Published

10 hours ago

April 2, 2026

Alice Rush

The embattled resource had high-profile antagonists in Texas before Trump took office.

By Arcelia Martin

Texas state officials have led a successful and concerted effort to prevent offshore wind developments in the Gulf. Over the last few years, key leaders whose signatures and support are required to permit energy developments off the coast signaled to investors that such approvals would be unlikely.

Why Doesn’t Texas, the Leader of Onshore Wind Energy, Have Any Offshore?

Climate Change

China Briefing 2 April 2026: EV profits rise | Ming Yang rejected | Iran war

Published

5 hours ago

April 2, 2026

Alice Rush

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s China Briefing.

China Briefing handpicks and explains the most important climate and energy stories from China over the past fortnight. Subscribe for free here.

Key developments

Climate on agenda at post-two sessions forums

‘UNWAVERING’ ON CLIMATE: “China will “unwaveringly” follow a low-carbon pathway, said environment vice-minister Li Gao at the China Development Forum (CDF) – a high-level and business-focused event traditionally held after China’s two sessions – according to business news outlet China Economic Times. Wang Jinsong, deputy director of the National Energy Administration, said China’s energy system will feature both “multi-energy” sources and “risk resilience”, reported industry news outlet BJX News. Liu Shijin, advisor at the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development said China must develop “accountability mechanisms” and “quantitative” emissions reduction targets, said finance news outlet Sina Finance. CDF attendees included Chinese premier Li Qiang, Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) head Huang Runqiu and National Development and Reform Commission chairman Zheng Shanjie, according to CDF organisers.

‘DEAL WITH IT’: Regarding international tensions over Chinese industrial exports, Bloomberg quoted Premier Li saying “we take our trading partners’ concerns seriously”, adding China has made “positive progress” in tackling the intense competition plaguing several industries, including clean-energy technologies. Nevertheless, consultancy Trivium China said in a note that the broad message at CDF was: “Yes, we’ve got an export-oriented growth model. Deal with it.”

上微信关注《碳简报》

IRAN IMPETUS: Meanwhile, Chinese climate envoy Liu Zhenmin attended the Bo’ao Forum for Asia in Hainan province, where he told Bloomberg that he “expects” the US will return to the Paris Agreement after the Trump administration. He added that the Middle East conflict will “definitely” not cause an oil or gas crisis in China, but had “convinced the government, at all levels, to speed up the energy transition”. (See Spotlight below.)

KOREA COOPERATION: The Bo’ao forum, a high-level platform for policymakers, business leaders and academics often compared to Davos, also featured a China-South Korea climate roundtable, where China Daily quoted former UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon calling for climate solutions that “transcend borders”. A few days earlier, China and South Korea held their first climate dialogue in seven years, said the World Korea, where talks included this year’s COP31 climate talks in Turkey, renewable energy and carbon markets.

Sinopec says cleantech pushed down profits in 2025

PRE-IRAN SQUEEZE: All of China’s three-largest oil and gas companies saw profits fall in 2025, with Sinopec seeing a 36.8% decline last year due to “rising substitution by new energy” and “weak” margins, according to Reuters. PetroChina’s net profits fell 4.5% year-on-year, said Securities Times, despite an increase in production. CNOOC’s profits were down 11.5% year-on-year, said Reuters, largely due to low oil prices. (These figures predate the impact of the Iran war. Oil and gas firms have been enjoying windfall gains since the start of the conflict.)

EV PROFITS: Meanwhile, a “growing roster” of electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers are becoming profitable, reported industry outlet Inside EVs, with Leapmotor, Nio and XPeng announcing they have recently made profits for the first time. This has come partially at the expense of BYD, which saw its profits fall “for the first time in four years” due to price wars in China reaching a “fever pitch”, reported the Financial Times. A growing number of Chinese car dealerships are focused on EVs, said finance news outlet Yicai. Yicai also reported that dealerships around the world are seeing a “surge” in demand for Chinese EVs as the conflict in the Middle East raises petrol prices.

Ming Yang factory plans rejected

‘UNWISE DEPENDENCIES’: The UK government has rejected plans by Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Ming Yang to invest up to £1.5bn in a factory in Scotland, citing national security concerns, reported the Financial Times. In a statement to the UK parliament, energy minister Michael Shanks said the government “will always act to protect our national security” and is “committed” to developing “resilient and sustainable offshore wind supply chains”. Liam Byrne, chair of the parliamentary business and trade committee, said in a statement that the UK cannot “create…new and unwise dependencies”.

Sign up to Carbon Brief’s free “China Briefing” email newsletter. All you need to know about the latest developments relating to China and climate change. Sent to your inbox every Thursday.

‘MISSED OPPORTUNITY’: In a response reposted by energy news outlet China Energy Net, Ming Yang said the government has “missed a critical opportunity” to partner with a company that has “no comparable [European] alternatives”. It said it had attempted to address security concerns through proposals such as only processing data onshore. An analysis in the Scotsman said that, while there were “genuine” concerns, “alignment with Japan and the EU on cybersecurity and energy” and US opposition drove the decision. The South China Morning Post cited an unnamed source saying the move was “likely” due to direct US pressure. On the same day, an investment by Danish turbine manufacturer Vestas was approved, reported BBC News, with Maf Smith, director of advisory firm Lumen and previously deputy chief executive of Renewable UK, asking on LinkedIn: “Coincidence?”

‘SKYROCKETING’ SOLAR: Elsewhere, Chinese solar exports to Cuba “skyrocketed” from $5m to $117m between 2023 and 2025 – even before the intensification of the US oil blockade, reported the Washington Post. China and the Philippines are “exploring” oil and gas cooperation in the disputed South China Sea following supply disruptions caused by the Middle East conflict, said Reuters. China has also “exported cargoes of diesel and other fuels” across south-east Asia, said Bloomberg, although Reuters said China would “extend its ban on refined fuel exports into April”.

More China news

IPCC’S ‘LONGER TIMELINE’: Governments failed to agree if a key climate report should be published in 2028, ahead of COP33, with China among the countries arguing for a “longer timeline”, said Carbon Brief.
SICHUAN SOJOURN: Premier Li toured several clean-energy sites in a visit to Sichuan province, urging officials to “continuously expand” capacity and “focus” on developing a “new-type power grid”, reported state news agency Xinhua.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS: The central government has said small hydropower projects must stay within the limits of what the local environment can tolerate, reported the Communist party-affiliated People’s Daily.
MEE INVESTIGATES: In recent inspections, the MEE criticised several bodies, including steel, power and coal firms, on “reckless” development of ”dual-high” projects and poor execution of “their…low-carbon transitions”, said the People’s Daily.
TRADE WAR POSITIONING: China has “launched a sweeping investigation” into US cleantech trade barriers, said Bloomberg.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY: The Chinese government has published an action plan for high-quality “energy-saving equipment”, including a focus on hydrogen electrolysers and other power equipment, said Xinhua.

Captured

Electric arc furnace use in China could rise to 73% by 2060

Steel produced by electric arc furnaces (EAFs), as opposed to burning coking coal, could account for at least 73% of China’s total steel production in 2060, according to a report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clear Air (CREA). Under this scenario, EAF uptake could cause steel-sector emissions to fall to 1.3bn tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2035, “representing a nearly 37% reduction” from peak levels.

Spotlight

How Chinese media has been covering the Iran energy crisis

As the closure of the Strait of Hormuz wreaks havoc on fossil-fuel supplies across the world, a prominent narrative in western media has been that low-carbon energy has helped mitigate the worst of the impact on China. While Chinese-language media has featured similar arguments, it has also highlighted China’s coal industry and broader energy security narratives.

In this edition, Carbon Brief looks at how Chinese news outlets have covered the implications of the US and Israel war with Iran on energy use.

As the conflict intensified, several Chinese-language outlets put the spotlight on China’s clean-energy infrastructure.

The tensions highlight the “importance” of energy security and the energy transition, wrote Bo’ao forum secretary-general Zhang Jun in a commentary for the Communist party-affiliated People’s Daily.

The China Youth Daily, a party-run newspaper oriented towards younger readers, said the conflict has “exacerbated” fragile energy supply chains, underscoring the need to “develop new energy sources for energy security”.

Building “localised” clean-energy capacity is a “strategic necessity”, as well as an important aspect of climate action, wrote Wang Ning, associate researcher at the government-affiliated Institute of World Economy in the state-supporting Global Times.

Meanwhile, Liu Ying, research fellow at Renmin University’s Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, told Xinhua that China is well-placed to benefit if the crisis catalyses a “restructuring of the global energy order” and hastens uptake of solar and wind power.

Echoing this sentiment, WeChat account Photovoltaic News, which is run by an unnamed individual, said: “New energy is precisely the core of China’s strength.”

Coal is king?

However, the broader commentary on the war has tended to emphasise China’s “all-of-the-above” approach to the energy transition.

A “sharp commentary” in the People’s Daily – a designation for comments that the newspaper finds important – said that a range of initiatives, from “diversified energy imports” to “vigorous development of green energy” allowed China to “secure its energy supply” and “take the initiative in energy security”.

Similarly, an editorial in commercial news outlet 21st Century Business Herald said that China is “less likely to face direct impacts from this oil crisis” because of its reliance on both coal and renewables.

It also noted the opportunity that the conflict represented in terms of greater global demand for Chinese clean-energy technology.

Coal’s role in the energy mix as a “ballast” and “peak-shaving” tool “continues to strengthen”, said economic news outlet Jiemian – although the outlet also acknowledged China’s “vigorous” clean-energy additions.

Pro-coal accounts on WeChat especially emphasised the fuel’s role in the crisis.

Coal will “continue to serve as the cornerstone of energy supply”, said Coal Vision, a WeChat account run by Xiamen Zhengzhuo Trading, a firm that trades coal and other commodities.

Similarly, Guizhou Coal Data argued: “When a real emergency strikes, you have to ask: which energy source do we truly control? There’s only one answer: coal.” The account is run by the information services firm Guizhou Yuteng Coal Industry Big Data Information Center.

Several outlets also highlighted China’s efforts to secure gas supplies from elsewhere.

Wen Shaoqing, columnist at nationalist outlet Guancha, wrote that an agreement between China and Turkmenistan shortly after the conflict began that reaffirmed plans to develop a new gas pipeline represented a “strategic” move to secure the “nation’s survival”.

Notably, two articles in Guancha summarising foreign outlets’ coverage of China’s response – both emphasising the role renewable energy played in insulating China from the energy shock – also received more than 100,000 views.

Security in coal chemicals

Meanwhile, Xinhua published an article on “turning China’s advantage in coal resources into an advantage in developing natural gas”, although it did not explicitly mention Iran. It added that the head of China’s state-owned PetroChina Coalbed Methane Co argued that coalbed methane could “propel China from [being] an energy giant to an energy powerhouse”.

Shortly after the Xinhua article was published, Jiemian said China had a responsibility to develop coalbed methane to “secure our energy self-sufficiency”.

Similarly, several news outlets covered the “boon” that the war might be for China’s coal-chemical industry.

An article posted by WeChat account Xinghai Intelligence Bureau argued that China’s development of a coal-chemical industry, rather than “new energy”, is what prepared it for “worst-case scenarios” such as the war. The account is run by technology media company Beijing Lightspeed Time Network Technology.

Finance news outlet EastMoney said that the “strategic value” of China’s coal-chemical industry will likely rise “against the backdrop of growing global instability”.

Watch, read, listen

RURAL SOLAR: New Security Beat published an on-the-ground look at how a rooftop solar push is playing out in a rural village in China.

TARGET TESTED: 21st Century Business Herald examined China’s new 17% carbon-intensity target, noting that projects already underway will take up a “significant portion of the carbon-emission growth allowance for the five-year plan”.

ELECTRON PIVOT: Redefining Energy spoke to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies’ Dr Michal Meidan on the factors driving China’s energy transition.

GEOTHERMAL LIMITS: ChinaTalk outlined the evolution of China’s approach to geothermal energy and the constraints that have limited uptake.

470%

How much Chinese solar exports to the Middle East grew year-on-year in the first quarter of 2026, according to WeChat news account Photovoltaic Box.

New science

“International climate policy actors” play an “overlooked yet critical” role in fostering climate policy “stability” in China through their links with policymakers | Environmental Politics
Climate change will degrade peatlands in Sichuan province over the coming century, driving biodiversity shifts and a decline in species richness | Frontiers in Plant Science

Recently published on WeChat

China Briefing is written by Anika Patel and edited by Simon Evans. Please send tips and feedback to china@carbonbrief.org

The post China Briefing 2 April 2026: EV profits rise | Ming Yang rejected | Iran war appeared first on Carbon Brief.

China Briefing 2 April 2026: EV profits rise | Ming Yang rejected | Iran war

Climate Change

Which State Leads in Battery Energy Storage? It Depends on How You Measure.

Published

7 hours ago

April 2, 2026

Alice Rush

Texas can stake a claim as the new leader. California also has a strong case.

By Dan Gearino

On a recent evening, batteries were the broad shoulders propping up California’s electricity grid.

Which State Leads in Battery Energy Storage? It Depends on How You Measure.

Climate Change

Analysis: How ‘plug-in solar’ can save UK homes £1,100 on energy bills

Published

7 hours ago

April 2, 2026

Alice Rush

Plug-in solar panels could save a typical UK household £1,100 over their 15-year lifetime, according to Carbon Brief analysis.

In response to the ongoing energy crisis, the UK government announced on 15 March a package of clean-energy measures to “boost” energy security.

Among these was the introduction of “plug-in” solar panels to the UK, which would be available “within months” at retailers, according to the government.

A cost-benefit analysis by Carbon Brief finds that plug-in solar could provide 400 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity each year, enough to meet 15% of demand for a typical household.

This could save £110 on electricity bills each year, meaning the typical upfront cost of around £500 for an 800-watt (W) system could be paid back within five years, according to the analysis.

Assuming the plug-in system has a 15-year lifespan, total net savings could reach £1,100.

Plug-in panels

Compared to rooftop solar, smaller plug-in solar systems consisting of one to two panels can be easily installed on balconies, in gardens and other outdoor spaces. They can be plugged directly into home sockets without the need for additional wiring, reducing electricity taken from the grid and thereby cutting bills.

Plug-in solar has already taken off in Germany, with official registrations already exceeding 1m installations (the actual number could be up to 4m). Other growing markets include France, Spain, the Netherlands and the US.

Panels could be available in the UK “within months” at retailers, such as Lidl and Sainsbury’s, according to the government. (Many of the products from EcoFlow, one of the main providers of plug-in solar in the UK, are already sold out online.)

The government said it will work with relevant bodies to update electrical regulations to allow the use of plug-in solar. The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) has advised homes to get their wiring checked before installing.

Costs and benefits

To assess the potential impact of plug-in solar, Carbon Brief conducted a cost-benefit analysis for an 800-watt (W) installation in a typical two-to-three bedroom home in London. The assumptions are approximate and will vary for different locations and set-ups.

Optimally placed panels – south-facing and tilted at around 40 degrees – would generate around 820 kilowatt hours (kWh) each year in London – at a “load factor” of 12% – according to the EU’s PVGIS database.

Actual output is likely to be lower, due to sub-optimal placement – such as vertically on balconies – as well as orientation and shading.

A report by trade body Solar Power Europe noted these factors could cut 30-60% from optimal output. This analysis assumes a 45% reduction from optimal output.

If a household is able to use 90% of the output – typical for such installations – then the panels would provide 400kWh of electricity each year, enough to meet 15% of typical demand.

This will vary on the household usage patterns, but running appliances such as washing machines during peak daylight hours could improve capture rates.

This could save £110 on electricity bills each year, meaning the upfront cost of around £500 could be paid back within 5 years, according to Carbon Brief’s analysis.

Assuming the panels last 15 years, total net savings over their lifetime could reach £1,100.

These savings assume a fixed unit cost of 27p/kWh, based on predictions for July 2026.

If electricity prices surged to 34p/kWh for a prolonged period – as they did during the 2022 gas price crisis – then annual savings could increase to around £140, further reducing the payback time.

If module costs fall over time as more suppliers enter the market, this could reduce the upfront cost and payback time.

If 3m households take up plug-in solar – comparable to Germany’s current deployment – this would generate 1.2 terawatt hours (TWh), less than 1% of UK demand.

While this would not significantly cut UK emissions overall, it could still save the households more than £330m in total and avoid around two tankers’ worth of imported liquified natural gas (LNG) each year, according to Carbon Brief’s analysis.

Unlocking participation

Aside from its economic benefits, plug-in solar could unlock participation in the clean-energy transition for a wider percentage of the population.

For example, renters make up around one-third of UK households and lack control over the installation of rooftop solar and heat pumps. Plug-in solar would enable them to engage in and benefit from clean energy in their homes.