Verde AgriTech, a company based in Brazil, has entered into an exclusive partnership with UNDO Carbon Ltd., a UK-based firm. Under this agreement, they will work together to create carbon removal credits. These credits will come from a process called Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW), using a special mineral that Verde mines in Brazil.
This deal marks Verde’s first major step into the carbon credit market. Both companies believe their combined strengths can lead to large-scale removal of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere.
What Is Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW)?
ERW is a method to capture CO₂ using natural minerals. The idea is to spread crushed rock, rich in silicate minerals, over farmland. When rain and soil interact with this rock, a natural chemical reaction pulls CO₂ from the air. Over time, that CO₂ becomes part of new, stable minerals — basically locking it in the ground.
UNDO specializes in this technique. They have developed systems to measure how much carbon is removed. They also know how to verify and package these removals into credits that companies can buy.
- RELATED: Microsoft and UNDO Partner for 15,000 Tons of Carbon Removal Using Enhanced Rock Weathering!
Scaling Carbon Removal Together
The partnership allows Verde to expand beyond fertilizers and minerals by selling carbon removal credits. Verde brings a large supply of glauconitic siltstone, mining operations, field-application capacity across Brazil, and local expertise in soil, agriculture, and mineral processing.
In effect, UNDO gains reliable access to mineral feedstock and a strong local partner, essential for scaling ERW projects. Verde’s facilities can handle, crush, and spread the rock, supported by its logistics and soil sampling experience.
UNDO will handle the measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) of CO₂ removed from the atmosphere. Their platform uses proprietary (patent‑pending) protocols to ensure the credits are real and permanent.
- Together, they aim to remove hundreds of thousands of tonnes of CO₂, with each tonne of rock capturing 70–120 kilograms depending on conditions.
Verde’s mineral reserves, in the hundreds of millions of tonnes, give the partnership long-term capacity to meet these goals.
The deal also offers a new revenue stream for the agritech company and high-quality credits verified through strict MRV, aligning with standards such as Verra, Gold Standard, and Puro.earth.
Cristiano Veloso, Founder and CEO, Verde, said:
“By combining our glauconitic siltstone products and established operations in Brazil with UNDO’s award-winning expertise in measurement, reporting, and verification, we aim to originate and deliver durable, high-quality carbon removal credits aligned with global best practices, including leading Enhanced Rock Weathering methodologies .”
The warrant system further aligns interests: UNDO benefits only when credits are sold, while Verde shares in future growth. With these combined strengths, the partnership could scale ERW locally and globally, providing credible, durable carbon removal.
Turning CO₂ Into Credible Carbon Credits
Verde and UNDO plan to sell the carbon removal credits to companies that want to offset their emissions. These credits are expected to be durable — meaning the CO₂ will stay locked away for a very long time.
The voluntary carbon market has grown steadily in recent years. Industry estimates show it reached around $2 billion in annual transactions. Projections suggest that it could rise to over $40 billion by 2030 as companies demand more high-quality carbon removal. This growth provides a strong commercial foundation for Verde and UNDO as they prepare to bring ERW credits to market.
Meanwhile, estimates show the global carbon market will rise sharply by 2030.

To align incentives, Verde is granting UNDO up to 1.7 million share purchase warrants. These warrants will vest (or become usable) based on future sales of carbon credits.
Here is how the warrant structure works:
- Initial warrants: 100,000 options, tied to credit sales at a high price per ton of CO₂.
- Additional warrants: 1,000,000, tied to more credit sales at slightly lower prices.
- Success-based warrants: 600,000, tied to further future sales if targets are met.
Verde’s Long Road to Carbon Market Leadership
Verde’s entry into carbon credits is not instant. In 2023, the company announced plans to enter the market. It highlighted the potential of its silicate rock for ERW to capture a lot of CO₂.
Based on its mineral reserves and processing capacity, Verde estimates it can produce up to 300,000 tonnes of carbon removal credits annually. This shows that carbon removal is a long-term strategic focus, not a side project.
To prepare, Verde explored partnerships that could strengthen its expertise in carbon markets. Verde teamed up early with WayCarbon, a well-known carbon project developer. They looked into how Verde’s minerals could help remove carbon and generate revenue.
WayCarbon guided Verde on project design, verification paths, and market demand. This helped Verde grasp what’s needed for high-quality, credible carbon credits.
These steps helped Verde gain experience in science, market trends, and regulations. This groundwork paved the way for bigger deals, like its current partnership with UNDO.
Studies in journals like Nature and PNAS back ERW’s effectiveness. They show that finely crushed silicate rock can capture CO₂ in months to years.
The carbon stays stored in mineral form for tens of thousands to millions of years. This validates Verde’s confidence in its mineral reserves as a tool for long-term climate mitigation.
ERW in Action: Impact on Emissions and Agriculture
This deal is part of a larger trend in the climate field: companies are looking for durable, scalable ways to remove CO₂. Enhanced Rock Weathering is one such method. When done right, it can store carbon for very long periods.
Brazil emits roughly 2.4 to 2.7 billion tonnes of CO₂-equivalent each year, depending on land-use trends. Agriculture accounts for about one-quarter of national emissions. Because ERW is deployed directly on farmland, it offers a pathway to reduce or offset part of this sector’s footprint while improving soil conditions.
Partnerships like this one help make carbon removal more real and credible. They mix scientific innovation (UNDO’s MRV systems) with physical capacity (Verde’s mineral operations). This could attract more buyers who want serious, long-term climate solutions.
However, scaling ERW also comes with challenges. Large-scale rock crushing and distribution can increase operational costs, and long-term monitoring requires specialized scientific methods.
Regulatory clarity for ERW credits is still developing in many markets, and some buyers remain cautious as they compare different carbon removal approaches. These factors may influence how quickly Verde and UNDO can expand their projects.
Blueprint for Scalable, Durable Carbon Removal
Verde AgriTech’s exclusive partnership with UNDO Carbon is a major step for both companies. Verde gains a new source of income. UNDO secures a reliable supply of mineral feedstock for its ERW work. Together, they hope to produce high-quality, durable carbon credits from Brazil.
If they succeed, they could remove hundreds of thousands of tonnes of CO₂ while building a scalable model for future carbon removal. Their partnership could become a blueprint for how mining and climate technology firms work together to fight climate change — not just in Brazil, but around the world.
The post Verde AgriTech and UNDO Carbon Partner to Scale Enhanced Rock Weathering appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

