows rich nations likely missed 2025 goal to double adaptation finance

Photo: IRENA@COP31

Photo: IRENA@COP31

COP31 Climate Conference

Monday 9 November – Friday 20 November – Antalya, Türkiye

The climate community’s attention turns this month to Antalya for the annual UN climate summit. From the outset, COP31 will have an unprecedented, and potentially explosive, set-up: Türkiye is COP president overseeing the non-negotiated Action Agenda, while Australia runs the negotiations.

Billed, once again, as an “implementation COP”, the talks come amid a global energy crisis largely sparked by the actions of the US government, which is not expected to show up on the Turkish Riviera. It is also the first COP in the era of climate overshoot, coming just weeks after the UN officially confirmed the 1.5C warming limit will be breached and set out a narrow pathway to bring temperatures back down to the most ambitious Paris goal.

Unlike most recent COPs, the formal negotiations lack a clear headline item. Countries are due to establish and define the scope of the Just Transition Mechanism agreed in Belém last year, including its rules, governance and possible funding arrangements. On adaptation, vulnerable countries want a clearer path to delivering last year’s pledge to triple finance by 2035 and to putting the new progress indicators to work on the ground.

Governments are also likely to clash over next steps on the transition away from fossil fuels, and especially over whether the mitigation work programme – the forum dedicated to emission-cutting measures – has any future beyond this year.

Notable events to look out for in Antalya:

Opening session (9 November): The summit kicks off with the customary first-morning plenary. After the usual pageantry from the host nation, negotiating blocs and individual countries will deliver statements setting out their stall for the next two weeks. Watch out for a potential fight over the summit’s agenda – perhaps on issues relating to finance and trade following submissions requesting additional items – also a COP tradition.

Electrification (10 November): On Energy Day, the Turkish presidency is expected to formally launch its flagship electrification pledge, revealing which countries have signed up. Signatories will voluntarily commit to raising electricity’s share of global final energy consumption to 35% by 2035, though the current text does not require that power to come from clean sources. There is also a question mark over whether and how this can be included in the political cover decision the COP co-hosts have said they will aim to produce.

Leaders Summit (11-12 November): Heads of state and governments will jet into town for the traditional high-level segment in the middle of the first week, where world leaders typically talk up their climate record, air their grievances and call for more action.

Relatively few powerful leaders are on the list this time. Brazil’s Lula is set for another star turn this year, fresh from his surprise election win in October. The UK’s Andy Burnham, Spain’s Pedro Sanchez and China’s vice-premier Ding Xuexiang are expected, alongside Türkiye’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Australia’s Anthony Albanese. In addition, African and small island nations will feature prominently.

Our COP31 Briefing newsletter will offer a more in-depth preview of the talks later this week.

Read more: Early speakers’ list suggests few powerful leaders will attend COP31

Read more: COP31 electrification pledge leaves out clean power commitment

Read more: From Belém to Antalya – gains, gaps and challenges for a new Just Transition Mechanism

International Maritime Organization (IMO) Shipping Talks

Monday 23 November – Friday 4 December – London, United Kingdom

One year on from explosive talks in which Trump’s officials teamed up with Saudi Arabia to delay a deal to make the shipping industry greener, governments will gather on the banks of the Thames for another attempt to reach agreement.

The Net Zero Framework, provisionally agreed in October 2025, includes a series of emissions reduction targets for the owners of large ships along with penalties for not meeting them, rewards for doing so and measures to make the maritime transition fair.

The framework is likely to be either tweaked or radically rewritten so that it’s more acceptable to the US and Saudis. Brazil and Japan have submitted compromise proposals. Analysts find those will move shipping further away from being able to meet its climate goals.

There will be closed-door talks between November 23-27 and a second week of talks open to accredited media from November 30 to December 4. Agreement on a proposal, perhaps decided through a vote, is expected after long and technical negotiations. The shipping industry’s 3% share of the world’s emissions is at stake.

Read more: London talks raise hopes for green shipping deal

The post What’s on the climate calendar for November 2026? appeared first on Climate Home News.

What’s on the climate calendar for November 2026?

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Interactive: Who wants what at the COP31 climate change summit

Published

on

Article Contents

Delegates will soon gather in the Turkish resort city of Antalya for UN climate negotiations, against a backdrop of war, energy crisis and climate extremes.

At COP31, nations will try to find agreement on various issues, including climate finance for developing countries and a global “just transition” towards a cleaner economy.

This summit is unusual due to its joint presidency, which means that Australia is leading the negotiations while Turkey hosts the conference.

Outside the formal negotiations, Turkey is also pushing its own priorities as part of a wider “action agenda”, including electrification, oceans and “green industrialisation”.

In order to track parties’ positions on key negotiating points and wider issues at COP31, Carbon Brief has analysed around 100 documents and captured them in the interactive table below.

The first column shows the countries and UN negotiating blocs, the second shows the topics up for debate and the third indicates specific issues within those topics.

The final column indicates the positions that the parties have expressed on each topic. These range from “priority” – meaning the party is likely to be pushing the issue – to “oppose”, meaning it is likely to push against it.

This is a “living document” that will be updated over the course of COP31.

Please get in touch if you would like to offer additions by emailing policy@carbonbrief.org.

Brief explanations of the key issues and jargon-filled language that permeate the talks can be found below the interactive table.

Just transition

At COP30 in Brazil in 2025, nations agreed to establish a practical mechanism to help drive a “just transition” to a low-carbon economy.

Key aspects of this “Belém-Antalya me