Rolls-Royce reported a 50% jump in underlying operating profit to £1.7 billion in the first half of 2025. The operating margin rose to 19.1%, up from 14% last year. This increase shows the effect of strategic changes, smarter operations, and cost discipline.
- Revenue grew by 10.8% to £9.06 billion and free cash flow hit £1.58 billion, driven by higher profits and solid performance from long-term service agreements (LTSA).
- Its market value topped £90 billion for the first time, placing it among the top five firms in the FTSE 100.

CEO Tufan Erginbilgic, said:
“Our multi-year transformation continues to deliver. Our actions led to strong first half year results, despite the challenges of the supply chain and tariffs. We are continuing to expand the earnings and cash potential of Rolls-Royce.
We delivered continued strong operational and strategic progress in the first half of 2025. In Civil Aerospace, we achieved significant time on wing milestones and delivered improved aftermarket profitability. In Power Systems, where we now see further growth potential, we continued to capture profitable growth across data centres and governmental. In addition, Rolls-Royce SMR was selected as the sole provider of the UK’s first small modular reactor programme. We expect Rolls-Royce SMR to be profitable and free cash flow positive by 2030.”
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RYCEY) Stock Performance
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has seen a strong comeback in 2025, following record profits. On July 31, Rolls-Royce reported a significant beat on its first-half operating profit and free cash flow, raising full-year forecasts. The company posted a 50% jump in operating profit to £1.7 billion and increased its guidance for 2025 operating profit to between £3.1 billion and £3.2 billion (up from a prior range of £2.7–£2.9 billion), and free cash flow to £3.0–£3.1 billion.
This strong performance was driven by:
- Substantial improvements in its civil aerospace business, with higher utilization and engine flying hours surpassing pre-pandemic levels.
- Growing power systems sales to data centers and government contracts.
- Robust order intake, particularly for large aircraft engines.
- Successful delivery on turnaround strategies set by the CEO, including enhanced profitability and margin expansion across divisions.
The jump reflected renewed investor confidence and belief that the company can sustain this growth trajectory. The day’s gain of about 10% made Rolls-Royce one of the top performers in major European indices and resulted in record share prices.

Analysts have praised the results. Shore Capital called them “excellent,” noting strong margins in Civil Aerospace. Morgan Stanley mentioned that the company’s guidance might be conservative, given the current momentum.
The firm also pleased investors by announcing an interim dividend of 4.5p per share, payable in September. Additionally, it completed £400 million of its planned £1 billion share buyback, boosting shareholder confidence.
The company raised its full-year forecast, now expecting £3.1 billion to £3.2 billion in profit and £3.0 billion to £3.1 billion in free cash flow.

SMRs Set to Power Rolls-Royce’s Nuclear Ambitions
The company’s clean energy vision centers on its Small Modular Reactor (SMR) program. It is making great progress and aims to be a global leader in SMRs.
Key SMR Developments:
-
UK Government Deal: Rolls-Royce was selected by Great British Energy – Nuclear as the preferred bidder to develop Britain’s first SMRs, supported by £2.5 billion in public funding.
-
Czech Republic Partnership: A partnership with ČEZ Group aims to deploy up to 3GW of clean energy in the Czech Republic, with more opportunities in Central Europe.
-
Growing Nuclear Ties: The UK and Hungary are deepening cooperation, potentially opening more SMR opportunities.
-
Technology Backing: Siemens Energy will supply steam turbines and generators, while Westinghouse is developing nuclear fuel for Rolls-Royce SMRs.
These collaborations enhance technical capabilities, lower costs, and support global SMR deployment.
Research and Supply Chain Push
Rolls-Royce is teaming up with the University of Sheffield’s AMRC. They aim to enhance modular manufacturing methods. This partnership will speed up production and lower costs for SMR.
As a member of the European Industrial Alliance on SMRs, Rolls-Royce collaborates with governments and industry to boost energy security and expand nuclear energy across Europe.
The company plans to form new utility partnerships in Asia and North America. It also aims to expand its supply chain with local engineering partners. There’s potential to link SMRs with energy storage and hydrogen. This could position them as a clean energy backbone for the future.
Rolls-Royce Aims Net Zero by 2050: Real Progress, Not Offsets
Rolls-Royce has made climate leadership a priority. It aims for net zero by 2050, not just in its operations but also across its products.
The company avoids relying on carbon offsets. Instead, it focuses on cutting emissions through innovation, efficient operations, and renewable fuels.
Here’s how it is cutting Scope 1 and 2 emissions from its operations:
It targets a 46% emissions cut by 2030, based on 2019 levels. The goal is to reach net zero emissions from its operations by 2050. This includes emissions from engine testing, which have increased due to higher development activity.

The company plans to use sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) in tests. They are shifting to clean power sources and installing batteries in locations like Friedrichshafen. Additionally, they are also buying renewable energy and focusing on efficiency improvements.
- In 2024, total Scope 1 and 2 emissions increased to 301 ktCO2e. This rise includes a 55 ktCO2e jump in test-related emissions.
- However, operational emissions dropped by 5 ktCO2e, a 3% decrease, which indicates progress.

Scope 3 Focus: Tackling Value Chain Emissions
Beyond direct emissions, Rolls-Royce is addressing Scope 3 emissions—especially from the use of its products (category 11) and purchased goods and services (category 1). These are major sources, with purchased goods accounting for 2.18 MtCO2e in 2024, around 2.5% of total emissions.
It is working with suppliers to set net zero targets, partnering with logistics firms for low-emission transport, and promoting resource efficiency to reduce waste.

Innovation for Cleaner Products
Rolls-Royce is investing significantly in future-ready, low-carbon products. They aim to ramp up their R&D spending on net-zero technologies by 75% this year.
Notable milestones include the UltraFan engine, a next-gen demonstrator with high fuel efficiency and SAF compatibility. All current in-production aero engines are certified to run on 100% sustainable aviation fuel. The company’s SMR projects aim to deliver scalable, clean electricity to national grids.
These projects are vital for its net-zero strategy and essential for decarbonizing the heavy industry and global aviation sectors.
All in all, Rolls-Royce demonstrates that climate action and financial growth can be mutually beneficial. From record profits to world-class clean tech investments, Rolls-Royce exemplifies how legacy companies can become climate leaders even without carbon credits. This approach helps create a responsible and profitable future.
- FURTHER READING: UK Bets on Rolls-Royce for Its First Small Modular Nuclear Reactors With £2.5B Pledge
The post Rolls-Royce Stock Soars with 50% Profit Surge, Strong SMR Partnerships, and Net Zero Drive appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

