Connect with us

Published

on

This blog was written by SACE Decarbonization Director Eddy Moore.

South Carolina Legislature Proposes to Roll Back Rate-Payer Protections

Five years ago, after utility companies spent $9 billion on a nuclear plant that was never finished, the South Carolina legislature reformed the law to increase scrutiny of utility plans and support renewable energy produced by independent developers. Now, a new Speaker of the House is leading a utility-supported effort to roll back those reforms and expand gas-fired power. If passed, the bill would increase costs for residents, undermine the state’s utility planning process, threaten continued buildout of new utility-scale solar, and drive up climate pollution across the state.

Major Fossil Fuel Expansion

The Speaker’s bill indicates legislative support for approximately 9,000 megawatts (MW) of new power plants that would burn fracked gas, plus new gas pipelines. The roughly $9 billion capital cost for the power plants alone would equal almost $2,000 each for every man, woman, and child in the state. The fuel for the power plants will likely exceed the cost of the plants themselves.  This bill is a multi-decade deadweight on the future economy of the state.

Just one of the new gas plants—a joint venture of Dominion Energy and state-owned Santee Cooper—could be as large as 2,000 MW and would take seven or more years to build because it first requires expanded interstate gas pipelines across sensitive wetlands and more than 100 miles of electric transmission upgrades. The legislative endorsement of the project, which is working its way through state approvals even without specific legislation, adds extra insurance for the utility companies that ratepayers will be required to foot the full bill if the complex project has major cost overruns. The project also would increase reliance on gas in Dominion Energy territory from the current 40% of all energy generated to almost 60%, tying its customers to international gas price spikes for decades to come instead of signing fixed-price renewable energy contracts.  

Eroding Consumer & Environmental Protections

In a state in which the legislature directly chooses the members Commission that regulates utility rates, the legislative endorsements would override the regulatory process. The regulatory process is further undermined by numerous other provisions of the bill. For instance, it requires the Commission to give special consideration to evidence provided by utility company witnesses. It also restores a pre-reform mandate for the Public Service Commission to support the financial integrity of the utility (which is already ensured elsewhere in the law), rather than having regulators focus more on the needs of ratepayers.  And it eliminates the authorization for the state’s Office of Consumer Affairs to intervene on behalf of utility ratepayers, which was enacted as a direct result of the nuclear fiasco. These moves to short circuit regulatory review processes are a blow to South Carolina residents since the Public Service Commission and the review processes they oversee stand as the only significant check on monopoly utilities’ profit motive at ratepayers’ expense. 

The bill also threatens the number one method of renewable energy development in South Carolina by shortening the length of standard contracts for new utility-scale solar facilities from ten years to five. Under current law, these contracts set the terms under which utilities buy energy from renewable energy providers, and thus are the basis of bank financing for the projects. Cutting the financing period in half will either drastically cut the revenue for solar or drive up the necessary unit cost of energy so that solar is priced out of the market. Either way, this provision would likely kill an otherwise growing solar and battery storage market. And it is patently unfair:  for comparison, coal-fired power plants in South Carolina are currently financed by ratepayers for over 70 years. 

Remarkably, given the recent history of nuclear project abandonment in South Carolina, the bill also authorizes up to three new “small modular” nuclear reactors. This novel technology is untested and the only project in the United States was recently abandoned for cost overruns. If the South Carolina reactors are abandoned like the last one, utility companies would be required to give a “fulsome accounting,” but still could be allowed to charge ratepayers for the plants.  

While the legislation obviously fails to heed the lessons learned after the $9 billion nuclear fiasco in South Carolina, its greater significance is a complete embrace of gas-fired power for decades to come. Out-of-state gas producers and pipeline companies see the electric power business as their only real growth opportunity in the domestic US market. The gas industry is fighting for market share, trying across the southeast to beat renewable energy to the punch as solar prices decline and utilities nationally increasingly turn to battery storage for dispatchable capacity.

Take Action to Fight Back

Hopefully, as legislators hear from constituents shocked by the bill’s backward emphasis on fossil fuel expansion and monopoly profit rather than competitive clean energy, they will pause and reconsider. South Carolina is home to a diverse and growing clean energy economy, and new technology and regulatory approaches can meet our electricity needs at lower cost and risk.  For instance, South Carolina should require its utilities to participate in a regional wholesale market to improve reliability, cost, and transparency. The state legislature spent almost a million dollars studying this option and found that it would save over $300 million per year, but shelved the study when utilities complained. Also, competitive renewable energy procurement processes have been demonstrated to lower cost and speed integration of clean energy resources. And binding energy efficiency program targets would speed adoption of the cheapest energy of all—the energy not generated in the first place. But the first step for South Carolina to reliably meet its energy needs should be to rethink the backward legislative approach represented by the recently introduced bill.

The post South Carolina Legislature Unlearns Lessons, Promotes Major Gas Industry Push appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

South Carolina Legislature Unlearns Lessons, Promotes Major Gas Industry Push

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Has Anything Improved in the Last Two Years?

Published

on

It depends on what you believe.

Fox News will tell you that our southern border is no longer being overrun, that we’ve discovered that vaccinations are unsafe, that we’re standing up against Sharia Law, we’re preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon, prices are coming down (or soon will be), Trump is an honest and effective servant of the American people and that the U.S. is once again respected on the world stage.

We live in a country where tens of millions of idiots believe every word of this.

Has Anything Improved in the Last Two Years?

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Uptime’s Takeaways from Hamburg 2026

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Uptime’s Takeaways from Hamburg 2026

The crew discusses Hamburg takeaways, including the industry mood, bigger blade risks, and OEM announcements.

The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast is brought to you by Weather Guard Lightning Tech, creators of the StrikeTape Ultra LPS retrofit. Subscribe to Uptime’s Substack newsletter. And check out Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” Youtube channel. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Uptime’s Takeaways from Hamburg 2026

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

A Relief to be around Like-Minded People

Published

on

I met a guy today from a rural part of Central England–“nothing but farms and pubs,” as he put it.  His father was an epidemiologist working for the United Nations, and so, as a boy, he lived all over the world and grew up largely in developing countries that suffered from horrific diseases.

He and his wife had the conversation one would expect from such people:

  • Why are we so content to ignore climate change that is ruining our planet?
  • Why are people so indifferent to the suffering of others?
  • How is it possible that billionaires expect to live well here on Earth while 99.9% of us suffering with wildfires, devastating storms, blistering heat, losses of landmasses, and desertification?
  • At the end of the day, is money really that precious?

Obviously, not everyone thinks this way, but to be in something of a “lovefest” for just a few minutes was a great relief.

relief.

A Relief to be around Like-Minded People

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com