New Rules: How to Implement and Communicate Climate Strategy for Companies
2023 was a big year for climate action. We saw major announcements of new global governance and regulations across the world:
- In the US, California passed SB-253 Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act and AB-1305 Voluntary carbon market disclosures.
- In Europe, the European Commission released its Proposal for a Directive on Green Claims.
- Globally, new rules for the quality and use of carbon credits were issued ICVCM (The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market) and VCMI (The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative), both receiving significant praise from global leaders at the most recent COP28.
At Terrapass, we’re excited by these developments. The world recognizes the need to significantly scale all climate solutions including voluntary carbon markets. For this we must have globally aligned standards. This came together on multiple fronts in 2023.
So, what does this mean for sustainability professionals and everyday consumers?
For everyday consumers this is great news. These regulations ensure that any climate accomplishments promoted by a business will be supported with details that clearly show how those claims were achieved. The rules also ensure that companies are actively working to reduce their own carbon emissions in addition to offsetting their remaining emissions. Please visit Terrapass for more information about your personal or small business carbon footprint.
For sustainability professionals the list of new rules and regulations might seem daunting, but it is also good news. This is a sign of a maturing industry. Policy and consumer experts are contributing their expertise to help make climate action impactful and understandable to both sustainability professionals and everyday customers.
Historically, professional sustainability terms like carbon neutral and net-zero often made their way into marketing and product messaging. Consumer advocates rightly recognized that everyday customers can’t evaluate these phrases on their own. Additionally, vague phrases like green, eco, and sustainable are often used to promote sustainability without any supporting information. Consumer advocates also recognized that customers must be able to see why a product is green. These new regulations in California and Europe ensure that climate communications are always factual and transparent. They ensure that companies can promote their sustainability accomplishments with confidence and that customers have information to evaluate those accomplishments.
New global governance, VCMI in particular, ensures that companies apply sustainability solutions in the most effective way. Terrapass has long promoted the principle of 1. Calculate, 2. Conserve, and 3. Offset in our sustainability guidance to customers. This approach prioritizes:
- First, understand where carbon emissions are in your business,
- Second, disclose your plan to reduce the carbon emissions of your business and regularly report progress, and
- Third, balance your remaining emissions with carbon credits that fund global emission reduction projects.
When companies describe their climate strategy, they sometimes combine these different elements into one term like “carbon neutral.” Phrases like this do reflect an important environmental achievement. However, they hide the distinction between your company’s emission reductions vs. global emission reductions funded through carbon credits. Emission reduction and offsetting must be separate elements of your sustainability strategy and they should also be separate elements of your climate communications. Key elements for your climate communications include:
Steps and priorities:
- Measure your carbon emissions, reduce emissions on a science-based trajectory, and disclose your progress publicly.
- Address your remaining emissions by funding high-quality carbon credits that help reduce greenhouse gases globally.
Tell two different stories in your climate communications:
- Business Emission Reduction: Our carbon footprint was 5,000 mT in 2023, a reduction of 500 mT vs. 2021 and 5% ahead of plan.
- Global Climate Contribution: We purchased 5,000 mT of carbon credits in 2023 to fund global carbon reductions equal to our remaining emissions.
Other considerations:
- Climate communications should be factual, specific and detailed; provide evidence of all environmental claims made.
- Talk about carbon credits as a way to balance your remaining emissions by funding global carbon reduction.
- Talk about carbon credits as a way to support other global sustainability goals (UN SDGs) when applicable.
- Avoid using vague, generic terms like green, eco, climate friendly, sustainable, etc. that are not substantiated.
- Avoid terms that combine your company’s emission reduction and carbon offsetting into one phrase like carbon neutral, climate neutral, etc.
Highlights from each of the new rules and regulations are provided below. Please contact a Terrapass sustainability advisor to help your company navigate its specific needs.
California SB-253 Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act
- For entities with total annual revenues in excess of $1,000,000,000 that do business in California:
- Starting in 2026: Report Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions
- Starting in 2027: Report Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions
- Other requirements:
- For the reporting entity’s prior fiscal year
- Reporting is due annually on a date to be determined by the state board.
- Reporting follows the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
- Reporting entity must obtain an assurance engagement, performed by an independent third-party assurance provider, of the entity’s public disclosure as provided.
California AB-1305 Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosures
- Entities operating in California and making climate-related claims:
- Must publicly disclose information documenting how the claim was determined to be accurate or accomplished, and the measurement of interim progress.
- Applies to claims of net-zero emissions, carbon neutrality or similar, as well as claims of significant reductions in greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions,
- Entities operating in California and using voluntary carbon credits to support a climate-related claim.
- Must publicly disclose detailed information related to the credits purchased, the underlying offset projects and any independent verification of the climate-related claims made.
EU Green Claims Directive
- Applies to EU companies and non-EU companies making environmental claims aimed at EU consumers.
- Aims to eliminate greenwashing across EU markets by setting out detailed rules for how companies should market their environmental impacts and performance. It targets “vague, misleading or unfounded information on products’ environmental characteristics. “
- The current list of commercial practices that are banned in the EU is updated to include generic environmental claims – such as ‘environmentally friendly’, ‘natural’, ‘biodegradable’, ‘climate neutral’ or ‘eco’ – unless they can be properly evidenced.
- On the use of carbon credits specifically, the Green Claims Directive allows companies to make “carbon neutral” claims supported by carbon credits, but only if the carbon credits are disclosed correctly:
- Clearly state that carbon credits are being used to offset emissions.
- Disclose sources of emissions and amounts addressed with carbon credits.
- Identify carbon offset project types and distinguish between Reduction and removal offsets (requested, not required)
ICVCM (The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market)
- New global quality standards for voluntary carbon credit projects; “regulatory-like”
- Program will be fully implemented over the course of 2023-2024.
- Rules for each carbon credit Category (Methodology/Project Type) were released in June 2023
- CCP-Eligible Programs (Registries) and CCP-Approved Categories (Project Types) will be announced in 2024.
- Not a one-time rule, standards will continuously evolve.
- First revision process for the CCPs in 2025, aimed at implementation starting in 2026.
- ICVCM points to VCMI for guidance on how businesses should use carbon credits.
VCMI (The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative)
- VCMI was established in 2021 to help ensure that voluntary carbon markets make a significant, measurable, and positive contribution to achieving the Paris Agreement goals.
- The VCMI Claims Code addresses market integrity on the demand side by guiding companies on:
- How they can credibly make voluntary use of carbon credits as part of their climate commitments, and
- The associated claims they can make regarding the use of those credits.
- The VCMI program should be followed together with ICVCM rules for high-integrity carbon credits.
Note: The above article provides introductory information only. Every organization must independently evaluate these rules and regulations, and determine specific actions needed for its own compliance.
Brought to you by terrapass.com
Written by Sam Tellen
Images per Copyright free
The post New Rules Tell Companies How to Implement and Communicate Climate Strategy appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

