Tesla’s (TSLA) dominance in Europe is fading fast. In July 2025, its sales in France plunged nearly 27%—one of its steepest monthly declines yet. Once an EV frontrunner, Tesla is now clearly struggling to keep up. Chinese competitors like BYD (BYDDY) are racing ahead, and local automakers are also pushing back hard.
What once felt like unstoppable momentum, Musk’s Tesla has turned into a scramble to retain market share. Europe’s EV market is now the most competitive in the world, and Tesla is feeling the heat.
A CNBC report highlighted that,
“Data published by the U.K.’s Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) showed Tesla’s new car sales dropped by nearly 60% to 987 units last month, down from 2,462 a year ago.”
Tesla’s European Market Share Continues to Shrink
According to the European Automobile Manufacturers Association, Tesla’s market share in the EU, U.K., and EFTA dropped to 2.8% in June, down from 3.4% the previous year.
The company sold 34,781 vehicles across the region that month, which is a 22.9% year-on-year drop. Also in July, its sales in France plunged by nearly 27%, marking one of its steepest monthly drops yet.
The above data tells that Tesla is facing severe headwinds across Europe, with sales falling in most major markets despite the launch of an updated Model Y. According to Reuters, Tesla’s new car registrations in:
-
Sweden fell 86%
-
Denmark dropped 52%
-
Netherlands sank 62%
-
Belgium declined 58%
-
Italy slipped 5%
-
Portugal slid 49%
The only bright spots were Norway and Spain, where Tesla saw gains of 83% and 27%, respectively. Norway’s spike followed the rollout of 0% interest loans on Tesla models, while Spain’s surge coincided with a 155% jump in sales of all electrified cars.
The chart below also tells us that Tesla is losing ground in Europe.

Model Y Revamp Fails to Lift Sales
Tesla had pinned hopes on its refreshed Model Y, which began selling in March 2025 in Europe. However, the update has failed to spark meaningful growth. According to analyst Felipe Munoz from JATO Dynamics, the updated Model Y “has so far failed to provide the expected sales boost.”
Even in Tesla-stronghold Sweden, Model Y registrations fell 88% in July. In Denmark, they dropped 49%. By contrast, Norway saw a resurgence, with Model Y registrations jumping fourfold to 715 units due to financing incentives.
Here’s how Tesla (TSLA) performed in Q2 2025.

- SEE DETAILS: TSLA Stock Drops on Weak Q2 2025 Earnings: Tesla Faces Carbon Credit, Margin, and Political Risks
Pricing Strategy and Margins Under Pressure
To stay competitive, Tesla has slashed prices across Europe, often undercutting its margins. In France, the company’s market share fell from 1.6% in 2024 to just 0.9% in 2025, with buyers turning to local brands like Renault, which outsold Tesla’s Model Y with its new Renault 5 model in June.
Aggressive discounting might stimulate demand in the short term, but it signals waning pricing power, a worrying trend for a brand that once commanded premium status.
Tight Rules Stall Tesla’s Self-Driving Push in Europe
Another pain point for Tesla in Europe is the region’s strict autonomous driving regulations. While Tesla’s supervised self-driving feature is a major selling point in the U.S., it’s not fully available in many European countries due to tighter rules.
Musk acknowledged in July that the company could have “a few rough quarters” ahead as it waits for approvals and ramps up production of a new, more affordable EV model.
Tesla’s efforts to diversify include a trial robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, using autonomous Model Y vehicles. However, this program is not yet authorized for widespread deployment in Europe.
BYD Steals the Spotlight in Major European Markets
While Tesla stumbled, Chinese EV giant BYD roared ahead. In Spain, BYD sold 2,158 cars in July, nearly 8X more than the same month last year.
- In the UK, BYD registered 3,184 vehicles, quadrupling its year-over-year numbers. And in Germany, BYD posted a 390% increase in July sales.
BYD’s affordability, growing dealership network, and product variety have helped it attract European buyers seeking alternatives to Tesla.
- Notably, BYD overtook Tesla in overall European EV sales as early as April 2025, a trend that now looks firmly established.

Smart Pricing, Sharp Growth
BYD’s strategy of affordable pricing and rapid expansion is paying off. Models like the Dolphin Surf (globally known as the Seagull) and the Seal U are leading the charge. The Seal U tied as Europe’s best-selling PHEV in June.
Looking ahead, BYD plans to expand into 12 more European countries by the end of 2025. The company is also preparing to launch local production in Hungary, helping it reduce costs, navigate EU tariffs, and better compete with local and global rivals.
Chinese Brands Make Their Mark
The impact goes beyond BYD. Chinese EV makers, led by BYD, have nearly doubled their collective market share in Europe — from 2.7% in early 2024 to 5.1% in the first half of 2025. This surge reflects the growing influence of Chinese automakers across the European auto market.
Broader EV Market Still Growing—But Tesla Lags Behind
It’s important to note that Tesla’s slump comes at a time when overall EV demand in Europe is still rising. In July:
-
Denmark’s overall car sales rose 20%
-
Sweden was up 6%
-
Norway surged 48%
-
Spain grew 17%
-
Portugal jumped 21%
This makes Tesla’s performance look even worse in comparison. The EV pioneer is not suffering from market decline, but rather losing ground to faster-moving rivals like BYD, Volkswagen, and Renault.

Elon Musk’s Controversies Add Fuel to the Fire
Aside from market dynamics, Tesla is battling reputational damage, much of it tied to CEO Elon Musk. His endorsement of Germany’s far-right AfD party and anti-union comments sparked protests at Tesla showrooms across Europe.
The backlash has been especially strong in Germany, where labor unions and political parties wield significant influence. Tesla’s sales in the country dropped 55% in July, with only 1,110 units sold compared to 2,469 a year ago. From January to July, Tesla’s total German sales plunged 57.8% to just 10,000 units.
In Britain, Tesla’s July sales fell 60%, while BYD’s more than quadrupled.
Legacy Automakers Also Feel the Heat
Tesla isn’t the only automaker feeling the squeeze. European giants like Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Stellantis, and Renault all posted weak Q2 results, citing falling demand and concerns over U.S. import tariffs.
However, these companies are still expanding their EV offerings and investing in local supply chains, unlike Tesla, which continues to rely heavily on exports and centralized production.
What Lies Ahead?
Tesla’s roadmap includes a more affordable EV model and the potential expansion of its Berlin Gigafactory’s output. But until production ramps up and autonomous features are approved in Europe, Tesla may continue to struggle.
In contrast, BYD and other Chinese players are gaining speed, price advantage, and regulatory momentum, making them serious threats to Tesla’s European ambitions.
Tesla’s 27% sales crash in France shows that the much-touted EV leader is on the defensive in a region once crucial to its global strategy. Concisely, unless Tesla adjusts its pricing, updates its lineup more frequently, and repairs its brand reputation, it may continue to lose ground to BYD and others.
The post BYD (BYDDY) Beats Tesla (TSLA) in Europe: The EV Shift No One Saw Coming appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

