Meta Platforms has signed a new renewable energy deal with Silicon Ranch to secure 100 megawatts (MW) of solar power for its first data center in South Carolina. The agreement ensures that the facility, located in the city of Templeton, will run entirely on renewable energy once it begins operations.
The Facebook owner is known for its policy of matching 100% of its global operations with renewable electricity. This latest project continues that commitment.
The solar capacity will come from Silicon Ranch’s U.S.-manufactured solar modules and panels. These parts will come from local sources. This aligns with recent federal and state efforts to boost clean energy supply chains. For Meta, the choice supports both energy sustainability and the American manufacturing sector.
Doubling Down on Net Zero: Meta’s Clean Power Play
Meta has been one of the largest corporate buyers of renewable power in the U.S. and globally. Since 2020, the company has achieved net-zero emissions for its global operations. It did this mainly by offsetting emissions with clean power purchases.
The company aims for net zero across its entire value chain by 2030. This includes emissions from suppliers, construction, and product life cycles. To reach this, Meta continues to:
- Develop or contract new solar and wind projects close to its data centers.
- Invest in renewable capacity that exceeds its immediate energy needs to ensure a stable, clean energy supply.
- Partner with local utilities and developers to add new capacity to regional grids.
By early 2025, Meta has contracts for over 10 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy globally. This positions it as one of the leading corporate buyers of renewable energy. The map shows the company’s renewable energy projects.

The new South Carolina deal builds on this success. It also expands renewable energy in the southeastern U.S. Demand for hyperscale data centers is growing quickly in this region.
MORE ON META’s CLEAN ENERGY DEALS:
- Enbridge Powers Meta Data Centers with $900M Texas Solar Investment
- Meta Boosts Renewable Energy with 650 MW Solar Agreement
- Meta Powers U.S. Data Centers with Nearly 800 MW of Clean Energy Deal with Invenergy
- Meta and XGS Energy Launch 150 MW Geothermal Project to Power its Data Centers in New Mexico
Why Solar for Data Centers?
Data centers consume massive amounts of electricity. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that global data center energy consumption was about 360 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2023. This accounts for nearly 2% of the world’s electricity demand.
With the rapid adoption of AI, machine learning, and cloud services, that figure could double by 2030.

Solar energy offers an attractive solution for companies like Meta:
- Scalability: Utility-scale solar projects can be built quickly to meet rising demand.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Solar has become one of the cheapest sources of new electricity worldwide.
- Low Emissions: Solar farms provide near-zero operational emissions, helping firms reduce Scope 2 emissions.
South Carolina provides an especially strong solar opportunity. The state ranks among the top 10 U.S. states for solar power growth, with more than 6,000 MW of installed capacity as of 2024. Favorable policies and abundant sunshine make it a natural location for Meta’s expansion.
AI’s Energy Appetite: The Race for Clean Power
The timing of this deal also reflects the industry’s race to manage AI-driven energy demand. McKinsey & Company estimates that artificial intelligence will need 124 GW of new data center capacity worldwide from 2025 to 2030. This will require trillions in investment and a sharp increase in renewable energy procurement.

Meta’s peers are already making similar moves:
- Microsoft plans to use 100% renewable electricity by 2025. They have also signed several power purchase agreements (PPAs) in the U.S. and Europe.
- Google is working toward a 24/7 carbon-free energy model, aiming to match its power use with renewable generation every hour of the day by 2030.
- Amazon Web Services (AWS) has signed contracts for over 500 renewable energy projects globally. This makes AWS the largest corporate buyer of renewable energy.
Meta’s South Carolina project signals its intent to stay competitive in both sustainability leadership and AI readiness.
Made in America: Solar Supply Chains Shine
Another important aspect of the Silicon Ranch deal is its reliance on U.S.-made solar components. This reflects a growing effort to localize supply chains for renewable energy equipment.
Federal incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) have led to billions in solar manufacturing in the U.S. The total planned solar module manufacturing capacity in the U.S. could exceed 50 GW by 2025. This will cover a large part of the new projects.

For Meta, sourcing from U.S. suppliers helps reduce shipping emissions, supports domestic jobs, and ensures compliance with clean energy policies that favor domestic content. It also offers protection against supply chain issues that have impacted global solar markets lately.
The Corporate Solar Rush: Who’s Leading the Pack?
Meta’s announcement fits into a broader surge in corporate renewable energy procurement. BloombergNEF reports that companies signed 36 GW of new clean energy contracts in 2024, with the U.S. accounting for nearly half of the total.
Key trends driving growth include:
- Policy Support: Incentives such as the IRA in the U.S. and similar measures abroad.
- Investor Pressure: Shareholders increasingly demand climate action and net-zero plans.
- Customer Expectations: Businesses and consumers prefer brands aligned with sustainability.
The rise of hyperscale data centers, especially those powering AI, is expected to accelerate demand. Analysts forecast that corporate PPAs could exceed 50 GW annually by 2030, creating a major pipeline for renewable developers.
Future-Proofing AI: Meta’s Next Green Moves
The 100 MW solar deal in South Carolina boosts Meta’s renewable energy goals. It also adds credibility as the company expands its AI-powered infrastructure.
Moreover, it shows that renewable procurement is now essential for technology companies working at hyperscale, not just optional.
Looking forward, Meta is expected to expand renewable sourcing in other states and potentially explore 24/7 carbon-free energy solutions, following Google’s lead. Water conservation will likely become important, too. Public interest in the environmental impact of data centers is growing.
For the renewable energy sector, corporate demand from companies like Meta will remain a key driver. Solar developers, utilities, and manufacturers stand to benefit from the race to power the digital economy sustainably.
As data centers expand, agreements like this will be key in shaping the tech industry and the clean energy shift.
The post Meta Taps US-Made Solar to Power Its First South Carolina AI Data Center appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

