Connect with us

Published

on

hydrogen

In 2024, hydrogen emerged as a climate-friendly alternative to fuel as well as electricity. Promising projects sparked to life on both the production and consumption fronts. Despite Trump’s pro-oil stance, analysts are optimistic about hydrogen’s future in this new year- 2025.

According to BNEF, clean H2 supply is projected to increase 30X and could reach 16.4 million metric tons annually by 2030. This surge is mostly attributed to supportive policies and a flourishing project pipeline.

As we step into 2025, several crucial moments await the low-carbon, clean hydrogen sector. This year, a wave of innovative startups is pushing the boundaries of hydrogen production, storage, and application, capable of transforming the clean energy landscape.

Here are the top 4 hydrogen startups of 2025 that are leading this revolution:

1. Hydrogenious LOHC Technologies (Germany): Revolutionizing Hydrogen Transport

Germany-based Hydrogenious LOHC Technologies is addressing one of the toughest challenges in the hydrogen value chain—safe and efficient storage and transport.

Founded in 2013, the company’s Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC) system uses benzyl toluene, a reusable heat transfer oil, to chemically bind hydrogen. This approach enables hydrogen to be stored and transported just like traditional fuels using existing infrastructure—cutting down both cost and risk.

Hydrogen System Targets 40% Emissions Cut

Hydrogenious, Bosch, and partners are installing a hydrogen power system at Hermann Josef Hospital in Erkelenz, Germany. Funded by Germany’s Education and Research Ministry, the Multi-SOFC (Solid Oxide Fuel Cells) project combines LOHC and SOFC technologies to deliver clean heat and power.

The project aims to reduce HJK’s carbon emissions by up to 40%. Initially, Bosch’s SOFC units run on natural gas while still achieving up to 60% electrical efficiency. Even in this early phase, the system cuts emissions by roughly 150 metric tons annually.

By 2026, Hydrogenious will integrate its LOHC technology, enabling the system to run primarily on hydrogen. Waste heat from the SOFC will power a dehydrogenation unit that releases hydrogen from the LOHC on-site, boosting overall system efficiency and lowering the hospital’s carbon footprint even further.

Thus, the Multi-SOFC project aims to deliver a reliable, low-emission energy solution. It shows how hydrogen can cleanly and affordably power large facilities. Once complete, it will serve as a global model for decarbonizing critical infrastructure.

Hydrogenious LOHC Technologies
Source: Hydrogenious LOHC Technologies

Why The Company Stands Out?

  • Backed by Big Names: Secured investments from JERA Americas, Temasek, Chevron, and Royal Vopak.
  • Industrial Projects: Operating a large-scale hydrogenation facility at Chempark Dormagen and contributing to the ‘Green Hydrogen @ Blue Danube’ initiative.
  • Global Expansion: Through a joint venture with Vopak, Hydrogenious is laying the groundwork for a global hydrogen supply chain.
  • Commercial Success: Deployed the first full LOHC-based hydrogen mobility chain, including pilot refueling stations in Germany.

With additional funding of €17 million raised in early 2025, the company is now accelerating its next phase of project deployment. Hydrogenious LOHC isn’t just innovating—it’s commercializing at scale.

MUST READ: Hydrogen in 2025: The Journey through Progress, Pitfalls, and Policy Shifts 

2. HiiROC (U.K.): Clean Hydrogen without CO₂

UK-based HiiROC is tackling the cost and emissions problem of hydrogen head-on with its Thermal Plasma Electrolysis (TPE) technology. Instead of relying on electricity-heavy electrolysis or carbon-intensive steam methane reforming, HiiROC produces zero-emission hydrogen by breaking down hydrocarbons into hydrogen and solid carbon black, a useful by-product.

What Makes It Game-Changing?

  • Ultra-Efficient: Uses 80% less power than water electrolysis.
  • Emission-Free: Produces no CO₂—a major leap in clean hydrogen production.
  • Modular Design: Can scale from small on-site generators to industrial-sized plants.
  • By-Product Value: Generates carbon black, widely used in tyres, plastics, and inks, offering dual revenue streams.
hydrogen HiiROC
Source: HiiROC

Zero-emission Carbon Black

HiiROC’s clean tech not only produces hydrogen but also generates solid, zero-emission carbon black as a by-product. It replaces traditional oil furnace methods that emit heavy pollution by creating a stable, pure form of carbon black with no emissions.

Thus, it offers a cleaner alternative for industries that rely on carbon black, including tyres, rubbers, plastics, inks, and toners.

 HiiROC HYDROGEN
Source: HiiROC

Unlocking New Potential Uses

HiiROC is also exploring innovative ways to put this clean carbon to work. Potential future applications include:

  • Environmental filters
  • Soil enhancers
  • Animal feed additives
  • High-performance and construction materials

In short, what was once a polluting material now has the potential to support decarbonization across multiple sectors.

Moving on, the company has raised over $35 million from major investors like Centrica and Kia Motors, reflecting strong market confidence. It’s partnering with Associated British Ports to build a production facility at Saltend Chemicals Park, set to produce 10 tonnes of hydrogen per day.

The company’s recognition under the UK’s Low Carbon Hydrogen Standard further boosts its regulatory credibility. With scalable tech, strategic projects, and government support, HiiROC is targeting to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors while keeping costs low.

3. Electric Hydrogen (U.S.): Scaling Clean Hydrogen for Heavy Industry

Founded in 2020, Electric Hydrogen, headquartered in Massachusetts, is on a mission to make green hydrogen cost-effective at an industrial scale. It focuses on building next-gen electrolyzer systems to decarbonize hard-to-electrify sectors such as:

  • Steel and metals production
  • Chemicals and ammonia
  • Cement manufacturing
  • Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) and e-methanol

In 2023, Electric Hydrogen raised $380 million in a funding round led by heavyweights including BP, Microsoft, and United Airlines. The raise pushed the company’s valuation past $1 billion, making it the first electrolyzer startup to reach unicorn status.

What Makes It Unique?

Electric Hydrogen’s standout innovation is its HYPRPlant—a fully integrated, modular electrolyzer platform designed for speed, scale, and cost savings.

  • Built around high-output PEM stacks
  • Pre-engineered for rapid site assembly
  • Cuts total installed costs by up to 60%
  • Backed by a 1.2 GW/year gigafactory in Massachusetts

This approach simplifies deployment, reduces risk, and accelerates timelines compared to traditional electrolysis systems.

Electric Hydrogen
Source:: Electric Hydrogen

Powering Cleaner Industries

Their 100MW plant uses advanced PEM technology and a smart “plant-as-a-product” design. This setup lowers costs by using fewer materials, saving space, and reducing installation time.

Their special electrolyzers produce much more hydrogen from the same stack size, making it easier to scale up and support big industrial projects.

Achieved Net Zero Emissions in 2023

In 2023, Electric Hydrogen’s Scope 1 and 2 emissions totaled around 600 metric tons of CO₂-equivalent, while Scope 3 emissions from their supply chain reached 17,725 metric tons.

Electric Hydrogen emissions
Source: Electric Hydrogen

However, the company offset all Scope 1 emissions by purchasing certified carbon credits from Sterling Planet and covered Scope 2 emissions with renewable energy certificates (RECs) from Terrapass.

  • This resulted in net-zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions in 2023.
Electric Hydrogen energy
Source: Electric Hydrogen

Most of their energy use came from electricity for manufacturing and R&D, along with natural gas for heating. A small amount of diesel was used to run a generator at the 1 MW protoplant in San Carlos, CA. It plans to use electricity to power larger test facilities in San Jose, CA, and Devens, MA.

4. Hystar (Norway): High-Efficiency Answer to Green Hydrogen Scaling

Founded in 2020 and based just outside Oslo, Hystar is a rising star in the clean hydrogen space. The company is reengineering how electrolyzers work—leveraging proprietary proton exchange membrane (PEM) technology to make green hydrogen production both cheaper and more scalable.

What Sets It Apart?

What sets Hystar apart is its ultra-thin membrane design—90% thinner than standard PEM systems. This breakthrough allows its systems to run at much higher current densities, which means:

  • Lower energy consumption
  • More hydrogen output per unit of power
  • Reduced use of critical raw materials

The result is a serious step-change in how economically green hydrogen can be produced at an industrial scale.

Smart Design, Scalable Tech

Hystar’s electrolysers are fully containerized and modular, making them easy to deploy. Its flagship Vega 1000 system delivers 5 MW of clean hydrogen production, designed for sectors like:

  • Heavy industry
  • Clean transport
  • Renewable energy storage
  • Industrial decarbonization

Better yet, the technology is built with automation and mass manufacturing in mind, future-proofing it for global scale.

Sustainable Production: From Megawatts to Gigawatts

Currently operating at 100 MW annual capacity, Hystar is scaling rapidly. Through Project Sagitta, the company is launching a gigawatt-scale, automated production facility in Høvik.

  • Starting with 1.5 GW/year by 2027
  • Expanding to 4.5 GW/year by 2031
  • Expected to produce 6 million tonnes of green hydrogen over 10 years
  • Avoiding over 11 million tonnes of CO₂ emissions

This bold scale-up reflects Hystar’s long-term vision: to help shift the market away from fossil-based “grey” hydrogen toward truly sustainable, zero-emission fuel.

The company secured $36 million in funding, drawing interest from strategic investors committed to decarbonization. Most notably, it has partnered with Nippon Steel Trading to accelerate the adoption of its tech across global markets.

With cutting-edge PEM innovation, a scalable business model, and the infrastructure to back it, Hystar is building more than electrolyzers—it’s building the backbone of the future hydrogen economy.

The post Top 4 Hydrogen Startups of 2025 Powering the Net Zero Future appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain

Published

on

“…Protecting nature makes our business more resilient…”

For companies with land, water, food, fiber, or commodity exposure, the supply chain may be the most practical place to turn nature from a risk into an operating asset.

Your supply chain already has a nature strategy. It may be undocumented. It may live in procurement files, supplier contracts, commodity maps, and one spreadsheet nobody opens without coffee. But it exists.

If your business depends on farms, forests, water, soil, packaging, rubber, timber, fibers, minerals, or food ingredients, nature is part of your operating system. The question is whether you manage that system with intent, or discover it during a disruption, audit, or difficult board question.

That is why more companies are asking how to find Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain. Do not begin by shopping for offsets. Begin by asking where nature already affects cost, continuity, emissions, regulatory exposure, and supplier resilience.

What Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain Means

The European Commission defines nature-based solutions as approaches inspired and supported by nature that are cost-effective, deliver environmental, social, and economic benefits, and help build resilience. They should also benefit biodiversity and support ecosystem services.

In supply-chain terms, that becomes practical. Nature-based solutions in your supply chain can include agroforestry in cocoa, coffee, rubber, or palm supply chains. They can include soil health programs for food ingredients, watershed restoration near water-intensive operations, mangrove restoration linked to coastal sourcing regions, and avoided deforestation in forest-linked commodities.

The key test is business relevance. If your procurement team relies on a landscape, watershed, crop, or supplier base, that is where opportunity may sit. The best projects do not hover outside the business like a framed certificate. They plug into the system that already produces your revenue.

Why the Boardroom Should Care

For many companies, the largest climate and nature exposure sits outside direct operations. The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard gives companies a method to account for and report value-chain emissions across sectors. Purchased goods, land use, transport, supplier energy, and product use can make direct emissions look like the visible tip of a very large iceberg.

The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures notes that many nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities arise upstream and downstream. That is why nature-based supply chain investments matter to boards. You are managing supply security, audit readiness, investor confidence, and regulatory preparedness.

For companies exposed to EU markets, this also connects to rules and expectations such as CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, and SBTi FLAG.

Step One: Map Where You Touch Land, Water, and Living Systems

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain starts with mapping, not marketing.

Begin with procurement and Scope 3 data. Which categories carry high spend, high emissions, or high sourcing risk? Which suppliers depend on agriculture, forestry, mining, water-intensive processing, or land conversion? Which regions face water stress, heat, flood risk, soil degradation, deforestation, or biodiversity pressure?

The Science Based Targets Network uses a clear process for companies: assess, prioritize, set targets, act, and track. That sequence keeps companies from treating nature as a mood board. You identify where the business has exposure, then decide where intervention can create measurable value.

Step Two: Look for Operational Value Before Carbon Value

This is the center of CCC’s Dual-Value Model. A nature-based supply chain investment should do useful work for the business before anyone counts the carbon.

Agroforestry may improve farmer resilience, shade crops, protect soil, and reduce pressure on forests. Watershed restoration may reduce water risk for beverage, textile, or manufacturing sites. Soil health programs may improve the stability of agricultural inputs.

Carbon and sustainability value can still be created. In some cases, the project may support Scope 3 insetting. In others, it may generate verified carbon credits. Sometimes the main value may be resilience, readiness, and better supplier data.

The IPCC has found that ecosystem-based adaptation can reduce climate risks to people, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, with multiple co-benefits, while also warning that effectiveness declines as warming increases. That is a sober argument for acting early.

Step Three: Separate Insetting, Offsetting, and Resilience

Nature-based solutions in your supply chain are not automatically carbon credits. They are not automatically Scope 3 reductions either.

An insetting opportunity usually sits inside or close to your value chain. It may support Scope 3 reporting if the accounting rules, project boundaries, supplier connection, and data quality are strong enough.

An offsetting opportunity usually involves verified credits outside your value chain. High-quality credits can still play a role for residual emissions, but they should not distract from direct reductions or credible value-chain work.

A resilience opportunity may deliver business value even if you cannot claim a Scope 3 reduction immediately. That may include water security, supplier capacity, land restoration, biodiversity protection, or regulatory readiness.

Gold Standard’s Scope 3 value-chain guidance focuses on reporting emissions reductions from interventions in purchased goods and services. Verra’s Scope 3 Standard Program is being developed to certify value-chain interventions and issue units for companies’ emissions accounting. The direction is clear: stronger evidence, tighter boundaries, and more disciplined claims.

Step Four: Design for Audit-Readiness From the Beginning

Weak data is where promising nature projects go to become expensive anecdotes.

Before public claims are made, you need to know the baseline. What would have happened without the project? Who owns or manages the land? Which suppliers are involved? How will outcomes be measured? How will leakage, permanence, and double counting be addressed?

The GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard gives companies methods to quantify, report, and track land emissions, CO2 removals, and related metrics. This matters because land projects are rarely neat. Farms change practices. Suppliers shift volumes. Weather changes outcomes.

What Recent Corporate Examples Show

Recent case studies show that supply-chain nature work is becoming more serious, and more scrutinized.

Reuters has reported on insetting to reduce emissions within supply chains, including examples linked to Reckitt, Danone, Nestlé, Earthworm Foundation, and Nature-based Insights. The same article highlights familiar problems: measurement, double counting, supplier incentives, and credibility.

Reuters has also reported on companies using the Science Based Targets Network process to examine nature impacts. GSK, Holcim, and Kering were among the first companies with validated science-based targets for nature.

The Financial Times has covered the promise and difficulty of soil carbon in corporate supply chains, including a PepsiCo example in India where yields reportedly increased while greenhouse gas emissions fell. The lesson is that carbon, soil, biodiversity, farmer economics, and measurement need to be handled together.

A Practical Screening Checklist

A supply-chain nature-based solution deserves deeper review when you can answer yes to most of these questions:

  • Does it sit in or near a material supply-chain hotspot?
  • Does it address a real business risk?
  • Can you connect it to supplier behavior, land management, or sourcing practices?
  • Can the outcomes be measured?
  • Are the claim boundaries clear?
  • Does it support Scope 3 strategy, SBTi FLAG, CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, or investor reporting needs?
  • Are permanence, leakage, land rights, and community issues addressed?

Build the Asset, Then Make the Claim

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain is about identifying where your business already depends on living systems, then designing interventions that make those systems more resilient, measurable, and commercially useful.

For companies with material Scope 3 exposure, the right project can support supplier resilience, emissions strategy, regulatory readiness, and credible climate communication. The wrong project can become a glossy story with a weak audit trail.

Carbon Credit Capital helps companies design nature-based carbon and sustainability assets that embed directly into corporate supply chains. Through CCC’s Dual-Value Model, you can assess where sustainability investment may support operational resilience, Scope 3 insetting eligibility, regulatory readiness, and high-quality carbon or sustainability value.

Schedule your consultation with the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital to explore how nature-based supply chain investments can support your next stage of climate strategy.

Sources

  1. European Commission: Nature-based solutions
  2. GHG Protocol: Corporate Value Chain Scope 3 Standard
  3. TNFD: Guidance on value chains
  4. European Commission: Corporate Sustainability Reporting
  5. European Commission: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence
  6. European Commission: Regulation on Deforestation-free Products
  7. SBTi: Forest, Land and Agriculture FLAG
  8. Science Based Targets Network: Take Action
  9. IPCC AR6 WGII Summary for Policymakers
  10. Gold Standard: Scope 3 Value Chain Interventions Guidance
  11. Verra: Scope 3 Standard Program
  12. GHG Protocol: Land Sector and Removals Standard
  13. Reuters: Can insetting stack the cards towards more sustainable supply chains?
  14. Reuters: Three companies put their impacts on nature under a microscope
  15. Financial Times: The dubious climate gains of turning soil into a carbon sink

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living

Published

on

Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.

For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.

Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.

The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.

More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)

Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.

Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.

Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:

  • Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
  • Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
  • Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
  • Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs

The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?

How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs

There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.

Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)

According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)

In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)

The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)

After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)

For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.

How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

A light bulb, a pen, a calculator and some copper euro cent coins lie on top of an electricity bill

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.

Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.

Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)

As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)

These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)

Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)

For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.

How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates

On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.

Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.

As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)

While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.

How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes

Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.

The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.

These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.

Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action

While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.

While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.

For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:

  1. Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
  2. Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
  3. Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.

Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.

Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.

The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance

Published

on

A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com