Disseminated on behalf of SolarBank Corporation.
SolarBank Corporation (NASDAQ: SUUN; Cboe CA: SUNN, FSE: GY2) teamed up with Viridi to build a 3.06 megawatt (MW) ground-mounted solar project. This project will also include a 1.2 megawatt-hour (MWh) battery energy storage system (BESS) in Buffalo, New York. This initiative plans to turn a closed landfill into a useful asset, providing clean energy to the local community.
Project Overview
- Location: Buffalo, New York
- Solar Capacity: 3.06 MW (DC)
- Battery Storage: 1.2 MWh
- Site: Repurposed closed landfill
In this collaboration, SolarBank will own the project, while Viridi will supply the battery storage system. The company has secured a lease for the site. It is now getting interconnection approval. Once the company gets the permits and funding, construction will start. The facility will then work as a community solar project.
Power Packed: Viridi’s Cutting-Edge Battery Solutions
Viridi equips its lithium-ion battery packs with integrated fire suppression and anti-propagation technology, adhering to stringent safety standards. Viridi’s design is different from traditional methods. It isolates each battery cell. This prevents thermal runaway. So, if one cell fails, it won’t cause bigger problems. Viridi is backed by a tier 1 management team, including the former Global Chairman of Investment Banking from JP Morgan.
Shared Sunshine: Empowering the Community with Solar
Community solar projects allow multiple participants to benefit from a single solar installation. Subscribers get credits on their electricity bills for their share of solar power. This lets them use renewable energy without needing their own installations.
Recently, SolarBank advanced two community solar projects in Skaneateles, New York, totaling 14.4 MW DC to power about 2,100 homes. The projects have completed the Coordinated Electric System Interconnection Review (CESIR) and are now proceeding with permitting.
The company aims to qualify for incentives under the NYSERDA NY-Sun Program. Once operational, these installations will supply clean energy to the local grid, offering residents access to renewable power without installing personal solar panels.
Storing the Sun: The Crucial Role of Battery Storage
Battery storage plays an important role in the energy transition. It helps integrate renewable sources, such as solar and wind, which can be unpredictable. Without effective storage, surplus energy can go unused, and grid operators may struggle to balance supply and demand. BESS technology solves these problems. It captures and stores electricity for later use, boosting efficiency and reliability.
The Growing BESS Market
The global Battery Energy Storage System market is growing fast. This rise comes from new technology and more use of renewable energy. In 2024, the market was valued at around $7.8 billion and is projected to reach $25.6 billion by 2029, growing at an annual rate of 26.9%.
In 2024, global BESS installations hit 205 GWh. This marks a 53% increase from the previous year, exceeding expectations. The grid-scale sector led this growth with 160 GWh deployed, 98% of which utilized lithium-ion technology.

Notably, 17 projects exceeding 1 GWh became operational in 2024, up from four in 2023. It shows there’s a strong pipeline for large projects. LFP batteries stay on top of the market because they are cheaper and have better technology.
- Looking ahead, over 400 GWh of grid projects are in the pipeline for 2025, though at least 30% may face delays or cancellations.
One of the key factors supporting this expansion is the significant cost reduction in battery systems. Over the past two years, solar module prices have decreased by 66%, while battery system prices have dropped by 58% in the last year.
Cost cuts have made renewable energy projects cheaper. This change encourages more investment in energy storage solutions.
Regional Expansion and Market Trends
Countries around the world are boosting their battery storage capacity. This helps them meet renewable energy goals.
China led the market with 67% of global BESS deployments. This was due to provincial mandates and falling battery costs. The U.S. and Canada followed, installing nearly 40 GWh, with California contributing half of this capacity.

Meanwhile, Europe’s battery storage market could exceed 50 GW by 2030, with an estimated €80 billion in investments supporting this expansion.
In the United States, battery storage capacity hit about 24 gigawatt-hours (GWh) in 2024. This is a 71% rise from the year before. Utility-scale battery capacity has seen rapid growth in the country, with over 20 gigawatts (GW) added in the past 4 years—equivalent to the capacity of 20 nuclear reactors.
This capacity may double to 40 GW by 2025. This shows how important battery storage is for a stronger grid and more renewable energy use.

These developments underscore the critical role of BESS in stabilizing the grid, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, and ensuring a consistent supply of renewable energy. SolarBank’s latest transaction positions the company at the forefront of this rapidly evolving battery storage market.
Bright Horizons: SolarBank’s Strategic Expansion
The Viridi BESS project aligns with SolarBank’s strategy to expand its portfolio of renewable energy assets across North America. The company plans to improve the reliability and efficiency of its solar systems. It will do this by using advanced battery storage solutions. This way, they can offer sustainable energy to different communities.
- As of February 20, 2025, SolarBank’s stock is trading at US$ 4.02, reflecting the market’s response to the company’s ongoing initiatives in the renewable energy sector.
With its expansion into battery storage, SolarBank is proactively addressing one of the biggest challenges in renewable energy—energy intermittency. By combining solar power with advanced storage solutions, the company is strengthening the foundation for a cleaner, more reliable energy system.
SolarBank is investing in BESS as demand for sustainable energy grows. This move will boost growth, attract new partnerships, and strengthen its leadership in renewable energy.
SolarBank’s partnership with Viridi shows its dedication to new renewable energy solutions. This effort helps in the larger goal of moving to a sustainable, low-carbon energy system. By repurposing a closed landfill into a productive solar and battery storage facility, the project not only provides clean energy to the Buffalo community but also sets a precedent.
This article contains forward-looking information. Please refer to the SolarBank press release entitled “SolarBank Partners with Viridi on Combined 3.06 MW Solar and 1.2 MWH Battery Energy Storage Project Located in Buffalo, New York.”
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: SUUN.
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post From Waste to Watts: SolarBank and Viridi Intend to Transform a Landfill Into a Solar Powerhouse with Battery Storage appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

