Chevron (NYSE: CVX) delivered better-than-expected earnings in the second quarter of 2025 despite falling oil prices and weaker refining margins. Profits fell year-over-year. However, strong production in the Permian Basin and careful capital management allowed the company to generate solid cash flow. This also helped maintain returns for shareholders.
Alongside its financial results, Chevron reaffirmed its climate goals. This includes net-zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050. It also involves ongoing investments in carbon capture, hydrogen, and renewable fuels. These efforts support a wider energy transition strategy.
Chevron’s Q2 Delivers Amid Oil Price Drops
Chevron Corporation shared its financial results for the second quarter of 2025. The results show pressure from lower oil prices but also show progress in its long-term strategy.
For the quarter ending June 30, 2025, the company posted net income of $2.49 billion, or $1.45 per share. After adjusting for special items, earnings came in at $1.77 per share, slightly higher than what Wall Street expected.
Total revenue came in at $44.82 billion, a decline of about 12% compared to the same quarter last year. This marks Chevron’s lowest quarterly profit in four years, largely due to weaker oil prices and refining margins.

Even so, the company’s earnings still exceeded analyst expectations on an adjusted basis.
Chevron’s earnings followed a similar trend seen across the oil and gas sector. Other major energy firms also reported lower profits, driven by high production levels and flat global demand.
In particular, weaker natural gas prices and reduced margins in fuels and chemicals impacted Chevron’s bottom line.
Strong Oil Production and Cash Flow Help Offset Weak Prices
Despite the decline in profits, Chevron maintained a strong operating performance. The company increased production in the Permian Basin, reaching over 1 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. This is the highest output the company has reported from that region since mid-2024.
Chevron generated $4.9 billion in free cash flow during the quarter, a 15% increase compared to the first quarter of the year. The company also returned $5.5 billion to shareholders through a mix of dividends and share buybacks.
Notably, Chevron continued its stock buyback program temporarily in the second quarter. The oil major’s ongoing efforts to acquire Hess Corporation will boost its access to oil reserves in Guyana.
Overall, Chevron’s operational strength and disciplined capital management helped it weather the effects of falling oil prices.
- INTERESTING READ: Big Oil’s Showdown: How Shell, Chevron & ExxonMobil Balance Big Profits with Net Zero?
Cleaner Barrels Ahead: Chevron’s Climate and Net Zero Plan
Chevron continues to work toward reducing its greenhouse gas emissions while meeting global energy demand. The company has a long-term goal of reaching net-zero emissions for its upstream Scope 1 and Scope 2 operations by 2050.
Scope 1 includes direct emissions from Chevron’s operations. Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from electricity and heat that Chevron buys.
Chevron measures emissions with a full value chain approach. This includes Scope 3 emissions. These emissions cover the use of sold products, such as gasoline and diesel. Although the company has not committed to a full Scope 3 net-zero goal, it reports these figures for transparency and to track progress.
In addition to these goals, Chevron has introduced a carbon intensity reduction target, aiming to cut emissions per unit of energy produced. The company’s target is to reduce its Portfolio Carbon Intensity by more than 5% by 2028, using a 2022 baseline.

Chevron’s reported greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for 2024 are approximately:
-
Scope 1: 53 to 54 million tonnes CO2 equivalent (Mt CO2e)
-
Scope 2 (market-based indirect emissions): about 3 to 4 million tonnes CO2e
-
Scope 3 (mainly from use of sold products): between 416 million and 717 million tonnes CO2e, depending on calculation method (production, throughput, or sales method).
Chevron’s portfolio carbon intensity is at around 70.7 grams CO2e per megajoule energy produced. The oil giant’s upstream carbon intensity is about 23.9 kg CO2e per barrel of oil equivalent.
Investing in Lower-Carbon Solutions
Beyond reducing emissions from its own operations, Chevron is building a portfolio of low-carbon businesses. The company is investing in carbon capture and storage (CCS), hydrogen, and renewable fuels.
According to its 2024 Corporate Sustainability Highlights, Chevron invested over $600 million in over 100 emissions abatement projects in 2024, which will grow to $1.5 billion this year. These projects aim to cut around 1.2 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent each year. These include:
-
methane emission reductions through facility retrofits,
-
electrification of natural gas compression stations, and
-
efficiency improvements at refineries and LNG plants.
Moreover, Chevron has invested over $1 billion in carbon capture and storage projects. These efforts aim to cut emissions by around 5 million tonnes of CO2 each year. The company is growing its range of abatement technologies and low-carbon investments. This shows a big increase from previous years.
These efforts aim to reduce the company’s upstream carbon intensity to around 24 kilograms of CO₂ equivalent per barrel of oil. Chevron’s decarbonization plan includes energy efficiency upgrades, equipment changes, and the use of renewable electricity at production sites.
Chevron has partnerships with multiple firms focused on carbon removal, including projects that store CO₂ underground or use advanced technologies to capture emissions at industrial sites. These investments are intended to grow over time as demand for clean energy increases.
The company is also looking into hydrogen storage solutions. It has also invested early in fusion energy technologies. These ventures are still in development but represent Chevron’s effort to stay ahead of long-term changes in the energy system.
Chevron’s total planned investment in low-carbon businesses is projected to reach $10 billion through 2028. The company has made it clear that it wants to be part of the energy transition, even while continuing to supply traditional oil and gas.
Eyes on 2026: Risks, Rewards, and What’s Next for Chevron
Still, Chevron faces criticism from some investors and environmental groups. Concerns include how fast things are changing. There’s also a need for total emissions cuts, not just reducing intensity.
Plus, the company keeps investing in oil and gas production. Chevron responds by saying it must balance energy reliability, affordability, and sustainability. It also supports carbon markets, carbon pricing, and efforts to scale up verified carbon credits.
Though the amount or figure wasn’t disclosed, Chevron has bought millions of carbon credits. Between 2022 and 2024, Chevron’s Colombian subsidiary purchased around 3 million carbon credits. These credits support Indigenous community conservation projects in the Colombian Amazon through the REDD+ program.
Chevron also bought 1.8 million carbon credits from the Cotuhé Putumayo project. This purchase helped offset regional emissions. These credits mainly reflect avoided deforestation and conservation efforts.
Chevron believes oil and gas will remain important for decades. Their strategy focuses on cutting emissions from this supply. At the same time, they are developing new energy solutions.
The company’s Q2 results show the pressure facing oil producers in a lower-price environment. Even though revenue and profits fell from last year, Chevron posted solid operating results.
Whether Chevron can meet its 2050 net-zero goals while maintaining shareholder value and energy supply will depend on policy changes, market demand, and technological progress. But for now, the company is signaling that it plans to be part of both today’s energy system and tomorrow’s clean energy transition.
The post Chevron (CVX Stock) Powers Through Q2 With $5.5B Payout, Permian Growth, and Net-Zero Push appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

