NC’s biggest utility is among 10 companies that have written to Trump’s new EPA administrator, Lee Zeldin, asking for relief from a key Biden emissions rule, as well as coal ash disposal requirements.
Environmental advocates in North Carolina are angry after 10 utilities and power companies, including Duke Energy, sent a letter Jan. 15 to Lee Zeldin, confirmed on Wednesday as EPA administrator, asking him to weaken environmental regulations over coal ash and natural gas.
Duke Energy Promised to Limit Emissions at Four New Gas Plants. It’s Already Back-Tracking
Climate Change
Top Climate Scientists Accuse the Livestock Industry of Pushing Fuzzy Math to Downplay its Climate Warming Emissions
An alternative emissions-calculating methodology underpins revised, less ambitious methane-reduction targets.
A group of the world’s leading climate scientists are warning governments and the livestock industry against adopting an “accounting trick” that will imperil the all-out global effort required to control heat-trapping emissions.
Climate Change
Corpus Christi Postpones Water Emergency to December as ‘Super El Niño’ Offers an End to Drought
In April, one of the city’s three reservoirs received its first inflows in eight months. But narrowly avoiding an immediate disaster doesn’t mean that Corpus Christi has solved its water crisis.
This story was produced in partnership by Inside Climate News and the Texas Newsroom, the state’s network of public radio stations.
Corpus Christi Postpones Water Emergency to December as ‘Super El Niño’ Offers an End to Drought
Climate Change
UNGA heeds Pacific voices, backs world court on states’ climate obligations
New York, United States, 21 May 2026 — The United Nations General Assembly voted with overwhelming support to adopt a landmark resolution led by Vanuatu and 12 other countries which will advance implementation of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Advisory Opinion on climate change and state responsibility, today.
The resolution passed with 141 votes in favour, 8 against and 28 abstentions. Australia voted in favour of the resolution, welcoming the landmark ICJ advisory opinion and its constructive role in advancing global climate action, although stopped short of co-sponsoring the resolution.
The outcome formally reaffirms the Court’s findings and calls on governments to align their policies with their legal obligations to limit global warming to 1.5°C – including by delivering deep, rapid and sustained emissions cuts, regulating fossil fuel companies, and protecting the right to a healthy environment. The resolution also requests the UN Secretary-General submit a report in 2027 on how to advance compliance with all obligations in relation to the Court’s findings – ensuring that pressure and scrutiny on governments will be sustained to deliver their legal obligations.[1]
Shiva Gounden, Head of Pacific, Greenpeace Australia Pacific said: “The world has followed the Pacific’s lead. Vanuatu and Pacific nations have once again shaped the global climate agenda, turning the voices of frontline communities into international action.
“While it is positive that Australia voted in favour of the resolution, Australia should have gone much further to stand with its Pacific family by co-sponsoring the resolution. This would have been a more genuine show of support for Pacific leadership as Australia prepares to preside over COP31 negotiations, where it has promised to centre Pacific needs and priorities.
“Governments can no longer ignore their legal responsibilities while backing the expansion of the fossil fuel industry. Pacific communities have fought for this moment because we are already living with the consequences of the climate crisis, and we will continue fighting until there is a fast, fair and funded phase-out of fossil fuels. This outcome is for the realisation of human rights of current and future generations to experience a life of dignity and to stand proudly on the righteous legacies of the past.”
In July 2025, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion outlining that states have legal obligations under international law to take urgent, equitable action to protect the climate system, including through emissions reduction, international cooperation, holding corporate polluters to account, and preventing climate harm.[2]
The UNGA resolution is expected to strengthen the political and legal weight of the Advisory Opinion across international negotiations, national policymaking, and climate litigation, while increasing pressure on governments to align their actions with their obligation to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
-ENDS-
Notes
[1] Greenpeace Media statement: World’s highest court delivers historic protections for climate-impacted communities
[2] A Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuels: Greenpeace Policy Briefing
Media contact
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
UNGA heeds Pacific voices, backs world court on states’ climate obligations
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
