Connect with us

Published

on

What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you think of Santos? If you’re a cycling fan or an Adelaide local, it might be the Tour Down Under – the pro-cycling race happening this month in South Australia of which Santos is the major sponsor.

However the fossil fuel company got far less attention for another big event that took place earlier this month: a court date for an oil spill that took place a few years ago.

Santos: Spiller Down Under

On January 6 2025, Santos pleaded guilty and was convicted of substandard operations leading to an oil spill in 2022 off the coast of Western Australia, where 25,000 litres of oil were released into the Indian Ocean. The spill took place in waters which hold significant cultural importance for the Ngarluma and Yindjibarndi people. Dead dolphins and other sea creatures were also found in the affected area shortly after the oil spill. For all of this damage the multi-billion dollar corporation was fined a measly $10,000 – nothing but a slap on the wrist.

For comparison, the maximum fine for an individual person in South Australia dumping only 50L worth of litter is up to $30,000, or 6 months in jail. Why are multi-billion dollar corporations allowed to get away with this?

This oil spill in 2022 is just one example on a long list of spills, leaks, and explosions on Santos projects that have harmed workers, marine life, and the environment.

In January 2023 another pipeline in South Australia had a major explosion. And in 2011 Santos was fined for breaching workplace safety laws after an explosion at the Moomba gas plant, on New Year’s Day in 2004. Come to think about it, this year’s fine was also a few days after new years in 2025. Are court cases and exploding pipelines becoming a new years tradition for the Adelaide headquartered company?

Also in 2023, a terrifying video from a Santos offshore gas project in WA shows several rope access technicians narrowly missing serious injury or death after a lift went badly wrong.

We could go on, but we’ll stop there for today.

The Great Cover Up: community sponsorships

The reason that major companies like Santos are sponsoring community events like the Tour Down Under is to bolster their reputation. They’ll go to great lengths to be associated with ‘helping out the community’ – almost as great as the lengths they will go to cover up their environmental damage.

When Santos spilled 25,000L of oil into the ocean in 2022, they failed to report it. A year later, an anonymous whistleblower accused Santos of a coverup.

“In defiance of their obligations, Santos had not mobilised environmental assessors to the island until a week after the incident,” said the whistleblower. “They could not have known the real scale of impact, it was never checked.” He also noted that he “was appalled at the culture and management within Santos, which demonstrated such wilful refusal to accept responsibility.”

Santos is not an anomaly. Many fossil fuel corporations have spills and explosions that they try to evade responsibility for, including Woodside – who now wants to be trusted to drill for gas near Scott Reef, threatening endangered whales, turtles, and sea snakes.

Companies like Santos and Woodside frequently sponsor community events because doing so buys them power. It smooths the way to their project approvals, and it makes communities reliant on the very fossil fuel companies who are responsible for the huge costs that then fall on communities when they have to clean up after environmental or climate disasters.

Fossil fuel companies like Santos are making climate change worse

It’s not just Santos’ spills and explosions that are causing harm, it’s the fossil fuels it produces for a profit.

Just 78 companies and state entities are responsible for over 70% of the toxic carbon pollution that’s driving climate change, but they’re leaving the rest of us to foot the bill for the massive cost of disasters they’ve helped to cause. Everyday Australians are currently paying $13 billion per year to clean up the impacts of climate change.

Let’s not forget that in 2022 alone, Santos raked in over US$3.8 billion.

We shouldn’t let billion-dollar companies profit off polluting while buying back social license from sponsoring local swim teams and sports competitions. Coal, oil and gas companies are the biggest contributors to climate change. They cause the damage – they should be paying to fix it.



Coal Fired Power Plant


Stop New Coal, Oil and Gas Projects

Sign the petition to demand the Australian Government stop new coal, oil and gas projects now.


Sign petition

https://www.greenpeace.org.au/article/santos-tour-down-under-why-fossil-fuel-companies-should-be-best-known-for-their-pollution-not-their-sponsorships/

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Maine Presses Pause on Large Data Centers. Will Other States Follow Its Lead?

Published

on

The moratorium is the first of its type to pass a legislative chamber, but about a dozen other states have pending proposals.

Maine is now the first state to pass a moratorium on the development of large data centers, and others may follow.

Maine Presses Pause on Large Data Centers. Will Other States Follow Its Lead?

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule

Published

on

The Trump EPA’s repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding revokes the agency’s authority to regulate climate pollution. Environmental activists are mourning the loss while vowing to resurrect it.

A procession of mourners representing sea level rise, melting permafrost, ecocide and other climate calamities grieved the demise of a groundbreaking climate rule outside the Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 9 headquarters in downtown San Francisco on Tuesday.

Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule

Continue Reading

Climate Change

IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day

Published

on

Global oil demand is expected to be almost one million barrels per day less than was forecast before the Iran war, as shortages and soaring costs prompt drastic cutbacks by consumers and businesses, a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday.

With the closure of the Strait of Hormuz choking off supplies and keeping prices high, less oil is being used to make products such as jet fuel, LPG cooking gas and petrochemicals, the Paris-based IEA said in its monthly oil report, forecasting the biggest quarterly demand drop since the COVID pandemic.

The Iran war “upends our global outlook”, the government-backed agency said, adding that it now expects oil demand to shrink by 80,000 barrels per day in 2026 from last year.

Before the conflict began, the IEA said in February it expected oil demand to rise by 850,000 barrels per day this year, meaning the difference between the pre-war and current estimates is 930,000 barrels a day, or 340 million barrels a year.

That could have a significant impact on the outlook for planet-heating carbon emissions this year.

At an intensity of 434 kg of carbon dioxide per barrel of oil – the estimate used by the US Environmental Protection Agency – the annual reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from oil for 2026, compared with the pre-war forecast, is similar to the amount emitted by the Philippines each year.

Harry Benham, senior advisor at Carbon Tracker, told Climate Home News that he expects at least half of the reduction in oil demand to be permanent because of efficiency gains, behavioural change and faster electrification.

The oil shock is leading to oil being replaced, especially in transport, with electricity and other fuels, just as past oil shocks drove lasting reductions in consumption, he said. “The shock doesn’t delay the transition – it reinforces it,” he added.

Demand takes a hit

While demand for oil has fallen significantly, supplies have fallen even further. Supply in March was 10 million barrels a day less than February, the IEA said, calling it the “largest disruption in history”.

This forecast relies on the assumption that regular deliveries of oil and gas from the Middle East will resume by the middle of the year, the IEA said, although the prospects for this “remain unclear at this stage”.

    Last month, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the CERAWeek oil industry conference that prices were not high enough to lead to permanent reductions in demand for oil, known as demand destruction.

    But the IEA said on Wednesday that “demand destruction will spread as scarcity and higher prices persist”.

    Industries contributing to weaker demand for oil include Asian petrochemical producers, who are cutting production as oil supplies dry up, the report said, while consumers are cutting back on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which is mainly used as a cooking gas in developing countries, the IEA said.

    Flight cancellations caused by the war have dampened demand for oil-based jet fuel, the IEA said. As well as cancellations caused by risk from the conflict itself, airports have warned that fuel shortages could lead to disruption.

    Across the world, governments, businesses and consumers have sought to reduce their oil use after the war. The government of Pakistan has cut the speed limit on its roads, so that people drive at a more fuel-efficient speed, and Laos has encouraged people to work from home to preserve scarce petrol and diesel.

    Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps

    Consumers in Bangladesh are seeking electric vehicles (EVs) to avoid fuel queues and, in Nigeria, more people are seeking to replace petrol and diesel generators with solar panels, Climate Home News has reported.

    In the longer term, the European Union is considering cutting taxes on electricity to help it replace fossil fuels and France is promoting EVs and heat pumps.

    IEA urged to help “future-proof” economies

    Meanwhile, the IEA came under fire last week from energy security experts, including former military chiefs, who signed an open letter in which they accused the agency of offering “only a temporary response to turbulent markets”, calling for stronger structural action “to future-proof our economies”.

    They said that besides releasing emergency oil stocks and offering advice on how to reduce oil demand in the short term, the IEA should show countries how to reduce their exposure to volatile oil and gas markets.

    The IEA has also been under pressure from the Trump administration to talk less about the transition away from fossil fuels.

    This article was amended on 15 April 2026 to correct the drop in 2026 forecast oil demand from “nearly a billion” to “nearly a million”

    The post IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day appeared first on Climate Home News.

    IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com