In the realm of clean energy, uranium-powered nuclear plants often take a back seat to solar and wind, yet they stand as the second-largest low-carbon electricity source globally. Nuclear energy operates emission-free, mitigating carbon dioxide and curbing harmful air pollutants. It’s not just an alternative; it is pivotal to global clean, sustainable energy transition – the key for net zero emissions.
In this article, we’ll explore the uniqueness and the driving forces behind the resurging interest in nuclear energy. This means delving into the uranium sector, an emerging bullish market and why it’s crucial for a net zero world.
Moving Away From Coal With Nuclear Energy
Transitioning from coal to cleaner energy sources is a pivotal step in addressing climate change.
For centuries, coal was the cornerstone of the industrial revolution, but its combustion accounts for over 40% of global carbon emissions. It’s also responsible for 75% of electricity generation emissions in 2019, as per the International Energy Agency (IEA)’s data.
To align with the Paris Agreement’s objectives of curbing global warming below 1.5°C, phasing out coal is imperative.
The shift toward clean energy involves pivoting from high-emission sources to low-carbon alternatives to mitigate climate impacts. This energy transition aims to eliminate reliance on fossil fuels, amplifying renewable options such as hydro, solar, wind, and nuclear power.
An excellent example of this transition is Ontario, which has been coal-free since 2014, primarily harnessing nuclear and hydro energy to power its grid sustainably.
Both coal and nuclear power plants operate using steam-driven turbines to generate electricity. Despite coal accounting for roughly ⅓ of global electricity generation, nuclear energy stands out for its capability to provide consistent baseload power, effectively supplementing intermittent renewable sources like solar and wind.
World Total Electricity Production by Energy Source

Back in 2003, Ontario pledged to phase out a quarter of its electricity generation by decommissioning nearly 9000 MW of coal capacity. To achieve this, the province refurbished nuclear units and integrated a mix of renewables and natural gas. Doing so allowed the Canadian province to successfully attain over 90% carbon-free electricity.
It’s a testament to the feasibility of transitioning away from coal toward cleaner, more sustainable energy sources like nuclear.
The adaptability of nuclear power plants in adjusting output according to demand and the availability of other energy sources adds resilience and stability to the grid, particularly in supporting variable renewables.
The recent report by the United States’ Department of Energy on nuclear power highlighted the potential to convert over 250 GW of coal capacity in the U.S. into nuclear power, effectively doubling the existing nuclear capacity.
Moreover, the DOE’s analysis revealed various benefits for communities near the coal plants considering such a transition. This includes the creation of 650 jobs, generating $275 million in economic activity, and an 86% reduction in GHG emissions.
Deputy secretary, Andrew Griffith, noted that the expertise and skills learned from operating coal plants could be adapted to nuclear power. He further underlined that this potential extends beyond just integrating into the electricity grid, as some reactor concepts can also offer applications in industrial heat.
The agency also emphasized the multi-dimensional benefits that nuclear power could offer for the energy transition.
Nuclear as Clean and Sustainable Energy Source
When the term “clean energy” is mentioned, most individuals tend to immediately think of solar panels or wind turbines. However, nuclear energy, often overlooked in these discussions, stands as the second-largest source of low-carbon electricity globally, trailing only hydropower.
To understand the cleanliness and sustainability of nuclear energy, consider these three key points:
- Zero Emissions and Air Quality Protection:
Nuclear energy is a zero-emission clean energy source. It operates via fission, splitting uranium atoms to generate energy. The resulting heat drives turbines for electricity production without emitting harmful byproducts present in fossil fuels.
In 2020, the United States avoided over 471 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions through nuclear energy, surpassing the collective impact of all other clean energy sources combined.
- Small Land Footprint:
Despite generating substantial carbon-free power, nuclear energy requires minimal land compared to other clean sources. A standard 1,000-megawatt nuclear facility in the U.S. operates on slightly over 1 square mile.
In comparison, wind farms require 360x more land area, while solar plants demand 75x more space to produce equivalent electricity. In other words, millions of solar panels or hundreds of wind turbines are needed to match the power output of a typical nuclear reactor.
- Extremely High Energy Density with Minimal Waste:
Nuclear fuel boasts an incredibly high energy density, nearly 1 million times greater than traditional energy sources. Consequently, the volume of used nuclear fuel isn’t as extensive as commonly believed.
Putting that in perspective: all the used nuclear fuel produced by the U.S. nuclear energy sector over 6 decades could fit within the dimensions of a football field at a depth of less than 10 yards.
This waste can potentially be reprocessed and recycled, although this isn’t currently practiced in the U.S. However, emerging advanced reactor designs aim to operate on used fuel, offering promising solutions.
Consider the following facts. They underscore the significance of nuclear energy in the realm of clean and sustainable power generation.

Uranium Bull Market is Emerging
Delving into the current market scenario, it helps to consider the historical context of the past decades.
Going back to the ‘60s and ‘70s, these were the pivotal periods when nuclear power stations were extensively built. These years marked the initial rise in demand coinciding with the emergency of nuclear technology.
Unfortunately, a series of accidents, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, led to nuclear downturn that put many projects on hold. This downturn persisted for about two decades.
Fast forward to the early 2000s, the climate change challenges start to kick in, particularly the increasing greenhouse gas emissions. This moment was dubbed the Renaissance of nuclear energy when new projects were revealed. Consequently, this resulted in a spike in 2007 as shown in the chart.
Then there has been a gradual but consistent uptick in uranium prices since 2019. Notably, this trend showed investors’ interest resurging due to the perceived potential in uranium investments. And a few days ago, uranium spot prices hit a 15-year high at $85 per pound.
Analysts even forecast more increases in prices, confirming that a uranium bull market is approaching, if it hasn’t come already. This makes GoldMining Inc (GLDG)’s uranium project even more valuable. As one of the companies making waves in the uranium market, GoldMining Inc brings exposure to one of the most exciting uranium exploration regions in the world.
How Does Uranium Help Achieve Net Zero Emission?
Uranium plays a significant role in the quest for achieving “net zero emissions“. It boasts a feature lacking in some renewable energy sources – capacity to provide reliable baseload energy production.
While solar, renewables, and hydroelectric power receive continued investment due to their eco-friendliness, they face challenges in delivering consistent energy output. For instance, solar energy is inactive at night, and wind turbines remain idle when there’s no wind. Recent occurrences, such as lower wind speeds in the United Kingdom resulting in decreased turbine energy production, have forced a shift to natural gas.
Although natural gas is a cleaner energy source compared to coal or oil, its carbon footprint remains notably higher. Surprisingly, a substantial portion of the world still heavily relies on coal for electricity generation.
In the United States, for instance, 19% of energy production persists from coal. Even in China, despite significant strides in reducing reliance on coal from 70% to 57% over a decade, there’s a fervent drive to further diminish this figure. This fuels China’s leadership in expanding nuclear capabilities as an alternative to coal.
Regardless if it’s coal or natural gas, it doesn’t matter. Nuclear is nearly 100% more effective than any other energy technology at reducing carbon emissions.
These developments resonate strongly with investors, particularly in the context of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations. Many investors view nuclear energy as a low-carbon means of energy production, aligning with ESG principles. The rising importance of ESG considerations has sparked newfound interest in evaluating nuclear energy’s place within this framework.
Overall, the reliability and low-carbon nature of nuclear energy underscore its significance in pursuing cleaner and dependable energy solutions. There’s simply no reaching net zero without nuclear, and so uranium, too.
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option position in any of the companies mentioned: GLDG
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involve risks which could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post No Net Zero Without Uranium: Here’s Why appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
China’s First-Ever Sovereign Green Bond Hits Global Market: Will It Power Its Net Zero Ambitions?
China’s Ministry of Finance (MoF) issued its first sovereign green bond, denominated in Chinese currency to the value of USD824m, on the London Stock Exchange. This is China’s first green sovereign bond and also its first sovereign bond issued overseas. The move shows China’s rising role in global green finance.
This plan started taking shape in early 2024. In January, officials from China and the UK met to discuss green finance. Then, in February, China’s Ministry of Finance released a detailed green bond framework. It explained how the funds raised will contribute to mitigation and adaptation, natural resource protection, pollution control, and biodiversity preservation. This helped China start offering green bonds to international investors.
China’s Green Bonds: A Journey That Began in 2014
China’s green bond journey started back in 2014. That year, Sean Kidney, head of the Climate Bonds Initiative, worked with China’s central bank on a task force. Their goal was to build a green bond market.
Since then, China has made huge progress. By 2023, the country was issuing more than USD 150 billion in green bonds every year. It also created clear rules, strong government support, and trusted agencies to check the quality of green projects.
Now, with its first sovereign green bond sold overseas, China is taking the next big step. This move shows that the country is ready to lead globally in green finance.
Part of Carbon Neutral Goals
Climate Action Tracker analyzed China’s emissions, and they are still rising. By 2030, they’re expected to be just 0.5% to 1.6% higher than earlier forecasts—reaching around 13.8 to 14.6 billion tonnes of CO₂.
In a more conservative outlook, emissions might peak before 2025 and then drop slowly—about 0.5% each year. But if China speeds up its shift to renewables and cuts back on coal, then it would lead to a faster decline to about 1% per year. Technically, it can save up to 750 million tonnes of CO₂ by 2030.
Still, even in both of these scenarios, China’s current climate policies aren’t strong enough to make a big dent this decade. To meet the 1.5°C climate goal of the Paris Agreement, China will need to boost its climate action in its next big policy plan (2026–2030).

Thus, this bond fits right into China’s national green plan and net-zero goals. Since 2013, China has followed the idea of “Ecological Civilization.” This means growing the economy while protecting nature.
China’s long-term sustainability plan includes major goals like the following:
- The Five-Sphere Integrated Plan
- The 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025)
- Peaking carbon emissions before 2030
- Reaching carbon neutrality by 2060
All of these support China’s “Beautiful China” vision that aims to make green development a key part of the country’s future.
Furthermore, China is using modern tools like artificial intelligence, smart tech, renewable energy, and carbon capture to make this successful. These technologies will help monitor the environment, save energy, and reduce pollution. They also support the growth of cleaner industries and smarter cities.
Investors Can Now Join the Green Effort
This new green bond connects money with climate action. It gives investors a chance to support China’s green goals directly.
Apart from Government backing, businesses and local communities also play a big role. Green business ideas, government rewards, and public action all help push China toward a cleaner future.
More significantly, these bonds could help finance renewable energy projects, green transport systems, waste-to-energy plants, and climate-resilient urban infrastructure
Thus, this bond is more than a financial tool. It shows China’s commitment to building a greener, healthier world.
China Sets a High Bar for Its Green Bonds
China has created a green bond framework that meets top global and local standards. It follows both the China Green Bond Principles (2022) and the ICMA Green Bond Principles (2021 with the 2022 Appendix). By aligning with these trusted guidelines, China builds strong trust among investors—especially those who care about sustainability and ESG values.
The framework focuses on four main parts: how the money is used, how projects are chosen, how the funds are managed, and how results are reported.
All the money raised from these green bonds will go toward eco-friendly projects listed in China’s national budget. This includes building green infrastructure, funding ongoing green programs, offering tax breaks for clean initiatives, and supporting local governments working on climate action.
Furthermore, the MoF will track all fund transactions in an internal register. Every year, it will share reports showing where the money went and what environmental benefits it achieved. This clear reporting gives confidence to investors and shows that their money is used productively.
Paving the Way for Future Climate Investments
This debut is likely just the start. The Ministry of Finance has built a framework to support future green bond issuances. These could be bigger and offered in different currencies.
As interest in low-carbon development grows and China pushes for cleaner, high-quality growth, more green bonds from the government are expected to follow.
This crucial step paved the way for China to issue green sovereign bonds to global investors. It came at a moment when global sustainable debt is about to hit USD 6 trillion, following Climate Bonds standards.
- READ MORE: Experts Say China’s Emissions Peak Is Near: How EVs and Renewables are Playing a Big Part
The post China’s First-Ever Sovereign Green Bond Hits Global Market: Will It Power Its Net Zero Ambitions? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
International Carbon Credits Back on the Table? EU’s Climate Goal Gets a Twist
The European Union (EU) is considering a new plan to help meet its 2040 climate goal. According to sources, the European Commission may allow countries to use international carbon credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This would be a big change from the EU’s current rule, which says climate targets must be met using domestic actions only.
Countdown to 2040: Can the EU Hit Its Green Target in Time?
The European Commission has proposed a target to cut EU greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. This goal is part of the EU’s plan to become “climate neutral” or net-zero zero by 2050.

Achieving the 2040 climate targets entails substantial financial commitments. The EU estimates a need for around €660 billion annually in energy investments during the 2031-2050 period. This represents about 3.2% of the EU’s GDP.
However, the official proposal for the 2040 goal has been delayed.
One reason for the delay is the growing political debate. Some governments and lawmakers worry that the green policies may hurt industries, especially with rising global competition and trade issues like U.S. tariffs. Because of this, the Commission is now exploring more flexible options to reach the 2040 goal.
One option is the use of international carbon credits.
Reuters reports that sources say the Commission is thinking about a new idea. They might let EU countries use international carbon credits to help meet part of the 2040 target. This would mean that countries could support CO2-reduction projects in other parts of the world—such as forest restoration in Brazil—and count those emissions savings toward their EU goals.
This would be a major shift for the EU. Until now, the EU’s climate targets have focused only on domestic efforts. International credits were banned from the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) after 2020 due to problems in the past.
What Are International Carbon Credits?
A carbon credit is a certificate that shows one tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) has been reduced or removed from the atmosphere. These credits can be created by projects such as planting trees, using cleaner energy, or capturing emissions. Countries or companies can buy these credits to offset their own emissions.
Under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, countries can trade these credits internationally. This helps fund climate projects in developing countries and allows other countries to meet their climate goals in a more flexible way. These projects include initiatives like reforestation, renewable energy installations, and methane capture.
EU’s Past Experience with Carbon Credits
Between 2008 and 2020, the EU allowed companies to use international credits under the ETS. Over 1.6 billion credits were used. Many of these credits came from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) systems under the Kyoto Protocol.
However, this system had problems. Many projects failed to deliver the promised emissions cuts. Some even led to fraud. Moreover, the many cheap credits lowered the carbon price in the EU. This made it easier for companies to pollute. This slowed down progress on cutting emissions inside the EU.
Because of these issues, the EU stopped accepting international credits after 2020. The current rules for the EU ETS focus only on domestic actions.
According to the European Environment Agency (EEA), the following would be the forecasted trend of the supply and demand of EU carbon credits until 2030.

Given the 2040 climate goals, the EC is thinking about bringing back international carbon credits. This would offer more flexibility in meeting emission reduction targets.
Article 6 Explained: A Second Chance for Global Offsets
The Paris Agreement introduced a new system under Article 6 to improve the way international carbon credits (ITMOs) work. This system includes rules to avoid double counting, ensure credits are real, and improve transparency.
Supporters of Article 6 say it can help developing countries get more climate funding. If the EU uses these credits again, it could also help poorer countries develop greener economies.
Critics, however, warn that the Article 6 system is still not strong enough. Some carbon credit projects may still overestimate emissions savings or fail to remove carbon in a permanent way. There are also concerns that switching back to international offsets may reduce the pressure on the EU to cut emissions at home.
The Contradicting Views from Experts
Some experts and groups are urging caution. Linda Kalcher from Strategic Perspectives said international credits have faced many issues. These include fraud and poor environmental benefits.
Others, like Andrei Marcu of the ERCST think-tank, believe that developing countries would welcome the move. These countries often need more climate finance and would benefit from EU support for local carbon projects.
Carbon Market Watch, an environmental group, warned that using carbon credits and removals instead of real domestic reductions could weaken the EU’s climate ambition. They particularly noted that:
“Carbon Market Watch warns that reckless reliance on Article 6 credits and carbon removals is not a replacement for domestic emissions reductions commitments.”
The EU’s climate laws and scientific advisors have strongly supported domestic emissions cuts. The European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change has said the EU should cut 90–95% of emissions by 2040 through domestic action only.
Buying credits from other countries may help meet targets on paper. However, experts say it does not reduce pollution inside the EU. They warn that it could slow the shift away from fossil fuels and delay investments in clean energy and green jobs within Europe.
What’s Next: Will the EU Go Global on Carbon Trading?
The European Commission says it is still aiming for a 90% cut by 2040, but it is also listening to calls for more flexibility. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said the 90% cut is the “starting point” and plans to propose the final target before summer.
Any target must be approved by EU countries and the European Parliament. This means more talks and possibly changes before anything is final.
If the EU decides to include international carbon credits in its 2040 plan, it would mark a big policy shift. The decision could impact how the world sees the EU’s climate leadership and how the global carbon credit market develops in the future.
The post International Carbon Credits Back on the Table? EU’s Climate Goal Gets a Twist appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Copper Prices Crash as U.S.-China Tariff War Triggers Market Mayhem
Just two weeks ago, copper prices were climbing fast due to the US stockpiling ahead of new tariffs. Traders warned that new US tariffs on copper could squeeze global supply. But things turned around quickly. But now, the copper rally has reversed into a full-blown crash.
This is a direct outcome of President Donald Trump’s trade war, aka “Trump Tariffs,” that is shaking the global market. Investors now fear that the new tariffs will slow down demand for copper worldwide.
The Copper Price Shock: Traders Scramble, Markets Tumble
Bloomberg reported, on Friday, April 4, copper prices dropped sharply, along with stock markets. The fall continued till Monday. In the London Metal Exchange, copper prices sank as much as 7.7% before bouncing back slightly to $8,735 a ton.

Earlier, we saw how traders rushed to send copper to the US before tariffs hit, driving premiums as high as $500 a ton. Big players like Mercuria and Trafigura even predicted prices could reach $12,000 a ton. But things changed rapidly when Trump shortened the tariff timeline, giving buyers very few days in hand.
Because of this, copper is piling up outside the US. Global buyers have more to choose from, but many aren’t interested. With demand dropping due to tariffs, the extra supply doesn’t help.
Chile’s Price Cut Signals Looming Economic Strain
Chile, the world’s biggest copper producer, is preparing to lower its copper price estimate for 2025. It’s a telltale sign of growing global economic concerns.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Chile’s copper agency, Cochilco, held its 2025 price forecast at $4.25 per pound in February. This came after it raised the estimate from $3.85 back in May 2024.
It also kept the 2026 forecast at $4.25. Cochilco expects copper prices to stay above $4.00 per pound for the next ten years.
- But the new data show copper prices to average between $3.90 and $4 per pound this year, which is below its previous forecast.
The final figure will be announced by the end of April. However, Juan Ignacio Guzman, head of Chilean mineral consulting firm GEM, said,
“If the trade war triggers a recession, prices could tumble to as low as $3 a pound — or about $6,600 a ton.”

Chile, which produced 24% of the world’s copper last year, is now feeling the pressure.
In a separate report from the Shanghai Metals Market, we discovered that,
- Chilean Customs data showed that Chile exported 182,338 metric tons of refined copper, including 33,496 metric tons to China in March.
- Exports of copper ore and concentrate totaled 1,304,782 metric tons, with China receiving 810,135 metric tons in the same month.
Earlier this year, in January and February, Chile’s copper production dropped compared to the previous month. Exports to China also declined during that period.
Analysts Warn of More Trouble Ahead
The Bloomberg report highlighted that the worst might not be over. Max Layton, global head of commodities research at Citigroup Inc., warned that the global trade shake-up could lead to a historic market correction. Citi now expects copper prices outside the US to average $8,500 this quarter — but they also say the risk of further drops is high.
BNP Paribas SA strategist David Wilson, who had warned prices could collapse, now sees the downtrend continuing in the short term. Goldman Sachs still believes in copper’s long-term value but admits that slower global growth could delay the expected supply shortage.
Meanwhile, JPMorgan now expects the US to fall into a recession this year. UBS estimates that every 1% drop in US GDP could cut output in export-driven Asian economies like Taiwan and South Korea by up to 2%.
China’s 34% Tariff Sparks Copper Stock Rout
Copper stocks have taken a beating amid falling prices, global slowdown fears, and rising trade tensions. The sharp selloff followed news from China’s Xinhua News Agency that Beijing will impose a 34% tariff on all US imports starting April 10.
Here’s a quick look at how major mining companies are reacting:
- Freeport-McMoRan: Shares dropped 13.1% in a single day. The stock is down 24.1% this week, bringing its market value to $41.9 billion.
- BHP Group and Rio Tinto: BHP’s shares fell 9.5%, cutting its value to $107.3 billion. Rio Tinto’s dropped 6.4%, is now valued at $93.5 billion. Both saw trading volumes nearly triple the usual.
- Southern Copper: Based in Mexico, the company fell 9.6% on Friday alone, pushing its weekly loss to 16.7%. Its market value now stands at $62.4 billion.
- Zijin Mining: This Chinese mining giant lost 7.2%, dropping to a market cap of $56.9 billion. It’s one of the few firms producing over 1 million tonnes of copper a year.
- Glencore and Anglo American: Glencore dropped 11.5%, while London-listed Anglo American fell 11%. Their market caps now stand at $36.9 billion and $28.6 billion, respectively. Both are down about 20% this week.
- Canadian Miners (Teck Resources, Ivanhoe Mines, First Quantum): Canadian copper stocks saw sharp losses. Teck dropped 12.1%, Ivanhoe fell 12.6%, and First Quantum slid 12.8% as investors pulled back across the board.
- Hindustan Copper: In India, shares fell 5.4% over the past five days and are down 15.7% so far in 2025.
KNOW MORE: Copper Prices Slump Below $9,000: What Does It Mean for Global Growth?
What started as a bullish rush has turned into a brutal crash. With tariffs rising and demand shrinking, copper is now a symbol of deeper market fears. Global supply chains are out of sync, and the world’s top miners are feeling the heat. If trade tensions escalate, this copper price crash may face a difficult recovery.
The post Copper Prices Crash as U.S.-China Tariff War Triggers Market Mayhem appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos1 year ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action
-
Carbon Footprint1 year ago
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change Videos1 year ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Climate Change Videos1 year ago