If you stop commuting, your work-related carbon footprint could drop by more than half. However, this only happens if you make smart choices at home and recognize the growing environmental impact of the digital tools that enable remote work.
Remote and hybrid work have grown rapidly since the pandemic, and research is now reflecting this shift. A 2023 study from Cornell University and Microsoft found that full-time remote workers can lower their work-related carbon footprint by up to 54% compared to office workers. However, this reduction depends a lot on your lifestyle, where you live, and how your home is powered. There is also a new factor to consider: AI tools are now part of most remote work setups, and they bring their own environmental impact that needs attention.
What the Latest Research Actually Shows
The Cornell/Microsoft study is the most comprehensive analysis to date, and its conclusions are more nuanced than the headlines suggest. Remote workers who log four or more days at home each week achieve the biggest emissions reductions — up to 54%. Hybrid workers, depending on arrangement, reduce their footprint by 11% to 29%. But working from home just one day a week? The benefit nearly disappears, largely offset by non-commute trips and residential energy use.
The study’s most surprising finding is that information and communication technology — your laptop, your router, your video calls — has a negligible impact on total carbon footprint compared to commuting and office building energy. The big variables are how you get around on non-work days, whether your home runs on clean energy, and whether your employer reduces office space when people stop working there regularly.
Seat sharing is one overlooked lever: hybrid workers sharing desks under full building attendance can cut office-related emissions by up to 28%. Companies that maintain empty office space for remote employees are effectively double counting their environmental footprint.
A 2025 survey found that 62.3% of Americans believe remote work has had a positive impact on the environment, and 95% of people working from home report that they behave more sustainably without trying by using reusable mugs, reducing printing, and cooking at home. Those behavioral shifts are real, even if they’re harder to quantify than commute math.

The AI Variable Adds Emissions
AI tools are becoming common for remote workers, and they’re not free from an emissions standpoint.
Every AI query you send, whether for a meeting summary, a draft email, or a research lookup, draws power at a data center. A December 2025 study in the journal Patterns estimated that AI systems running in data centers could produce between 32.6 and 79.7 million tons of CO₂ in 2025 alone. Our own coverage of AI’s carbon footprint found that always-on AI agents, the kind that continuously scan inboxes, monitor projects, or run background analysis, can consume orders of magnitude more energy than occasional conversational use.
AI’s efficiency picture is mixed, but improving as chips, data centers, and prompts are refined. Google reported a 33x reduction in energy per median prompt over one year. But historically, efficiency gains in computing are overwhelmed by growth in usage — and AI-assisted remote work tools are proliferating fast. The World Economic Forum said in September 2025 that without intentional design, the hidden carbon footprint of remote digital collaboration could grow unchecked, offsetting the gains from reduced commuting.
For example, on hour-long HD video call can emit between 150 and 1,000 grams of CO₂, depending on how the data center is powered. Switching to standard definition or turning the camera off entirely for large-group updates can dramatically reduce that impact.
Location Still Drives the Math
Where your employees live influences the sustainability calculus more than almost anything else. Urban workers who can bike or take transit to a coworking space on hybrid days often outperform both full-remote and office-commuter models. Suburban and rural remote workers, especially those in single-occupancy gas-powered vehicles, can neutralize the home energy savings quickly.
Electric vehicles shift that equation, but only if the regional grid is clean. The Cornell study notes that emissions reductions from EVs depend on the extent of power grid decarbonization. A remote worker in West Virginia charging an EV from a coal-heavy grid will not see the same benefit as one in the Pacific Northwest.
There’s also an equity dimension that sustainability analyses frequently miss. A 2023 study in the journal Resources, Conservation and Recycling found that low-income workers who are least likely to hold remote-eligible jobs shoulder a disproportionate share of the burden in carbon reduction scenarios centered on telework. A green work policy that only works for knowledge workers isn’t a complete climate strategy.
The Home Office Is Where Individuals Have the Most Control
Your home energy source matters most. Workers with solar panels, heat pumps, or access to renewable energy tariffs capture substantially more of the commute-reduction benefit. Those heating with natural gas or cooling with inefficient window units can erode the benefit considerably.
Choosing ENERGY STAR-rated equipment is the baseline. Beyond that, the Cornell study found that non-commute travel is the sleeper variable because remote workers who use their schedule flexibility to run more errands by car, or who move farther from urban centers, can significantly offset what they save by not driving to an office. Bike-accessible errands and transit-friendly neighborhoods matter.
Use AI tools intentionally rather than as a default for tasks you can do quickly without them. Turn off always-on AI agents when continuous monitoring isn’t necessary. Check whether your preferred platforms disclose their energy sourcing, and push the ones that don’t.
What Employers Can Do Differently
Research findings clearly suggest that remote work’s environmental benefits are not automatic. They require active choices by organizations, not just individuals. Companies tracking carbon neutrality should include the emissions of their remote workforce in their accounting, not treat off-site employees as zero-emission by default.
Concrete organizational steps supported by research:
- Reduce or eliminate dedicated office space for fully remote employees; shifting a desk hoteling strategy to make room for people when they are in the office.
- Implement seat sharing for hybrid arrangements in existing offices.
- Incentivize public transit and active commuting for hybrid workers.
- Audit AI tool deployments to understand which agents run continuously and whether batch processing could serve the same function at a fraction of the energy cost.
- Normalize lower-bandwidth video defaults: turn off HD video for large meetings and encourage camera-optional norms for all-hands updates.
- Choose cloud and collaboration platforms that disclose renewable energy commitments, and pressure those that don’t to be transparent.
Actions To Take At Home
The most impactful individual moves, in rough order of significance:
- Power your home using clean energy. Solar panels, a green energy tariff, or a community solar subscription capture the full benefit of eliminating your commute.
- Drive less on days off. Non-commute car trips are the biggest wildcard in remote work emissions. Combine errands, bike when you can, and stay aware of the trips you’re adding back.
- Use AI tools intentionally. Every query has a cost. Treat AI the way you’d treat any other energy-using appliance — useful, but worth using mindfully.
- Lower video call resolution. Switching from HD to SD in video meetings — or turning your camera off for large presentations — can cut conferencing emissions significantly.
- Buy refurbished or Energy Star equipment. A refurbished laptop avoids new materials extraction. Energy Star monitors and peripherals reduce idle-state draw.
- Advocate for your building. If you’re in a hybrid arrangement, push your employer to implement seat sharing and right-size the office footprint.
Related Reading on Earth911
Your AI Carbon Footprint: What Every Query Really Costs
Greening the Cloud: How AI Is Reshaping Data Center Power Demands
What Is the Carbon Footprint of Video Streaming?
Editor’s Note: This article was orginally published on March 13, 2018, and was substantially updated in March 2026.
The post Is Working from Home Really More Sustainable? appeared first on Earth911.
https://earth911.com/business-policy/telecommuting-sustainable/
Green Living
Earth911 Inspiration: Be a Mountain or Lean on One
This week’s quote is a Somali proverb: “Be a mountain or lean on one.”
Earth911 inspirations. Post them, share your desire to help people think of the planet first, every day. Click to get a larger image.
The post Earth911 Inspiration: Be a Mountain or Lean on One appeared first on Earth911.
https://earth911.com/inspire/earth911-inspiration-be-a-mountain/
Green Living
8 Best Ethical & Sustainable Flats That Are Effortlessly Chic
Ballet flats have long been a staple in my wardrobe, but in the past few years have experienced a significant resurgence — and for good reason. The right pair can be practical, versatile, and oh so chic through days at work, with family, or out for the evening. But finding that “just right” set that’s well-crafted and sustainably made can be a whole other story. That’s why this sustainable flats guide exists.
Comfort, style, sustainability, and longevity are a lot to ask in a shoe, but I don’t believe it’s too much. It just takes some extra digging. And thankfully, I’ve done that digging for you. Because I get it! I want a flat that looks beautiful. I want a flat that’s made responsibly in line with my values. I want a shoe I can actually wear for my life. And I want that shoe to be worth the investment — it has to last. That’s why I vetted through dozens of brands to create this curated list of flats.
What Makes a Flat More Sustainable?
Material Sourcing
Footwear is a tricky category when it comes to sustainable fashion because we ask a lot of our shoes. We wear them in rain or sunshine, paved paths and cobblestone, day in and day out for years. And through it all, they have to remain beautiful. Because when they’re unwearable, there’s not much left to do with them: there is no viable footwear recycling today. Anywhere that calls it “shoe recycling” is really repurposing that footwear. But once it can no longer be worn, it’s simply trash.
In other words, our shoes need to be incredibly durable, even though the most durable materials don’t always come with the lightest footprint. In footwear, when we talk about durability, we usually rely on leather or high-performance synthetic materials. Leather can hold up with many years of wear, getting more beautiful with wear, and is easy to repair when needed. Synthetic materials are also durable, particularly for withstanding the elements like snow and rain.
But sourcing these materials conventionally is highly polluting — so how can we source these materials better?
For synthetics, we have recycled options. Today, that’s largely recycling from plastic bottles, which isn’t without it’s controversies, but there is much innovation happening in the industry around true textile-to-textile recycling.
For leather, I look for:
- Vegetable-tanned (rather than chromium tanned)
- Locally-sourced leather (more traceability), and/or
- Leather Working Group certified leather, which covers responsible management of water, energy, and waste; safe chemical management, traceability of the raw material, and occupational safety for workers.
Notably, there is no certification for animal welfare, so these are imperfect systems. But the alternative is footwear made from synthetic plastic materials or vegan leather alternatives that don’t yet meet the same durability standards as leather. Sustainability within today’s constraints requires trade-offs.
That said, there is always secondhand leather — by buying shoes secondhand you can access the quality of leather without adding further demand for the material.
Responsible Manufacturing
When considering responsible production practices, I look for first and foremost: transparency. Seeing what the brand shares about their material sourcing, their process, and who made their shoes where. And then I look at the details of that process: were the shoes made locally or within a geographic region? How are the workers paid and treated — and under which conditions do they work?
And, sometimes a brand employs an out-of-the-box approach to manufacturing entirely. There are a few slow fashion footwear brands challenging the traditional fashion system of ordering in mass quantities before demand is assessed —which inevitably leads to overproduction. These brands use an “on demand” model instead, producing their shoes only after they’ve been ordered. This reduces the risk of overproduction (i.e. producing more than what gets sold) while also encouraging more thoughtful consumption. You can’t impulse buy a pair of Mary Janes that you have to wait 8 weeks for.
Wearable and Beautiful
The most perfectly environmentally sustainable flat in the world is useless if no one wants to wear it. And as I mentioned earlier, footwear cannot be recycled into new footwear at the end of its life, so we want our shoes to last a really long time. That means they need to be design forward and comfortable, too.
My Top Picks for More Sustainable and Ethical Flats
Keeping all of that in mind, these more sustainable flats brands meet this criteria, albeit to various extents. Some err more on comfort while some more on style. Some have admirable levels of transparency and social impact, while other brands have more of a focus on their ecological impact. I’ve included descriptions alongside each brand as well as a summary of conscious qualities so you can find a brand that meets your priorities best. And, of course, a price range so you know what makes sense for your budget as well.
Some that this guide includes affiliate links which means we may earn a commission if you shop through these links. As always, brands featured in shopping guides are brands that meet our strict sustainability criteria that we think you’ll love.
1. ALOHAS
Spanish brand ALOHAS flips the typical fashion production system on its head with its on-demand model.
Instead of overproducing thousands of shoes to later discount them, ALOHAS does the exact opposite. Its newest styles are available for pre-order at a discount of 30%, so the footwear brand can more accurately forecast demand. Then the shoes — like their flats — are primarily made by local artisans in Spain and Portugal. The brand regularly shows the behind the scenes of their production on their social media.
Conscious Qualities: On-Demand Production, Locally Made
Size Range: EU 35-42 (US 5-11)
Price Range: $195-$225
2. Rothy’s
If you’re looking for flats for all-day wear at work or running errands, Rothy’s is my recommendation with their cushy insoles. The brand makes their more sustainable flats from recycled plastic bottles, as well as materials like hemp and merino wool, but they still look sleek enough for the office.
While I might not wear Rothy’s flats to a fashion event (I prefer smooth leather for more elevated occasions), they are more than stylish enough to wear to most of my real-life scenarios. My favorite part about Rothy’s, though, is that they are machine washable.
Materials: Recycled & Natural Materials, Owns One Factory (undisclosed percentage of production)
Size Range: US 5-13
Price Range: $99-$165
3. Vivaia
Vivaia has the most adorable sustainable Mary Janes made from recycled plastic bottles. The adjustable straps and arch support make Vivaia’s Mary Janes suitable for all-day comfort, even if your feet are typically prone to slipping out of flats.
This vegan footwear brand also makes square-toe and pointed-toe flats for a more elevated look. And of the several recycled plastic bottle footwear brands on the market today, Vivaia tends to have the most elevated designs in my opinion.
Conscious Qualities: Vegan, Recycled Materials
Size Range: US 5-11
Price: $97 – $116
4. The RealReal
The RealReal is an authenticated luxury resale platform with contemporary, designer, and high-end luxury brands. Depending on your priorities you can find shoes in anywhere from pristine condition (but higher priced)) to “fair” or even “as is” for the largest discount from full price.
You don’t always have as many options aesthetically when shopping more sustainably, so I like to go to The RealReal when I’m looking for specific styles. I was recently looking for Mary Janes with feminine detailing and came across Larroude Flats on The RealReal, where I purchased a pair of neutral scalloped accent flats. (Pictured here!)
Conscious Qualities: Secondhand
Size Range: US 3.5-14
Price Range: $9+
5. ESSĒN
ESSĒN elegant, minimalist footwear is artisan handcrafted from Leather Working Group-certified leather in solar-powered facilities in Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Each shoe also comes with a product passport where you can view the step-by-step journey that product took through the brand’s supply chain from raw material to manufacturing to packaging and distribution.
Beyond transparency and responsible manufacturing, ESSĒN’s slow fashion business model prevents overproduction by operating on a made to order basis. Meaning while sizes and styles are predefined, the shoes are only produced after they’ve been ordered.
Conscious Qualities: LWG Certified, Supply Chain Transparency, On Demand Production
Size Range: EU 35-44 (US 4-13)
Price Range: $295-$450
6. Allbirds
Another comfort-first footwear option besides Rothy’s is Allbirds. The brand creates lightweight, super smooth and breathable flats from tree fibers, aptly called “Tree Breezers”. The (washable) shoes are also soft enough to wear without socks.
The Allbirds Tree Breezers are far more comfortable than typical flats, though I find that the Rothy’s are slightly comfier.
Conscious Qualities: Natural materials (FSC-Certified eucalyptus, castor mean oil, sugarcane EVA)
Size Range: US 5-11
Price Range: $105-$125
7. Darzah
Fair trade certified by Fair Trade Federation, Darzah’s ethical flats are entirely hand-embroidered and handcrafted in Palestine from locally sourced leather.
The tatreez flats from this nonprofit are embroidered by refugee and low-income women artisans in the West Bank with this traditional Palestinian techniques.
Conscious Qualities: Sustains Heritage Crafts, Fair Trade Certified
Size Range: EU 36-41 (US 6-10)
Price Range: $199 – $209
8. Nisolo
If you’re seeking a quality pair of classic leather flats ideal for your capsule wardrobe, Nisolo is a strong pick. Nisolo’s flats are handcrafted by artisans using leather sourced from a Leather Working Group certified tannery.
I’ve been wearing my Nisolo shoes for many years and can attest to their quality and durability.
That said, the brand has recently turned over to new ownership and now has significantly less information about their sustainability and ethics in their supply chain. I will be keeping a close eye on this brand to see if it continues to uphold the values Nisolo has long held.
Conscious Qualities: LWG-Certified, Artisan Handcrafted
Size Range: US 5-11
Price: $138 – $198
For More Slow Fashion Content:
You May Also Want to Check Out:
The Best Affordable Ethical Fashion Brands
Responsibly Made Vegan Shoe Brands
15 Brands with Ethical Boots to Rock this Fall (and Beyond)
The post 8 Best Ethical & Sustainable Flats That Are Effortlessly Chic appeared first on Conscious Life & Style.
https://www.consciouslifeandstyle.com/sustainable-ethical-flats/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sustainable-ethical-flats
Green Living
Earth911 Inspiration: What Provides Survives — Simon M. Lamb
Today’s quote is from writer, businessman, and conservationist Simon M. Lamb. In his book, Junglenomics: Nature’s Solutions to the World Environment Crisis, he suggests that nature provides solutions to help us reform our environmentally destructive economic practices.
Lamb writes, “As in nature, so in economics — what provides survives.”
Earth911 inspirations. Post them, share your desire to help people think of the planet first, every day. Click the poster to get a larger image.
Editor’s Note: This poster was originally published on March 27, 2020.
The post Earth911 Inspiration: What Provides Survives — Simon M. Lamb appeared first on Earth911.
https://earth911.com/inspire/earth911-inspiration-what-provides-survives-simon-m-lamb/
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases12 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测










