Connect with us

Published

on

The UK’s solar farms and rooftops generated more electricity than ever before in the first five months of 2025, as the country enjoyed its sunniest spring on record.

The figures, revealed in new Carbon Brief analysis, show that the nation’s solar sites have generated a record 7.6 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity during January to May 2025.

This is some 42% higher than the 5.4TWh generated in the same period last year, as well as marking a much larger 260% increase in the past decade.

Solar hit a new half-hourly record of 13.2 gigawatts (GW) on 6 April and, for the first time, accounted for more than 10% of monthly electricity generation in two consecutive months (April and May).

The solar electricity generated in 2025 to date has avoided the need to import gas costing around £600m, which would have released 6m tonnes of carbon dioxide (MtCO2) when burned.

However, solar was still only the UK’s sixth-largest source of electricity in 2025 to date, after gas (37TWh), wind (33TWh), imports (18TWh), nuclear (15TWh) and biomass (8.0TWh).

Although this year’s solar high was partly driven by the record sunniest spring, it was also aided by rising capacity, which reached 20.2GW in 2024, up by 2.3GW from 17.9GW a year earlier.

Solar capacity is set to reach at least 45GW by 2030 as part of the government’s ambition to decarbonise the power sector and become a “clean-energy superpower”.

(This article refers to the UK throughout, but the electricity generation data only covers the island of Great Britain. Northern Ireland is part of the all-Ireland electricity system.)

Solar record

The leap in solar output in 2025 saw generation reaching a record 7.6TWh in the first five months of the year, up 42% year-on-year.

Electricity output from UK solar installations saw particularly big jumps in March – where the 2,320 megawatts (MW) average was up 66% from a year earlier – and in April (3,189MW, up 53%).

There was a more modest 37% year-on-year increase in May 2025 – the country’s second-sunniest May on record – with average output reaching a new monthly high of 3,383MW.

The amount of electricity generated from solar also hit a new high of 2.5TWh in May 2025, beating April 2025’s 2.3TWh into second place. The previous record of 2.1TWh was set in June 2024.

The figure below shows the average monthly output of the UK’s solar capacity, in MW. Output dips in the short, dark days of winter and generally peaks with the longer daylight hours in June.

(The differences between installed electricity generating capacity, actual power output at any given moment and the amount of electricity generated per hour/day/month/year can cause confusion. The UK’s installed solar capacity reached 20GW at the end of last year. This is the maximum amount of power that could theoretically be produced at one time. In practice, the maximum power output recorded to date is 13GW and the average across a full month reached just over 3GW in May, generating 2.5TWh of electricity.)

Monthly average electricity output from solar power in the UK from 2013 to 2025, megawatts.
Monthly average electricity output from solar power in the UK from 2013 to 2025, megawatts. Source: Carbon Brief analysis of figures from the National Electricity System Operator (NESO).

The electricity generated by the UK’s solar panels in the first five months of 2025 – at 7.5TWh – is enough to have offset the need for around 16TWh of imported gas.

Buying this gas would have cost around £600m – based on recent average wholesale prices – and burning it would have resulted in roughly 6MtCO2, adding nearly 2% to total UK emissions.

The 16TWh of avoided gas imports is equivalent to 10% of the UK’s net gas imports in the same period last year – or around 10 individual Q-Max liquified natural gas (LNG) tankers, the largest currently available.

(For comparison, the UK only took 24 LNG deliveries during April to September 2024, according to data provider Argus. Figures for the first five months of last year are not available.)

The total amount of electricity generated by solar determines how many deliveries of imported gas can be avoided each month, as well as how far the power sector can cut its emissions.

In total, solar accounted for 11.6% of UK electricity generation in May 2025, only the fourth time it has ever breached the 10% threshold, after June 2023, June 2024 and April 2025.

(Solar topped 10% of monthly global electricity generation for the first time in April this year.)

However, the impact on the electricity market depends more closely on the hour-to-hour and day-to-day variations in solar generation due to the weather, seasons and diurnal cycles.

The highest UK solar output on record was reached at 13:00 on 6 April, when the technology was delivering 13.2GW of power and meeting 40% of demand for that half-hour period.

Sunniest spring

The UK saw 653 hours of sunshine in the period from 1 March to 31 May 2025, making it the sunniest spring since records began in 1910, according to the Met Office.

This total is 43% higher than the average for 1961-90. Before this year, the previous record for the sunniest spring had been set in 2020, when there were 626 sunshine hours.

UK sunshine hours have been on an increasing trend, particularly since the 1980s, according to Met Office analysis for Carbon Brief and illustrated in the chart below, which does not cover 2025.

The analysis found that, on average, spring months had been around 15% sunnier over the past decade than during the reference period from 1961-90.

(The analysis put this trend down to a combination of natural variability, changing circulation patterns and possible human influence from shifts in aerosol pollution.)

Sunshine duration UK
Annual UK sunshine duration from 1910 to 2024, hours per year. The trend is represented by a black dashed line, the 1991-2020 average is shown in pink and the highest and lowest values in the series are shown by the red and blue dashed lines, respectively. The 2024 value is represented by the horizontal brown line. Credit: Met Office

In a statement announcing the sunniest spring, Met Office scientist Emily Carlisle said: “Seven of the top ten sunniest springs on record for the UK since 1910 have occurred since the year 2000.”

A further Met Office release notes that spring 2025 is not only the sunniest spring on record, but also the fourth-sunniest season overall, with only three summers having had more sunshine.

The extra sunshine this spring contributed to unusually high solar power output per unit of installed capacity, a metric known as the “capacity factor” of the UK’s solar plants.

The capacity factor is a percentage, showing the actual electricity generation relative to the maximum theoretical output, if the panels were working at full capacity all of the time.

Clean power

While sunny weather helped drive the new highs for solar this spring, the UK’s growing capacity also contributed to the records.

After stagnating at around 12-14GW for several years after the then-Conservative government’s decision to end subsidies for solar in 2015, the UK’s installed capacity has since leapt to 20.2GW as of the end of 2024.

Capacity has grown as prices have fallen – boosting the economic case for solar – and as projects with newer “contracts for difference” have started to get built.

Early 2025 has seen the strongest start to the year since 2012 in terms of new rooftop solar capacity. Moreover, the UK is expected to add 3-3.5GW of new solar capacity across 2025 as a whole, according to Solar Media Market Research, up from the 2.3GW added in 2024.

Since taking office last July, energy secretary Ed Miliband has approved around 3GW of new solar capacity at giant sites, including the 500MW Heckington Fen and 500MW Gate Burton schemes.

The government is targeting 45-47GW of solar by 2030 as part of its “mission” to become a “clean-energy superpower”, which aims to have low-carbon sources meeting 100% of UK electricity demand and at least 95% of generation in the country.

Before then, the National Energy System Operator (NESO) is aiming to run the electricity system without fossil fuels for a short period, at some point this year.

Since setting itself this target in 2019, NESO has been making preparations by contracting for zero-carbon sources of grid stability services. These include “inertia” and voltage control, which have traditionally only been offered by conventional fossil-fuel generators.

Only familiar to grid engineers, previously, these terms have recently seen widespread usage in media coverage and finger-pointing over April’s blackouts in Spain and Portugal.

The increase in electricity generation from variable sources, such as wind and solar, brings new technical and market-related challenges, including increasing periods of “negative pricing”.

However, the solutions to these challenges are well-known and already being implemented in the UK. These include the buildout of battery storage systems, increasing interconnector capacity linking the national grid to other countries and new sources of grid stability, such as flywheels.

The post Analysis: UK’s solar power surges 42% after sunniest spring on record appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Analysis: UK’s solar power surges 42% after sunniest spring on record

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Efforts to green lithium extraction face scrutiny over water use 

Published

on

Mining companies are showcasing new technologies which they say could extract more lithium – a key ingredient for electric vehicle (EV) batteries – from South America’s vast, dry salt flats with lower environmental impacts.

But environmentalists question whether the expensive technology is ready to be rolled out at scale, while scientists warn it could worsen the depletion of scarce freshwater resources in the region and say more research is needed.

The “lithium triangle” – an area spanning Argentina, Bolivia and Chile – holds more than half of the world’s known lithium reserves. Here, lithium is found in salty brine beneath the region’s salt flats, which are among some of the driest places on Earth.

Lithium mining in the region has soared, driven by booming demand to manufacture batteries for EVs and large-scale energy storage.

Mining companies drill into the flats and pump the mineral-rich brine to the surface, where it is left under the sun in giant evaporation pools for 18 months until the lithium is concentrated enough to be extracted.

The technique is relatively cheap but requires vast amounts of land and water. More than 90% of the brine’s original water content is lost to evaporation and freshwater is needed at different stages of the process.

One study suggested that the Atacama Salt Flat in Chile is sinking by up to 2 centimetres a year because lithium-rich brine is being pumped at a faster rate than aquifers are being recharged.

    Lithium extraction in the region has led to repeated conflicts with local communities, who fear the impact of the industry on local water supplies and the region’s fragile ecosystem.

    The lithium industry’s answer is direct lithium extraction (DLE), a group of technologies that selectively extracts the silvery metal from brine without the need for vast open-air evaporation ponds. DLE, it argues, can reduce both land and water use.

    Direct lithium extraction investment is growing

    The technology is gaining considerable attention from mining companies, investors and governments as a way to reduce the industry’s environmental impacts while recovering more lithium from brine.

    DLE investment is expected to grow at twice the pace of the lithium market at large, according to research firm IDTechX.

    There are around a dozen DLE projects at different stages of development across South America. The Chilean government has made it a central pillar of its latest National Lithium Strategy, mandating its use in new mining projects.

    Last year, French company Eramet opened Centenario Ratones in northern Argentina, the first plant in the world to attempt to extract lithium solely using DLE.

    Eramet’s lithium extraction plant is widely seen as a major test of the technology. “Everyone is on the edge of their seats to see how this progresses,” said Federico Gay, a lithium analyst at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. “If they prove to be successful, I’m sure more capital will venture into the DLE space,” he said.

    More than 70 different technologies are classified as DLE. Brine is still extracted from the salt flats but is separated from the lithium using chemical compounds or sieve-like membranes before being reinjected underground.

    DLE techniques have been used commercially since 1996, but only as part of a hybrid model still involving evaporation pools. Of the four plants in production making partial use of DLE, one is in Argentina and three are in China.

    Reduced environmental footprint

    New-generation DLE technologies have been hailed as “potentially game-changing” for addressing some of the issues of traditional brine extraction.

    “DLE could potentially have a transformative impact on lithium production,” the International Lithium Association found in a recent report on the technology.

    Firstly, there is no need for evaporation pools – some of which cover an area equivalent to the size of 3,000 football pitches.

    “The land impact is minimal, compared to evaporation where it’s huge,” said Gay.

    A drone view shows Eramet’s lithium production plant at Salar Centenario in Salta, Argentina, July 4, 2024. (Photo: REUTERS/Matias Baglietto)

    A drone view shows Eramet’s lithium production plant at Salar Centenario in Salta, Argentina, July 4, 2024. (Photo: REUTERS/Matias Baglietto)

    The process is also significantly quicker and increases lithium recovery. Roughly half of the lithium is lost during evaporation, whereas DLE can recover more than 90% of the metal in the brine.

    In addition, the brine can be reinjected into the salt flats, although this is a complicated process that needs to be carefully handled to avoid damaging their hydrological balance.

    However, Gay said the commissioning of a DLE plant is currently several times more expensive than a traditional lithium brine extraction plant.

    “In theory it works, but in practice we only have a few examples,” Gay said. “Most of these companies are promising to break the cost curve and ramp up indefinitely. I think in the next two years it’s time to actually fulfill some of those promises.”

    Freshwater concerns

    However, concerns over the use of freshwater persist.

    Although DLE doesn’t require the evaporation of brine water, it often needs more freshwater to clean or cool equipment.

    A 2023 study published in the journal Nature reviewed 57 articles on DLE that analysed freshwater consumption. A quarter of the articles reported significantly higher use of freshwater than conventional lithium brine mining – more than 10 times higher in some cases.

    “These volumes of freshwater are not available in the vicinity of [salt flats] and would even pose problems around less-arid geothermal resources,” the study found.

    The company tracking energy transition minerals back to the mines

    Dan Corkran, a hydrologist at the University of Massachusetts, recently published research showing that the pumping of freshwater from the salt flats had a much higher impact on local wetland ecosystems than the pumping of salty brine. “The two cannot be considered equivalent in a water footprint calculation,” he said, explaining that doing so would “obscure the true impact” of lithium extraction.

    Newer DLE processes are “claiming to require little-to-no freshwater”, he added, but the impact of these technologies is yet to be thoroughly analysed.

    Dried-up rivers

    Last week, Indigenous communities from across South America held a summit to discuss their concerns over ongoing lithium extraction.

    The meeting, organised by the Andean Wetlands Alliance, coincided with the 14th International Lithium Seminar, which brought together industry players and politicians from Argentina and beyond.

    Indigenous representatives visited the nearby Hombre Muerto Salt Flat, which has borne the brunt of nearly three decades of lithium extraction. Today, a lithium plant there uses a hybrid approach including DLE and evaporation pools.

    Local people say the river “dried up” in the years after the mine opened. Corkran’s study linked a 90% reduction in wetland vegetation to the lithium’s plant freshwater extraction.

    Pia Marchegiani, of Argentine environmental NGO FARN, said that while DLE is being promoted by companies as a “better” technique for extraction, freshwater use remained unclear. “There are many open questions,” she said.

    AI and satellite data help researchers map world’s transition minerals rush

    Stronger regulations

    Analysts speaking to Climate Home News have also questioned the commercial readiness of the technology.

    Eramet was forced to downgrade its production projections at its DLE plant earlier this year, blaming the late commissioning of a crucial component.

    Climate Home News asked Eramet for the water footprint of its DLE plant and whether its calculations excluded brine, but it did not respond.

    For Eduardo Gigante, an Argentina-based lithium consultant, DLE is a “very promising technology”. But beyond the hype, it is not yet ready for large-scale deployment, he said.

    Strong regulations are needed to ensure that the environmental impact of the lithium rush is taken seriously, Gigante added.

    In Argentina alone, there are currently 38 proposals for new lithium mines. At least two-thirds are expected to use DLE. “If you extract a lot of water without control, this is a problem,” said Gigante. “You need strong regulations, a strong government in order to control this.”

    The post Efforts to green lithium extraction face scrutiny over water use  appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Efforts to green lithium extraction face scrutiny over water use 

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Maryland’s Conowingo Dam Settlement Reasserts State’s Clean Water Act Authority but Revives Dredging Debate

    Published

    on

    The new agreement commits $340 million in environmental investments tied to the Conowingo Dam’s long-term operation, setting an example of successful citizen advocacy.

    Maryland this month finalized a $340 million deal with Constellation Energy to relicense the Conowingo Dam in Cecil County, ending years of litigation and regulatory uncertainty. The agreement restores the state’s authority to enforce water quality standards under the Clean Water Act and sets a possible precedent for dozens of hydroelectric relicensing cases nationwide expected in coming years.

    Maryland’s Conowingo Dam Settlement Reasserts State’s Clean Water Act Authority but Revives Dredging Debate

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    A Michigan Town Hopes to Stop a Data Center With a 2026 Ballot Initiative

    Published

    on

    Local officials see millions of dollars in tax revenue, but more than 950 residents who signed ballot petitions fear endless noise, pollution and higher electric rates.

    This is the second of three articles about Michigan communities organizing to stop the construction of energy-intensive computing facilities.

    A Michigan Town Hopes to Stop a Data Center With a 2026 Ballot Initiative

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com