The U.S. Air Force chose Oklo Inc., a nuclear energy startup based in California, as the preferred contractor to build a microreactor at its Eielson Base in Alaska. This step shows increasing military confidence in nuclear microreactor technology. It can provide off-grid power and heat in tough environments.
Oklo Nuclear: Powering the Future with Microreactors
Founded in 2013 by MIT engineers Jacob DeWitte and Caroline Cochran, Oklo develops small, advanced nuclear reactors. These reactors aim to provide clean and reliable energy.
These “Aurora” microreactors are smaller than regular nuclear power plants. They produce around 15 to 50 megawatts of electricity. That’s enough to power a small town, a military base, or a large industrial facility.
What makes the Aurora design unique is its ability to use recycled nuclear waste as fuel and run for up to 10 years without refueling. It also uses a fast-neutron spectrum and liquid metal cooling, allowing for a safer, more efficient design.
If the reactor overheats, the system slows the reaction. This removes the need for complex backup systems. Oklo aims to sell energy through long-term contracts, where it owns, operates, and maintains the reactor for the customer. This business model makes Oklo more like an energy service provider than a traditional reactor builder.
Steps Forward and Setbacks
In early 2025, Oklo finished drilling and site evaluations, which are necessary before construction starts. They must follow these steps before submitting a new licensing application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
Oklo submitted a combined license application to the NRC in 2020. However, it was rejected in 2022 because it lacked important technical information.
Despite the setback, the company has been working closely with regulators and plans to reapply later in 2025. If the NRC approves the application, Oklo could begin construction and possibly start generating power by 2027.
The company’s recent progress has also sparked interest from investors. After announcing the site preparation in Idaho, Oklo’s stock rose significantly. In 2025, its share price increased by more than 50% year-to-date and nearly 190% over the past 12 months.

The market seems to be responding to the company’s momentum and its potential role in the next wave of clean energy innovation.
Alaskan Pilot with the Air Force: A Cold Test for Hot Tech
The recent deal with the US Department of Defense is a major event for Oklo. The DoD selected the company for a long-term power purchase agreement.
The agreement, still in the planning stage, involves building an Aurora microreactor at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska. The base is about 26 miles southeast of Fairbanks. It is remote and hard to power using traditional methods.
Under the plan, Oklo will design, build, own, and operate the microreactor on-site. The reactor is expected to provide up to 75 megawatts of electric and thermal energy to the base. This energy setup lets the base run on its own. It also cuts down on the need for costly fuel deliveries, which can be tough during harsh Alaskan winters.
While the Notice of Intent from the U.S. Air Force shows a strong commitment to working with Oklo, the project is not yet finalized. It still needs NRC licensing approval, final contract negotiations, and further planning.
This is not the first time Eielson AFB has been involved in a microreactor plan. In 2023, a similar deal was canceled. This happened because of delays in regulatory permits and unclear timelines. This time, Oklo hopes its improved design and updated application will clear those hurdles.
If everything goes according to plan, Oklo could begin delivering power to Eielson as early as 2028. The project supports the Department of Defense’s goal. It aims to enhance energy security at military sites.
Also, it seeks to lower carbon emissions by using small, local clean energy sources. The US military is pursuing similar goal of powering its bases with nuclear.
Small Reactors, Big Future: Beyond the Arctic Circle
Oklo’s work is part of a larger movement toward small modular reactors (SMRs) and microreactors that aim to provide carbon-free power in places where wind and solar are not reliable. These advanced nuclear technologies are gaining attention not only from the military but also from tech companies and industrial users.
In 2025, big data center operators and cloud providers like Amazon, Google, and Switch showed interest in teaming up with nuclear companies. They want to secure long-term power for their operations.
Oklo is looking beyond Alaska. It plans to develop other projects in Idaho and Ohio, targeting a range of customers from local governments to private companies. The company’s approach—combining long-term contracts with on-site operation—could offer a flexible solution to growing global energy needs.
However, there are still some concerns. One issue is nuclear proliferation. Aurora reactors use high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU). This type has more uranium-235 than regular nuclear fuel.
In some cases, the design may involve plutonium-based fuels from recycled waste. Critics worry that these materials, if not properly secured, could be diverted for use in weapons.
In response, Oklo claims its design traps plutonium in radioactive waste. This makes it hard and risky to extract for other uses.
Oklo’s Nuclear Peers: Who Else Is Powering Up?
Alongside Oklo, several companies are advancing nuclear energy through SMRs and microreactors.
NuScale Power, based in Oregon, is a public company whose VOYGR‑6 SMR design (462 MWe) was approved in May 2025, building on its earlier VOYGR‑4 certification in 2023. It leads the SMR field with NRC design approval and a growing project pipeline.
TerraPower, backed by Bill Gates, is developing the Natrium reactor—a 345 MWe sodium‑cooled system paired with 1 GWh molten salt energy storage. Construction began in 2024, with commercial operation targeted by 2030.
Kairos Power focuses on fluoride‑salt high‑temperature reactors. It received NRC approval for its Hermes demonstration reactor in Tennessee and has a deal with Google to supply AI data centers by 2030.
Oklo’s Aurora microreactor represents a bold step forward in the future of clean, decentralized energy. Backed by the U.S. Air Force and rising investor trust, the company shows that small nuclear can significantly power remote sites, military bases, and tech infrastructure. While challenges remain, Oklo’s progress signals that microreactors may soon become a practical solution to both energy security and climate goals.
The post Oklo Stock Soars After U.S. Air Force Nuclear Energy Deal appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测



