The voluntary carbon market made great strides in early 2025. strong growth. This is fueled by record credit retirements, a focus on integrity, and increased interest in carbon removals compared to traditional avoidance credits.
We have studied newly published reports from two credible research agencies, namely Sylvera and CEEZER. Both say that organizations are now willing to invest more in credits that deliver real climate impact. Thus, the market is shifting from quantity to quality, and the numbers support this. Let’s deep dive.
Carbon Credit Retirements Reach a New Peak
Carbon credit retirements hit 95 million in the first six months of 2025, the highest total ever recorded for a half-year. This marks a 9% increase compared to H1 2024. More importantly, total retirement value jumped by 32%, indicating that buyers are not just retiring more credits—they’re paying more for the right ones.
This increase reflects a clear preference for verified high-quality credits. Buyers are becoming more selective and placing climate integrity at the forefront.

Supply is Growing, But Demand Is Growing Faster
On the supply side, carbon credit issuances rose to 77 million in Q2 2025, a 39% increase from the previous quarter. This represents a 14% boost compared to Q2 2024.
Yet even with more credits available, retirements continue to outpace issuances. If this trend holds, this year could see negative net issuance for the first time. However, this imbalance can inevitably put pressure on developers to meet demand for high-integrity credits. As companies pursue long-term climate targets, they seek more than low-cost offsets.

Quality Becomes a Core Priority
Data shows buyers are moving up the quality ladder. In H1 2025, 57% of Sylvera-rated credits retired had BB ratings or higher, up from 52% in all of 2024. This shift is driven by better due diligence tools, clearer carbon credit ratings, and initiatives like the ICVCM’s Core Carbon Principles.
Market participants are becoming more informed and aligning purchases with ESG goals, climate science, and regulations. Buyers now choose credits with intention instead of blindly purchasing.
CORSIA Spurs Growth in Compliance-Eligible Credits
The Sylvera report further emphasizes that more than 37% of credits issued in Q2 2025 could be eligible under Phase 1 of CORSIA, the global offsetting scheme for international aviation.
- This is a notable increase from 28% in the same period of 2024. This alignment with international standards is closing the gap between voluntary and compliance markets.
Full CORSIA eligibility depends on host country authorizations under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The cancellation deadline for Phase 1 is January 2028, and developers are closely watching national authorities’ responses.
The Market Shifts Toward Durable Carbon Removals
One key trend of 2025 is the strong shift toward carbon removals. CEEZER data shows a 102% increase in the share of removal credits transacted compared to last year. Buyers are prioritizing long-term impact over short-term avoidance.
Spending patterns reflect this shift. The average spend per ton across all credit types has more than doubled, rising 2.2 times year-on-year. For removals specifically, prices have increased by 3.2 times. This premium reflects interest in projects with lasting impact, such as biochar, mineralization, and reforestation.
Companies are now focusing on credits in Oxford Category 5, representing durable removals with low reversal risk, rather than Category 4 credits, which carry higher long-term uncertainties.

Nature-Based Credits in Demand, But Supply and Standards Remain a Challenge
Nature-based projects like ARR (Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation) are attracting premium prices. On average, ARR credits are selling for $24 per ton in the primary market. For credits with BBB+ ratings, prices can reach up to $27. However, these credits only make up 3.7% of total retirements, indicating high demand but limited supply.
This supply-demand gap is prompting developers to increase high-quality nature-based removal projects. However, challenges like land access, cost, and long verification timelines still hinder expansion.
Moving on, REDD+ projects, aimed at reducing deforestation and forest degradation, rebounded in Q2 2025. Their share rose from 3% in Q1 to 16%, the highest since Q2 2023. Still, scrutiny remains over outdated REDD+ methodologies, many of which may not meet ICVCM’s integrity standards.
This uncertainty is pushing buyers to explore alternatives like waste management, biogas, and improved forest management, where credibility and transparency are easier to achieve.
North America Leads Issuance Growth
Significantly, North America has become a major player in carbon markets, doubling its share of new issuances to 43% in Q2 2025. This growth propelled the American Carbon Registry (ACR) to the top spot among registries, holding a 33% share. Gold Standard followed at 25%, and Verra at 21%.
This surge reflects stronger project pipelines, clearer regulations, and confidence in the U.S. market’s ability to meet both voluntary and compliance criteria.
Industrial and Commercial Credits Gain Market Share
Carbon credit projects from industrial and commercial sectors are quickly gaining traction. In H1 2025, these projects accounted for 19% of new issuances, up from just 7.9% during the same time in 2024. These include initiatives like refrigerant recovery, methane capture, and energy efficiency upgrades.
These scalable, technology-driven projects are becoming popular alternatives to traditional forestry and land use projects. As demand grows, industrial credits are expected to capture a larger share of the market.
Tech and Services Drive Up Carbon Removal Demand
The CEEZER report also highlighted that professional services and tech sectors are emerging as key players in carbon removal. Professional services firms now account for 24% of the total retirement value in 2025. The tech and IT sector has seen a 61% jump in retirement value for removals, the highest growth rate of any sector this year.
These industries align decarbonization with business values, helping shape the next phase of the market.
Greenhushing Begins to Decline
Many companies used to quietly retire credits. This trend is known as “greenhushing.” However, things are changing. CEEZER’s Greenhushing Index tracks these anonymous retirements. It peaked at 42% during the 2024 U.S. elections. By Q1 2025, it fell to 35% and then to 23% in Q2.
This decline indicates growing buyer confidence. Companies are becoming more transparent, using credit retirements to showcase their climate leadership.

So, Is Integrity the New Standard for the Carbon Market?
Data from H1 2025 shows the carbon market is growing. Buyers are now focusing on credits that offer long-term benefits instead of offsets. With PACM credits coming later this year and high-integrity standards becoming standard, 2025 could establish new benchmarks for credibility and performance.
As demand and quality expectations increase, developers and registries will feel more pressure to deliver. The voluntary carbon market is aligning more with compliance markets. It is becoming a key tool for global climate action.
Allister Furey, CEO at Sylvera, summarized:
“Demand for credits and, in particular, high-quality credits is at an all-time high. At the same time, increasing use of project-based credits in compliance schemes is narrowing the gap between voluntary and compliance markets. Meeting both higher climate integrity standards, as evidenced by ratings, and eligibility criteria for schemes, like CORSIA, is being seen as essential for new projects in development. Market alignment with both integrity and regulatory expectations is starting to unlock the potential of carbon markets to deliver genuine climate impact at lower economic costs.”
If this trend continues, 2025 won’t just break records; it could redefine how the world values the carbon removal market.
The post Carbon Removal in 2025: Are You Investing in the Right Climate Credits? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

