Connect with us

Published

on

Introduction: A Warning and a Call for Transformation

In an era of ecological crisis and climate disruption, it is increasingly clear that the colonial constructs that define our current economic systems—especially those that reduce the natural world to commodities—are no longer sustainable. As humanity grapples with climate change, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem collapse, we are called to rethink how we understand the value of nature. This is not a moment for fear but for hope rooted in responsibility. The time has come to reconstitute new forms of recognition for natural resources—forms that draw from natural law and Indigenous worldviews and move us toward decommodification processes.

Understanding Natural Law: A Foundation for Balance and Reciprocity

 In many Indigenous traditions, natural law is a set of guiding principles that govern the relationships between all beings—human and non-human. It is rooted in observation, interdependence, respect, and responsibility. Natural law recognizes that humans are not above nature but are part of it and that every element of the natural world holds intrinsic value beyond economic worth.

In contrast to colonial legal and economic systems prioritizing ownership, control, and extraction, natural law prioritizes relationality, responsibility, and continuity. It is about living by the rhythms and rules of Mother Earth rather than trying to dominate them.

Lumber and Natural Law: A New Way to Value Forests

Take the Canadian lumber industry as an example. Under colonial economic systems, forests are measured by board feet, market value, and export potential. Trees are seen as units of production.

Under natural law, however, a forest is not just timber—it is a living ecosystem. It provides medicines, oxygen, shelter, cultural teachings, and spiritual connection. Decommodifying lumber means recognizing and protecting these broader values. It could involve setting harvest limits based on ecological regeneration, requiring community-governed stewardship, or embedding cultural protocols and consent in forestry operations. This approach would align extractive industries with the natural cycles and laws of the territories in which they operate.

What Happens If We Don’t Change? A Vision of 50 Years Without Decommodification

 If we fail to implement decommodification processes, the next 50 years may see natural resources pushed beyond their limits:

  • Forests depleted beyond regeneration, triggering mass species extinction.
  • Waterways are poisoned or privatized, denying future generations access to clean water.
  • Sacred sites are destroyed for short-term gains.
  • Climate systems pushed into irreversible tipping points, affecting global food security, migration, and public health.

Without intentional change, our value systems will prioritize profit over planetary survival.

Decommodification as Policy: What Could It Look Like?

 Decommodification doesn’t mean halting all use of natural resources—it means rethinking how we value and manage them. Policies rooted in natural law could include:

  • Community-Led Stewardship Models: Return governance of lands and resources to Indigenous Nations and local communities.
  • Ecological Carrying Capacity Laws: Mandate that extraction levels stay within nature’s regenerating ability.
  • Cultural Impact Assessments: Alongside environmental reviews, evaluate resource projects’ cultural and spiritual impacts.
  • Rights of Nature Legislation: Recognize rivers, forests, and ecosystems as legal persons with rights to thrive.
  • Circular and Regenerative Economies: Design systems that reuse, restore, and regenerate rather than extract and discard.

Each of these policies would build toward an economy that is aligned with rather than in opposition to the Earth’s well-being.

Technology and Innovation: A Partner in Responsibility

 When aligned with values of responsibility and sustainability, technology can support a future of balanced resource use. Imagine:

  • Biomaterials replacing fossil fuels.
  • AI and data analytics monitoring ecosystem health in real-time.
  • Traditional Knowledge databases informing climate-smart agriculture.
  • Clean energy grids co-designed by Indigenous communities.

Technological innovation can either accelerate the destruction of nature—or help us restore and protect it. The choice lies in the values we embed within our systems.

Decommodification and Climate Action: Mitigation and Adaptation

 Decommodification of natural resources is not just a philosophical shift—it is a practical strategy for climate change mitigation and adaptation:

  • Mitigation: Reduced extraction and emissions through regenerative systems.
  • Adaptation: Stronger community resilience through land-based governance and ecological health.
  • Equity: Ensuring all peoples, especially Indigenous Nations, have agency in climate solutions.

By recognizing that nature is not a commodity but a relation, we build the cultural, spiritual, and ecological foundations for long-term resilience.

A Shared Future Rooted in Respect

The consequences will be severe if we continue to commodify and exploit nature. But if we reimagine our relationship to the Earth through natural law, decommodify our policies and economies, and act with love for future generations—for all our relations—we can create a just, thriving future.

Now is the time to ask: What do we value? And how will we ensure that our grandchildren and their grandchildren inherit a planet where they can live well, in balance, and in beauty?

By Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

 

(Image Credit: Fellipe Ditadi, Unsplash+, licensed image)

The post Reimagining Our Relationship with Natural Resources: A Path Toward Climate Resilience through Natural Law and Decommodification appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

Reimagining Our Relationship with Natural Resources: A Path Toward Climate Resilience through Natural Law and Decommodification

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Vanuatu pushes new UN resolution demanding full climate compensation

Published

on

Countries responsible for climate change could be required to pay “full and prompt reparation” for the damage they have caused, under a new United Nations resolution being pursued by the Pacific island state of Vanuatu, an initial draft shows.

The resolution seeks to turn into action last year’s landmark advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which found that states have a legal obligation to prevent climate harm and that breaches of this duty could expose them to compensation claims from affected countries.

Under the “zero draft” of the resolution seen by Climate Home News, the UN’s General Assembly, its main policy-making body, would also demand that countries stop any “wrongful acts” contributing to rising emissions, which may include the production and licensing of planet-heating fossil fuels.

Gas flaring soars in Niger Delta post-Shell, afflicting communities

‘Demand’ is the strongest verb calling for an obligation to comply in UN language, but it is rarely used in a resolution.

Countries would also be called upon to respect their legal obligations by enacting national climate plans consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5C and by adopting appropriate policies, including measures to “ensure a rapid, just and quantified phase-out of fossil fuel production and use”, the document shows.

End of March vote targeted

The draft, meant as a starting point for negotiations, was circulated last week by the government of Vanuatu following discussions with a dozen nations, including the Netherlands, Colombia and Kenya.

Countries are expected to take part in informal consultations between February 13-17 aimed at agreeing on wording that would secure broad support among UN member states, according to a statement from Vanuatu, which also led the diplomatic drive for the ICJ’s advisory opinion. A vote on the follow-up resolution could take place by the end of March, it added.

    Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu’s climate minister, said respecting the court’s decision is “essential for the credibility of the international system and for effective collective action”.

    “At a time when respect for international law is under pressure globally, this initiative affirms the central role of the International Court of Justice and the importance of multilateral cooperation,” he added in written comments.

    New damage register and reparation mechanism

    If adopted in its current form, the draft resolution would also create an “International Register of Damage”, which is described as a comprehensive and transparent record of evidence on loss and damage linked to climate change.

    It would also ask the UN secretary-general to put forward proposals for a climate reparation mechanism that could coordinate and facilitate the resolution of compensation claims and promote financial models to help cover climate-related damage.

    The fledgling Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) – set up under the UN climate change regime – is set to hand out money to the first set of initiatives aimed at addressing climate-driven destruction later this year. However, the just-over $590 million currently in the fund’s coffers is dwarfed by the scale of need in developing countries, with loss and damage costs estimated to reach up to $400 billion a year by 2030.

    Like other small island nations, Vanuatu is among the world’s most vulnerable countries to the effects of climate change, while having contributed the least to global warming. Last year’s ICJ decision stemmed from a March 2023 resolution led by the Pacific nation asking the world’s top court to define countries’ legal obligations in relation to climate change.

    Regenvanu said in September 2025 that it was important to follow up the ICJ ruling with a new UNGA resolution because it could be approved by a majority vote, while progress can be blocked in other fora like the UN climate negotiations that require consensus for decisions.

    The post Vanuatu pushes new UN resolution demanding full climate compensation appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Vanuatu pushes new UN resolution demanding full climate compensation

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    China maximises battery recycling to shore up critical mineral supplies

    Published

    on

    Even the busiest streets of Shanghai have become noticeably quieter as sales of electric vehicles (EVs) skyrocketed in China, with charging points mushrooming in residential compounds, car parks and service stations across the megacity.

    Many Chinese drivers have upgraded their conventional vehicles to electric ones – or already replaced old EVs with newer models – incentivised by the government’s generous trade-in policies, or tempted by the latest hi-tech features such as controls powered by artificial intelligence (AI).

    “Different from conventional cars, EVs are more like fast-moving consumer goods, like smartphones,” explained Mo Ke, founder and chief analyst of Tianjin-based battery-research firm, RealLi Research. Their digital systems can become outdated quickly, so Chinese people typically change their EVs after five or six years while a conventional car can be driven much longer, he told Climate Home News.

    EV sales surpassed 16 million in China last year. Roughly 10% of all vehicles on the road were electric, and half of all new vehicles sold carried a green EV number plate, with an average of 45,000 EVs rolling off the production lines each day.

    But while fast-growing EV uptake is good news for Chinese EV and battery manufacturers, it is creating a huge volume of spent batteries.

    Tsunami of spent batteries

    Last year, China generated nearly 400,000 tonnes of old or damaged power batteries, largely consisting of vehicle batteries, according to government data. That is projected to rise to one million tonnes per year in 2030, officials forecast.

    The growing waste problem has spurred the government to launch a series of new policies aimed at regulating the country’s battery recycling industry, which though well-established is marked by a high degree of informality – especially in the lucrative repurposing sector where discarded EV batteries are given a new lease of life in less energy-intensive uses, such as power storage.

      China is determined to build a “standardised, safe and efficient” recycling system for batteries, Wang Peng, a director at China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, told a press conference as the government launched a recycling industry push in mid-January.

      A policy paper published by the government last month detailed Beijing’s plans to mandate end-of-life recycling for EVs together with their batteries to prevent them from entering the grey, informal market, and establish a digital system to track the lifecycle of every battery manufactured in the country. Under the plans, EV and battery makers will be held responsible for recycling the batteries they produce and sell.

      “The volume of the Chinese market is too big, so it has to take actions ahead of other countries,” Mo said, adding that he expected the government to release more details about implementation of the plans in the near future.

      Critical minerals choke point

      China’s strategy for the battery recycling sector could also prove a boon for the world’s largest battery producer by bolstering its supply of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel and manganese.

      Along with the looming large-scale battery retirement, policymakers’ focus on battery recycling also reflects concern about critical minerals supplies, said Li Yifei, assistant professor of environmental studies at New York University Shanghai. “The government also felt the increasing pressure of securing resources,” he told Climate Home News.

      “When you set up an efficient battery-recycling system, you essentially secure a new source for critical minerals, and that can help you enhance economic security. That’s why the industry is so important,” Lin Xiao, chief executive of Botree Recycling Technologies, a Chinese company offering battery-recycling solutions, told Climate Home News.

      Cobalt and nickel-free electric car batteries boom in “good news” for rainforests

      China dominates global refining of several minerals critical for producing EV batteries, but it still relies on imports of the raw materials – a choke point Beijing is acutely aware of, industry experts say.

      China imports more than 90% of its cobalt, nickel and manganese, which are important ingredients for EV batteries, Hu Song, a senior researcher with the state-run China Automotive Technology and Research Centre, told China’s CCTV state broadcaster in June 2025. For lithium, the figure was around 60% in 2024, according to a separate report.

      “If [those] resources cannot be recycled, then we will keep facing strangleholds in the future,” Hu said.

      Big players gain ground

      Spent EV batteries can be reused in settings that have lower energy requirements, such as in two-wheelers or energy-storage systems. When they become too depleted for repurposing, they can be scrapped and shredded into “black mass”, a powdery mixture containing valuable metals that can be recovered.

      Reflecting the size of China’s EV market, the country already dominates global battery recycling capacity. It is home to 78% of the world’s battery pre-treatment capacity, which is for scrapping and shredding, and 89% of the capacity for refining black mass, according to 2025 forecasts by Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, a UK firm tracking battery supply chains.

      A number of large corporate players have emerged in the sector in recent years.

      Huayou Cobalt, a major producer of battery minerals, has built a business model for recycling, repurposing and shredding old batteries, as well as refining black mass and making new batteries using recovered materials.

      It recently signed a deal with Encory, a joint venture between BMW and Berlin-based environmental service provider Interzero, to develop cutting-edge battery-recycling technologies, with their first joint factory set to open in China this year.

        Suzhou-based Botree Recycling Technologies has developed various solutions to turn retired power batteries into new ones. Meanwhile, Brunp Recycling, the recycling arm of Chinese battery giant CATL, has built large factories to recycle lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, a type of lithium battery that does not use nickel or cobalt, as well as nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) batteries, which are more popular outside of China.

        But Mo, of RealLi Research, said much remains to be done to regulate and formalise the battery recycling industry.

        Underground workshops

        Across China, small underground workshops plague the repurposing sector, rebundling depleted batteries for sale without following industry standards or complying with health and safety requirements.

        Because these operators have lower operational costs, they are able to offer higher prices to EV owners to buy their old batteries, undercutting formal recycling companies.

        “This creates distortions in the market where legitimate players, who invest in proper detection, hazardous waste treatment and compliance, struggle to compete purely on price,” a spokesperson at CATL, the world’s largest battery manufacturer, told Climate Home News.

        Despite such challenges, CATL’s Brunp subsidiary produced 17,100 tonnes of lithium in 2024 from the 128,700 tonnes of depleted batteries it recycled that year, according to CATL’s annual report.

        Recycling expertise in demand

        Since it was founded in 2019, Botree has formed partnerships with several major clients, which together recycle about half of China’s power batteries, the company’s CEO Lin said.

        As other countries grapple with rising volumes of spent batteries, Chinese recyclers are also finding new foreign markets for their know-how.

        Botree has joined forces with Spanish consulting firm ILUNION and renewable energy company EFT-Systems to build a factory to recycle LFP batteries in Valladolid.

        The plant, scheduled to start operation in 2027, will be able to recycle 6,000 tonnes of LFPs annually when it opens, accounting for roughly 15% of demand in the Spanish market.

        “(The companies) tell us what batteries they recycle and what battery materials they want to regenerate,” Lin said. “We can design a complete process for them.”

        The post China maximises battery recycling to shore up critical mineral supplies appeared first on Climate Home News.

        China maximises battery recycling to shore up critical mineral supplies

        Continue Reading

        Climate Change

        A Groundbreaking Geothermal Heating and Cooling Network Saves This Colorado College Money and Water

        Published

        on

        When a former oil and gas developer partnered with Colorado Mesa University on geothermal, the school saved millions and set a new standard for energy-efficient buildings.

        GRAND JUNCTION, Colo.—The discussions started roughly a decade ago, when an account manager at Xcel Energy, the electricity and gas utility provider, expressed confusion, officials at Colorado Mesa University recalled.

        A Groundbreaking Geothermal Heating and Cooling Network Saves This Colorado College Money and Water

        Continue Reading

        Trending

        Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com