Google, Kairos Power, and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) have joined forces to bring the next generation of nuclear energy to the U.S. electricity grid. On August 18, the partners announced a landmark power purchase agreement (PPA) for Kairos Power’s Hermes 2 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
- The project is the first step under a broader agreement between Kairos Power and Google to bring 500 MW of advanced nuclear capacity online by 2035. It will directly support the tech giant’s growth and clean energy goals.
Kairos Scales Up Hermes 2 to Power Google Data Centers
This agreement marks the first time a U.S. utility will buy electricity from an advanced Generation IV (GEN IV) nuclear reactor. Under the deal, the Hermes 2 reactor will supply up to 50 megawatts (MW) of round-the-clock, carbon-free energy to TVA’s grid starting in 2030.
Originally designed to generate 28 MW. By boosting output, Kairos Power ensures that the plant delivers enough energy for data centers that run 24/7 with near-zero downtime. Precisely, that electricity will power Google’s massive data centers in Montgomery County, Tennessee, and Jackson County, Alabama.

Amanda Peterson Corio, Google’s Global Head of Data Center Energy
“To power the future, we need to grow the availability of smart, firm energy sources. This collaboration with TVA, Kairos Power, and the Oak Ridge community will accelerate the deployment of innovative nuclear technologies and help support the needs of our growing digital economy while also bringing firm carbon-free energy to the electricity system. Lessons from the development and operation of the Hermes 2 plant will help drive down the cost of future reactors, improving the economics of clean firm power generation in the TVA region and beyond.”
Mike Laufer, Kairos Power CEO and co-founder, also noted,
“This collaboration is an important enabler to making advanced nuclear energy commercially competitive. The re-envisioned Hermes 2 gets us closer to the commercial fleet sooner and could only be made possible by close collaboration with TVA and Google, and a supportive local community. We are excited to grow Kairos Power’s operations in Oak Ridge while writing a new chapter in the region’s distinguished nuclear history.”
TVA Bridges Utilities, Tech, and Innovation in Nuclear Power
TVA will buy the electricity from Kairos Power and deliver it to Google through its grid. In return, Google will receive the clean energy attributes tied to Hermes 2, ensuring its local operations are powered with verified carbon-free energy every hour of every day.
This three-way model, i.e, bringing together energy customers, utilities, and technology developers, highlights a new path for delivering advanced energy projects. Instead of utilities or developers shouldering all the risk, partnerships distribute costs and accelerate innovation.
Don Moul, TVA President and CEO, said,
“Energy security is national security, and electricity is the strategic commodity that is the building block for AI and our nation’s economic prosperity. The world is looking for American leadership, and this first-of-a-kind agreement is the start of an innovative way of doing business. By developing a technology, a supply chain, and a delivery model that can build an industry to unleash American energy, we can attract and support companies like Google and help America win the AI race.”
Why Oak Ridge Matters
The decision to build Hermes 2 in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, carries deep symbolic weight. Oak Ridge played a central role in nuclear innovation during the 20th century and was the site of some of the biggest breakthroughs in U.S. nuclear history. Now, it’s becoming a hub for the next era of nuclear innovation.
Beyond clean energy, the project will drive local growth. Kairos Power is working with the University of Tennessee and other regional institutions to train operators, engineers, and technicians. These programs aim to create a pipeline of high-paying, skilled jobs in advanced nuclear technology, ensuring that the benefits of Hermes 2 extend far beyond the plant itself.
- ALSO READ: Google Backs Fusion Energy: Signs 200MW Offtake Agreement with Commonwealth Fusion Systems
Rising Electricity Demand in the AI Era
The timing of Hermes 2 couldn’t be more critical. America’s power grid faces surging demand, fueled by data centers and transportation electrification.
Deloitte estimates that data center power use could increase fivefold by 2035, climbing to 176 gigawatts (GW).

- The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) projects that U.S. electricity demand will rise 2% annually, surging nearly 50% by 2050.
This growth is driven not just by cloud services but by artificial intelligence (AI), which requires immense computing power. AI-focused data centers may consume thousands of megawatts each, far beyond the capacity of traditional renewable energy solutions alone.
Why Nuclear Energy is a Strong Fit for Data Centers?
Nuclear power is emerging as one of the few reliable options to meet skyrocketing electricity needs while cutting emissions. IEA says, in 2024, nuclear supplied 18.5% of U.S. electricity, despite accounting for less than 8% of total operating capacity.
-
Massive power output: A single nuclear reactor can generate 800 MW or more, enough to support multiple hyperscale data centers.
-
Around-the-clock reliability: Unlike wind and solar, nuclear plants provide steady power, day and night.
-
Low emissions: Nuclear energy produces almost no greenhouse gases during operation, making it a climate-friendly option.
-
Efficient land use: Nuclear facilities need far less land compared to solar or wind farms, which makes them ideal for regions where space is limited.
The Rise of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)
While traditional nuclear plants are ideal for massive grids, small modular reactors (SMRs) are changing the game. SMRs typically generate up to 300 MW, making them flexible, scalable, and perfectly sized for powering individual data centers or clusters.
SMRs also carry advantages in cost and deployment:
-
They can be built in factories and assembled on-site, speeding up timelines.
-
Their modular design lowers upfront capital risks.
-
They can be paired with renewables to provide grid stability.
Experts predict that by 2035, SMRs could cover 10% of the forecasted increase in U.S. data center electricity demand if regulatory and financial hurdles are overcome.

Kairos Power–TVA–Google Model Cracks the Cost Barrier
Based on the above analysis, the Kairos Power–TVA–Google model is also designed to spread out costs and bring down expenses for utilities and households over time. This is possible because of leveraging early partnerships with major energy buyers like Google.
Moving on, the Hermes 2 project is a blueprint for how advanced nuclear can scale across the U.S. energy system.
-
For utilities, it provides reliable, carbon-free power without overburdening ratepayers.
-
For tech companies, it delivers guaranteed clean energy to match massive AI and data needs.
-
For communities, it creates jobs, training programs, and long-term economic benefits.
Boosting Google’s 2030 Carbon-free Energy Goal
The U.S. is entering a new era where electricity demand is rising fast, mainly due to data centers and AI. And renewable energy can’t do it alone. The grid needs a reliable, scalable, and carbon-free solution.
For Google, Hermes 2 builds on nearly a decade of clean energy work with TVA. Since 2015, Google has invested a lot in renewable energy for the Tennessee Valley. This effort helps modernize the grid and supports data center growth.
Now, with Hermes 2, Google is taking the next leap — adding 24/7 nuclear power to complement wind and solar. This move helps meet Google’s 2030 carbon-free energy goal. It also ensures that its expanding AI operations are powered reliably.

Google, Kairos Power, and TVA are proving that nuclear and data centers can grow together. If Hermes 2 works, it may speed up SMR use across the U.S. This would help meet climate goals and manage rising energy demands.
The post Google, Kairos, and TVA Unlock Advanced Nuclear Energy for America’s AI Data Centers appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

