Connect with us

Published

on

silver

Silver is emerging as one of the most critical metals in the global shift toward green energy and high-tech innovation. While traditionally seen as a precious metal, silver now plays a central role in multiple industries—from solar energy and electric vehicles to medical devices and water purification.

Silver Goes Green: The Metal Powering a Sustainable Tomorrow

Unlike gold, which is primarily held as a store of value, silver enjoys strong industrial demand, making it a dynamic asset for investors. And in 2025, silver’s story is being driven by two big forces: skyrocketing green tech demand and tight supply.

Electronics and EV Growth

Silver is unmatched when it comes to electrical conductivity. It’s found in almost every smartphone, laptop, and electric car. The electronics industry alone consumed more than 200 million ounces of silver back in 2018, and that number is rising fast.

As electric vehicles become more popular, the metal’s demand can surge even further. Hybrid and EV production is expected to triple silver use in the auto sector by 2040, according to the Silver Institute.

silver demand
Source: The Silver Institute

Solar Power Surge

Silver is also a key ingredient in photovoltaic (PV) cells—the heart of solar panels. In 2025, silver demand from the solar sector is projected to account for 14% of global demand, up from 5% in 2014. Even as manufacturers reduce silver use per panel, the explosive growth in solar installations is driving total consumption higher. The Silver Institute expects a 20% increase in the solar PV market this year alone.

Other Green Uses:

Silver’s antimicrobial properties make it valuable for medical devices and coatings that prevent infections. It’s also used in catalysts to produce ethylene oxide, a critical compound for eco-friendly materials like antifreeze and textiles. On top of that, silver nanoparticles are now helping purify drinking water, a game-changing solution for underserved regions.

Silver Market 2025: Deficit Holds as Industrial Demand Breaks Records

The Silver Institute has highlighted that the global silver market is on track to post its fifth straight annual deficit in 2025. Although the shortfall may shrink by 19% to 149 million ounces (Moz), it will still remain one of the largest in recent years.

Let’s study how experts at The Silver Institute have portrayed the details of the silver market this year.

Industrial Demand Breaks New Ground

Global silver demand will hold steady at 1.20 billion ounces, with industrial use driving the market. As said before, silver demand in clean energy, electronics, and electric vehicles continues to climb. Industrial fabrication is set to rise by 3%, topping 700 Moz for the first time.

Photovoltaic installations will hit new highs despite policy shifts in the U.S., while vehicle electrification and AI-powered devices will further boost silver consumption. Demand will also grow in the ethylene oxide sector and brazing alloys.

Investment Rebounds, Jewelry Slows

Physical silver investment will rise by 3% as investors in Europe and North America adapt to higher prices. Easing profit-taking will also support the uptick. However, high local prices will likely prompt some Indian investors to sell, limiting the global recovery.

Jewelry demand is expected to drop by 6%. In India, soaring prices will drive a double-digit decline, while cautious spending in China will further weigh on sales. Western markets may hold up better as consumers shift from gold to branded silver jewelry. Meanwhile, global silverware demand will fall by 16%, led by a steep decline in Indian purchases.

silver supply and demand
Source: Metal Focus, Image taken from The Silver Institute

Supply Grows but Still Lags Behind Demand

Silver supply will grow by 3% to reach 1.05 billion ounces, the highest level in over a decade. Mine production will increase by 2% to 844 Moz, with expansions underway in China, Canada, Chile, and Morocco.

Silver recycling will rise by 5%, crossing the 200 Moz mark for the first time since 2012. Industrial scrap and India’s price-led recycling of jewelry and silverware will drive this growth. However, this supply is still in deficit for the growing demand.

Why Silver Stocks Are Heating Up in 2025

Silver stocks are gaining attention in 2025 as strong demand and tight supply push prices higher. It’s trading around $36.73/oz in June 2025 and is widely expected to break past $40/oz by mid-year.

silver price
Source: Investing.com

Furthermore, as industrial use of silver is growing fast, especially in solar panels, electric vehicles, and electronics, it’s helping silver companies grow and attract more investors.

At the same time, mine supply isn’t keeping up. Many new projects are delayed, and that’s limiting how much silver can be produced. This supply gap is boosting silver prices and making silver stocks more valuable.

Investors are also buying silver as a safe bet during uncertain times. The Silver Institute also pointed out that with high inflation, rising U.S. debt, and global trade tensions, many people are turning to silver as both a store of value and a key industrial metal.

Additionally, government support for clean energy is also lifting demand for silver. As this trend continues, silver stocks are set to benefit even more in 2025.

So, for investors looking to ride this wave, silver stocks offer high-leverage exposure to rising prices.

Top 3 Silver Stocks to Buy Now

These companies stand out for their performance, business models, and exposure to rising silver demand:

1. Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM)

Vancouver-based Wheaton is a top streaming company. Instead of mining, it signs contracts to buy silver and gold from other miners at fixed, low costs. This model reduces risk, ensures consistent margins, and lets Wheaton profit from price gains without high operating costs.

The company’s attributable silver production for 2025 is forecast at 20.5 to 22.5 million ounces

  • Stock Strength: WPM returned 54% in the last year and is up 133% over five years.
  • Investor Appeal: Ideal for conservative investors looking for reliable exposure to silver with less volatility than direct mining.

ESG Strategy

Wheaton plans to cut Scope 2 emissions by 50% by 2030 from a 2018 baseline of 38.5 tCO₂e. By 2040, it aims to align 80% of its Scope 3 financed emissions with 1.5˚C reduction targets.

Wheaton esg emission
Source: Wheaton

It funds climate solutions at partner sites and industry-wide to support the mining sector’s low-carbon shift. Its Climate Solutions Committee backs clean tech, innovation, and decarbonization projects. The company also launched the Future of Mining Challenge to promote emerging climate technologies.

2. Pan American Silver (PAAS)

Pan American Silver is one of the largest silver producers globally, with operations across Latin America. The company benefits from large economies, geographic diversity, and exposure to both silver and gold. La Colorada of Mexico is one of the company’s flagship mines, producing 7.1 million ounces (Moz) of silver in 2017.

  • Stock Strength: PAAS delivered 48% gains over one year and recently acquired Tahoe Resources to expand its footprint.
  • Investor Appeal: Great for investors who want exposure to mining operations and are looking for long-term production growth.

2025 Energy and Emissions Reduction Goals

PAAS’s latest sustainability report highlights that by 2025, the company aims to cut energy use by 67,000 GJ—around 1.1% of its projected total—and lower GHG emissions by 27,500 tCO₂e, or about 8.2% of its 2025 base case.

emissions Pan American Silver
Source: Pan American Silver

It also reaffirms its broader goal to reduce global Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by at least 30% by 2030.

3. MAG Silver (MAG)

MAG Silver is focused on developing high-grade silver projects, most notably the Juanicipio project in Mexico, in partnership with Fresnillo. The Juanicipio mine is one of the most promising silver projects globally, with low costs and strong margins.

  • Stock Strength: The stock surged 40% in the last year, with a 38% gain in the past six months as production ramped up.
  • Investor Appeal: Thanks to MAG’s aggressive growth profile, it is perfect for those seeking higher returns with a bit more risk.

Climate Commitment at Juanicipio Mine

MAG Silver is taking action to fight climate change and reduce its impact on the planet and local communities. The company follows a clear plan that supports its values, operations, and what its stakeholders expect.

It owns 44% of the Juanicipio Mine, while Fresnillo plc owns 56% and runs the site. Since this is MAG’s main asset, it includes 100% of the mine’s energy use and emissions in its own reports, even though Fresnillo reports them as the operator.

MAG silver
Source: Mag Silver
  • In 2023, the mine produced 21,614 tonnes of CO₂ emissions. Juanicipio was responsible for over 95% of this total.

Overall, experts predict silver prices to remain strong, making select silver stocks a good choice for long-term growth as clean energy demand increases. Factors like inflation, interest rates, and global clean energy policies can all influence silver prices, so staying informed on these trends can help with smarter investment decisions.

The post Why Silver Is the New Gold: Top 3 Silver Stocks to Watch in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain

Published

on

“…Protecting nature makes our business more resilient…”

For companies with land, water, food, fiber, or commodity exposure, the supply chain may be the most practical place to turn nature from a risk into an operating asset.

Your supply chain already has a nature strategy. It may be undocumented. It may live in procurement files, supplier contracts, commodity maps, and one spreadsheet nobody opens without coffee. But it exists.

If your business depends on farms, forests, water, soil, packaging, rubber, timber, fibers, minerals, or food ingredients, nature is part of your operating system. The question is whether you manage that system with intent, or discover it during a disruption, audit, or difficult board question.

That is why more companies are asking how to find Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain. Do not begin by shopping for offsets. Begin by asking where nature already affects cost, continuity, emissions, regulatory exposure, and supplier resilience.

What Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain Means

The European Commission defines nature-based solutions as approaches inspired and supported by nature that are cost-effective, deliver environmental, social, and economic benefits, and help build resilience. They should also benefit biodiversity and support ecosystem services.

In supply-chain terms, that becomes practical. Nature-based solutions in your supply chain can include agroforestry in cocoa, coffee, rubber, or palm supply chains. They can include soil health programs for food ingredients, watershed restoration near water-intensive operations, mangrove restoration linked to coastal sourcing regions, and avoided deforestation in forest-linked commodities.

The key test is business relevance. If your procurement team relies on a landscape, watershed, crop, or supplier base, that is where opportunity may sit. The best projects do not hover outside the business like a framed certificate. They plug into the system that already produces your revenue.

Why the Boardroom Should Care

For many companies, the largest climate and nature exposure sits outside direct operations. The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard gives companies a method to account for and report value-chain emissions across sectors. Purchased goods, land use, transport, supplier energy, and product use can make direct emissions look like the visible tip of a very large iceberg.

The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures notes that many nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities arise upstream and downstream. That is why nature-based supply chain investments matter to boards. You are managing supply security, audit readiness, investor confidence, and regulatory preparedness.

For companies exposed to EU markets, this also connects to rules and expectations such as CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, and SBTi FLAG.

Step One: Map Where You Touch Land, Water, and Living Systems

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain starts with mapping, not marketing.

Begin with procurement and Scope 3 data. Which categories carry high spend, high emissions, or high sourcing risk? Which suppliers depend on agriculture, forestry, mining, water-intensive processing, or land conversion? Which regions face water stress, heat, flood risk, soil degradation, deforestation, or biodiversity pressure?

The Science Based Targets Network uses a clear process for companies: assess, prioritize, set targets, act, and track. That sequence keeps companies from treating nature as a mood board. You identify where the business has exposure, then decide where intervention can create measurable value.

Step Two: Look for Operational Value Before Carbon Value

This is the center of CCC’s Dual-Value Model. A nature-based supply chain investment should do useful work for the business before anyone counts the carbon.

Agroforestry may improve farmer resilience, shade crops, protect soil, and reduce pressure on forests. Watershed restoration may reduce water risk for beverage, textile, or manufacturing sites. Soil health programs may improve the stability of agricultural inputs.

Carbon and sustainability value can still be created. In some cases, the project may support Scope 3 insetting. In others, it may generate verified carbon credits. Sometimes the main value may be resilience, readiness, and better supplier data.

The IPCC has found that ecosystem-based adaptation can reduce climate risks to people, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, with multiple co-benefits, while also warning that effectiveness declines as warming increases. That is a sober argument for acting early.

Step Three: Separate Insetting, Offsetting, and Resilience

Nature-based solutions in your supply chain are not automatically carbon credits. They are not automatically Scope 3 reductions either.

An insetting opportunity usually sits inside or close to your value chain. It may support Scope 3 reporting if the accounting rules, project boundaries, supplier connection, and data quality are strong enough.

An offsetting opportunity usually involves verified credits outside your value chain. High-quality credits can still play a role for residual emissions, but they should not distract from direct reductions or credible value-chain work.

A resilience opportunity may deliver business value even if you cannot claim a Scope 3 reduction immediately. That may include water security, supplier capacity, land restoration, biodiversity protection, or regulatory readiness.

Gold Standard’s Scope 3 value-chain guidance focuses on reporting emissions reductions from interventions in purchased goods and services. Verra’s Scope 3 Standard Program is being developed to certify value-chain interventions and issue units for companies’ emissions accounting. The direction is clear: stronger evidence, tighter boundaries, and more disciplined claims.

Step Four: Design for Audit-Readiness From the Beginning

Weak data is where promising nature projects go to become expensive anecdotes.

Before public claims are made, you need to know the baseline. What would have happened without the project? Who owns or manages the land? Which suppliers are involved? How will outcomes be measured? How will leakage, permanence, and double counting be addressed?

The GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard gives companies methods to quantify, report, and track land emissions, CO2 removals, and related metrics. This matters because land projects are rarely neat. Farms change practices. Suppliers shift volumes. Weather changes outcomes.

What Recent Corporate Examples Show

Recent case studies show that supply-chain nature work is becoming more serious, and more scrutinized.

Reuters has reported on insetting to reduce emissions within supply chains, including examples linked to Reckitt, Danone, Nestlé, Earthworm Foundation, and Nature-based Insights. The same article highlights familiar problems: measurement, double counting, supplier incentives, and credibility.

Reuters has also reported on companies using the Science Based Targets Network process to examine nature impacts. GSK, Holcim, and Kering were among the first companies with validated science-based targets for nature.

The Financial Times has covered the promise and difficulty of soil carbon in corporate supply chains, including a PepsiCo example in India where yields reportedly increased while greenhouse gas emissions fell. The lesson is that carbon, soil, biodiversity, farmer economics, and measurement need to be handled together.

A Practical Screening Checklist

A supply-chain nature-based solution deserves deeper review when you can answer yes to most of these questions:

  • Does it sit in or near a material supply-chain hotspot?
  • Does it address a real business risk?
  • Can you connect it to supplier behavior, land management, or sourcing practices?
  • Can the outcomes be measured?
  • Are the claim boundaries clear?
  • Does it support Scope 3 strategy, SBTi FLAG, CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, or investor reporting needs?
  • Are permanence, leakage, land rights, and community issues addressed?

Build the Asset, Then Make the Claim

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain is about identifying where your business already depends on living systems, then designing interventions that make those systems more resilient, measurable, and commercially useful.

For companies with material Scope 3 exposure, the right project can support supplier resilience, emissions strategy, regulatory readiness, and credible climate communication. The wrong project can become a glossy story with a weak audit trail.

Carbon Credit Capital helps companies design nature-based carbon and sustainability assets that embed directly into corporate supply chains. Through CCC’s Dual-Value Model, you can assess where sustainability investment may support operational resilience, Scope 3 insetting eligibility, regulatory readiness, and high-quality carbon or sustainability value.

Schedule your consultation with the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital to explore how nature-based supply chain investments can support your next stage of climate strategy.

Sources

  1. European Commission: Nature-based solutions
  2. GHG Protocol: Corporate Value Chain Scope 3 Standard
  3. TNFD: Guidance on value chains
  4. European Commission: Corporate Sustainability Reporting
  5. European Commission: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence
  6. European Commission: Regulation on Deforestation-free Products
  7. SBTi: Forest, Land and Agriculture FLAG
  8. Science Based Targets Network: Take Action
  9. IPCC AR6 WGII Summary for Policymakers
  10. Gold Standard: Scope 3 Value Chain Interventions Guidance
  11. Verra: Scope 3 Standard Program
  12. GHG Protocol: Land Sector and Removals Standard
  13. Reuters: Can insetting stack the cards towards more sustainable supply chains?
  14. Reuters: Three companies put their impacts on nature under a microscope
  15. Financial Times: The dubious climate gains of turning soil into a carbon sink

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living

Published

on

Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.

For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.

Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.

The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.

More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)

Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.

Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.

Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:

  • Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
  • Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
  • Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
  • Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs

The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?

How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs

There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.

Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)

According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)

In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)

The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)

After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)

For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.

How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

A light bulb, a pen, a calculator and some copper euro cent coins lie on top of an electricity bill

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.

Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.

Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)

As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)

These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)

Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)

For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.

How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates

On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.

Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.

As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)

While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.

How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes

Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.

The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.

These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.

Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action

While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.

While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.

For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:

  1. Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
  2. Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
  3. Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.

Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.

Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.

The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance

Published

on

A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com