This op-ed, written by SACE Senior Decarbonization Manager Shelley Robins & Dr. Crystal Cavalier, originally appeared in the Greensboro News & Record on December 22, 2024.
Pipeline Company Misleads the Public for Profit and Fossil Fuels
When a Texas company gets its employee in Pennsylvania to write to our local newspaper about the weather we just experienced, you have to wonder why.
Williams Transco already owns more than 33,000 miles of pipelines in the country, but they are trying to ram through an unneeded massive expansion called the Southeast Supply Enhancement Project (SSEP) in our area. What they won’t tell you is that their projects keep getting scrapped because communities don’t want them: like the Northeast Supply Enhancement Project and Regional Energy Access Expansion.
Maybe it’s because they have one of the worst safety records in the country. According to the watchdog Pipeline Safety Trust, Williams is worse than other gas transmission operators in fatalities, cost and releases per incident.
Or it could be that, while they greenwash their image, they fail to mention recent winter blackouts in Texas and North Carolina were caused by freezing temperatures that shut down gas wells and caused the failure of mechanical components at gas-fired power plants — not by inadequate pipeline capacity.
For example, the Natural Resources Defense Council noted that “during Winter Storm Elliott in December 2022, 65 percent of gas plant outages in the region managed by PJM (the regional transmission organization) were due to plant failures. In addition, gas production fell by 20 percent due to the freezing of production wells.”
Transco stands to make a 14% return on investment for this $1.5 billion methane project. That would fuel Duke Energy’s proposed massive gas buildout in the South — not in the Triad. In their own application they state: “The benefits of the project are not realized by those who are impacted.”
Instead, the impacts are born by those whose properties are impacted and benefits are seen by those outside the project area, “including jobs, additional natural gas and very limited tax revenues.”
Transco’s massive methane pipeline threatens groundwater contamination for well users in Oak Ridge and areas crossing the headwaters of the city of Greensboro’s three water supply reservoirs, Lakes Higgins, Brandt and Townsend. The 42-inch-diameter pipe would cross more than 100 individual water bodies across 16 watersheds, including one major crossing of the Dan River in Rockingham County that would span 230 feet.
Transco doesn’t want you to know that hazardous sites are along its proposed route, that, if disturbed, could exacerbate groundwater contamination risks. The proposed route crosses one Superfund site, two unlined landfills, five inactive hazardous waste sites and dozens of underground storage tanks.
Furthermore, Transco claims that increasing gas supplies is good for the climate because gas replaces coal. Methane, the primary ingredient in what the gas industry calls “natural gas,” is a fossil fuel and greenhouse gas, and it is 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide in trapping heat in the atmosphere over the short term. Methane is released across the gas supply chain — from the wells that produce it, through the pipes that carry it, even from the appliances that use it. Methane alone is responsible for one-third of global warming. Burning methane still releases carbon dioxide, the primary driver of climate change, and is responsible for super-charging Hurricane Helene, a storm that will require decades and billions for recovery.
How can Williams be proud of increasing the likelihood of another Helene?
Join residents across Virginia and North Carolina standing up to these bullies and demand our elected officials say no to this unneeded, dirty, dangerous project. We deserve better, cleaner, cheaper energy — and we know we can get it. Find out more at www.nossep.org
The post Pipeline company misleads the public for profit and fossil fuels appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Pipeline company misleads the public for profit and fossil fuels
Renewable Energy
Where the Republican Party Has Gone Since Eisenhower in the 1950s
If you look this up, you’ll see that it’s correct. Eisenhower was a fierce advocate of the following:
- Infrastructure, e.g., the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, creating the 41,000-mile Interstate Highway System to improve national defense and commerce
- Social Programs, Social Security, minimum wage, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
- Fiscal Policy, lower taxes, a balanced budget, and reduced government regulation, aiming to limit federal intervention in local affairs
- Foreign Policy, nuclear deterrence and relying on the CIA for covert operations
- Civil Rights, desegregation of the military and the armed forces, support for the Brown v. Board of Education decision
Where the Republican Party Has Gone Since Eisenhower in the 1950s
Renewable Energy
Voter ID
My only problem with this is the U.S. Constitution, which clearly lays out the laws by which our elections will be conducted. I.e., it’s up to each of the 50 states to make and implement their own procedures.
Obviously, conspiracy theorists, at the direction of Newsmax and their peers, are convinced that there is a significant amount of voter fraud, but the fact is that there have been only a few dozen incidents of proven fraud out of the last one billion votes cast.
Yes, we could have an amendment could be proposed and passed into law that changes all of this, but until then, I’m going to support the U.S. Constitution, which has done right by the American people since its passage in 1789.
Renewable Energy
EPA Rolls Back Regulations on Heavy Metals from Coal-Fired Power Plants
Yes, our atmosphere and our waterways will soon be seeing increasing concentrations of mercury, lead, cadmium, selenium, and arsenic, not to mention other neurotoxins like a wide array of radioactive isotopes, so that the Trump administration can placate billionaire donors.
But seriously, what are a few million agonizing deaths from these carcinogens compared with huge campaign donations?
EPA Rolls Back Regulations on Heavy Metals from Coal-Fired Power Plants
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
