The transition to a low-carbon economy is not just a trend—it’s a must. With climate change accelerating, companies are under increasing pressure to reduce their carbon footprints. Major tech companies, such as Meta, Apple, and Netflix, have committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2030, while mining and energy giants like Barrick, Newmont, and ExxonMobil are following suit. For investors, this evolving trend presents a unique opportunity to invest in carbon stocks and support innovative companies focused on carbon reduction and capture.
Why Carbon Stocks Are Gaining Traction in 2025
Carbon stocks are becoming increasingly popular as people and organizations alike strive to meet climate goals. These stocks represent companies that focus on reducing or offsetting carbon emissions. They are drawing attention not only for their environmental benefits but also for their potential financial returns.
With governments and corporations prioritizing carbon reduction technologies and emissions offsets, the market for carbon-related solutions is poised for rapid growth.
In 2025, here are the top five carbon stocks worth keeping on your radar.
1. Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP): A Leader in Clean Energy
Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP) is one of the world’s largest publicly traded renewable energy companies. With a clear focus on clean, renewable energy, BEP distinguishes itself from many of its competitors by operating as a pure-play renewable energy company. This means that its portfolio consists exclusively of renewable sources of power generation, unlike other companies that often combine renewable energy with fossil fuel assets.
Global Portfolio and Capacity
As of 2024, BEP’s diversified portfolio encompasses over 35,000 megawatts of operating capacity across various renewable energy sources:
- Hydroelectric Plants: 229 facilities
- Wind Farms: 105 installations
- Solar Power Plants: 88 sites
- Energy Storage Facilities: 700 megawatts of capacity
This extensive array of assets spans multiple regions, including North America, South America, Europe, and Asia, underscoring BEP’s commitment to global renewable energy development.

Financial Performance, Growth, and Expansion Plans
In the third quarter of 2024, BEP reported Funds From Operations (FFO) of $278 million, equating to $0.42 per unit. This represents an 11% increase compared to the same period in the prior year, highlighting the company’s robust financial health and operational efficiency.
Over the past 5 years, BEP has maintained an average dividend yield of around 5%. Since its inception over two decades ago, it has reached over $109 billion in assets under management globally.
The company is actively pursuing an ambitious growth strategy, with a development pipeline poised to add 11,000 megawatts of capacity. This expansion represents a 46% increase over the current operating capacity, with plans to execute these developments over the next 3 years.
Successful realization of this pipeline could enable the renewable energy company to significantly scale its power generation capabilities. Here’s what BEP’s development and growth plans look like, highlighting its 10.5 GW partnership with Microsoft:

Positioning in the Transition to Clean Energy
As corporations worldwide strive to achieve net-zero carbon emissions, the demand for renewable energy sources is escalating. BEP’s exclusive focus on carbon-free energy positions it as a preferred partner for companies seeking to reduce their carbon footprints.
For investors seeking exposure to the renewable energy sector with a preference for established companies demonstrating stable growth and reliable returns, Brookfield Renewable Partners represents a compelling option.
2. Aker Carbon Capture ASA (AKCCF): Pioneering Carbon Capture Solutions
Aker Carbon Capture (AKCCF) is a Norwegian company specializing in carbon capture technology. Leveraging its expertise from the Aker Group, a global leader in offshore engineering, Aker Carbon Capture has developed modular carbon capture systems that are both cost-effective and scalable.
One of the company’s standout innovations is the “Just Catch” modular carbon capture plant. It is designed to meet the needs of mid-sized industries like cement, biomass, and waste-to-energy. This plant reduces the time and cost typically associated with custom-built carbon capture facilities.
Aker has also developed a proprietary amine solvent, a technology that efficiently captures CO₂ from industrial emissions. This solvent is highly stable, has low degradation rates, and minimizes energy consumption, making it a cost-effective solution for industries looking to reduce their carbon footprint.
The technology has been successfully deployed in real-world projects, such as the CO₂ capture pilot at the Norcem cement plant in Brevik, Norway.
Aker Carbon Capture is also undergoing a joint venture with SLB to form SLB Capturi, which will further accelerate the development of large-scale carbon capture technologies. The carbon capture company partnered with Microsoft last year to capture and store carbon at pulp and paper mills.
Financial Performance, Key Projects, and Outlook
As of the third quarter of 2024, ACC ASA reported a net loss of NOK 47 million. The company maintained a robust financial position with NOK 4.5 billion in cash and an equity standing at NOK 5.5 billion.
ACC ASA is involved in several significant carbon capture projects including:
- Heidelberg Materials Brevik CCS Project (Norway): Captures 400,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually.
- Ørsted’s BECCS Project (Denmark): Deploying five Just Catch units to capture up to 500,000 tonnes of CO₂.
- Twence Project (Netherlands): Captures 100,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually for use in local agriculture.
With a solid financial foundation and strategic partnerships, ACC ASA is well-positioned to expand its carbon capture solutions globally. The aim is to contribute significantly to the reduction of industrial CO₂ emissions and support the transition to a low-carbon economy.
3. LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA): Turning Emissions into Valuable Products
LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA) is a pioneering carbon recycling company that transforms waste carbon emissions into sustainable fuels and chemicals through innovative biotechnology using gas fermentation. Through this process, industrial emissions—rich in carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide—are converted into ethanol and other chemicals.

The company uses proprietary microbes engineered to thrive in industrial gas streams, such as those found in steel mills and refineries. These microbes consume waste gases, turning them into useful products.
The ethanol produced can serve as a building block for various products, including jet fuel, plastics, and synthetic fibers.
Financial Performance and Strategic Development
In the third quarter of 2024, LanzaTech reported revenue of $9.9 million, a decrease from $17.4 million in the second quarter and $19.6 million in the third quarter of 2023. This decline was primarily due to a timing delay in a LanzaJet sublicensing event, which was expected to generate about $8.0 million in licensing revenue.
LanzaTech has been actively expanding its technological capabilities and market reach:
- CirculAir Initiative: In June 2024, LanzaTech and its subsidiary LanzaJet introduced CirculAir, a commercially viable solution designed to convert waste carbon and renewable power into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).
- Project Drake: LanzaTech advanced Project Drake, a 30-million-gallon sustainable aviation fuel project, furthering its commitment to large-scale SAF production.
Key Projects and Partnerships
The carbon recycling company has engaged in several significant projects and collaborations, including:
- Technip Energies Collaboration: Received U.S. Department of Energy funding to commercialize CO₂-to-ethylene technology.
- Eramet Partnership: Developing a Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) project in Norway.
- LanzaJet Initiative: Introducing CirculAir, a technology to produce sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).
Additionally, LanzaTech is developing a novel biocatalyst to directly convert CO₂ to ethanol at 100% carbon efficiency, leveraging affordable, renewable hydrogen. This transformative technology aims to produce biofuels and feedstocks for valuable products using carbon-free renewable energy, water, and CO₂.
With a solid financial foundation bolstered by recent capital raises and strategic partnerships, LanzaTech is well-positioned to expand its carbon recycling solutions globally, creating sustainable products from waste carbon.
4. Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY): Carbon Capture with Enhanced Oil Recovery
Occidental Petroleum (OXY) is a major player in the oil and gas industry. However, in recent years, the company has been transforming itself into a leader in carbon management solutions.
Occidental has embraced Direct Air Capture (DAC) technology, which removes CO₂ directly from the atmosphere. In partnership with Carbon Engineering, Occidental is constructing the world’s largest DAC facility in Texas, a groundbreaking project that will play a significant role in achieving global emission reduction targets.

Financial Performance
In the third quarter of 2024, Occidental reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $964 million, or $0.98 per diluted share. The company has scheduled the announcement of its fourth-quarter 2024 financial results for February 18, 2025.
Carbon Capture Initiatives
Occidental is actively investing in DAC technology through its subsidiary, 1PointFive. The company’s flagship DAC facility, named STRATOS, is under construction in the Permian Basin.
STRATOS is designed to extract 500,000 metric tons of atmospheric CO₂ annually, laying the foundation for commercial-scale DAC deployment. The facility will begin operations in the summer of 2025, with live power anticipated to come online in December 2024.
- RELATED: Are Direct Air Capture Plants Facing Massive Clean Energy Challenge in the U.S.? A S&P Global Report
Occidental plans to integrate the captured CO₂ into enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes, injecting the CO₂ into aging oil fields to extract additional oil while effectively sequestering the CO₂ underground.
This approach creates a closed-loop system that both boosts oil production and reduces atmospheric carbon.
Additionally, Occidental is developing a project to transport and store CO₂ captured from Velocys’ planned Bayou Fuels biomass-to-fuels project in Natchez, Mississippi, in secure geologic formations.
The Bayou Fuels project converts waste woody biomass into transportation fuels, and applying CO₂ capture and storage can make the facility a net-negative carbon dioxide emitter.
Occidental’s approach is an example of how traditional energy companies are evolving to embrace sustainability. By combining its existing expertise in oil extraction with innovative carbon capture methods, Occidental is paving the way for a future where fossil fuel extraction can coexist with carbon reduction technologies.
5. Equinor ASA (EQNR): Leading the Way in Carbon Storage and Capture
Equinor, formerly known as Statoil, is a Norwegian energy giant that has diversified its portfolio to include renewable energy sources like wind power. It has also been at the forefront of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies for over 25 years.
Their extensive experience includes operating the world’s first dedicated CO₂ storage site at the Sleipner field since 1996 and the Snøhvit field since 2008. The image from the company’s presentation below shows its overall performance in the latest report.

Moreover, Equinor is a key player in the Northern Lights project, a pioneering initiative in Norway aimed at developing a large-scale CCS infrastructure.
The Northern Lights project focuses on capturing CO₂ from industrial sources, transporting it via ships, and securely storing it beneath the North Sea seabed. This project is a crucial step in addressing the complexities of CCS, and Equinor is positioning itself as a facilitator of this transformative technology.
What makes the Northern Lights project particularly noteworthy is its open-source infrastructure. It allows other companies to use the storage facilities. This collaborative model could accelerate the widespread adoption of CCS technology across Europe and beyond.

Financial Performance
Other Key Projects and Developments
- Bayou Bend CCS Project: Equinor has acquired a 25% interest in Bayou Bend CCS LLC, positioning it to be one of the largest carbon capture and storage projects in the United States.
- UK Carbon Storage Initiatives: Equinor, in collaboration with BP and TotalEnergies, has secured investment into Britain’s carbon capture projects, directly supporting 2,000 jobs in the northeast of England.
Strategic Partnerships, Technological Innovations, and Outlook
Equinor has signed an agreement with French gas grid operator GRTgaz to develop a CO₂ transport system that will carry captured CO₂ from French industrial emitters to offshore storage sites in Norway.
The Norwegian energy giant operates the Technology Centre Mongstad, the world’s largest and most flexible plant for testing and improving CO₂ capture technologies. This facility plays a crucial role in advancing CCUS solutions to decarbonize industries and the energy system.
In December 2024, Equinor secured over $3 billion in financing for its Empire Wind 1 offshore project in the U.S. Scheduled to become fully operational by 2027, the project will deliver clean energy to 500,000 New York homes, advancing the company’s renewable energy ambitions.
- READ MORE: Equinor’s $3B Financing Deal for Empire Wind 1 Project: A Turning Point for U.S. Offshore Wind?
Equinor has decades of experience in offshore oil and gas exploration, and its deep-rooted knowledge of energy infrastructure is key to its success in developing large-scale CCS solutions. With the potential to store the equivalent of 1,000 years of Norwegian CO₂ emissions beneath the seabed, Equinor’s initiatives are pivotal in supporting global climate goals.
Conclusion: The Future of Carbon Stocks
As more companies declare their commitment to net-zero goals and seek innovative solutions to reduce carbon emissions, carbon stocks are becoming attractive to investors. The top carbon stocks or companies mentioned in this article—Brookfield Renewable Partners, Aker Carbon Capture, LanzaTech, Occidental Petroleum, and Equinor—are leading the charge in decarbonizing industries and creating sustainable solutions for a carbon-constrained world.
By investing in these carbon stocks, investors not only support the transition to a cleaner, more sustainable future but also position themselves to benefit from the growth of the green economy.
As we move closer to 2030 and beyond, carbon stocks will become an increasingly important part of investment portfolios aiming to align financial returns with environmental impact.
The post Top 5 Carbon Stocks to Watch in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy10 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

