Companies worldwide are under pressure to meet their 2030 net-zero targets, and high-quality carbon removal solutions are becoming scarce. Biochar offers a promising solution. It’s a carbon-rich material made by heating organic waste in low oxygen. This process is called pyrolysis.
Biochar lasts long and captures carbon. It also boosts soil health and helps crops grow better. However, new research from Supercritical shows that access to high-quality biochar carbon credits is getting tighter. Early adopters are securing their supply with long-term agreements.
Supercritical CEO, Michelle You, remarked:
“This isn’t just about buying carbon removal—it’s about securing future access in an increasingly competitive market. Companies signing offtakes today are gaining supply security and cost stability, while those waiting on the sidelines or relying on spot purchases will face shrinking availability and escalating prices.”
The Biochar Land Grab: Why Supply is Disappearing
Biochar turns agricultural waste into stable carbon. When buried in soil, it can stay there for centuries. This makes biochar one of the most effective carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods available today.
Biochar is popular with 80% of CDR buyers as it is affordable and scalable. This makes it a smart choice for cutting emissions and boosting environmental health.
Despite these benefits, biochar production faces significant supply constraints. The latest Supercritical report, Locked in or Left Behind? Biochar Offtakes in 2025, highlights that 62% of the 2025 high-quality biochar supply is already locked into offtake agreements, with nearly 30% secured through 2026.

Companies must act now in this tight market. If they don’t, they risk missing out on affordable carbon removal credits.
Offtake Agreements: The Smartest Play in Carbon Removal
An offtake agreement is a long-term purchase contract that allows companies to secure future carbon removal credits before they are issued. These agreements help biochar suppliers feel secure financially. They can scale up production. Buyers benefit, too, as they get stable prices and a guaranteed supply.
Companies with multi-year offtake agreements save up to 31% compared to those buying credits on the spot market. People who depend on one-time purchases are seeing costs go up. They also face a shrinking supply of good-quality credits.
With biochar prices increasing 18% in 2024, securing long-term agreements has become the most strategic way to manage carbon removal costs.
Biochar Market Trends and Future Outlook
The demand for high-quality CDR solutions is expected to skyrocket in the coming years. According to Supercritical’s research:
- Global demand for durable carbon removal is expected to hit 40–200 MtCO₂ each year by 2030. However, the current supply falls far short of this need.
- Biochar accounted for 86% of all CDR deliveries in 2024, proving its reliability in the market.
- If just 10% of companies with Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) commitments began buying carbon removal credits today, the market would need to grow 25 times its current size.

The biochar carbon credits market has experienced notable growth in recent years. This reflects an increasing corporate focus on sustainable practices and carbon removal strategies.
Pricing Trends
Biochar carbon credits command significantly higher prices compared to the broader voluntary carbon market.
In 2023, transaction prices ranged between $100 and $200 per metric ton of CO₂ equivalent, with an average price of around $150. This contrasts with the overall voluntary carbon market average of $5.80 per metric ton in the same year.
Future Outlook
Forecasts by MSCI Carbon Markets suggest that demand for biochar carbon credits could increase 20-fold over the next decade. However, this anticipated growth may lead to short-term price compression due to rising supply and competition, with prices potentially softening before strengthening again up to 2035.
As net-zero deadlines near, organizations that wait to get carbon credits will face tougher competition. Prices may rise, and they might not get any supply at all. This is very important. Updated SBTi guidelines will likely add interim carbon removal targets. This will increase demand even more.
Who is Leading the Biochar Offtake Movement?
Large corporations are already securing multi-year offtakes to future-proof their carbon removal strategies. Microsoft, Google, and Stripe have bought a lot of biochar credits. This ensures they get high-quality supplies at steady prices.

Other companies have followed suit, recognizing that offtakes are the key to maintaining cost-effective and reliable carbon removal solutions.
A few notable biochar offtake deals include:
- Google & Varaha (India): The largest biochar offtake agreement to date.
- Charm Industrial (USA): A 100,000-tonne multi-year biochar removal contract.
- Exomad Green (Bolivia): 70,000 tonnes secured over a seven-year contract.
These deals show that big buyers are eager to secure supply. They want to act before the market tightens further.
Waiting Could Cost Big: Spot Market vs. Offtakes
While some companies may prefer to buy carbon credits on the spot market, this approach comes with significant risks. The biochar market is splitting. Early movers are getting the best supply, but latecomers must fight for what’s left.
Key risks of relying on spot purchases include:
- Higher Prices: Biochar prices have increased at a 29.2% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) over the past four years, and price volatility is expected to continue.
- Limited Supply: As of 2025, more than 60% of available high-quality biochar is already locked into offtakes, leaving little room for new buyers.
- Lower-Quality Projects: Companies waiting to purchase on the spot market may be forced to accept lower-quality credits, which may not meet the highest standards for durability and effectiveness.
In contrast, companies with offtake agreements today are protecting their net-zero goals. They ensure a steady supply of high-quality biochar credits at clear prices.

The Urgency to Act Now
Biochar is becoming a top choice for large-scale carbon removal. However, its supply is quickly vanishing due to long-term contracts.
As prices rise and demand exceeds supply, companies must act now. If they don’t, they might be priced out or miss out on quality removals.
For organizations serious about meeting their net-zero commitments, securing biochar carbon credits via offtake agreements now is not just a smart move—it’s essential. As the market continues to evolve, those who take action today will shape the future of carbon removal, while those who hesitate risk being left behind.
The post The Biochar Gold Rush: Why Companies Are Scrambling to Lock in Carbon Credits appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

