Nvidia reported strong results for the third quarter of its fiscal year ending October 26, 2025. The company posted $57 billion in revenue, which increased 22% from the previous quarter and 62% from the same period last year. The numbers show that demand for Nvidia’s chips and systems remains high, especially in artificial intelligence and data center markets.
Q3 Performance: High Revenue and Steady Profit Margins
The Data Center segment led the quarter again with $51.2 billion in revenue. This segment grew 25% from the previous quarter and 66% from a year earlier. Growth comes from ongoing orders by cloud companies, enterprise clients, and research institutions. They use Nvidia’s platforms to train and run AI models.

Profitability also stayed strong. Nvidia reported a 73.4% GAAP gross margin, up slightly from the previous quarter. Its non-GAAP gross margin was 73.6%. These margins show the company continues to benefit from strong pricing power and high demand for advanced AI hardware.
Net income reached $31.9 billion, rising 21% from the previous quarter and 65% from the year before. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) came in at $1.30 on both a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. Operating income also remained high at $36 billion, showing that Nvidia is managing its expenses while growing its revenue.

Cash generation continued to strengthen. Free cash flow was about $22.1 billion, which increased by 32% from last year. Nvidia also returned $37 billion to shareholders in the first nine months of fiscal 2026 through buybacks and dividends. The company still has more than $62 billion available under its current buyback authorization.
Overall, the financial results show that Nvidia is still growing at a fast pace, even as its growth rate begins to stabilize. The results also provide a strong base as the company expands into new areas, such as infrastructure and energy-efficient computing.
After the earnings release, Nvidia’s stock rose about 3% in after-hours trading. This came after stronger-than-expected revenue and earnings.

Q4 Forecast and Short-Term Trends
Nvidia expects another strong quarter ahead. For Q4 fiscal 2026, the company forecasts revenue of around $65 billion, plus or minus 2%. It also expects gross margins to improve slightly, reaching about 75% on a non-GAAP basis. Operating expenses are set to rise as the company invests in research and in new product development cycles.
The outlook suggests that Nvidia believes demand will remain strong in the near term. At the same time, the company faces new challenges. Growth is still high, but it is no longer rising at the extreme levels of earlier years.
Nvidia will focus more on expanding its infrastructure. They aim to boost efficiency and manage long-term costs. These trends set the stage for the company’s latest major initiative.
A Major Strategic Turn: The $100 Billion AI Deal with Brookfield
Nvidia just announced a big partnership with Brookfield Asset Management, a leading asset management company. They plan to create an AI infrastructure program worth up to $100 billion. This move marks a shift in Nvidia’s strategy.
The chipmaker will shift from just selling chips and systems. Now, it will help build a complete infrastructure for AI growth. The program will include investments in land, power, data centers, and advanced computing systems.
Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia, stated:
“AI is transforming every industry, and like electricity, it will require every nation to build the infrastructure to power it. AI infrastructure demands land, power, and purpose-built supercomputers—and our partnership with Brookfield brings all of these elements together in a ready-to-deploy AI cloud.”
Brookfield brings experience in infrastructure, real estate, and energy. Nvidia brings the technology and the hardware that run modern AI models. Together, they aim to support global demand for AI computing, which continues to rise sharply.

This partnership shows that Nvidia is expanding beyond its traditional role as a chip designer. The company wants to be part of designing and building the physical foundations that AI depends on. This includes everything from cooling systems to energy supply.
The move could help Nvidia secure long-term revenue streams and reduce the bottlenecks that come from limited infrastructure capacity.
Powering AI Responsibly: Energy Use and Emissions
As Nvidia steps deeper into infrastructure, the environmental impact of AI computing becomes more important. Data centers and high-performance computing systems use large amounts of electricity. They also demand advanced cooling systems and steady grid capacity.
The company has acknowledged these challenges and increased its sustainability efforts across its operations, supply chain, and product designs.
A key part of Nvidia’s environmental strategy is its use of clean electricity. The company reports that it achieved 100% renewable electricity for its offices and data centers under its operational control. This shift reduces its Scope 1 and 2 emissions and lowers the carbon footprint of its own operations.

- The GPU king has set science-based targets to reduce emissions. They want to limit global warming to 1.5°C. The goal is to cut Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 50% by FY 2030, using FY 2023 as the baseline.
For its products, Nvidia aims to cut emissions intensity during customer use by 75% per petaflop of computing power by 2030. This target matters because most of Nvidia’s emissions come from how its products are used, not how they are manufactured.
A big part of Nvidia’s total emissions comes from its suppliers, also known as Scope 3 emissions. They occur during the production of components.

Nvidia is also engaging its supply chain. The company reports that it has engaged suppliers responsible for more than 80% of its upstream emissions. It encourages these suppliers to set their own science-based targets.
The Blackwell GPU and Beyond
Energy efficiency is another focus area. Nvidia’s newer systems deliver much better performance for every unit of power used. Some platforms show 50% to 99% lower energy use per unit of compute compared to older systems.
The Blackwell GPU platform is very energy-efficient. It’s built to manage large AI workloads and cut down on power use.
Despite these efforts, Nvidia still faces challenges. Its total emissions rose in recent years because demand for its products grew so quickly. Scope 3 emissions make up the biggest part of its footprint. Reducing them will require long-term efforts with suppliers and customers.
As Nvidia grows its infrastructure role, it must also create facilities that use clean electricity. Efficient cooling systems will help keep its environmental impact aligned with its goals.
Balancing Growth, Infrastructure, and Sustainability
Nvidia’s Q3 results show a company that remains strong financially and continues to grow at a fast pace. The new partnership with Brookfield shows that Nvidia is preparing for the next phase of AI growth by investing in global infrastructure.
At the same time, the company is working to reduce emissions, improve energy efficiency, and manage its environmental impact as its influence expands. The coming years will test how well Nvidia balances these goals.
Strong finances give the company momentum. Large-scale projects bring long timelines. Sustainability efforts will become more important as AI’s energy use grows worldwide. Nvidia’s long-term progress will depend on how effectively it brings the strategies together.
The post Nvidia’s (NVDA) Stock Rose on Q3 Strong Results: $57B Revenue, $100B AI Infrastructure Plan appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

