In 2025, global energy investment is projected to reach a record $3.3 trillion, with clean energy beating fossil fuels, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). This growth happens even with geopolitical tensions and economic uncertainty. It shows that the world is still focused on energy security and moving to cleaner energy sources.
This article explores the main trends, drivers, and challenges shaping energy investment this year, with the main findings from the IEA’s World Energy Investment 2025 report. It provides a clear picture of where global energy capital is flowing and what challenges lie ahead.
Clean Energy Surges Past Fossil Fuels in Investment Race
In 2025, an expected $3.3 trillion will be invested in global energy generation. Of this, around $2.2 trillion will support renewables, nuclear power, electricity grids, storage, low-emission fuels, energy efficiency, and electrification. This is double the amount set for oil, natural gas, and coal, which will receive around $1.1 trillion.

Clean energy investment surged after the COVID-19 pandemic. This growth continues thanks to technology, economic factors, and policy support, not only climate policies.
Solar Power Leads the Way
Investment in low-emission power has nearly doubled in five years. Solar photovoltaic (PV) technology is driving this growth. By 2025, global spending on solar energy, including utility-scale and rooftop systems, is set to hit $450 billion. This will make it the largest energy investment category.
Solar panels, especially those imported from China, are becoming more affordable and are driving energy investment in many developing countries. For example, Pakistan imported 19 gigawatts (GW) of solar capacity in 2024, about half its total grid-connected capacity.
Growth in Batteries and Nuclear Energy
Spending on batteries for power sector storage will hit $66 billion by 2025. This will help integrate renewable energy sources into electricity grids. Nuclear investment is also rising, with spending on new plants and refurbishments expected to exceed $70 billion this year. Interest in new nuclear technologies, such as small modular reactors (SMRs), is growing, especially in the United States and the Middle East.

Global Giants Drive the Clean Energy Boom
About 70% of the recent increase in clean energy investment comes from countries that import fossil fuels, led by China, Europe, and India. China is investing heavily in reducing its reliance on imported oil and gas and becoming a leader in clean energy technologies.
A separate report by energy think tank Ember also shows the same trend – China takes the lead in clean energy investment in early 2025.

Meanwhile, Europe sped up its investment in renewables and energy efficiency. This change came after Russian gas supplies were disrupted due to the Ukraine invasion. The United States has boosted investment. This is partly to compete with China in the supply chains for new clean technologies.

Emissions reduction is a big reason to invest, but it’s not always the main one for mature and cost-competitive clean technologies. Investors are also influenced by concerns about energy security and the desire to lead in new industries.
Uncertainty in the global economy and trade is making some investors hold off on new project approvals. However, spending on current projects is still strong, especially in the field of rising artificial intelligence (AI) dominance.
AI + Energy: The Data Center Effect
The fast rise of AI and data centers is driving up electricity demand. This trend is also boosting investment in power generation. Annual investment in data centers has risen by 67% over the past two years, and from 2025 to 2030, an additional $4.2 trillion is expected globally.
By 2030, data centers might use 950 terawatt-hours of electricity, doubling their current amount. This could lead to over $170 billion in investments for new generation capacity. Renewables will meet most of this demand, as shown below.

However, interest is rising in next-generation solutions like small modular nuclear reactors. SMRs provide stable power and fit the constant energy needs of data centers.
Technology companies are also exploring geothermal energy partnerships, supported by rising venture capital. Tech giants and energy developers are teaming up for new nuclear and geothermal projects. However, challenges like cost uncertainties and regulatory hurdles for SMRs still exist.
Gridlock Ahead: Infrastructure Struggles to Keep Pace
Investment in the electricity sector is set to reach $1.5 trillion in 2025, about 50% higher than the total spent on bringing oil, natural gas, and coal to market. Spending on electricity grids is around $400 billion each year. But this isn’t enough to match the fast rise in power demand and the growth of renewables.
Delays in permitting, supply chain bottlenecks for components like transformers and cables, and the weak financial health of utilities, especially in developing countries, are slowing progress.
Coal and Gas Remain Significant
Despite the focus on clean energy, coal and gas continue to play a major role in some regions. In 2024, China greenlit nearly 100 GW of new coal-fired power plants. India added another 15 GW. This raised global approvals to their highest since 2015.
In contrast, advanced economies did not order any new coal-fired power plants last year.
Notably, investment in new gas-fired power is rising. The United States and the Middle East make up nearly half of the new project approvals.
Fossil Fuel Investment Trends: Oil and Gas Investment Declines
Oil prices and demand are set to drop, leading to a 6% decrease in investment in upstream oil projects in 2025. This will be the first annual decline since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the largest since 2016.
Upstream oil and gas investment is expected to drop by around 4%. This brings the total to just under $570 billion. Of this amount, 40% will go toward maintaining production at current fields. Investment in oil refineries is also set to reach its lowest level in a decade.

Spending on new LNG facilities is rising despite some delays and cost overruns. Projects in the United States, Qatar, and Canada are getting ready to start. From 2026 to 2028, the world may experience huge yearly jumps in LNG capacity, with the United States set to nearly double its export capacity.
Meanwhile, investment in coal supply is expected to increase by 4% in 2025, continuing a trend of steady growth over the past five years. This reflects ongoing demand in parts of Asia, even as advanced economies move away from coal.
The Outlook for 2025 and Beyond
The global energy investment scene is changing fast, as reported by the IEA. Clean energy technologies are drawing more money and interest. Fossil fuels are still important in some areas. However, the trend is shifting.
More investment is going into renewables, electrification, and energy efficiency. This transition is being shaped by technology advances, economic factors, and the need for energy security, as well as by climate policies.
To meet rising electricity demand and ensure energy security, investment in grids and storage should accelerate. As such, continued support for innovation and infrastructure will be crucial for a successful energy transition in the years ahead.
The post Clean Energy Beats Fossil Fuel in Historic $3.3T Global Energy Investment in 2025, IEA Report appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

