On the first day of the United Nations Ocean Conference in Nice, France, the findings of a new study have revealed that ocean acidification (OA) — which damages ecosystems like coral reefs — is not only getting worse, but crossed its “planetary boundary” roughly five years ago.
The findings came as a surprise, as scientists in a report published last year said OA was “approaching a critical threshold,” but had not yet crossed the boundary.
The nine defined planetary boundaries in which Earth can operate safely include climate change, freshwater use and OA.
“OA is the term given to the long-term shift of marine carbonate chemistry resulting primarily from the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2) by the oceans, leading to an increase in ocean acidity and a decrease in carbonate ion (CO32−) concentration,” the authors of the study wrote. “OA can severely affect marine organisms through its direct impact on physiology, growth, survival and reproduction.”
The researchers pointed out that ocean conditions vary widely across the world, with OA levels in tropical regions over two times as high as in polar regions.
“Looking across different areas of the world, the polar regions show the biggest changes in ocean acidification at the surface. Meanwhile, in deeper waters, the largest changes are happening in areas just outside the poles and in the upwelling regions along the west coast of North America and near the equator,” said lead author of the report Helen Findlay, a professor at the United Kingdom’s Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML) and chair of the North-East Atlantic Ocean Acidification Hub, in a press release from PML.
The study, led by PML, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States and Oregon State University’s Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies (CIMERS), said OA’s threat to marine ecosystems globally is much more widespread than previously believed.
The research team used the most recent chemical and physical measurements of the upper ocean, along with studies of marine life and advanced computer models to conclude that by 2020, average ocean conditions globally were already very near — and in some regions had already surpassed — the OA “danger zone.”
“Most ocean life doesn’t just live at the surface – the waters below are home to many more different types of plants and animals. Since these deeper waters are changing so much, the impacts of ocean acidification could be far worse than we thought. This has huge implications for important underwater ecosystems like tropical and even deep-sea coral reefs that provide essential habitats and nursing refuge for many species, in addition to the impacts being felt on bottom-dwelling creatures like crabs, sea stars, and other shellfish such as mussels and oysters,” Findlay explained.

Professor Helen Findlay working in the laboratory to investigate the impacts of climate change and ocean acidification on marine organisms and ecosystem functioning. Plymouth Marine Laboratory
The team discovered that roughly 60 percent of deeper ocean waters — down to approximately 656 feet — had crossed the planetary boundary for OA — compared with 40 percent at the surface. The increase in acidification has enormous implications for the survival rates of many sea creatures, particularly those who build their skeletons or shells from calcium carbonate.
Some subtropical and tropical coral reefs have already lost 43 percent of suitable habitats, while pteropods, a main food web species in the polar regions — also known as “sea butterflies” — have lost as much as 61 percent of their habitat. Additionally, 13 percent of the habitats of coastal shellfish species have been lost worldwide.
Based on the findings, the scientists recommended that a change be made to the previous safety limit of a 10 percent deviation from pre-industrial levels being harmful to ocean ecosystems, as the entire surface of the ocean had already exceeded the stricter limit by about the year 2000.
“Ocean acidification isn’t just an environmental crisis – it’s a ticking time bomb for marine ecosystems and coastal economies. As our seas increase in acidity, we’re witnessing the loss of critical habitats that countless marine species depend on and this, in turn, has major societal and economic implications.” said Steve Widdicombe, a professor at PML who is co-chair of the Global Ocean Acidification Observing Network, one of the focuses of the UN’s sustainable development goal of addressing and minimizing the effects of OA.
“From the coral reefs that support tourism to the shellfish industries that sustain coastal communities, we’re gambling with both biodiversity and billions in economic value every day that action is delayed,” Widdicombe added.
The authors of the study suggested conservation measures should be directed toward to species and regions that are most vulnerable to acidification. They also emphasized the importance of suitable management measures or protection of areas that are the least compromised by acidification to ensure their longevity.
The newly identified subsurface water impacts highlight a pressing need to safeguard mid-water habitats and their marine life. The researchers stressed the importance of improved approaches to addressing OA, as well as other ocean pressures, to better support stronger ecosystem resilience.
“This report makes it clear: we are running out of time and what we do – or fail to do – now is already determining our future,” said Jessie Turner, director of the International Alliance to Combat Ocean Acidification, who was not part of the study, as The Guardian reported. “We are coming to terms with an existential threat while grappling with the difficult reality that much suitable habitat for key species has already been lost. It’s clear that governments can no longer afford to overlook acidification in mainstream policy agendas.”
The study, “Ocean Acidification: Another Planetary Boundary Crossed,” was published in the journal Global Change Biology.
TOMORROW
Join the launch of the #COP30 Virtual Ocean Pavilion during #UNOC3!
10 June |
10–11 AM CEST |
Zoom
Join via Zoom here: us02web.zoom.us/j/8955059069…— Plymouth Marine Laboratory (@plymouthmarine.bsky.social) June 9, 2025 at 2:11 PM
The post ‘Ticking Time Bomb’ of Ocean Acidification Has Already Crossed Planetary Boundary, Threatening Marine Ecosystems: Study appeared first on EcoWatch.
https://www.ecowatch.com/ocean-acidification-planetary-boundary.html
Green Living
High Levels of Mercury Found in Alligators in Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia
In a new study, scientists have detected high levels of mercury contamination in alligators from the Okefenokee Swamp in southeastern Georgia. The contamination in the alligators could be an indicator of more widespread heavy metal contamination in the region, which could be harmful to other wildlife, and ultimately humans.
“Alligators are very ancient creatures, and we can look at them in these areas as an indicator of what else might be happening in the ecosystem,” Kristen Zemaitis, lead author of the study and a graduate of the Odum School of Ecology at University of Georgia, said in a statement. “Studying them can relate to many different things in the food web.”
Scientists analyzed blood samples and dietary habits of 133 alligators from three different sites: Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia; Jekyll Island, Georgia; and Yawkey Wildlife Center, South Carolina. While the team found mercury in alligators from all three sites, the amount of mercury in alligators from the Okefenokee Swamp was up to eight times higher compared to the alligators along the coast. They published their findings in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.
Older alligators also had higher levels of mercury, which the researchers explained could be both because of the longer time the mercury could spend accumulating as well as an increase in the volume of prey — which are likely also contaminated with mercury — that the alligators eat as they grow.
But even young alligators were found to contain mercury, as “Mothers are passing toxins and heavy metals into the egg yolks during reproduction,” Zemaitis said.

A new study found that smaller alligators and hatchlings could inherit high levels of mercury from their mothers. Chamberlain Smith / University of Georgia
Because Okefenokee Swamp shares water with the Suwannee and St. Marys rivers, the researchers warned that mercury levels found in alligators, at the top of the food chain, likely means local fish also contain mercury.
“Mercury is a neurotoxin that is very lethal to organisms,” Jeb Byers, co-author of the study and a professor at the Odum School, said in a statement. “If it builds up, it moves through the food web and creates the perfect storm. That’s what we have in the Okefenokee.”
That could also pose a threat for people who hunt or fish in this area, especially if they are consuming their catches.
“Mercury contamination can be a high concern for the people who can be consuming a lot of fish or game species from the rivers, swamps or oceans that have high mercury,” Zemaitis explained. “In any given ecosystem, there are some organisms that can tolerate only very little amounts of mercury, which can result in neurological issues, reproductive issues and eventually death.”
Following this study, Zemaitis hopes to do a deeper investigation into the source of this mercury pollution, how it spreads throughout ecosystems and how it is affecting other wildlife.
“Now that we know this about one of the apex predators in these systems, we wonder what else is being affected?” she said.
The post High Levels of Mercury Found in Alligators in Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia appeared first on EcoWatch.
https://www.ecowatch.com/alligators-mercury-okefenokee-swamp.html
Green Living
Trump Plans to ‘Wean off of FEMA’ After Hurricane Season, Saying States Can ‘Handle It’
President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced he is planning to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) “as it exists today” after the 2025 hurricane season.
Trump said he wants to make disaster response and recovery the responsibility of states rather than the federal government.
“We want to wean off of FEMA, and we want to bring it down to the state level,” Trump said, as CNN reported. “A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can’t handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn’t be governor.”
Trump added that less federal aid would be provided for disaster recovery, with the funding to be distributed directly by the Oval Office.
“We’re going to give out less money… It’s going to be from the president’s office,” Trump said, as reported by The Hill. “As an example, I just gave out $71 million to a certain state. They were looking to do about $120 [million] — they were very happy with the $71 million.”
For months, Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem have repeatedly criticized FEMA, calling the agency unnecessary and ineffective and vowing to phase it out.
WATCH: “We want to see FEMA eliminated.”
Trump & Noem say they want to end FEMA and give storm-torn states LESS money — while Trump takes personal credit for it. (Likely helping Red states more readily)
As they take credit for the job FEMA is currently doing.
— The Tennessee Holler (@thetnholler.bsky.social) June 10, 2025 at 1:34 PM
“You’ve been very clear that you want to see FEMA eliminated as it exists today, so I’m preparing all of these governors [so] that they will have more control over the decisions on how they respond to their communities so that it can happen faster,” Noem told Trump on Tuesday, as The Hill reported.
Noem and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth are co-chairs of a newly established FEMA Review Council, which is expected to give recommendations on how to dramatically reduce the role of the agency and reform its mission and operations, reported CNN.
Noem said the administration was “building communication and mutual aid agreements among states to respond to each other so that they can stand on their own two feet with the federal government coming in in catastrophic circumstances with funding,” as The Hill reported.
Plans to shutter FEMA have confused state and federal emergency managers, who do not believe localized efforts would be able to replace the agency’s strong infrastructure. They said the budgets and personnel of most states would not be enough to tackle the most catastrophic disasters alone, even with a federal financial safety net.

“This is a complete misunderstanding of the role of the federal government in emergency management and disaster response and recovery, and it’s an abdication of that role when a state is overwhelmed,” a FEMA leader told CNN. “It is clear from the president’s remarks that their plan is to limp through hurricane season and then dismantle the agency.”
NOAA predicts this year’s hurricane season will be “above-normal” with as many as 19 named storms.
Following months of upheaval and layoffs, the 2025 hurricane started on June 1 with FEMA short-staffed and underprepared.
The agency has lost 10 percent or more of its staff since January, including much of its senior leadership. It is projected that FEMA will lose nearly 30 percent of its workforce before the end of this year, shrinking it from roughly 26,000 to about 18,000.
Noem recently reopened some FEMA training centers and continued contract extensions for employees who are deployed during disasters in a last-minute effort to shore up hurricane preparedness.
The Trump administration has discussed ending the practice of FEMA staff going door-to-door to assist people in applying for disaster aid, reported The Washington Post. It has also talked about the possibility of raising the damage threshold for communities to qualify for federal assistance.
“It has not worked out well,” Trump said on Tuesday of FEMA’s historic disaster response. “It’s extremely expensive. When you have a tornado or a hurricane or you have a problem of any kind in a state, that’s what you have governors for. They’re supposed to fix those problems.”
The post Trump Plans to ‘Wean off of FEMA’ After Hurricane Season, Saying States Can ‘Handle It’ appeared first on EcoWatch.
https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-fema-2025-hurricane-season.html
Green Living
U.S. Produced Record Amount of Energy in 2024, EIA Reports
According to a recent analysis from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the U.S. produced a record amount of energy last year, totaling 103 quadrillion British thermal units (BTUs).
The amount of energy produced in 2024 surpassed the previous record set in 2023 by 1%. However, while U.S. energy production is up, including for solar and wind sources, several other types of renewable energy sources stalled or even declined in 2024.
According to the analysis, natural gas accounted for most of the energy production in the U.S. in 2024, making up 38% of the energy mix. Natural gas has been the country’s largest source of produced energy since 2011, EIA reported.

This was followed by crude oil, which made up 27% of the domestically produced energy mix in the U.S. last year.
Coal reached its lowest output for a year since 1964, totaling 512 million short tons and making up 10% of total energy production in the U.S.
On the renewables front, solar, wind and biofuel energies each separately set records in 2024. Solar capacity increased 25%, while wind capacity increased 8%. Biofuels reached 1.4 million barrels per day of production, an increase of 6% compared to the previous records set for biofuels in 2023.
Other renewable energy sources did not beat records, though. As EIA reported, “Output from other energy sources that are primarily used for electric power generation either peaked decades ago (hydropower and nuclear) or fell slightly from their 2023 values (geothermal).”
Earlier in 2025, EIA predicted that solar and wind capacity would continue to grow this year, with utility-scale solar capacity expected to add 32.5 gigawatts, utility-scale wind capacity to add 7.7 gigawatts and battery storage to add 18.2 gigawatts.
However, the U.S. could face challenges to expanding renewables and reducing reliance on fossil fuels as the current administration has planned to suspend permits and leases for wind energy projects and has proposed opening up National Petroleum Reserve lands in Alaska for fossil fuel extraction.
Meanwhile, renewable energy is in high demand globally. Earlier this year, China invested more money into renewable energy sources over coal from overseas for the first time, and the country has set a record for new solar and wind installations in 2023 and again in 2024. In the EU, electricity generation from solar power surpassed electricity from coal power in 2024 for the first time.
Experts have predicted that renewables will continue to grow in the U.S. and abroad, but poor policies could cause the U.S. to fall behind in the global clean energy transition, leading to $50 billion of lost exports.
The post U.S. Produced Record Amount of Energy in 2024, EIA Reports appeared first on EcoWatch.
https://www.ecowatch.com/us-energy-production-record-2024.html
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Carbon Footprint1 year ago
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action
-
Climate Change Videos1 year ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Some firms unaware of England’s new single-use plastic ban