Introduction Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta
Jakarta, the bustling capital of Indonesia, faces a myriad of challenges when it comes to transportation.
As one of the most populous and traffic-congested cities in the world, Jakarta has long been grappling with pollution, traffic jams, and inefficiencies in its transportation systems.
However, the city is actively working to transition towards sustainable transportation solutions, aiming to reduce its carbon footprint and improve the quality of life for its residents.
In this article, we will explore the various initiatives and efforts aimed at achieving sustainable transportation in Jakarta.
What is Sustainable Transportation
Sustainable transportation, often referred to as “green transportation” or “eco-friendly transportation,” encompasses various modes of travel and systems that are designed to have minimal environmental impacts while meeting the mobility needs of individuals and communities.
It aims to reduce the negative effects of transportation on the environment, promote energy efficiency, and create more liveable and healthy communities.
Here are some key components and principles of sustainable transportation:
1. Public Transportation: Efficient and well-maintained public transportation systems, such as buses, trams, subways, and commuter trains, play a vital role in sustainable transportation. They reduce the number of private vehicles on the road, leading to lower emissions and less traffic congestion.
2. Cycling and Walking: Promoting cycling and walking as viable modes of transportation can reduce the dependence on motorized vehicles. This involves creating safe and convenient infrastructure like bike lanes, pedestrian-friendly streets, and sidewalks.
3. Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: Transitioning from conventional gasoline and diesel vehicles to electric and hybrid vehicles can significantly reduce emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. Electric cars, buses, and bikes are gaining popularity as cleaner alternatives.
4. Carpooling and Ridesharing: Encouraging carpooling and ridesharing reduces the number of vehicles on the road, saving energy and reducing emissions. Ride-hailing services with shared options also contribute to this concept.
5. Sustainable Urban Planning: Designing cities and communities with a focus on mixed land use, compact development, and transit-oriented development can reduce the need for long commutes and car travel. This approach promotes the use of public transportation, cycling, and walking.
6. Energy Efficiency: Sustainable transportation initiatives prioritize energy-efficient vehicles and infrastructure. This includes fuel-efficient engines, renewable energy sources for public transit, and smart traffic management systems to reduce congestion and fuel consumption.
7. Reduced Emissions: Implementing emission standards and encouraging the use of low-emission and zero-emission vehicles are essential for reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation.
8. Incentives and Policies: Government incentives, subsidies, and policies can play a crucial role in promoting sustainable transportation. Examples include tax incentives for electric vehicle purchases, congestion pricing to reduce traffic, and fuel efficiency standards for automobiles.
9. Accessibility and Inclusivity: Sustainable transportation should be accessible to all members of society, regardless of age, income, or physical abilities. Ensuring inclusivity in public transportation and infrastructure is a key principle.
10. Behavioral Change: Educating and encouraging people to adopt sustainable transportation options is vital. Awareness campaigns, incentives, and programs that promote sustainable travel choices can lead to a shift in behavior.
Sustainable transportation is a critical component of addressing climate change, improving air quality, and creating more livable, healthy communities. It requires a multifaceted approach involving government policies, urban planning, technology, and individual choices to reduce the environmental and social impacts of transportation while meeting the mobility needs of society.
Challenges in Jakarta’s Transportation
1. Traffic Congestion: Jakarta’s infamous traffic jams are a major issue, resulting in lost productivity, air pollution, and stress for its residents.
2. Air Pollution: The high number of motorized vehicles on the road contributes to poor air quality, which has adverse health effects.
3. Lack of Public Transport: Despite improvements in public transportation, Jakarta still faces challenges in providing efficient and widespread options for its residents.
Sustainable Transportation Initiatives in Jakarta
1. Mass Rapid Transit (MRT): The Jakarta MRT has been a game-changer in reducing traffic congestion and air pollution. Since its inception, it has significantly increased the use of public transportation in the city.
2. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): The TransJakarta BRT system is one of the largest in the world. It offers a cost-effective and efficient means of transport, helping to reduce the reliance on private vehicles.
3. Cycling Infrastructure: Jakarta has been working on developing dedicated cycling lanes and bike-sharing programs to encourage cycling as a sustainable mode of transportation.
4. Electric Vehicles (EVs): The adoption of electric vehicles in Jakarta is gaining traction, with incentives for EV users and the establishment of charging stations throughout the city.
5. Pedestrian-Friendly Streets: Efforts have been made to create pedestrian-friendly streets, encouraging walking and reducing the need for short car trips.
Sustainabile Transportation in Jakarta: Private Sector Contributions
The quest for sustainable transportation in Jakarta is not solely a government-led effort. The private sector has emerged as a key player in driving change towards a greener, more efficient transportation system in the Indonesian capital.
1. Ride-Hailing Services: Companies like Gojek and Grab have introduced ride-hailing services that offer carpooling and motorbike services. These platforms not only provide convenient transportation options but also encourage shared rides, reducing the number of single-occupancy vehicles on the road.
2. Electric Scooters: Electric scooter-sharing services, such as Lime and Bird, have made their presence felt in Jakarta. These companies offer eco-friendly last-mile transportation solutions, reducing the reliance on short car trips and mitigating traffic congestion.
3. Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure: Private companies have been investing in EV charging infrastructure throughout Jakarta. They are making it more convenient for residents to adopt electric vehicles by expanding the charging network.
4. Sustainable Logistics: Delivery companies operating in Jakarta, like GoSend and J&T Express, have been integrating electric bikes and electric vehicles into their fleets. This not only reduces emissions but also improves delivery efficiency in traffic-prone areas.
5. Bike-Sharing Services: Private firms have introduced bike-sharing programs, providing residents with easy access to bicycles for short trips. These programs promote cycling as a sustainable mode of transportation.
6. Emissions Reduction Technologies: Private vehicle manufacturers and technology companies are working on emissions reduction technologies and innovative solutions, like retrofitting older vehicles with cleaner engines and promoting fuel-efficient driving practices.
7. Sustainable Development: Real estate developers are incorporating sustainable transportation elements into urban development projects. This includes creating pedestrian-friendly areas, bike storage facilities, and integrating public transportation hubs into new communities.
Challenges and Collaborations
While the private sector’s contributions to sustainable transportation in Jakarta are commendable, challenges remain. These include infrastructure limitations, regulatory hurdles, and the need for standardization in services and technologies. Collaboration between the public and private sectors is vital to overcoming these challenges.
The Jakarta city government, in partnership with private enterprises, has initiated several public-private collaborations to address transportation issues. These collaborations involve the development of integrated transportation solutions, the promotion of electric vehicle adoption, and the establishment of smart transportation systems.
The private sector’s contributions to sustainable transportation in Jakarta have been instrumental in shaping a more eco-friendly and efficient mobility landscape. Ride-hailing services, electric scooters, bike-sharing programs, and investments in EV infrastructure are all steps in the right direction.
However, continued collaboration between public and private entities, along with supportive government policies, will be essential to drive further progress and create a truly sustainable and accessible transportation system for Jakarta’s residents. With these efforts, Jakarta is on a path towards a cleaner, more sustainable future for urban transportation.
Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta: The Jakarta MRT (Mass Rapid Transit)
The Jakarta MRT (Mass Rapid Transit) is a crucial component of the city’s efforts to improve its transportation infrastructure and move towards more sustainable urban mobility solutions.
Here’s an overview of the Jakarta MRT:
1. Inauguration: The Jakarta MRT officially opened its doors to the public in March 2019. It marked a significant milestone in addressing Jakarta’s notorious traffic congestion and providing a more efficient and eco-friendly mode of transportation.
2. Line and Expansion: The initial line, known as the North-South Line (Lebak Bulus to Bundaran HI), spans approximately 15.7 kilometers with 13 stations. An expansion to the line is planned to further extend its reach and accommodate more commuters.
3. Public Transportation Integration: The Jakarta MRT integrates seamlessly with other public transportation systems, including TransJakarta (the city’s BRT system) and commuter trains, making it easier for commuters to switch between modes of transport.
4. Reducing Congestion: One of the primary objectives of the Jakarta MRT is to alleviate the city’s notorious traffic jams. By offering a faster and more efficient alternative to private vehicles, it helps to reduce congestion and improve overall traffic flow.
5. Environmentally Friendly: The Jakarta MRT uses electric-powered trains, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution compared to traditional gasoline or diesel-powered vehicles. This contributes to improved air quality in the city.
6. Accessibility: The Jakarta MRT is designed to be accessible to all, with features like elevators, ramps, and designated spaces for passengers with disabilities. This promotes inclusivity in public transportation.
7. Safety and Security: The MRT places a strong emphasis on passenger safety and security. Surveillance cameras, dedicated staff, and emergency response systems are in place to ensure a safe commuting experience.
8. Ridership and Impact: Since its inception, the Jakarta MRT has seen a significant increase in ridership, with millions of commuters benefiting from its services. It has had a positive impact on reducing travel times and increasing convenience for residents.
9. Future Expansion: The Jakarta government has plans to expand the MRT system, with additional lines and extensions to serve more areas of the city. This expansion aims to further reduce reliance on private cars and enhance the overall public transportation network.
10. Economic Growth: The Jakarta MRT also contributes to economic growth by connecting various areas of the city and facilitating access to business districts, commercial centers, and cultural hubs.
In summary, the Jakarta MRT is a transformative transportation system that has not only improved the daily commute for residents but also made significant strides in reducing traffic congestion and promoting sustainable transportation. As Jakarta continues to grow and develop, the MRT is expected to play a vital role in shaping the city’s mobility and environmental future.
Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta: The Jakarta LRT (Light Rail Transit)
The Jakarta LRT (Light Rail Transit) is another important component of the city’s efforts to enhance its public transportation system and address traffic congestion.
Here is an overview of the Jakarta LRT:
1. Introduction: The Jakarta LRT is a modern urban rail transit system designed to provide efficient, environmentally friendly, and convenient transportation options to residents and visitors.
2. Two Lines: The Jakarta LRT consists of two lines – the Kelapa Gading Line and the Cibubur Line. These lines connect different areas of the city, improving access to various neighborhoods and business districts.
3. Integration with Other Modes: The LRT is designed to be integrated with other modes of public transportation, such as buses, commuter trains, and the Jakarta MRT. This integration offers passengers seamless connectivity for their entire journey.
4. Light Rail Technology: Unlike the heavy rail used in the Jakarta MRT, the LRT employs light rail technology. Light rail vehicles are smaller and designed for shorter distances within the city, making them suitable for serving various neighborhoods and reducing road traffic.
5. Environmental Benefits: The Jakarta LRT, like the MRT, contributes to environmental sustainability. It uses electric-powered trains, which are more energy-efficient and produce fewer emissions compared to traditional gasoline or diesel vehicles.
6. Congestion Relief: The LRT aims to reduce traffic congestion by offering a faster and more reliable alternative to private vehicles. This not only benefits commuters but also eases the overall traffic situation in the city.
7. Stations and Accessibility: Jakarta LRT stations are equipped with facilities to ensure accessibility for all passengers, including those with disabilities. Elevators, ramps, and other amenities make it a more inclusive mode of transportation.
8. Safety Measures: Safety is a priority, and the Jakarta LRT has safety measures in place, including surveillance systems, station personnel, and emergency response protocols.
9. Economic Impact: The LRT contributes to economic growth by improving access to various commercial, business, and residential areas. It can stimulate development in neighborhoods along its routes.
10. Ridership: Since its introduction, the Jakarta LRT has seen growing ridership as more people recognize the benefits of using this public transportation system. It offers a convenient way to navigate the city.
In summary, the Jakarta LRT plays a pivotal role in improving public transportation in the city. Its two lines connect different parts of Jakarta, making it easier for residents and visitors to get around while reducing traffic congestion and environmental impact. The LRT complements the existing transportation infrastructure, such as the Jakarta MRT and TransJakarta BRT, in creating a more integrated and sustainable public transportation network for the city.
Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta: The Busway
The Busway, officially known as “TransJakarta,” is Jakarta’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system. It is a prominent and crucial component of the city’s public transportation network.
Here’s an overview of the Busway:
1. Inception: TransJakarta, commonly referred to as the Busway, was introduced in 2004 as a solution to Jakarta’s persistent traffic congestion and lack of efficient public transportation. It is one of the earliest BRT systems in Southeast Asia.
2. Dedicated Bus Lane: The Busway features dedicated bus lanes on major thoroughfares throughout Jakarta. These lanes are physically separated from regular traffic, allowing buses to move more swiftly and efficiently.
3. Stations and Corridors: The BRT system comprises multiple corridors with various routes that connect different parts of Jakarta. Each corridor has well-planned stations that offer convenient boarding and alighting points for passengers.
4. High-Capacity Buses: TransJakarta employs high-capacity articulated buses to accommodate a large number of passengers. These buses are air-conditioned and equipped with facilities for people with disabilities.
5. Frequent Service: Buses in the TransJakarta system operate at high frequencies during peak hours and are known for their punctuality. This frequent service is aimed at reducing waiting times for passengers.
6. Ticketing System: The BRT system utilizes a unified ticketing system that allows passengers to use a single card or ticket for multiple modes of public transportation, including buses and the Jakarta MRT.
7. Efficiency and Reliability: TransJakarta is designed to provide a more efficient and reliable means of transportation, thereby reducing the reliance on private vehicles and addressing traffic congestion.
8. Environmental Benefits: By reducing the number of individual cars on the road, the BRT system contributes to environmental sustainability by lowering emissions and improving air quality in the city.
9. Accessibility: TransJakarta stations are designed to be accessible to people with disabilities and those with reduced mobility, with features like ramps, elevators, and designated seating.
10. Integration with Other Modes: The Busway is integrated with other public transportation systems, such as the Jakarta MRT and the soon-to-be-expanded Jakarta LRT, offering passengers a seamless experience when transferring between modes.
In summary, the TransJakarta Busway is a significant part of Jakarta’s public transportation system. It provides a reliable, efficient, and eco-friendly means of commuting for millions of residents and visitors in the city. The BRT system has played a crucial role in addressing traffic congestion and promoting sustainable transportation solutions, aligning with Jakarta’s efforts to become a more liveable and accessible city.
Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta: Commuter Rail
Commuter rail, often referred to as suburban or metropolitan rail, is a type of passenger train service designed to transport people between residential areas and urban centers or business districts. These commuter rail systems are common in many major cities worldwide and play a crucial role in providing efficient transportation for daily commuters.
Here are some key features and characteristics of commuter rail:
1. Urban-Suburban Connectivity: Commuter rail systems are primarily designed to connect urban centers with surrounding suburbs and outlying residential areas. They serve as a vital link for commuters who live farther from the city but work or study there.
2. Frequent Service: Commuter trains typically run on a regular schedule with frequent departures during peak commuting hours. This ensures that commuters have reliable and convenient transportation options.
3. Stations: Commuter rail lines have stations strategically located in both urban and suburban areas. These stations serve as boarding and alighting points for passengers and often provide parking facilities for those who drive to the station.
4. Dedicated Tracks: Commuter trains often operate on dedicated tracks or rights-of-way separate from freight and long-distance passenger trains. This separation ensures that commuter trains can maintain their schedules and avoid delays.
5. Economical: Commuter rail is often more economical than driving or taking a taxi to work daily. It can save commuters money on fuel, parking, and vehicle maintenance while also reducing the environmental impact.
6. Environmentally Friendly: Commuter rail systems generally use electric or diesel-electric locomotives, which are more energy-efficient and produce fewer emissions compared to individual automobiles.
7. Accessibility: Most commuter rail systems are designed to be accessible to passengers with disabilities, with features like ramps, elevators, and level boarding platforms.
8. Integration with Other Modes: Commuter rail often integrates with other public transportation systems, such as buses and subways, to provide passengers with a seamless and connected transit experience.
9. Ridership and Impact: Commuter rail services carry millions of passengers daily, helping to reduce traffic congestion and air pollution in major cities. They also contribute to urban development and revitalization of suburban areas.
10. Economic and Social Benefits: Commuter rail systems stimulate economic growth by facilitating access to job opportunities, education, and cultural activities in urban centers. They enhance the quality of life for residents in suburbs by reducing commute times and providing more leisure time.
In summary, commuter rail is a vital component of urban transportation systems, providing a reliable and sustainable means of commuting for individuals living in suburban areas. These systems offer a host of economic, environmental, and social benefits, making them an integral part of the daily lives of many city residents.
Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta: Grab and Gojek
Grab and Gojek are two of the most prominent ride-hailing and technology companies in Southeast Asia, both based in Indonesia. They offer a range of services that extend beyond ride-sharing.
Here’s an overview:
Gojek
1. Origin: Gojek was founded in 2010 in Jakarta, Indonesia. It initially started as a ride-hailing service but has since evolved into a Super App, offering a wide range of services.
2. Services: Gojek’s Super App includes ride-hailing, food delivery, grocery delivery, courier services, and digital payment services. It has a diverse ecosystem, including GoRide (ride-hailing), GoFood (food delivery), GoPay (digital wallet), and many other services.
3. Regional Expansion: While Gojek originated in Indonesia, it expanded to several other Southeast Asian countries, including Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines, offering various services tailored to local markets.
4. Economic and Social Impact: Gojek has made a significant impact on employment, enabling many people to become part-time or full-time drivers and delivery partners. It has also played a role in improving urban mobility and accessibility in the cities it serves.
Grab
1. Origin: Grab, originally known as MyTeksi, was founded in 2012 in Malaysia. It has since transformed into a Southeast Asian Super App.
2. Services: Grab offers services similar to Gojek, including ride-hailing, food delivery, grocery delivery, digital payments (GrabPay), and financial service.
3. Regional Expansion: Grab has expanded its operations across Southeast Asia, becoming one of the dominant ride-hailing and technology companies in the region.
4. Diverse Offerings: Grab provides a wide range of services tailored to the needs of each market it operates in, such as GrabCar (ride-hailing), GrabFood (food delivery), GrabExpress (courier services), and GrabMart (grocery delivery).
Key Similarities:
1. Both Gojek and Grab offer Super Apps with multiple services, creating a one-stop platform for users to access various on-demand services.
2. They have a significant presence in the ride-hailing and food delivery sectors in their respective markets.
3. Both companies have expanded beyond their home countries to become regional players, offering their services in multiple Southeast Asian nations.
4. Gojek and Grab have made substantial contributions to the gig economy by providing income opportunities for drivers and delivery partners.
5. They both have digital payment services integrated into their platforms, allowing users to make cashless transactions.
6. These companies have been involved in mergers and partnerships, such as the merger between Grab and Uber’s Southeast Asian operations and discussions of potential collaboration between Gojek and Grab.
In summary, Gojek and Grab are influential technology companies that have not only transformed the way people move and order food but have also become integral parts of the digital economy in Southeast Asia, offering an array of services that cater to the diverse needs of consumers in the region.
Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta: Electric vehicles (EVs)
Electric vehicles (EVs) are gaining popularity in Jakarta as the city works toward more sustainable transportation options.
Here’s an overview of the electric vehicle landscape in Jakarta:
1. Government Initiatives: The Jakarta city government has been supportive of EV adoption and has introduced incentives and policies to encourage the use of electric vehicles. This includes tax breaks and reduced registration fees for EV owners.
2. Charging Infrastructure: The development of charging infrastructure is crucial for the growth of EVs in Jakarta. Charging stations are being installed at various locations throughout the city, making it more convenient for EV owners to charge their vehicles.
3. Electric Scooters: Electric scooters have become a common sight in Jakarta. Various companies offer electric scooter-sharing services, providing a convenient and eco-friendly last-mile transportation solution.
4. Electric Buses: Jakarta has introduced electric buses into its public transportation fleet. These electric buses contribute to reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
5. Ride-Hailing Electric Vehicles: Companies like Gojek and Grab have started incorporating electric cars into their ride-hailing fleets. This encourages more people to experience electric mobility.
6. Private EV Ownersy: Jakarta is seeing a gradual increase in private EV ownership. Electric cars, such as Tesla and locally manufactured EVs, are becoming more accessible to consumers.
7. Environmental Benefits: Electric vehicles contribute to improved air quality and reduced noise pollution. This is particularly important in a densely populated city like Jakarta, which faces air quality challenges.
8. Long-Term Sustainability: EVs align with Jakarta’s efforts to reduce its carbon footprint and combat climate change. As the city continues to grow, sustainable transportation options are a priority.
In summary, electric vehicles are gradually becoming a more visible and viable mode of transportation in Jakarta. The government’s support, the presence of electric scooters, buses, and the inclusion of EVs in ride-hailing services are all contributing to the growth of electric mobility in the city. As the charging infrastructure continues to expand and technology advances, it is likely that electric vehicles will play an increasingly significant role in Jakarta’s transportation ecosystem.
Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta: Challenges Ahead
1. Infrastructure Development: Expanding public transportation and cycling infrastructure will require significant investment and ongoing development.
2. Behavior Change: Encouraging residents to shift from private cars to public transportation, cycling, or walking is a significant challenge that requires education and incentives.
3. Air Quality: Addressing air pollution remains a top priority, and it requires the enforcement of stricter emission standards and better urban planning.
Conclusion for Sustainable Transportation in Jakarta
Jakarta’s journey toward sustainable transportation is an ongoing process, marked by notable progress and ambitious goals.
While challenges persist, the city is committed to improving the quality of life for its residents and reducing its environmental footprint. Through the implementation of initiatives such as the MRT, BRT, cycling infrastructure, and electric vehicles, Jakarta is taking important steps towards a greener, more sustainable transportation future.
With continued investment and community involvement, the city is well on its way to achieving these goals and setting an example for other megacities facing similar challenges.
https://www.exaputra.com/2023/11/sustainable-transportation-in-jakarta.html
Renewable Energy
Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory
Vestas doubles second quarter profit and adds €4.7 billion in market value overnight. Plus EnBW finishes He Dreiht after a V236 blade break, the UK blocks Ming Yang’s Scottish factory, and India rules turbines are movable goods.
The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast is brought to you by Weather Guard Lightning Tech, creators of the StrikeTape Ultra LPS retrofit. Subscribe to Uptime’s Substack newsletter. And check out Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” Youtube channel. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
The Uptime Wind Energy podcast, brought to you by StrikeTape. Protecting thousands of wind turbines from lightning damage worldwide. Visit StrikeTape.com. And now, your hosts
Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall, and I’m here with Rosemary Barnes, Matthew Stead, and Yolanda Padron. And three out of the four of us will be in Melbourne Australia talking to a number of operators and interested parties about WOMA 2027. Matthew, where will we be the couple of days we’re in Melbourne?
Matthew Stead: So, um, first of all, we’ve got the Pullman, uh, East Melbourne, which is, uh, where the venue will be for, for 2027. Um, so that’ll be our home base. Um, we’ve got around about eight meetings planned already. So what we’re doing is we’re talking to the operators and a few other industry, um, players about [00:01:00] what we need to talk about, how we’re gonna move the industry forward in Australia.
Uh, so it’s gonna be jam-packed, but there’s a little bit of time left on the Friday afternoon if there’s any late-minute, um, people that wanna get in contact and catch up with us, um, for next Thursday, Friday, or actually Friday. Uh, so yeah, it’s gonna be a, a jam-packed time. I think we’re gonna be tired, too many coffees, and talking to all the key, all the key operators, uh, about what they wanna hear about and how we can move the, the industry forward.
Allen Hall: And if someone wants to put an input into the WOMA panel about what will be discussed at WOMA 2027, Matthew, how would they do that? How do they get ahold of you?
Matthew Stead: Well, we have a wonderful website, and that’s got all the details you could ever want. Um, you can also register on the website, so please register.
Otherwise, um, I’m sure we’re gonna be a sellout this year for sure. So woma2027.com.
Rosemary Barnes: I just wanna add that when people talk to [00:02:00] me about the event, they always say how they love that the topics are so relevant, and the reason why that they’re so relevant is because we make sure to go around to operators and find out what are the issues that they’re really dealing with.
So anybody that’s thinking of attending, even if you can’t, you know, meet us up, meet up with us in Melbourne, get in touch and tell us what are the, yeah, what are the topics that you’re struggling with that you’re not, um, you’re having trouble finding enough information, having trouble finding the people that can help you.
And y- yeah, like we take all of that information, and that’s how we come up with our agenda each year. And yeah, I mean, for us, that’s the, the main thing is that this has to be really relevant, up-to-date information for the industry, and we need your help to make sure it stays that way. I
Matthew Stead: mean, that’s what we’ve done the last two years, so this is– we’re just repeating the formula, um, listening to the operators and getting the good topics and the good speakers.
Allen Hall: Well, Vestas has had a good quarter. Uh, the, for the last couple of years, honestly, s- [00:03:00] Vestas has been really thin on margins. There was questions about it continuing on. Rising costs mostly, uh, supply chains, especially during COVID, were bad. Uh, and, uh, but for the most part, the shareholders stayed attached.
Well, that story is changing rapidly. The world’s largest turbine maker posted second quarter operating profits of $400- €46 million, more than double what the analysts had expected, and it’s raised its full-year margin guidance alongside half-year results for the first time in a decade. The shares climbed about 20% in Copenhagen, adding roughly €4.7 billion of market value in a single session.
Now, the chief executive, uh, Henrik Andersen, ha- put it plainly to, uh, uh, in a couple of news sources that something much bigger is happening and Vestas is gonna be the, the leader in wind. That’s how I read it, that everybody [00:04:00]at Vestas was super happy with the, the change in direction and things were moving up steadily.
But a 20% jump in a day is remarkable. You don’t see that in large industrial businesses like wind energy. Matthew, this has real implications on what happens next for Vestas because success like this usually means more orders.
Matthew Stead: Yeah, I wonder what’s going on under the hood there. Um, I mean, Vestas is a quality company, although, although can I just do a quick segue?
How many turbines were installed in Denmark in the last, uh, two years? Like last year and the year before?
Allen Hall: I don’t know. How many?
Matthew Stead: I believe it was eight turbines installed onshore in Denmark last year, and the year before it was 12. So, you know, maybe, maybe Vestas needs to focus on their own backyard a little bit as well.
Allen Hall: I’m not sure there’s a lot of opportunity there. Yeah, onshore.
Matthew Stead: How can you ever be full? I mean, there’s always, um, [00:05:00] uh, you know, um, you know, resiting or, um, you know, upgrades and-
Rosemary Barnes: You know what? Allen and I are probably gonna get some time in Jutland, uh, later this year, um, and that area and the old wind turbines there was actually the inspiration for my whole YouTube channel.
It just, ’cause there’s, you know, there’s turbines there from, the earliest one is, um, from the ’70s and still going. I think it’s one and a half megawatts, actually huge for, for that time. Um, and it was like community made, um, at Tvind. But anyway, I’m interested to revisit the site and have a look and see are these, you know, all these old turbines still there.
It’s only, like six years since I went through and did the experience but for the most part, they don’t seem to be yet pulling down the, the small old ones and putting up big ones. There’s a lot of, a lot of them are community owned. Um, and yeah, I mean, Danish people love wind turbines, but there’s only so many that you can have onshore.
Like, people are happy to live near them by, you know, the standards of people in other countries, but you don’t want [00:06:00] one in your literal backyard. I think that there is, there, there is a, a limit to how many more onshore wind turbines that you can get in that area and offshore expansion is the more likely way to go.
Um, and also I think it’s, it’s, it’s good to recognize that if you have a domestic only or a domestic first strategy, that will only get you so far and then you have to expand, and I think Denmark did that really well. I think Germany a little bit less. I think that Enercon were a bit surprised, um, by their strategy.
It, uh, they had a real hard time anyway when they had to transition away from mostly Germany to getting overseas. And obviously, like if you look at China, they have most of their installations are in China. They are trying so hard to get outside of China because it’s not, like even a market as big as China, it’s got decades to go before it will be full.
Um, you can still recognize that that’s not your, like long-term strategy for growth has to involve expansion, I think.
Allen Hall: I think Vestas, regardless of what happens in Denmark, is making a play for the United States. That seems to be [00:07:00] where a significant effort is happening at the moment and on offshore. Their– Vestas seems very excited about the offshore opportunities.
Of course, there’s a ton of wind turbines gonna be installed in the UK and, and all around Northern Europe. Offshore, the opportunities to buy turbines, there’s only a couple that you could get today. Uh, uh, the GE Vernova offerings I, I don’t think are gonna fit the mold, and I don’t know if GE’s even actively selling.
So their competitor realistically is Siemens Gamesa, which does seem like the smaller player at the minute versus Vestas, which is heavily pushing the V236 and will fill order books like crazy, I think, uh, just based upon the, the history they’ve had and everybody knowing who they are. So Also on the move in Australia, right?
Vestas is huge in Australia right now.
Rosemary Barnes: I think it’s really good that their, um, yeah, finances, uh, are [00:08:00] looking a bit better ’cause it’s been funny. Like, I tried early on in my wind career to invest in, you know, wind turbine manufacturers knowing that there would be immense growth, and I was right. There, there was immense growth.
Not that that was so hard to figure out that there would be, but it did not lead to any kind of, um, return on, on anything, you know. Like, that did not keep pace with the just general market. Um, so I, I stopped trying to, stopped trying to invest to that. But it has been really, really hard for the companies to, you know, raise money or y- you know, do any of the things that they need to do because they’ve always, like, they’re growing, growing, growing, but finances has been so tight that it has been a real constraint on the amount of engineering that they could do, and I really hope that Vestas are gonna take this opportunity that they’ve got compared to, you know, a lot of the other manufacturers.
Vestas do have really strong, um, innovation and, yeah, engineering capabilities for doing– you know, developing new technologies and improving them, and I really hope that they’re taking this opportunity to build that up. There are a lot [00:09:00] of very good engineers with a lot of experience in the industry in that area that are working in other fields at the moment because, you know, there’s been a lot of contraction in Denmark.
So I don’t know, it seems like a really good time to hire back some of that really in-depth knowledge and, yeah, get a- get ahead of, you know, some of the future quality problems. We’re going through such a hard time at the moment from the fast development that happened in the 20-teens when there wasn’t a whole lot of money around.
We’re dealing with quality problems now, so, you know, maybe we can get ahead and not have the next round of them if we can invest in just a lot more, uh, engineering capacity.
Allen Hall: When you have success like Vestas has, usually the upper level management and some of the executive team starts getting pilfered, that they’ll get offers to repeat that success at another company, and it sounds like that process has started already.
There’s a couple of executives that have recently departing or are in the midst of departing from Vestas. [00:10:00] I would see that continuing f- at least for the next six months, uh, because everybody wants to repeat that, right? If you can get a 20% increase in your valuation overnight, uh, I can, I can list a number of companies, regardless of industry, that would love to participate.
Even in a 5% increase, that would be remarkable. So, um, Vestas is gonna have a hard time holding onto this. That’s just the nature of the business where things are successful, people will wander. And Rosemary, I, I think they’re– And Yolanda In, in my book, Vestas should sort of s-stand down and just make quality products.
I’m not sure you sh-should tinker too much at the time being and just make the good stuff better. That seems like a way to really increase profits.
Yolanda Padron: Yeah, I mean, solving a lot of the issues that– And, and that’s not just a Vestas exclusive thing, right? All of these OEMs have some sort of issue that maybe– I know Rosie’s touched a lot on, on it, where [00:11:00] you build this version A and then version B solves one of the small little issues, but now it creates another little problem, and then you have version C, and then everything just kinda has its own niche little issue, um, that really expands over time.
So if they could solidify what they already have in, in a, in a model that, that would help them just even keep a lot of their customers, I think that’d be great, and it would help, certainly help them, um, not continuously, like, rotate around the customers, ’cause it almost feels like, at least in the States, right, you, you get GE to be really, really strong and have a huge market share, and then GE starts focusing more on gas turbines, so then they all go onto Vestas, and then they all go onto Ontara now.
Um, and then just, you know, just kind of everybody starts cycling through them because they just kind of want something that’s better quality than what they’re getting in the long haul.
Matthew Stead: Allen, you, you talked about you think there’s something big under the hood. I think you, you [00:12:00] thought that maybe Vestas was angling towards something or being quite bullish.
Do you think that they might take over GE Vernova?
Allen Hall: I don’t think they’re gonna grab Vernova, and I don’t think Vernova is for sale at the minute, but I wonder if Siemens Gamesa is, or Nordex. I mean, Nordex has done terrific the last couple of quarters and is making inroads in places that I didn’t think possible three, four years ago.
Uh, the European marketplace is be- becoming really unique in that sense that there’s a lot of money being put out. But is there a sole perfect solution for Europe? Not at the minute, ’cause you got two competitors there, and then China trying to, to work its way in. Will the Europeans come together and form something more united, even if it’s just a partnership, a loose partnership, versus letting China on the shores?
We’ll see. 64 of the largest machines that Vestas has builds are standing off the German coast, but one blade is missing a [00:13:00] piece. We’ll talk about that when we come back.
Speaker: Are you overspending on lightning repairs? Most operators are because solving lightning damage is complicated. Weather Guard Lightning Tech helps operators reduce lightning damage. Our innovative StrikeTape lightning diverter protects over twenty thousand blades worldwide. Now, StrikeTape Ultra installs faster than ever.
StrikeTape Ultra cures uptower in just fifteen minutes, even in cold weather. Visit weatherguardwind.com to schedule a call.
Allen Hall: Well, Germany’s largest offshore wind farm is now fully installed, and EnBW confirmed this, uh, past week that all 64 of the Vestas V236 15-megawatt turbines are s- standing at the He Dreiht wind farm about 85 kilometers northwest of Borkum. Uh, 960 megawatts, [00:14:00] 2.4 billion euros invested. Man, these offshore projects are expensive to get installed.
Uh, so it’s power for roughly 1.1 million households, and there’s no state subsidy behind any of it. And so this is a little bit of a u- unique situation. Uh, th- well, the one footnote about the wind farm is they had a V236 blade break and fall into the North Sea, and they had fished it out and I think I passed along s- pictures that I saw online of, uh, one of the police boats pulling the shear web out of the water I don’t know what to think anymore about some of these offshore blade issues.
Obviously, Vestas is very conscientious about it and will be doing RCAs and engineering reviews and all the above to go identify what the problem is. But it does just lead to a little bit of a pause of do– what is going on for some of these offshore [00:15:00] wind blade installations or, or whatever’s causing these blades to break?
Do we have a good handle on it? Yolanda, is– are we following up on all the design details so that we can prevent these things in the future?
Yolanda Padron: I mean, I’d, I’d hope you’d be following up on the design, right? Like, and, um, but I think there is still a little bit of a disconnect from, from what we’ve seen, and again, not just Vestas exclusive, um, between the people who are designing and the people who are manufacturing, the people who are in operations, right?
So, uh- The, from what we’ve heard, uh, this could have potentially been a, um, partially because of a transportation issue, which is what happens a lot in onshore. It’s a lot more common than we would like it to be. Um, and so that even goes beyond what would go on in the design studio and what would go on in the manufacturing and what would [00:16:00] go on even just for the people that are running the site, right?
So, so some sort of, um, in between, uh, EPC error. Um, but yeah, I just think that, like in a lot of industries, there should be a lot more communication between all of these teams on the lower level, so that way a lot of these problems can, can be avoided.
Allen Hall: I’m wondering if it’s actually an issue on the, the testing side.
And, uh, the one question that just popped up, and we saw from the ORE Catapult, uh, survey that’s being conducted at the moment, and if you haven’t participated in that, you just visit ORE Catapult and answer some of the survey questions. But torsion on a blade, which is very difficult to test for, and it really isn’t tested for today, but does happen during the move and the transportation of these big offshore blades.
Is it one area that we need to do a little more work in or maybe spend some more time focusing on it to see what is happening as blades are [00:17:00]moved?
Rosemary Barnes: The thing about te- torsion is that it is much more significant as blades get longer. I can’t, I can’t remember the equation off the top of my head, which is, um, bothering me.
But I think it scales with, like, the fourth power or something of, of length. And so whilst it was always a bit of a problem, it’s much more of a problem as it gets, as blades get bigger. I mean, they’ve never, like, fully tested a blade, and there was always a lot of reliance on, hey, y- you know, like we’ve tested certain things that is possible to test in a test facility on the ground.
But they also rely on their decades of experience of how blades actually behave in the field. But, you know, remember, that’s a real lagging, lagging indicator because y- you know, their decades of experience is mostly with lots smaller blades. Now, blades are really different because they’re longer and different effects are, are taking over.
It’s not just, uh, torsion, but it’s also the laminates get much thicker, and then y- you know, you, you have issues with the way that they’re curing, [00:18:00] and there’s a lot more just space for, um, defects to be present in a really thick laminate All of those things add up. Oh, yeah, then add in addition, like new materials, carbon fiber is new, and then new ways of producing it, you know, pultrusions, um, all kinds of different materials like balsa’s being replaced with foams and, um, like, you know, 10 times that number of what sounds like a small innovation, but all of these things have the potential for damage and don’t have a really long track record in the field to be able to kind of calibrate.
We do need to remember that, like, when you do something new, things are gonna break, uh, sometimes, they’re gonna fail sometimes. If they don’t, then you’re definitely being too conservative, and your product is costing more than it should, and nobody wants more expensive wind energy, right?
Matthew Stead: Rosie, Rosie, I, I know you’re doing some, some excellent work on, um, industry studies around erosion and temperature and so forth.
Um, I just wanted to let a little secret out of the bag that, um, in the future there will also be some [00:19:00] other studies on torsion and blade twist and blade dynamics. So, um, just a few things are in, in train at the moment, which I can’t share, share, but, uh, watch this space around better understanding blade twist.
Allen Hall: The Hydride wind farm runs on European turbines, but the next one might not. Two governments with two very different answers on who gets to build Europe’s wind fleet.
Delamination and bondline failures in blades are difficult problems to detect early. These hidden issues can cost you millions in repairs and lost energy production. CIC NDT are specialists to detect these critical flaws before they become expensive burdens. Their nondestructive test technology penetrates deep into blade materials to find voids and cracks traditional inspections completely miss.
CIC NDT maps every critical defect, delivers actionable [00:20:00] reports, and provides support to get your blades back in service. So visit cicndt.com because catching blade problems early will save you millions
Well, two countries and two decisions, one question. In Scotland, the UK government blocked plans for the Chinese manufacturer Mingyang to build a turbine factory, uh, near Inverness on national security grounds. 1.5 billion pounds of investment, up to about 1,500 jobs. And First Minister John Swinney has asked the new prime minister to reconsider.
And the UK energy secretary minister called that request irresponsible. Meanwhile, up in Denmark, Vattenfall has just won two offshore wind farms and will not say whether it will buy European turbines. Danish suppliers are not taking that quietly. So [00:21:00] the Scotland question about the Mingyang factory is at least being discussed again with the new prime minister in the UK.
It does seem like there’s a lot to do and get the government formed and make all this stuff happen. But I don’t see a Burnham administration changing the outcome for Mingyang, but I could be wrong. At the, the same time, Vestas is pushing for a more Eurocentric focus and to really keep out the Chinese.
Uh, something has to give here pretty soon.
Matthew Stead: I actually think Mingyang should, um, set up a factory in Scotland. I, I mean, what’s wrong with that? I mean, uh, why is that a security issue?
Rosemary Barnes: Set up the factory and put the, like, whatever you’re worried about, put protections in place for it, require it to be a local joint venture or whatever.
You know, we’ve seen the blueprint in many of what used to be, you know, less rich countries. That’s how they, you know, got a head start on some of these technologies. It’s not like, I don’t think that China [00:22:00] has a head start on wind, wind turbine technology, but they certainly have different ways of doing things that, um, yeah, we could, we could learn from.
But I think across the board, wind turbines, batteries, solar panels, whatever, let them set up factories, put the rules in place that mean that your country benefits from it and you’re getting the, you know, the information transfer.
Yolanda Padron: Do you think that’ll, like, impulse a lot of these more established European companies to maybe start fixing some of the issues that they’ve known about for, for a while, um, particularly regarding the blades and everything that we’ve talked about earlier?
Like, there’s enough competition there, so maybe they need to start looking a little bit more deeply into their problems.
Allen Hall: Do we think that Chinese operations have been out front, forward, honest, I’ll even use, about their blade issues?
Rosemary Barnes: No, but this is a good way to find out, isn’t it?
Allen Hall: Governments decide who is allowed to build a turbine after a discussion on Scotland.
Uh, but, but [00:23:00] occasionally, a court decides what a turbine legally is. India has just settled that question, and the reasoning should be of interest to anybody who ships machines across a border right after this. As wind energy professionals, staying informed is crucial and let’s face it, difficult. That’s why the Uptime Podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine.
PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high-quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit peswind.com today. A tax fight in India has produced a definition every turbine supplier should read.
Is a wind turbine bolted to a concrete foundation movable goods, or is it immovable property? State tax authorities argued immovable, which would have [00:24:00] taxed erection and commissioning contracts at 18% instead of 5%. The Andhra Pradesh, uh, High Court disagreed, and on the 12th of August, the Supreme Court declined to interfere.
The reasoning rests on something this whole industry takes for granted. A turbine can be taken down, moved, and put back up. So a turbine is a movable object, and it has less taxation. Bonus. So this is a really interesting discussion that’s happening in India because it’s probably symptomatic of things we’re seeing elsewhere across the world about taxation for wind turbines, right?
That, um, if there’s a way to tax a wind turbine, we’re gonna try to do it. This is a unique way, uh, that happens in India where depending on if it’s permanent or movable, the tax rates are different. I, I guess that would apply to a lot of components inside a wind turbine too, Matthew, don’t you? Like the, the generator, the, the big heavy things, [00:25:00] gearbox, generator, blades, rotors, tower sections, would be taxed at a, a lesser rate.
Matthew Stead: I agree with the court case that it’s all movable and, uh, you can actually buy turbines on the secondhand market, can’t you? I mean, if I wanted to buy, yeah, whatever, whatever, I could buy one and, and put it up in my backyard if I had a bigger backyard. Um, so yeah, I vote for movable. I vote for lower taxes.
Yolanda Padron: The way that it would work a lot of times in the US is, I mean, it’s, you pay, the company itself pays a lot less than they would’ve over time, right? Just by pure, the, the regular kind of tax laws. Um, but the community, there’d be just direct donations to the community, so then they’d get, uh, like money would actually come into the community where the turbines were being built instead of just distributed around the state, which I mean, in a state as big as Texas, it gets, um, but easier for that c- um, that county to get a lot more, uh, funding than they would typically get if it was [00:26:00] through a big enough area.
Um, but yeah, no, I agr- I completely agree with you guys that, that this should be a movable good. I mean, how many times have we seen, uh, even just a blade, um, that it looks like it’s, uh, just a, a failed blade that they have to go in and replace, and then they take it out, fix it, and then just bring it back to the same site or take it to another site across the country.
And, and to that point, like if you were to h- judge it as something that’s immovable, would then any blade replacement just not be taxed? Because then it’s, you’re moving that one component and two, but it’s essentially the same turbine. Like, I don’t know how that all would make sense.
Allen Hall: I think the Uptime Supreme Court agrees with the Indian Supreme Court that wind turbines are movable, and that’s good.
Well, that wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you. [00:27:00] Reach out to us on LinkedIn. And if you found value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review. It really helps other wind energy professionals discover the show.
And don’t forget to subscribe so you never miss an episode. For Rosa, Yolanda, and Matthew, I’m Allen Hall. We’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy podcast.
Renewable Energy
Vermont and Florida: A Key Difference
Can’t swear that the story here is authentic, but it sure rings true.
Vermont is a somewhat quirky state, but it protects its citizens very well. FWIW, this is where I want MY tax dollars going too.
Florida is a deeply red state that, true to form, wants as much ignorance as it can possibly produce. Educated people aren’t voting for people like Ron Desantis.
Renewable Energy
Republicans: Will This Work?
The GOP is asking American voters to believe that “radical left Democrat extremists” are leading the country into socialism/communism. They’re hoping that this fear will outweigh the electorate’s understanding of the damage that Trump, with help of congressional Republicans, is inflicting on this nation in the form of the war in Iran, destroyed relations with allies, inflation, shoddy education, environmental collapse, and threats to Social Security and Medicare.
As we all know, the rate at which a lie becomes accepted as true is a function of the frequency that it is repeated. And God knows, we see this crap about communism every time we turn around.
But this looks like an unwinnable battle. Virtually no one wants to abandon free enterprise. Moreover, Trump’s abysmal polling numbers reflect the fact that is largely despised as a criminal–the most corrupt figure in U.S. history.
How would you like to be campaigning to retired baby boomers on the platform that we cannot afford Social Security any longer, because we’ve siphoned off huge amounts of money, like our president’s “vanity war,” with only further downside in sight, that is costing $1 billion a day?
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy10 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits









