Connect with us

Published

on

Laurie van der Burg is global public finance campaign manager at Oil Change International. Mariana Paoli is global advocacy lead at Christian Aid. Rebecca Thissen is global advocacy lead at Climate Action Network International.

While climate disasters intensify across the Global South, another connected crisis is quietly unfolding – one with less media coverage, but just as deadly. Governments are drowning in debt, and the money they need for clean energy and resilience is flowing not into solar panels, but to creditors in the Global North.

Meanwhile, the US is on a mission to make this debt and climate spiral even worse: it is pressuring the World Bank and other global institutions to abandon climate action and to instead use their public funds to underwrite the private profits of American and multinational corporations, including through investments in fossil fuels.

Climate shocks and volatile currencies hike debt burden for poor countries

At meetings this week in New York to prepare for the United Nations’ 4th Financing for Development conference (FfD4) that will take place in Seville in June, countries face a clear choice: reject these attempts – including US efforts to weaken its outcomes – or lay the foundation for a renewed financing framework in Seville – one that will ensure the world’s poorest countries get the resources they need to survive.

A system built to extract

Many Global South countries now spend five times more on debt repayments than on climate action. Some cannot rebuild after floods or droughts because they’re paying interest on loans from decades ago. Others remain dependent on expensive fossil fuel imports – or stuck exporting oil and gas just to stay afloat.

This isn’t misfortune – it’s design. The global financial system was built by – and continues to benefit – the rich countries that did the most to cause the climate crisis. Today, they are demanding loan repayments from those who contributed the least, while offering “climate finance” largely in the form of new debt.

Ghana, for example, received over $2 billion in World Bank financing for oil and gas projects, yet project delays have left it reliant on expensive fossil fuel imports. On top of that, “take or pay” contracts that guarantee profits for foreign investors but not public coffers are costing the country over $1 billion a year, while many Ghanaians still lack access to affordable energy.

This is not an isolated case. Many countries are trapped in a vicious cycle of relying on fossil fuel extraction to service their debts, fueled by conditions imposed by international financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF). A study from the ODI think-tank found that debt levels rose sharply in the last decade in major oil and gas exporting countries across the Global
South.

Global South countries have the solutions

Global South groups – such as the African Group and the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) – have put forward clear, workable solutions. They have successfully pushed for establishing a UN Tax Convention to close tax loopholes and stop the outflow of wealth through tax havens, negotiations for which are ongoing. They have also repeatedly called for dramatically increased public, grant-based climate finance.

Global billionaires tax to fight climate change, hunger rises up political agenda

With 2025 declared a Jubilee year for debt forgiveness by the late Pope Francis, the calls for debt cancellation and to adopt a UN Sovereign Debt Convention have become impossible to ignore. The current draft text for FfD4 calls for a process to establish such a Convention, which would provide an alternative to the insufficient attempts to tackle the debt crisis by the G20 and the IMF, and finally put debtor and creditor countries at equal footing.

The Convention could set up a multilateral sovereign debt resolution mechanism to deliver faster and fairer debt restructurings and cancellation. It could develop a new approach to debt sustainability framework and analyses (DSAs), ensuring that the assessment is aligned with human rights, climate and sustainable development needs.

But the Global North is blocking reform

Instead of stepping up and supporting financial system reform, wealthy governments – including the UK, France, and Germany – are cutting aid and outsourcing their responsibilities to the private sector. They are obstructing bold action in UN spaces and instead push to keep decision-making behind closed doors in elite clubs like the OECD, where poorer countries have no seat at the table. Their approach of prioritising the mobilisation of private money and offering loans rather than grants or highly-concessional public money has been tested and failed. Even the World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill admitted that the “Billions to Trillions” agenda never delivered.

Trump’s first 100 days: US walks away from global climate action

Rather than supporting harmful approaches and piecemeal reforms, the EU and UK should strengthen their alliances with Global South countries and back their proposals for system change and more democratic governance of financial institutions.

This would help free up the public money needed to fund the solutions. Money is out there, it is just a matter of political will. Just the world’s 10 richest individuals hold more than $1 trillion in combined wealth. Fossil fuel companies made $1 trillion in profits last year. Governments still give hundreds of billions annually in fossil fuel subsidies, paid for by the public.

Taxing the ultra-wealthy, making polluters pay, ending fossil fuel handouts, and cancelling exploitative debts, could free up more than $5 trillion a year – enough to fund a global Just Transition and build a
more equal, stable world.

Seville is a moment of reckoning

The Seville conference is a rare opportunity to prove that international cooperation can still deliver in an age of crisis. For too long, climate finance, debt relief, tax justice, and fossil fuel phaseout have been treated in isolation. But these crises are deeply connected – and demand a unified response.

Seville must be the moment when governments back Global South–led solutions that can start shifting the global economy toward justice, resilience, and sustainability. At the heart of that effort must be securing a UN Sovereign Debt Convention – to finally rebalance a system rigged against the world’s poorest.

Wealthy countries must rise to the occasion – not with more financial engineering, but by strengthening the public tools that serve the common good. Anything less isn’t climate action. It’s exploitation with a green label.

The post Without debt relief, climate action will fail appeared first on Climate Home News.

Without debt relief, climate action will fail

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Corpus Christi Leaders Believe Data Center Plans May Be Behind Delays to Emergency Water Supply

Published

on

Authorities in Sinton won’t confirm or deny Corpus Christi’s suggestion that the small town is hoarding its precious groundwater for data centers. Across Texas, a booming buildout of server farms is adding strain to water resources that are already stretched to their limit.

This story was produced in partnership by Inside Climate News and the Texas Newsroom, the state’s network of public radio stations.

Corpus Christi Leaders Believe Data Center Plans May Be Behind Delays to Emergency Water Supply

Continue Reading

Climate Change

New Zealand Moves to Ban Tort Liability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Damage

Published

on

The move comes as the American Petroleum Institute and Republicans in Congress push legislation in the U.S. to shield the oil and gas industry from climate accountability.

New Zealand’s government has announced that it plans to amend the country’s signature climate law to prohibit liability arising from climate change damages, a controversial move that critics say would shield polluters from climate lawsuits and undermine the rule of law. It comes amidst recent legislative action from Republican lawmakers in the U.S. to similarly restrict liability for climate-related harms.

New Zealand Moves to Ban Tort Liability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Damage

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Pacific civil society cautions ISA of ‘bluewashing’ deep-sea mining

Published

on

SUVA, FIJI, Tuesday 19 May 2026 – Pacific civil society groups are calling for transparency and inclusion in regional deep-sea mining talks, as environmental stewardship concerns and poor economic prospects accompany the corporate push.

This cautionary call comes on the first day of the International Seabed Authority (ISA)’s Pacific Small Island Developing States regional workshop, the so-called ‘Deep Seabed Sustainable Blue Growth Initiative’ in Suva, Fiji.

The Pacific Regional Non-Government Organisations (PRNGO) Alliance, including Pacific Conference of Churches (PCC), Fiji Council of Social Services (FCOSS), Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG), Greenpeace Australia Pacific (GPAP), and over 20 Pacific civil society organisations, questioned the agenda of the “blue growth” forum, arguing that the workshop emphasises sponsoring States, but only includes observer engagement with other Pacific Small Island Developing States (PSIDS).

The collective stressed the importance of ensuring that the workshop does not unintentionally privilege or amplify only the perspectives of sponsoring States in a manner that could be perceived as legitimising or advancing deep-sea mining pathways in the Pacific.

Mr Joey Tau, Chair of the PRNGO Alliance, said: “We are extremely concerned that the current agenda is inappropriate to the Pacific context; as it stands, it clearly centres states that have an interest in deep-sea mining, with relations and benefits to the mining industry. Such regional workshops must ensure equal visibility and space for non-sponsoring States, particularly those advocating for precautionary approaches and environmental safeguards.

“We also challenge the ISA in its mandate to encourage policy discussions on effective protection of the marine environment and not just on the economics, exploration and exploitation.”

Ms Vani Catanasiga, Executive Director of the FCOSS, said: “The ISA came in to conduct a workshop, but they excluded civil society organisations. Why has that been allowed? The ISA is excluding a body of knowledge that is needed for concrete conversations that also takes into consideration the well-being of the Pacific people. This was not well thought through – this forum should have at least emphasised the importance of a civil society perspective. As we are aware, deep-sea mining will have transboundary harm; this is why it is important to have civil society in the room during these conversations.”

Reverend James Bhagwan, General-Secretary of PCC, said: For Pacific peoples, there is nothing sustainable about deep-sea mining when it violates our cultural and spiritual connection to the ocean. The ocean is not an empty space. It is not simply a resource. It is our common home, our provider, our ancestor, our climate regulator, and part of God’s creation. In the Pacific, we have long said: the ocean is us, and we are the ocean. To mine the ocean is to wound the life-system that holds our peoples, our islands and future generations together.”

Ms Laisa Nainoka, Oceans Campaigner at PANG, said: “There is no such thing as sustainable deep-sea mining. Harm does not become harmless just because we rebrand it. It is fundamentally destructive, with far-reaching impacts on the ocean, marine life, and the communities that depend on them for survival. These impacts are not confined to the high seas or the exclusive economic zones of sponsoring states, it is felt across the entire ocean.”

Mr Rae Bainteiti, Political Coordinator at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: Calling the destruction of our ocean floor ‘sustainable blue growth’ is deceptive, biased, and wrong – it is bluewashing the biggest modern threat to the Pacific. Deep-sea mining is a risky investment that will cost the Pacific the most and benefit us the least. The average Pacific Island State would only receive mere thousands of dollars through the ISA benefit-sharing regime as it stands, while international mining companies rake in billions. There is no Pacific ‘blue growth’ in a mined ocean. True blue growth should mean investing in healthy oceans, sustainable livelihoods, climate resilience, and protecting marine ecosystems, not opening the door to another extractive industry.”

Pacific civil society organisations have consistently emphasised that, rather than framing deep-sea mining as an opportunity for “blue growth,” the ISA should prioritise its environmental protection obligations.

At the forum this week, PRNGO is calling for the ISA to:

  • Actively include civil society and community perspectives in workshops;
  • Prevent pro-mining bias in deep-sea mining governance by shifting focus away from heavily invested Sponsoring States toward meaningful engagement with PSIDS;
  • Give equal weight to dialogue about protecting nature, including the role of independent science, the application of the precautionary approach, and the consideration of cumulative mining impacts.

To date, 40 countries have called for a moratorium or precautionary pause on deep-sea mining, including seven Pacific nations.

– ENDS –

Pacific civil society cautions ISA of ‘bluewashing’ deep-sea mining

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com