Apple’s China Clean Energy Fund Initiatives
On March 24, 2025, Apple launched its second China Clean Energy Fund. The company is committing $99.3 million (RMB 720 million) as the main investor. The fund, managed by Schroders, aims to grow renewable energy projects across China.
It builds on the success of Apple’s first clean energy fund, which started in 2018. That first fund helped develop over 1 gigawatt of renewable energy across 14 Chinese provinces. Some of the projects it financed include:
- Concord Jing Tang and Concord Shen Zhang Tang wind farms in Hunan Province, and
- Wind facility developed by Fenghua Energy Investment in Hubei Province.
These projects collectively supplied 134 megawatts of renewable energy, significantly advancing China’s renewable energy targets. The country’s 14th Five-Year Plan aims for renewables to supply 33% of its electricity by 2025. By 2026, solar power is set to surpass coal as the top energy source, reaching 1.38 terawatts—150 GW more than coal.

The new fund will add about 550,000 megawatt-hours of wind and solar energy to China’s power grid each year. This number is expected to rise as more investors join.
Apple’s strategy is to support renewable energy projects at an early stage. This makes it easier for suppliers to switch to clean energy.
- Currently, two-thirds of Apple’s production in China runs on renewable energy. More than 100 suppliers are working toward using 100% renewable energy for Apple products.
Apple CEO Tim Cook stressed the importance of these efforts. He stated,
“The business community has a big role to play in the development of China-U.S. relations. Apple is willing to contribute to the stable, healthy, and sustainable development of bilateral relations.”
This comes at a critical time when the U.S. and China are engaged in a trade war, with tensions rising over technology, tariffs, and economic policies. Despite these challenges, Apple continues to strengthen its ties with China while advancing its clean energy goals.
Progress Toward 2030 Carbon Neutrality
Apple has made major progress in cutting greenhouse gas emissions. According to its 2024 Environmental Progress Report, the company has reduced emissions by over 55% since 2015. Apple aims to cut emissions by 75% from 2015 levels before reaching full carbon neutrality by 2030.

Lisa Jackson, Apple’s Vice President of Environment, Policy, and Social Initiatives, said, “We’ve slashed emissions by more than half, all while serving more users than ever before.”
Apple is taking several steps to reach this goal. The company is moving to low-carbon electricity, using recycled and renewable materials, and improving shipping methods.
One key focus is shifting product transportation from air freight to ocean shipping, which has a lower carbon footprint. These actions are part of Apple’s 2030 plan, a strategy to eliminate net emissions across its entire business.
This approach reflects Apple’s dedication to reducing its environmental impact. It is also setting a standard for corporate responsibility in the tech industry. The image below shows the company’s progress by the numbers.

Here are the other areas where Apple is showing progress in its sustainability efforts.
Supplier Clean Energy Commitments
Apple is also working with its suppliers to help them transition to clean energy. As of April 2024, over 320 suppliers, making up 95% of Apple’s direct manufacturing spending, have committed to using 100% renewable energy by 2030. This number has grown significantly, with more than 50 new suppliers joining in the past year.
These commitments are part of Apple’s Supplier Clean Energy Program, which aims to decarbonize the company’s global supply chain.
In 2021 alone, Apple’s suppliers generated 18.1 million megawatt-hours of clean energy. This avoided 13.9 million metric tons of carbon emissions, a 62% increase over 2020.
The big tech company has also invested in nearly 500 megawatts of renewable electricity projects to help cover upstream emissions. All these show the company’s commitment to encouraging suppliers to also adopt sustainable practices.
Innovations in Product Design
Apple is also reducing its carbon footprint through product design. In September 2023, the company introduced its first carbon-neutral products in the new Apple Watch lineup. Thanks to design improvements and clean energy, product emissions dropped by over 75% for each carbon-neutral Apple Watch.
Apple has also eliminated leather across all its product lines. Instead, the company introduced a new material called FineWoven, which has a much lower carbon footprint. The company is also using entirely fiber-based packaging for its Apple Watch models.
In 2024, Apple reported a 30% reduction in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions for its iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max models. This was achieved by using clean electricity, more recycled materials, and better shipping methods.
Challenges and Criticisms: Facing Greenwashing Claims
Despite these efforts, Apple has faced criticism over its environmental claims. In February 2025, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the company. The lawsuit alleges that Apple misled consumers by labeling certain Apple Watch models as “carbon neutral.”
Plaintiffs argue that Apple’s reliance on carbon offset projects in Kenya and China does not deliver real emissions reductions. The lawsuit seeks damages and an order preventing Apple from marketing these watches as carbon neutral.
These challenges highlight the need for transparency in corporate sustainability claims. In response, Apple continues to emphasize its dedication to real carbon reductions and long-term environmental progress.
Apple remains a leader in corporate sustainability. The company’s $99.3 million China Clean Energy Fund will expand renewable energy and help suppliers transition to 100% clean power. By pushing for clean energy, improving product design, and encouraging supplier commitments, the tech giant is setting an example for the tech industry.
The post Apple Boosts China’s Clean Energy With $99 Million: Can It Power a Carbon-Neutral Future? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

