TotalEnergies has made a big move in the UK clean energy sector. The oil major acquired a 435-megawatt (MW) renewable energy portfolio from Low Carbon. This portfolio includes large-scale solar power plants and advanced battery storage projects.
The acquisition boosts TotalEnergies‘ role in the UK energy market. It also aids the country’s shift to greener power sources.
Olivier Jouny, Senior Vice President of Renewables at TotalEnergies, remarked:
“We are delighted with the acquisition of these projects from Low Carbon. Located in the south of England, they benefit from favorable sunlight and complement our integrated electricity portfolio in the UK, which includes 1.1 GW of gross installed offshore wind, 1.3 GW of gross combined cycle gas turbine, and more than 600 MW of solar projects under development.”
Why Is This Acquisition Important?
The new portfolio adds 350 MW of solar energy and 85 MW of battery storage to TotalEnergies’ assets in the UK. This addition is essential because it helps the UK work toward its goal of having 70% of its electricity come from renewable sources by 2030. The clean energy from these projects is enough to power about 100,000 homes each year.
The oil major now manages over 600 MW of solar energy projects under development in the UK. These new assets join the company’s existing wind and gas power supplies, creating a more balanced and low-carbon energy mix. A diverse energy mix helps ensure a stable supply of electricity while reducing the use of fossil fuels.
Batteries: The Unsung Heroes of Solar Power
Solar power depends on sunlight, so it does not always generate electricity consistently. For example, solar panels produce less power on cloudy days or at night. Battery storage systems address this issue. They store extra electricity when the sun shines and release it when solar production decreases.
TotalEnergies’ 85 MW of battery storage increases the reliability of solar power. These batteries can provide electricity during periods of high demand or when solar generation is low. This reduces the need for backup energy from fossil fuels, which helps lower overall carbon emissions.
Environmental Benefits of the New Renewable Portfolio
The newly acquired projects are expected to deliver more than 350 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electricity each year. This is a major step toward reducing the use of fossil fuels in power generation. Solar energy produces far fewer carbon emissions than traditional sources, such as coal or natural gas.
Replacing 350 GWh of fossil-fuel-based electricity with solar power could reduce 50,000–60,000 tonnes of CO₂ emissions every year. The addition of battery storage makes this impact even greater by helping to match electricity supply with demand. This reduces the need for gas-fired power plants during times of high energy use or low solar production.
TotalEnergies’ strategy supports the UK’s Clean Power 2030 roadmap, shown below, which aims for a renewable-led electricity grid. This acquisition aligns with both the company’s and the nation’s goals for a cleaner, low-emissions future.

Estimated CO₂ Emissions Reduction
Switching 350 GWh of fossil-fuel electricity to solar power can cut CO₂ emissions by about 50,000 to 60,000 tonnes each year. This estimate is based on typical UK grid emission factors for displaced fossil generation.
Additional Impact from Battery Storage
The 85 MW battery storage will boost carbon savings. It allows more renewable energy to be used when needed. This also cuts down on fossil fuel backup.
Studies and industry data suggest that each megawatt of battery storage can avoid 500–1,000 tonnes of CO₂ emissions annually. For 85 MW of battery capacity, this translates to an additional annual reduction of 42,000 to 85,000 tonnes of CO₂ emissions.
Combined Annual CO₂ Savings
TotalEnergies’ expansion could reduce CO₂ emissions by 92,000 to 145,000 tonnes each year. This estimate comes from combining reductions from solar and battery storage. The figure shows how clean electricity generation and better grid reliability from energy storage work together.
Riding the Renewable Wave in the UK and Globally
The renewable energy market is growing quickly, both in the UK and around the world. In the UK, solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity could reach 20 gigawatts (GW) by 2025. At the same time, energy storage is becoming more important, with the UK energy storage market expected to be worth about £1.5 billion by 2030.

As shown by the chart above, demand could reach almost 10 GWh by 2030 and then double to 20 GWh by 2035. The British government has encouraged the growth of BESS by launching innovation competitions.
One recent example is the Longer Duration Energy Storage Demonstration (LODES), which offered £69 million in funding for start-ups and supported new types of battery technologies.
Globally, renewable energy could grow by 12% each year for the next five years. This growth comes from two main factors. First, government rules promote clean energy. Second, companies want to reduce their emissions.
Energy companies, like TotalEnergies, are driving this change. They are buying renewable assets and forming new partnerships.
TotalEnergies already owns 1.1 GW of offshore wind and 1.3 GW of gas capacity in the UK. The new 435 MW portfolio strengthens the company’s ability to provide a full mix of clean energy sources.

The oil giant can meet the UK’s rising energy demand by using solar, wind, gas, and battery storage. This approach also helps them stick to climate goals.
Powering the Path to Net Zero
Last year, TotalEnergies launched an initiative called “Our 5 Levers for Sustainable Change.” This program aims to involve all employees in reducing emissions by improving energy efficiency and using low-carbon technologies throughout the company’s operations.
In 2024, TotalEnergies reduced emissions from its operated sites by more than 36% compared to 2015 levels. This achievement was supported by over 200 projects focused on cutting emissions, which together eliminated 1.3 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e).

The company recently updated its emissions target for 2025 to 37 million tons (Mt) of CO₂e per year. It plans to reduce its net Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 40% by 2030, compared to 2015. This goal includes using 5 million carbon credits from nature-based projects. These credits will be reserved for emissions that cannot be eliminated after 2030 and will be used gradually, at about 10% per year.
By the end of 2024, TotalEnergies had invested about $750 million in projects to reduce emissions. These investments help save 1.5 million tons of CO₂e annually and reduce energy costs by more than $100 million each year.
While emissions from flexible power generation increased slightly, this was due to the addition of combined-cycle gas turbines (CCGTs) in the U.S. and the U.K. These turbines support the company’s expansion of low-carbon electricity.
Despite this, TotalEnergies’ total emissions fell by 25% compared to 2015 levels, showing significant progress toward its net-zero goals.
By investing in both solar power and battery storage, TotalEnergies is helping to ensure that clean electricity can be used at any time, not just when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing. This increases the reliability of the energy system and reduces the risk of power interruptions.
TotalEnergies’ recent acquisition from Low Carbon shows how big energy firms are leading the shift to cleaner, more dependable energy. The company is expanding its renewable energy portfolio, which supports national and global efforts to cut carbon emissions and protect the environment.
- READ MORE: Shell, Equinor, and TotalEnergies Expand Northern Lights CCS with $714 Million Investment
The post TotalEnergies Expands UK Renewables with 435 MW Acquisition appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

