Aramco, a top player in energy and chemicals, has teamed up with Siemens Energy. Together, they have launched Saudi Arabia’s first Direct Air Capture (DAC) test unit. The plant can remove 12 tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year. This initiative is a big step. It will help reduce Saudi emissions and promote carbon capture technology for a more sustainable future.
Ali A. Al-Meshari, Aramco Senior Vice President of Technology Oversight and Coordination, said:
“Technologies that directly capture carbon dioxide from the air will likely play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions moving forward, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors. The test facility launched by Aramco is a key step in our efforts to scale up viable DAC systems, for deployment in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and beyond. In addition to helping address emissions, the CO2 extracted through this process can in turn be used to produce more sustainable chemicals and fuels.”
Saudi Arabia Emissions

Aramco and Siemens Energy Push for Cost-Effective DAC Expansion
The press release revealed that Aramco will use the facility to test advanced CO2 capture materials for Saudi Arabia’s climate. The company also wants to lower costs. This will make DAC technology more affordable and easier to expand in the region.
Siemens Energy is a global leader in energy technology. The company helps industries and nations cut emissions in their energy sectors. They create reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy systems.
By partnering with Siemens, Aramco can quickly scale up its DAC technology. This move will pave the way for larger DAC projects in the future.
Expanding Carbon Capture Efforts
This initiative aligns with Aramco’s broader carbon capture strategy, a key element in its goal to achieve net-zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions across its wholly-owned operated assets by 2050.
It is focusing on both point-source CO2 capture and removing CO2 from the air. This is part of its circular carbon economy approach.
Building One of the World’s Largest CCUS Hubs
This launch followed the announcement when Aramco, Linde, and SLB signed a deal in December last year. They will develop one of the biggest Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) hubs in the Jubail industrial zone. Aramco has a majority stake of 60%, with Linde and SLB each owning 20%.
Starting in 2027, the Jubail CCUS hub will capture up to nine million metric tons of CO2 per year. This hub will initially capture nine million metric tons of CO2 each year. It will take emissions from three Aramco gas plants and other industrial sources.
Future phases will boost capacity even more. This reinforces Aramco’s commitment to cutting emissions and promoting sustainability. By sharing CO2 transport and storage, industrial emitters can reduce costs and risks. They also benefit from economies of scale.
Aramco’s Innovative Carbon Capture Technologies
Other than the Jubail CCUS hub, Aramco has more innovative CCUS projects in its portfolio. They use the latest and cutting-edge technology and smart solutions to tackle emissions.
Hawiyah NGL CCS plant
The Hawiyah NGL plant captures 45 million standard cubic feet of CO2 daily. CO2 moves 85 kilometers to the Uthmaniyah oil reservoir. There, it increases oil production and stores carbon underground. This is part of Aramco’s long-term carbon management strategy.
Mobile Carbon Capture technology
Aramco is making vehicles cleaner. Its Mobile Carbon Capture technology traps up to 25% of a car’s CO2 emissions. The captured carbon is stored on board and later unloaded at fuel stations for recycling or sequestration.
The company is also developing cleaner fuels and engine technology. Aramco doesn’t see CO2 as waste. Instead, it transforms it into valuable resources for new materials and energy.
Natural Carbon Sinks
Nature is a key ally in Aramco’s fight against emissions. The company is restoring and planting millions of mangrove trees. These natural carbon sinks absorb CO2, boost biodiversity, and conserve water. They are also building algae ponds and photobioreactors. These will help capture more CO2, beyond just trees.

Aramco’s Commitment to a Low-Carbon Future
Aramco is dedicated to cutting emissions while supplying the world’s energy needs. The company invests in low-carbon projects to help Saudi Arabia reach net-zero emissions by 2060.
It also plans to achieve net-zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for its wholly owned assets by 2050, as per its sustainability report.
Emission Reduction and 2035 Target
-
Upstream carbon intensity (2023): 9.6 kg CO2e per barrel of oil equivalent (boe).
-
Scope 2 emissions (2023): 13.0 MMtCO2e under a market-based calculation.
-
52 MMtCO2e targeted reduction by 2035 from its operations.

Aramco follows a structured approach focused on five key areas to achieve these targets. We explain them below:
1. Energy Efficiency
It focuses on energy efficiency to reduce emissions. The goal is to cut 7 MMtCO2e each year through energy-saving measures. Here are some techniques:
- Optimizing oil and gas operations to reduce waste.
- Using digital tools and AI to track energy use and find areas to improve.
Historic impact – Since 2000, Aramco’s Energy Management Program cut emissions by 31.43 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MMtCO2e) and aims to
2. Flaring and Methane Reduction
Reducing gas flaring and methane leaks is a top priority. They have invested in technologies like advanced sensors and satellite monitoring to quickly detect and fix methane leaks. The gas would otherwise be burned or released into the atmosphere.
-
Flare gas recovery – In 2023, Aramco recovered 8.9 billion standard cubic feet (scf) of flare gas, preventing unnecessary emissions.
Notably, Aramco has one of the lowest upstream methane and flaring intensities in the global energy industry. Additionally, their upstream methane emissions decreased by 5.1%
despite an increase in natural gas production.

3. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
As explained before, Carbon capture and storage is a major part of Aramco’s emissions reduction plan. With large-scale CCS projects in the pipeline, they aim to store up to 14 MMtCO2e per year by 2035.
The Jubail CCS Hub will play a major role in supporting the Kingdom’s target of capturing 44 MMtCO2e per year by 2035.
4. Expanding Renewables
Aramco is diversifying its energy portfolio. It invests in solar and wind power. The company is also exploring geothermal energy. This aims to further reduce emissions.
-
Major investments – By 2030, Aramco plans to develop 12 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind energy.
In January 2024, Aramco’s 1.5 GW solar project, one of the largest in the region, became fully operational. Its goal is to invest in research that makes renewable energy cheaper and more efficient.
5. Natural Climate Solutions
Third-party studies show Aramco’s mangrove projects have absorbed about 445,000 tons of CO2. Their algae farms and other biological methods capture CO2 from the air effectively.
- Carbon credit portfolio: They are also working on high-quality carbon offset projects. This helps balance emissions from tough-to-reduce sectors.
In conclusion, Aramco and Siemens Energy’s partnership is all set to transform Saudi Arabia’s carbon capture efforts. This collaboration marks a major step toward a cleaner, more sustainable future.
The post Aramco’s First-Of-Its-Kind Direct Air Capture Plant Powers Saudi’s Net-Zero Mission appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

