The football governing body in Europe, Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), plans to allocate funding competitively through a newly established ‘climate fund,’ to address the sports’ significant carbon footprint.
The climate fund was established in part of UEFA EURO 2024 in Germany following the slogan ‘United by Football – Together for Nature’. The event will kick off in Munich on June 14 and ends with the final in Berlin on July 14.
Football’s Scoring Big on Carbon Footprint
Being the most popular sport globally, football or soccer in American terms, may not be considered a major carbon emitter compared to certain industries. However, the global football industry contributes to over 30 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. That’s roughly equal to the emissions of a small country like Denmark.
Leveraging its popularity and influence, the football industry can have a pivotal role in educating fans about climate change. With a market value of ~$1.9 trillion in 2019, it can help promote innovative solutions to address environmental challenges.
A study conducted a calculation of greenhouse has (GHG) emissions related to transportation for tire 3 football games during the 2012/13 season. The estimated emissions for transport to and from stadiums amounted to 56,237 tons of CO2e. Notably, the carbon footprint tends to increase for more significant games, as supporters and players often travel greater distances for crucial matches.
The chart shows the distance travelled by participating teams during the EURO 2020 event.

Spectators and teams are using various means of transportation to attend the tournament. Each mode emits a certain amount of CO2 as shown below, with flying releasing the most pollution.

To accurately assess their emissions, football clubs must consider not only the transport to and from games. They also have to account for all materials purchased for players, business travel, and even the emissions associated with the production of merchandise sold to fans. This requires a comprehensive mapping of the club’s activities, purchases, and sales.
The football league in the U.S. opted to purchase carbon credits to offset a portion of its carbon emissions.
- READ MORE: First NFL Team to Buy Carbon Credits
Kicking Off Change: UEFA’s €7 Million Climate Fund
For the Euro 2024 tournament this summer, UEFA will contribute €25 ($27) to the fund for every ‘unavoidable’ tonne of CO2e emissions. The estimated total of the fund stands at around €7 million ($7.6M) based on pre-event emissions projections.
Amateur football clubs in Germany, where the tournament takes place, have until June 30 to apply for financial support for their sustainability projects.
Eligible projects, focusing on the energy transition, water stewardship, waste management, or smart mobility, must be new initiatives. Clubs can seek up to 250,000 euros, and a streamlined application process is available for requests under 25,000 euros.
The objective is for UEFA’s financing to contribute to long-term emissions reduction, involving fans and local communities in the process.
Bernd Neuendorf, president of Germany’s football association (DFB), emphasized that the UEFA climate fund signifies the importance of amateur football in the country. He also noted that it provides clubs with an opportunity to enhance their commitment to environmental and climate protection.
Neuendorf further highlighted the collaborative efforts between the DFB, Germany’s federal government, UEFA, and other stakeholders to initially reduce the projected carbon footprint of the tournament, minimizing the necessity for offsetting.
Major sporting events, such as this, face challenges in decarbonization. Transportation accounts for a significant portion (60% – 70%) of football’s carbon footprint according to some estimates.
Addressing Scope 3 emissions, where transport footprint fall, is the most challenging task for professional sporting events. For instance, the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar generated an estimated 3.6 million tonnes of CO2e. Over half of these emissions came from spectator transportation, highlighting the substantial impact of travel.
UEFA’s Unique Approach: Local Goals, Global Impact
UEFA’s approach to offsetting stands out for its emphasis on community engagement rather than tracking of individual emissions in tonnes.
A notable distinction is the investment in small-scale local projects, deviating from the trend among many corporations that favor large-scale global initiatives. While most of these projects are nature-based, there’s a growing interest in supporting early-stage man-made carbon capture and removal technologies.
The year 2023 posed challenges for advocates of large international nature-based carbon offsetting schemes within voluntary carbon markets (VCM). These markets exceeded $1 billion in value collectively in 2021, with projections indicating a potential 160-fold increase by 2050.
Amid the integrity issues surrounding the VCM, initiatives like the Voluntary Carbon Market Integrity Initiative (VCMI) launched the Claims Code of Practice. The Code serves as a rulebook for companies in project selection, offsetting claims, and decarbonization-offsetting strategies. Collaborating with the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Markets (ICVCM), VCMI aims to enhance confidence in the market.
As UEFA takes a leap towards a sustainable football future, the climate fund becomes a symbol of the sport’s commitment to environmental responsibility. With an innovative offsetting approach and community-centric projects, UEFA aims to drive lasting change in football’s carbon footprint.
The post UEFA’s Green Goals: $7.6M Climate Fund for EURO 2024 Carbon Footprint appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

