PowerBank Corporation and Orbit AI are preparing to launch a new project that aims to bring AI computing, communication systems, and blockchain verification into space. The companies plan to build the “Orbital Cloud“, a network of satellites. They can send data, run AI programs, and verify digital transactions while circling the Earth. Their first satellite, DeStarlink Genesis-1, is expected to launch in December 2025.
The project combines renewable energy, satellite networks, and advanced computing. It also reflects PowerBank’s move from traditional solar projects into digital infrastructure.
Dr. Richard Lu, CEO of PowerBank, said:
“The next frontier of human innovation isn’t just in space exploration — it’s in building the infrastructure of tomorrow above the Earth. The combined markets for orbital satellites, in-orbit data centers, blockchain verification, and solar-powered digital infrastructure are projected to exceed $700 billion over the next decade. By integrating solar energy with orbital computing, PowerBank is helping create a globally sovereign, AI-enabled digital layer in space — a system that can help power finance, communications, and critical infrastructure.”
Orbit AI will supply satellite technology and computing systems. PowerBank will provide solar energy and thermal control solutions that will allow the satellites to operate in space.
A New Type of Digital Infrastructure in Space
The Orbital Cloud brings together two main systems developed by Orbit AI. The first is DeStarlink, a decentralized network of satellites. Like current global internet constellations, it avoids relying on one operator or nation. The second is DeStarAI, a group of orbital AI data centers that use high-performance hardware to process data in low Earth orbit.
Orbit AI plans to combine these systems into one connected layer. This layer will allow satellites to store data, run AI models, and send information globally. It also verifies blockchain transactions.
The satellites work in space, so they don’t face typical limits found on Earth. They avoid issues like cooling needs, power shortages, and local regulations.
PowerBank plans to support this system by supplying solar arrays and cooling control technologies. These systems aim to power the satellites and help them manage the extreme temperatures in space. The company sees this as part of its move into digital assets and data centers, where solar energy helps meet the growing demand for AI and cloud computing.
How the Orbital Cloud Works
The Orbital Cloud works by placing computing hardware, communication tools, and blockchain systems together on satellites. These satellites move in low Earth orbit, which allows them to send data with low delay and maintain constant coverage.
The system uses solar panels to power the AI computers on board. Space offers steady sunlight, which allows continuous energy generation. Because there is no atmosphere in orbit, the satellites can also release heat more easily, which helps the computers stay cool. This reduces the need for complex cooling buildings or large data center facilities on Earth.
Genesis-1, the first test satellite, will include an Ethereum wallet and a blockchain node. This means it can verify transactions from orbit. It will also carry an initial AI payload that can run basic inference tasks. As more satellites launch, they will connect and form a larger network.
As the system expands, Orbit AI will let users send data, run AI programs, or request blockchain verification via the Orbital Cloud. PowerBank and Orbit AI expect this system to support industries such as finance, communication, defense, and digital identity systems.
Why Orbital Computing Is Becoming a Multi-Billion-Dollar Market
Several fast-growing sectors support the idea behind the Orbital Cloud. The companies point to forecasts showing strong growth in satellite technology, space-based data services, AI computing, and renewable energy infrastructure. Together, these sectors may form a market worth more than US$700 billion over the next decade.
Industry research highlights several key trends:
-
Orbital infrastructure is expected to grow from US$13.5 billion in 2024 to US$21.3 billion by 2029.
-
The global satellite market may reach US$615 billion by 2032.
-
In-orbit data centers may expand from US$1.77 billion in 2029 to US$39.1 billion by 2035.
-
Satellite data services may grow from about US$12 billion in 2024 to more than US$55 billion by 2034.

These markets grow due to rising demand for AI processing. Digital sovereignty also needs to drive them. Plus, the use of blockchain systems is on the rise. More countries and companies want secure, independent digital networks, but terrestrial infrastructure can’t keep up. So, space-based systems could become more important.
Moreover, orbital data centers avoid land, water, and grid constraints while accessing uninterrupted solar energy and natural radiative cooling. Companies like Axiom Space, Starcloud, Google, and ADA Space are also into this. These trends reinforce the commercial potential behind PowerBank and Orbit AI’s orbital ambitions.
PowerBank’s leadership sees this shift as an opportunity to combine solar infrastructure with the next wave of digital systems. Orbit AI’s leadership describes the Orbital Cloud as a way to build an autonomous digital layer that does not depend on Earth-based networks. Both companies view the partnership as a step toward long-term commercial growth in space technology.
The Hardware Stack Powering the Orbital Cloud
The project plans to use hardware and technologies from several global leaders. Orbit AI and PowerBank intend to work with companies that provide GPUs, satellite materials, launch systems, and blockchain tools. These parts work together to create the computing, communication, and verification functions of the Orbital Cloud.
The planned major contributors are:
-
NVIDIA for AI hardware.
-
Ethereum Foundation for blockchain frameworks.
-
Galaxy Space for satellite components.
-
Galactic Energy for launch technologies.
-
SparkX Satellite for building the Genesis-1 satellite.
-
AscendX Aerospace for materials for future satellite structures.
NVIDIA was chosen for its expertise in AI hardware, as shown by its record-breaking earnings on November 19, 2025: $57 billion in quarterly revenue, driven by demand for its accelerators and new Blackwell GPUs. This technology surge confirms NVIDIA’s central role in powering next-generation AI networks both on Earth and in space – supporting projects like the Orbital Cloud as industries rapidly pivot to scalable, climate-resilient infrastructure.
These partners support different stages of the project. Some focus on computing power while others provide communications gear. Some contribute launch vehicles or satellite parts. This approach allows PowerBank and Orbit AI to blend proven technologies in their orbital system. They don’t have to build every part from scratch.
Because of this, the project uses high-performance hardware and well-tested satellite structures. This reduces risk during early launches and also allows companies to focus on scaling the system after the first satellites work well.
Funding Roadmap and Key Launch Targets
PowerBank plans to begin its involvement with an initial US$50,000 investment in Orbit AI. The company also aims to invest up to US$10 million. In return, it can get an equity stake of 2% to 20%, depending on the final terms and how well the Genesis-1 launch performs.
Both companies have outlined a development timeline that runs from 2025 to 2030. The key steps are:
-
Launch Genesis-1 in late 2025.
-
Deploy more satellites in 2026.
-
Build a complete constellation by 2027 and 2028.
From 2028 to 2030, the companies plan to introduce autonomous network operations, where satellites can coordinate, compute, and verify on their own without heavy ground control.
If these milestones succeed, the Orbital Cloud could be one of the first large-scale orbital computing systems. It could also influence how countries, companies, and developers design digital services in the future.
The post PowerBank and Orbit AI to Launch the First Orbital Cloud for Space-Based Digital Network appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

