A Journey Through Time: Tracing the History of Renewable Energy in the United States
The tale of renewable energy in the United States is a long and winding one, marked by periods of innovation, decline, and resurgence.
Let’s take a trip down memory lane to explore this dynamic story:
Early Beginnings (Before 1800s):
- Wood Power: For millennia, wood remained the primary source of energy for heating, cooking, and lighting. Its abundance and ease of access made it the go-to fuel for early Americans.
- Water Power: Harnessing the power of flowing water for grinding grain and powering small mills started appearing as early as the 17th century.
The Rise of Hydropower (1800s – Early 1900s):
- Industrial Revolution: The 19th century saw a surge in industrialization, demanding greater energy needs. Hydropower emerged as a powerful solution, with the first commercial hydroelectric plant opening in Appleton, Wisconsin, in 1882.
- Dam Construction Boom: Large-scale dam projects like Hoover Dam in the 1930s further cemented hydropower’s dominance as the leading renewable energy source.
Shifting Landscapes (Early 1900s – Mid 20th Century):
- Fossil Fuel Era: Discovery of vast oil and natural gas reserves, coupled with technological advancements, led to a shift towards these cheaper and readily available fossil fuels. Renewable energy gradually receded into the background.
- Wood’s Resurgence: World War I and II, with their constraints on fossil fuels, saw a temporary return to wood as a heating source.
Environmental Awakening (Mid 20th Century – Present):
- Renewed Interest: Growing concerns about environmental damage and limited fossil fuel resources sparked a renewed interest in renewable energy sources in the 1970s.
- Policy Push: The oil crisis of the 1970s further propelled policy changes encouraging renewable energy development. The Carter administration invested in solar and wind research, laying the groundwork for future advancements.
- Tech Advancements: Technological innovations, particularly in solar panels and wind turbines, drastically reduced their costs, making them more competitive with fossil fuels.
- Continued Growth: Today, renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and geothermal are witnessing significant growth, driven by supportive policies, falling costs, and public demand for clean energy.
Key Milestones:
- 1978: The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) encourages renewable energy development by requiring utilities to buy surplus electricity from small producers.
- 1992: The Energy Policy Act of 1992 incentivizes renewable energy projects with tax credits and grants.
- 2005: The Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) require states to increase their reliance on renewable energy sources.
- 2011: Renewable energy surpasses nuclear power for the first time in the United States.
- 2022: The Inflation Reduction Act provides substantial funding for renewable energy development, transmission, and storage.
Looking Ahead:
The future of renewable energy in the United States is bright. With continued investment, technological advancements, and supportive policies, renewable sources are poised to play an increasingly crucial role in meeting the nation’s energy needs while creating a cleaner and more sustainable future.
Renewable Energy Consumption in the United States
Here’s a breakdown of renewable energy consumption in the US, incorporating insights from recent data and addressing potential confusion:
Overall:
- In 2022, renewable energy accounted for 13.18 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) of total energy consumption, or 13% of the national energy use.
- This figure includes renewable sources like hydropower, wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, and biofuels.
- Notably, hydropower makes up the largest share of renewable consumption, contributing approximately 37% of the total.
- However, solar and wind are experiencing the fastest growth, with their combined contribution reaching 33% in 2022.
Consumption vs. Production:
- It’s crucial to differentiate between consumption and production. While 13% represents consumption, renewable energy production in the US reached 13.40 quads, or 13% of total production, in 2022.
Specific Sources:
Here’s a breakdown of specific renewable energy sources’ consumption based on 2022 data:
- Hydropower: 4.90 quads (37%)
- Biomass: 3.02 quads (23%)
- Wind: 1.62 quads (12%)
- Solar: 1.43 quads (11%)
- Biofuels: 1.34 quads (10%)
- Geothermal: 0.87 quads (7%)
Growth and Future Outlook:
- Renewable energy consumption has been steadily increasing in the US, with a significant jump from 9.9% in 2021 to 13% in 2022.
- Factors like the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and continued technological advancements are expected to accelerate this growth in the coming years.
- Experts predict that renewable energy consumption could reach 28% of total energy use by 2050.
Breakdown Data of Renewable Energy in the United States
Production (2022):
| Source | Energy Production (Trillion Btu) | Percentage of Total Renewable Production |
|---|---|---|
| Hydropower | 8.13 | 61.3% |
| Wind | 13.30 | 29.8% |
| Solar | 3.99 | 7.5% |
| Biomass | 2.00 | 1.4% |
| Geothermal | 0.01 | 0.0% |
| Total Renewables | 17.43 | 13.4% |
Consumption (2022):
| Source | Energy Consumption (Trillion Btu) | Percentage of Total Renewable Consumption |
|---|---|---|
| Hydropower | 7.85 | 58.5% |
| Wind | 5.92 | 43.9% |
| Solar | 1.29 | 9.6% |
| Biomass (Biofuels & Electricity) | 4.42 | 32.8% |
| Geothermal | 0.03 | 0.2% |
| Total Renewables | 19.51 | 15.0% |
Additional Breakdown:
- Wind: Texas, Oklahoma, and Iowa are the top three states for wind energy production.
- Solar: California, Texas, and Florida are the top three states for solar energy production.
- Biomass: Biofuels (mainly for transportation) account for roughly half of biomass consumption, while the other half comes from biomass electricity generation.
- Hydropower: The majority of hydropower production comes from large dams, especially in the West and Pacific Northwest.
Sources:
- U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA): https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=92&t=4
- EIA Monthly Energy Review: https://www.eia.gov/mer/
Hydropower Statistics in the United States
Production:
- 2022: Hydropower accounted for 6.2% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation and 28.7% of total utility-scale renewable electricity generation.
- Energy generation:
- 262 billion kilowatthours (kWh) in 2022 (13.4% of renewable production, 61.3% of hydro production)
- Highest recorded annual generation was in 2011 (812 billion kWh)
- Capacity:
- 102 gigawatts (GW) as of 2022, primarily from large dams.
- Largest facility: Grand Coulee Dam (Washington) with 6,765 MW capacity.
Consumption:
- 2022: Consumed 7.85 trillion Btu (equivalent to 230 TWh).
- Source:
- Conventional Hydropower: 99.8%
- Pumped Storage Hydropower: 0.2%
Distribution:
- Top 5 Hydropower-Producing States:
- Washington
- California
- Oregon
- Tennessee
- Alabama
- Regional Breakdown:
- West: 62% of national capacity
- Southeast: 22%
- Northeast: 9%
- Midwest: 7%
Environmental Impact:
- Positive: Clean energy source, low greenhouse gas emissions.
- Negative: Dams can harm ecosystems and fisheries, displace communities.
Additional Notes:
- Hydropower development has slowed down in recent years due to environmental concerns and competition from other renewable sources.
- Pumped storage hydropower plays a critical role in grid management by storing and releasing energy when needed.
- The future of hydropower in the US is uncertain, but it is likely to remain an important source of clean energy.
Wind Energy Statistics in the United States
Here’s a summary of some key statistics on wind energy in the US, as of 2023/early 2024:
Generation:
- Electricity: In 2022, wind power generated 434.8 terawatt hours of electricity, making it the main source of renewable energy in the US, surpassing hydropower. (Source: Statista)
- Growth: Since 2000, wind electricity generation has increased significantly, from 6 billion kWh to 380 billion kWh in 2021. In 2022, it accounted for 10.2% of total US utility-scale electricity generation. (Source: EIA)
Capacity and Infrastructure:
- Installed capacity: As of 2023, the US has a total wind power capacity of 146 gigawatts (GW), enough to power 46 million American homes. This makes it the fourth-largest source of electricity generation capacity in the country. (Source: Clean Power Alliance)
- Turbines: Over 70,000 wind turbines are currently operating across all 50 states. (Source: Clean Power Alliance)
Economic Impact:
- Jobs: In 2020, the wind industry supported over 120,000 jobs in the US. (Source: Clean Power Alliance)
- Investments: Renewable energy investments, including wind, rose to $105 billion in 2021, a 7% increase from the previous year. (Source: Statista)
- Environmental benefits: Wind energy avoided 336 million metric tons of CO2 emissions in 2022. (Source: Clean Power Alliance)
Solar Energy Statistics in the United States
Here’s a summary of some key statistics on solar energy in the US, as of 2023/early 2024:
Generation:
- Electricity: In 2022, solar power generated 145.6 terawatt hours of electricity, representing 3.4% of the total and 15.9% of renewable energy production. (Source: Statista, EcoWatch)
- Growth: Solar electricity generation has seen rapid growth, experiencing an average annual increase of 24% in the last decade. (Source: Statista)
Capacity and Infrastructure:
- Installed capacity: As of 2022, the US has a total solar power capacity of 110 gigawatts (GW), enough to power 37 million American homes. (Source: Statista)
- Systems: Over 3 million solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are installed across the US, with residential installations growing at a record pace in 2022. (Source: SEIA)
Economic Impact:
- Jobs: The solar industry employed over 346,000 workers in 2022, and the workforce grew by 3.7% from the previous year. (Source: EcoWatch)
- Investments: Private investments in the solar industry reached $36 billion in 2022. (Source: SEIA)
- Environmental benefits: Solar energy avoided 84 million metric tons of CO2 emissions in 2022. (Source: SEIA)
Biomass Energy Statistics in the United States
Here’s some key data on biomass energy in the US as of February 19, 2024:
Overall Contribution:
- Share of total energy consumption: 5% in 2022 (4,930 trillion British thermal units, TBtu)
- Largest source before mid-1800s.
Sources of Biomass Energy:
- Biofuels (49%):
- Ethanol production: 15.4 billion gallons in 2022
- Biodiesel/renewable diesel production: 3.1 billion gallons in 2022
- Wood and wood waste (43%):
- Net electricity generation: 39.9 gigawatt hours in 2019 (3rd largest non-hydroelectric renewable source)
- Densified biomass fuel production capacity: 12.96 million tons per year (as of November 2023)
- Waste energy (8%)
Geothermal Energy Statistics in the United States
Here’s some key data on geothermal energy in the US as of February 19, 2024:
Overall Contribution:
- Share of total electricity generation: 0.4% in 2022 (17 billion kilowatthours)
- Ranked 5th among renewable energy sources in the US.
Capacity and Production:
- Installed geothermal capacity: 2,653 megawatts (MW) as of 2022, leading the world.
- Geothermal electricity generation: 214 trillion British thermal units (Btu) of renewable energy consumed in 2022.
- California: holds the top spot with 2,792 MW installed capacity, followed by Nevada with 805 MW.
Additional Notes:
- Geothermal energy also finds applications beyond electricity generation, including direct heating for buildings, greenhouses, and industrial processes.
- Despite its potential, geothermal energy faces challenges like upfront costs, limited geographical suitability, and permitting hurdles.
Top 10 Largest Renewable Energy Infrastructures in the United States by Capacity
Here’s a table summarizing the Largest Renewable Energy Infrastructures in the United States by Capacity
| Rank | Infrastructure Name | Type | Capacity (Gigawatts) | State(s) | Owner(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grand Coulee Dam Hydroelectric Project | Hydroelectric | 7.26 | Washington | U.S. Bureau of Reclamation |
| 2 | Hoover Dam Hydroelectric Project | Hydroelectric | 2.08 | Arizona & Nevada | U.S. Bureau of Reclamation |
| 3 | Antelope Solar Project | Solar | 3.5 GW (DC) | California | NextEra Energy |
| 4 | Alta Wind Farms | Wind | 1.3 GW | California | PacifiCorp & Berkshire Hathaway Energy |
| 5 | Fowler Ridge Wind Farm | Wind | 1.26 GW | Indiana | EDP Renewables |
| 6 | Sapphire Wind Farm | Wind | 1.22 GW | Wyoming | PacifiCorp & Berkshire Hathaway Energy |
| 7 | Coronation Solar Project | Solar | 1.2 GW (AC) | New Mexico | Enel Green Power |
| 8 | Desert Sunlight Solar Farm | Solar | 550 MW (AC) | California | First Solar |
| 9 | Diamond Generating Station (Unit 3) | Natural Gas with Carbon Capture & Storage | 0.53 GW (net) | Oklahoma | NET Power & Fluor Corporation |
| 10 | Topaz Solar Farm | Solar | 550 MW (AC) | California | SunPower & Google |
Notes:
- This list includes both operational and under-construction projects.
- Capacity is measured in either gigawatts (GW) or megawatts (MW). DC (direct current) and AC (alternating current) capacities are specified where relevant.
- “Natural Gas with Carbon Capture & Storage” is still technically considered a fossil fuel source, but included here due to its potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Top 10 Largest Renewable Energy Companies in the United States
The renewable energy sector in the United States is rapidly growing, with many companies playing a significant role in the transition to clean energy.
Here are 10 of the largest renewable energy companies in the US, along with some of their notable projects:
1. NextEra Energy:
- Market Cap: $186.4 billion
- Focus: Wind and solar energy
- Notable projects:
- Wind: Grady County Wind Farm (Texas, 815 MW), Summit Ridge Wind Farm (Iowa, 540 MW)
- Solar: Manatee Solar Energy Center (Florida, 700 MW), Voyager Solar Project (California, 500 MW)
2. Brookfield Renewable Partners:
- Market Cap: $70.6 billion
- Focus: Hydropower, wind, solar, and battery storage
- Notable projects:
- Hydropower: Grand River Hydro Facility (Michigan, 1,000 MW)
- Wind: Jericho Wind Farm (Texas, 213 MW), Shannon Ridge Wind Farm (Iowa, 175 MW)
- Solar: Maricopa Solar Project (California, 400 MW)
3. Ørsted:
- Market Cap: $49.8 billion
- Focus: Offshore wind energy
- Notable projects:
- Offshore wind: Block Island Wind Farm (Rhode Island, 30 MW), Hornsea Project 2 (UK, 1.386 GW)
4. Duke Energy:
- Market Cap: $69.8 billion
- Focus: Diversified energy company with significant renewable energy investments
- Notable projects:
- Solar: Hamilton Solar PV Facility (North Carolina, 80 MW), Buckeye Solar Facility (Arizona, 100 MW)
- Wind: Atlantic Coast Offshore Wind Farm (North Carolina, 2.5 GW)
5. Dominion Energy:
- Market Cap: $60.4 billion
- Focus: Diversified energy company with significant renewable energy investments
- Notable projects:
- Solar: Coastal Virginia Solar Project (Virginia, 170 MW), Mount Sterling Solar Facility (Kentucky, 130 MW)
- Offshore wind: Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind (Virginia, 2.6 GW)
6. Constellation Energy:
- Market Cap: $22.4 billion
- Focus: Regulated utility with investments in renewable energy generation
- Notable projects:
- Solar: Beryl Solar Project (Utah, 200 MW)
- Wind: Wild Horse Solar Facility (Nevada, 500 MW)
7. EDP Renewables North America:
- Market Cap: N/A (subsidiary of EDP Renewables)
- Focus: Wind and solar energy
- Notable projects:
- Wind: Fowler Ridge Wind Farm (Indiana, 600 MW)
- Solar: Agua Caliente Solar Project (Arizona, 290 MW)
8. Invenergy:
- Market Cap: N/A (private company)
- Focus: Wind and solar energy
- Notable projects:
- Wind: Capricorn Ridge Wind Farm (Texas, 460 MW)
- Solar: Mojave Solar Project (California, 500 MW)
9. Apex Clean Energy:
- Market Cap: N/A (private company)
- Focus: Wind and solar energy
- Notable projects:
- Wind: Atlantic Sunrise Wind Farm (Virginia, 600 MW)
- Solar: Blue Mountain Solar Farm (Utah, 130 MW)
10. Avangrid Renewables:
- Market Cap: N/A (subsidiary of Avangrid)
- Focus: Wind and solar energy
- Notable projects:
- Wind: Weaver Wind Project (Wyoming, 243 MW)
- Solar: Castle Solar Project (California, 267 MW)
This list is not exhaustive, and there are many other important renewable energy companies in the United States. However, it provides a good overview of some of the leading players in the industry and their current projects.
Latest Renewable Energy Tech in the US: A Data-Driven Look
The US renewable energy landscape is buzzing with advancements across various sources and storage solutions. Here’s a data-driven snapshot of some key developments:
Solar:
- Perovskite solar cells: Boasting cheaper production and exceeding 25% efficiency (compared to traditional silicon’s 20%), these next-gen cells could revolutionize the industry.
- Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV): This aesthetically pleasing tech integrates solar panels directly into buildings, reducing costs and offering seamless integration.
Wind:
- Offshore wind: Vast untapped resources are propelling large-scale projects, offering stronger and more consistent wind energy.
- Floating wind turbines: Expanding possibilities by allowing deployment in deeper waters, particularly along the West Coast.
Energy storage:
- Long-duration storage: Technologies like flow batteries and compressed air are crucial for integrating renewables into the grid, offering days or even weeks of storage capacity.
- Battery advancements: Continuously decreasing costs and emerging chemistries like lithium-sulfur batteries promise even higher energy storage potential.
Other technologies:
- Geothermal energy: New methods for extracting energy from lower-temperature resources aim to unlock more of this clean and reliable source.
- Hydrogen: Produced from renewables, hydrogen offers storage, electricity generation, and vehicle fuel potential, but cost and infrastructure hurdles remain.
Data highlights:
- In 2022, annual US renewable energy generation surpassed coal for the first time.
- Domestic solar energy is expected to rise by 75% and wind by 11% by 2025.
- The Energy Department invests heavily in driving down the cost of solar energy in America.
These are just a few examples of the dynamic renewable energy landscape in the US. As costs continue to fall and technologies further mature, we can expect even more exciting breakthroughs in the future, paving the way for a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.
Future of Renewable Energy Development in United States
The future of renewable energy development in the United States appears bright, driven by several key factors:
Growing Demand:
- Public and corporate demand for clean energy is surging, fueled by climate change concerns and economic benefits.
- Net-zero targets set by governments and corporations further accelerate the shift towards renewables.
Technological Advancements:
- Continued cost reductions in solar, wind, and other renewables make them increasingly competitive with fossil fuels.
- Innovations in areas like grid integration, energy storage, and emerging technologies like geothermal and hydrogen unlock new possibilities.
Policy and Investment:
- The Biden administration’s ambitious goals and infrastructure investments prioritize renewable energy development.
- States are enacting clean energy mandates and providing incentives, creating a supportive policy environment.
- Continued private sector investment fuels innovation and project development.
Challenges and Opportunities:
- Transmission grid upgrades are crucial to connect renewable energy sources to demand centers.
- Permitting processes and community concerns require streamlining and transparent solutions.
- Ensuring a just transition for workers in the fossil fuel industry is vital for social acceptance.
Potential Future Trajectory:
- Experts predict continued exponential growth in renewable energy capacity, potentially reaching 80% of the US electricity mix by 2050.
- Decentralized renewables like rooftop solar and community microgrids could play a significant role.
- Hybrid energy systems combining renewables with other sources like natural gas may be utilized for grid stability.
- The US has the potential to become a global leader in clean energy technology and export innovation.
Here are some additional data points to consider:
- In 2023, renewable energy accounted for 22% of US electricity generation, with solar and wind leading the way.
- The Energy Information Administration projects renewables to be the fastest-growing source of electricity generation in the coming decades.
- The renewable energy sector already employs millions of Americans, and these numbers are expected to grow significantly.
The future of renewable energy development in the US is promising, with potential for significant economic and environmental benefits. However, overcoming challenges and maximizing opportunities will require continued policy support, technological advancements, and community engagement.
https://www.exaputra.com/2024/02/united-states-renewable-energy-landscape.html
Renewable Energy
The Trump Delusion
As shown here, there are (formerly credible) people who are telling us that Trump is restoring Americans’ trust in government.
Do they truly believe this?
Renewable Energy
When Truth No Longer Matters
One of the casualties of the post-truth era is that the statements of our “leaders” no longer are required to have any basis in fact. What Jim Jordan says here is a fine example.
When he says “better” here, is he referring to runaway inflation? Trump’s purposeless and illegal war with no end in sight? His blatant corruption and criminality? His having, quite successfully, divided the American people into groups that hate each other? The enrichment of billionaires at the expense of the working class? The carefully engineered collapse of the environment so as to favor his donors in fossil fuels? The demise of the U.S. educational system?
Please be clear.
Renewable Energy
CNC Onsite Cuts Repair Costs With Uptower Machining
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

CNC Onsite Cuts Repair Costs With Uptower Machining
Søren Kellenberger, CEO of CNC Onsite, joins to discuss uptower yaw gear repairs, flat tower flanges, and replacing 1,000 blade root bushings across 26 turbines.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Allen Hall 2025: Soren, welcome back to the podcast.
Søren Kellenberger: Thank you, Allen, and, uh, nice doing it, uh, face-to-face- Yes, it’s great … and not as a team, uh, call. Right. That’s
Allen Hall 2025: true. Yeah. You’ve been doing a good bit of traveling, and you’re the new head of CNC Onsite.
Søren Kellenberger: I am, yes.
Allen Hall 2025: So congratulations on that.
Søren Kellenberger: Thank you very much.
Allen Hall 2025: And all the exciting new things that CNC Onsite [00:01:00] is doing, plus all the things you have developed and are now out in the field implementing, the, the list goes on and on and on.
I’m alwa- every time I talk to you, “Oh, we got a new-” Yeah … “machine to do something uptower.” So it’s all uptower, which is the, the beauty of CNC Onsite. You’re thinking about the operator and the cost to pull the blades off and do lifting the cell off and all those things. If we can do it uptower, we can save 30, 40, 50% of the cost of a repair.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: That’s where CNC Onsite is just really killing it. You guys are doing great. Thank
Søren Kellenberger: you. Of course, we like what we do, but, uh, thank you.
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. No, it’s good, it’s good. And, and so w- let’s talk about the things that I know about, and we’ll start there, and then we’ll go to all the new things you’re doing.
So the one that I see a lot of operators asking about is yaw tooth. Yeah.
Søren Kellenberger: Uh,
Allen Hall 2025: deformations, broken teeth on the yaw gear. That’s a big problem. And when I talk to [00:02:00] technicians, and I have them texting me about this, like, “Oh, well, I just weld on the gear back on, weld the tooth back on.” That’s a short-term solution.
That’s not gonna be long-term. The long-term solution is the CNC Onsite. Can you explain what you do to permanently fix these yaw gear problems?
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah. So what we do is actually we start by getting information about the, uh, original yaw ring, so the dimension of the teeth, and we get some load data. And, uh, then we start designing a replacement segment.
Uh, so what we ac- the process is actually that we bring a CNC controlled machine uptower, mount it on the yaw ring, and then we mill away that worn area, uh, creating a small pocket. And then those, uh, segments that we have designed, they are prefabricated. We bring them up and mount them in, in that, uh, pocket and bring the- The yaw ring back to where it’s, you can say, original design, uh, [00:03:00] that way.
Yeah
Allen Hall 2025: It’s better than the original design, ’cause you’re actually putting in better teeth than the, the manufacturer did originally.
Søren Kellenberger: True. Yeah, yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: So that happens, so you’re, you’re machining out those old teeth, broken teeth, putting the new set of teeth in th- and that all bolts in, and that’s it. That’s it.
But the, the difficulty is getting the machinery uptower to do that. That’s where a lot of your, your technology comes from, is getting this very accurate, uh, well-defined machine uptower and doing very controlled grinding and milling. Yes. So can you explain what that system looks like? If I’m gonna grind off those yaw, broken yaw teeth, how big is that kit?
Søren Kellenberger: It… Obviously, it depends a little bit on the turbine size. Sure, okay. Yeah. So, uh, it, so the, the newer five, six, uh, 10 megawatt turbines have larger teeth, so yeah, there you need a, a larger machine.
Allen Hall 2025: Okay.
Søren Kellenberger: But let’s say for, uh, Vestas three megawatt, the, the [00:04:00] complete machine weighs about 250 kilos. That’s it? So yeah.
So it, it comes up in smaller components. We just use, uh, the, the internal crane in, in the nacelle, and, uh, then we can lift the components to the yaw ring, assemble the machine, and then we are basically good to go. So it take, takes less than a day to get everything up and, uh, get set and be ready to, to machine.
Allen Hall 2025: So if you wanna fix a yaw gear problem, how long does it take from start to finish to get that done?
Søren Kellenberger: It typically, it takes one day to get everything up and get ready, and then per six teeth, which is a typical segment, it takes about a day to machine that. Okay. So, uh, let’s say you have, uh, somewhere between 10 and 15 teeth, it’s, uh, two to three segments.
So we do that in a week. Um-
Allen Hall 2025: Wow … and- ‘Cause the alternative is call a crane, have them lifting the cell off.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: Take the yaw gear off, put a yaw gear on, if you can find a yaw gear. Yes. Put the nacelle back on. [00:05:00] Well, and I guess obviously the rotors are coming down too, so- Yeah. You’re talking about- Yes
hundreds of thousands of dollars in downtime. Yeah. It’s a big ordeal. The CNC Onsite method is so much easier.
Søren Kellenberger: We will just put our equipment in the back of our truck- … and then, uh, we’ll, we are ready to mobilize in a few days. So yeah, we can significantly, uh, bring down the downtime and, and as you said, the crane cost is of course extremely high.
And then you can add all the project management. You know, con- do I actually have my access roads, uh, still available? Right. Is the crane pad intact? And all of that stuff you need to organize. You can just forget about that and, uh- And
Allen Hall 2025: get it done …
Søren Kellenberger: get it done. Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah. There’s, there’s a lot of owners, we, everybody knows who the machines are that have the, the, the yaw tooth problem.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: So if you’re one of those owner operators, you better get ahold of CNC Onsite. Now, flanges on tower sections. It’s become a, a really critical issue. You hear a lot of, of [00:06:00] operators, OEMs talking about, “I’m putting together these tower sections and those flanges don’t really meet up quite right.”
Søren Kellenberger: Yep.
Allen Hall 2025: “I’m creating uneven torque patterns, bolt pat- my bolt tightening is not quite right.”
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: And it never really seats right, so you have this mechanical, built-in mechanical problem. CNC Onsite is now fixing that so those flanges are actually really flat. Really flat, yes. ‘Cause that’s what you need.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah. They’re highly loaded.
Søren Kellenberger: If, if you want, uh… If you want your joints to be, uh, basically maintenance free, uh, we can, uh, achieve that with machining the flanges. And then, of course, you need to be in control with your bolt tightening process. Sure. But if you do those two things, you can have maintenance free bolted connections, and there’s so much money to be saved in the operations.
Um, and of course, when you have these bolts that end up fatiguing, some of them don’t get caught in time and you end up ha- having a catastrophic failure on the turbine. Uh- We’ve [00:07:00] seen that … because you have that zipper effect. Once a bolt starts breaking, the neighboring ones take that extra load and it accelerates really quickly.
Uh, yeah. Sure does.
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah. It’s a very serious situation, but it starts with this very simple solution which is just make the flange flat.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah. But I think it’s some… a part of the issue is that those buying the towers aren’t necessarily responsible for the operational cost of maintaining that bolted connection.
So they might save a little bit of money when they buy the tower sections with rougher tolerances, but you will spend the money 10 times in the operations. Uh, and, and that’s, I think that’s where some of the operations, uh, re- the, the, those responsible for operational costs should, uh, get a little bit more CapEx spend, uh- Oh, sure.
Yeah. And, and then, uh, actually save a lot of money and, and reduce risk. Uh, it’s a huge, huge risk
Allen Hall 2025: It’s, it’s one of those lessons learned. You [00:08:00] don’t know that they should be flat. You shouldn’t know… You don’t know your flanges should be flat until you experience the problems, and then you want all your flanges flat from here on out.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: But there’s only one way to do that really, and that’s to call CNC Onsite to come in and to make them flat.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: Because it’s a difficult thing to do. You really need to have the machining prowess and the tight tolerances that CNC Onsite’s gonna deliver in a tool that can actually be adapted to that tower ring and make those surfaces flat.
It’s complicated. Exactly.
Søren Kellenberger: It is. Uh, but that is what we do every day, so, uh- Yes, I’ve noticed … yeah, so
Allen Hall 2025: so- You take on those challenges
Søren Kellenberger: So we are optimizing our machines to be not only fit for one-offs, but actually to go into a manufacturing, uh, process. So we have op- optimized our machines a lot with, uh, automatic alignment and, uh, stuff like that to, to really make that process, uh, easier.
Because it has been considered that when you had to machine a flange, you weren’t in [00:09:00] control with your production, uh, processes. But I think that is, um, a bit of a misinterpretation. It’s, it’s a little bit like saying when I have a casted component, I cannot get a bearing fit, uh, in my cast process. That’s not because your cast process is wrong, there’s just some limitations to what you can do.
Sure. And it’s basically the same here. Yes. And, and if you apply that con- uh, planned machining, you can gain some real benefits, uh, later on and the cost will, of course, drop dra- dramatically if you plan it, rather than call for one, uh, every time you have one that is out of tolerances and, and you can even narrow those tolerances down and get the benefits from maintenance-free bowler connections.
Allen Hall 2025: Right.
Søren Kellenberger: Uh-
Allen Hall 2025: Right, ’cause you’re gonna pay for it for the next 20, 30 years. Yeah. Yeah. That’s absolutely right. Now, you’re getting involved in some of the safety aspects of operating a turbine. Uh, some of the pins and the lockouts on the low-speed gearboxes get a little worn over time, so the hole [00:10:00] you put the pin in gets worn.
There’s a lot of loads on that and- Yeah … it starts to oblong out and eventually, if you’re trying to work on that gearbox, you’re trying to keep that and your technicians safe, which is what you’re doing- Yeah … that lockout pin doesn’t quite fit in the hole and it creates a little bit of a safety risk.
Yeah. So now CNC on-site’s coming in and saying, “Hey, wait a minute. We can realign that, clean that hole up, make that safe again.”
Søren Kellenberger: Yes.
Allen Hall 2025: Explain what that looks like and what that process is to do that.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah. So again, it’s the same thought like with the, with the O-ring, uh, that instead of bringing a component down and trying to fix it, we have designed some machinery we can bring uptower and then make that repair.
So basically what we do is that, that we mill that hole a little bit larger and then we bring a bushing, uh, that we, uh, freeze into that hole- Okay … and to recreate that tight fit again with a, with a locking pin. Uh, so it’s, it’s not that [00:11:00] complicated, but you still need to know, of course, what you are doing.
So finding the center of the original hole is one of the critical things because you want the center of the new ring to be in that same position- Sure … to make sure it fits with the pin
Allen Hall 2025: right. So- Right. You can’t just take a drill up there and try to clean out that hole. No, no. That is not the way to do that
That,
Søren Kellenberger: that
Allen Hall 2025: won’t work. No, no . I’m sure it’s been tried, but- Yeah … no, you wanna have accurate mach- actual, uh, tight tolerance machinery up there to, to align that hole, drill it properly, put that insert back into that spot- Yeah … which is gonna be a hardened insert so it’ll last longer, right?
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah, yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: So once you do that, y- it’s a permanent fix to a otherwise nagging problem.
That’s wonderful.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: So, th- again, that kit just goes right uptower, right up the, the lift, right up the cl- crane- Exactly … and bang, you’re done. Yeah. Okay.
Søren Kellenberger: So all our machines are designed to be able to be lifted with the internal crane-
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah …
Søren Kellenberger: of that specific nacelle.
Allen Hall 2025: Okay.
Søren Kellenberger: So obviously as the cells go bigger, they have more load cap- uh- Me too
load capacity. Yeah. So for the smaller [00:12:00] turbines, the machines come in, in a bit smaller parts- Okay … so that we are sure we stay within that 250 or 500 kilogram or even whatever the limit is of, of that- Yeah, yeah, yeah … crane. And then we can, uh, reassemble everything uptower and still do tolerances within a few hundredths of a millimeter.
And, and I think that is, that is really the core of, of what we do that, that we can achieve those workshop tolerances on site, um-
Allen Hall 2025: It’s crazy when I tell people that. I say, “Well, you know, CNC on-site, they can’t… I mean, those, those tolerances can’t be that tight.” And I say, “No, no, no, no. They’re talking about, you know, fractions of a millimeter,” which in, in American terms means fractions of a mil.
Yeah. That’s 1/1000th of an inch. That’s the tolerance you’re doing.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: Uh, and that means quality at the end of the day. If you can machine things that tight, that means what you’re getting is gonna be right for that job. Yeah. It’s gonna fix that, fix that problem permanently, which is the goal. Yes. Don’t recreate the problem.
Just fix it once and be done. Now, blade root [00:13:00] inserts, huge issue. CNC on-site has been developing tooling to drill out those existing inserts and, and put in new inserts, and you’re having success with that.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: That’s a… it seems like a complicated process, but you have owned that quite well. Talk about what that machinery looks like today, how you’re doing that process, and what have you learned from doing some, uh, field work.
Søren Kellenberger: It’s, uh… we actually, we’ve, we’ve developed two different machines now. Okay. So we, we have, we have one that is, uh, fully CNC controlled, uh, when you need to do a lot of bushings. Yeah. Um, that one takes a bit more, uh, time to set up, but, but, uh, each drilling process is, is really fast. Uh, and then we have developed a semi-automatic machine as well, uh, which is a little bit easier to mount, mounts directly on the blade.
And it’s, uh, really perfect when you only have smaller areas of the, the blade root where you don’t need to replace all bushings- But maybe typically it’s, it’s in the high load [00:14:00] area, which is 15 to 20 bushings maybe. Right. Something like that, right? Yes.
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah.
Søren Kellenberger: So, so there we can just mount it directly on the blade and, and then drill from, uh, from there.
Um, and it works really well. We completed, uh, the first large scale, uh, commercial, uh, project, uh, together with our good friends from, uh, We4C. Uh- Right.
Allen Hall 2025: Yes.
Søren Kellenberger: And, uh, and now we are producing, uh, two more drilling machines- Oh … uh, for, for new upcoming, uh, projects also together with, uh, the guys from, from We4C.
Allen Hall 2025: Wow.
Søren Kellenberger: So now it’s, it’s starting to, uh, to pick up. Um, it’s been a relatively long process, and I guess no one really wants to be the first mover on, uh, on new technology, right? Right. So we’ve had a lot of questions. Oh, that… And that looks interesting, but how many, uh, turbines, uh, or how many blades have you repaired?
And it’s been up until now, well, it’s only tested in the lab. Uh, but now we have the first, uh, large scale commercial, uh, project with, uh, 26, uh, turbines, [00:15:00] uh, repaired and, uh, and 1,000 bushings, uh, that were replaced, uh, across those, uh, 26 turbines. So-
Allen Hall 2025: Wow …
Søren Kellenberger: so I guess that is now large scale. Uh-
Allen Hall 2025: That’s large scale.
Yeah. Yeah. I would consider 1,000 a large scale test. Yeah. Yeah. Yes. And that brings all those turbines back to life.
Søren Kellenberger: Absolutely. They are up running, uh, full power again, so, uh, that is, uh-
Allen Hall 2025: That’s huge …
Søren Kellenberger: really nice.
Allen Hall 2025: For the operator, I’m sure they love that.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah. And, and of course, uh, there’s, there’s been a lot of discussions about blades and, uh, bla- the, the waste, uh, issue you have on, on worn- Oh
out blades. Sure. So by being able to fix them instead of replacing them, not only is the, the cost for fixing a blade a lot lower than buying new ones, uh, but, but also from a, an environmental perspective. The not having to scrap them and create that waste is, uh, is also a nice, uh,
Allen Hall 2025: thing. Yeah, it’s one of the things that pops up more recently about replacing blades, and I think the [00:16:00] industry and the operators are pushing back on that.
Uh, because a lot of times the OEM wants to replace a blade, it’s just easier for them to do.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: But the reality is, is that yeah, you’re creating this additional problem. What are you gonna do with the disposal of this blade? Do we really need to do that? Is it so far gone that I can’t recover it? I think a lot of times, especially with fiberglass blades- Yeah
you can bring them back to life.
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: Just with a little bit of engineering, uh, prowess and some good machinery- Yeah. You can, you can make magic happen, and that’s what CNC OnSite is doing. So that, that’s really amazing that, uh, you’re starting to get more adoption of that on, on the blade root inserts. I know across the United States there’s all kinds of issues, and you’re proving it out.
I think the adoption rate in America and all over is gonna really step up. Now, uh, you always have some cool new project, sort of top secret. What are you working on that the world needs to know about?
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah. W- I mean, we are constantly, uh, [00:17:00]expanding our, our line of services. Uh, so- Sure … so we are just out there trying to listen to what kind of issues do we see in, in the industry-
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah
Søren Kellenberger: and how can that be fixed, uh, uptower. So, so some of the, the latest, uh, innovations we’ve been doing is a, a new machine on, um… to, to do shaft milling. Uh, so that c- that can be on generator shafts, uh, for instance. There are some machines out there, but we’ve decided to go, uh, against CNC control- Okay
because it gives us a lot of, uh, opportunities both on, on speed, uh, of the process. It’s a more safe, uh, way to, uh, to do it.
Allen Hall 2025: Sure.
Søren Kellenberger: And we can actually also do different, uh, shapes on the shaft, so, so we can do more advanced, uh, repairs. Okay. We, we don’t need to stick to a certain diameter all the way. Now we can, we can mo- make grooves, and we can do, uh- Really?
all sort of sorts of stuff, uh- Oh … along that process because it’s CNC controlled.
Allen Hall 2025: Oh, sure. Okay. Um, and- Boy, okay. That makes a lot of sense. So you can actually take a, a, a basic, [00:18:00] basic, basic design of a shaft and make modifications to it- Yeah … to extend the lifetime and make it work better.
Søren Kellenberger: Yes. So typically we would mill down, uh, the shaft and- Sure
install a sleeve- Sure … to recreate a, a bearing fit, for instance.
Allen Hall 2025: Right. Yeah.
Søren Kellenberger: But we have possibilities to, uh, to create, um, grooves or anything that would do a stress relief or whatever you need, lubrication, or if you, if you want to do something, uh, afterwards, we, we can do that with, uh, with our machines.
Uh- Yeah. So yeah, we, we have some new machines for, for hollow shaft, uh, machining, so we can do stuff, uh, inside the main shaft, for instance. We can do stuff on the, the outside, as I mentioned on, on the generator shaft, but that could be on the gearbox as well. So- Sure … sometimes we see issues on the main shaft to, to gearbox, uh, connection.
Allen Hall 2025: Yeah.
Søren Kellenberger: We are able to, to fix, uh, those, uh, things uptower. Wow. And, uh, so yeah, lot of new, uh, stuff being, uh, developed.
Allen Hall 2025: That’s, that’s awesome.
Søren Kellenberger: [00:19:00] Yeah.
Allen Hall 2025: And I, I know you guys are busy, but- If somebody wants to get ahold of CNC Onsite and get work done this year, they better be making phone calls to you- … quickly. So I, I know your order book is filling up and you’re, you’re having to devote crews and machinery and time.
Yeah. How do people get ahold of you and get on that contact list and can start working the process?
Søren Kellenberger: I would say go into, uh, cnconsite.dk and, uh, there we have all our, our contacts. Uh, so just reach out. There’s a, yeah, formula you can, uh, fill in, uh, or you can find our direct contacts in our webpage, and, uh, then we can start looking at it.
So we are quite busy, but we are always- Yeah … open for, uh, discussions and, uh, yeah. That,
Allen Hall 2025: that’s a problem with being successful, is you’re just always busy running around trying to take care of problems, and that’s the thing, is that everybody I talk to that’s used CNC Onsite loves it-
Søren Kellenberger: Yeah …
Allen Hall 2025: and loves the process and loves the work you do.
So there’s gonna be a lot more phone calls and a lot more orders coming your way, and that’s- Yeah … that’s awesome. [00:20:00] Soren- Yeah … it’s so good to see you again and it’s so good to see you in person. Yeah. And congratulations on the promotion and everything that’s happening at CNC Onsite.
Søren Kellenberger: Thank you, Allen. It’s a pleasure.
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测












