Rio Tinto has completed its $6.7 billion acquisition of Arcadium Lithium in the U.S. The Royal Court of Jersey approved the deal on March 5, officially making Arcadium Lithium a part of Rio Tinto Lithium. This acquisition also brings the Rincon lithium project into Rio Tinto’s growing portfolio.
Rio Tinto’s Big Bet on Arcadium Lithium
- With this acquisition, Rio Tinto aims to grow the capacity of its Tier 1 assets to over 200 thousand tonnes per year of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) by 2028.
Furthermore, it expects strong growth, higher EBITDA, and improved cash flow in the coming years. It will deploy advanced technologies and its strong global hold to boost its market presence in the lithium sector.
Explaining more, Rio Tinto Chief Executive Officer Jakob Stausholm said,
“Today we are delighted to welcome the employees of Arcadium to Rio Tinto. Together, we are accelerating our efforts to source, mine and produce minerals needed for the energy transition. By combining Rio Tinto’s scale, financial strength, operational and project development experience with Arcadium’s Tier 1 assets, technical and commercial capabilities, we are creating a world-class lithium business which sits alongside our leading iron ore, aluminium and copper operations. We believe we are well-positioned to deliver the materials needed for the energy transition while maintaining our focus on.”
As part of the agreement, Arcadium Lithium shareholders will receive $5.85 per share. To fund the purchase, Rio Tinto is using a bridge loan facility, which it plans to replace with long-term debt financing.
Following the acquisition, Arcadium Lithium’s shares and CHESS Depositary Receipts (CDIs) will be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).
Other than Acradium Lithium, Rio Tinto invested $2.5 billion in the Rincon project in Argentina, which was approved last year in December 2024.
This expansion will increase the site’s annual capacity to 60,000 tonnes of battery-grade lithium carbonate. Additionally, it also includes a 3,000-tonne starter plant and a larger 57,000-tonne facility.
The ongoing decline in lithium prices has sparked strong industry reactions. Some mining companies are delaying new projects, while others are cutting costs to stay profitable. Smaller lithium miners are feeling the most pressure. Without strong financial backing, many are struggling to survive. Some have even halted operations or are seeking mergers to stay afloat.
Notably, major producers like Albemarle and SQM plan to cut production, hoping to prevent further price drops and stabilize the market.
However, with these two massive lithium deals, Rio Tinto is consolidating its position in the global lithium market. Notably, the Acardium acquisition occurred amid an excess supply and significantly lower prices since their peak in 2022.
Rio Tinto’s Net Zero Goals
Rio Tinto has set ambitious targets to cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50% by 2030 (compared to 2018 levels) and to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. Its latest sustainability report revealed:
- 2024 gross Scope 1 and 2 emissions: 30.7 Mt CO2e
- 2024 emissions reduction: 3.2 million tonnes of CO2e through renewable energy contracts
- Projected additional reductions by 2030: 3.6 million tonnes per year
To reach these goals, Rio Tinto has signed major renewable power purchase agreements and invested in solar and wind energy projects.
Additionally, the company is committing $143 million in Western Australia to develop BioIron™, an innovative ironmaking process that could slash CO2 emissions by up to 95% compared to traditional blast furnace methods.

Roadmap to a Greener Future
Rio Tinto’s comprehensive strategy to achieve its 2030 emissions target includes transitioning to renewable electricity and reducing process heat emissions at its alumina refineries. A key priority is cutting emissions at its Pacific Aluminium operations, particularly at the Boyne and Tomago smelters.
The company is also advancing other sustainability initiatives:
- Richards Bay Minerals: Expanding renewable energy contracts
- Queensland Alumina Limited (QAL): Improving alumina processing efficiency
Expanding the Use of Carbon Credits
To meet its 2030 net emissions target, Rio Tinto plans to use high-quality carbon credits from nature-based solutions. These credits will be capped at 10% of the company’s 2018 baseline emissions.
Most of these credits will come from Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs), supporting compliance with the country’s Safeguard Mechanism. Rio Tinto remains committed to transparency in its emissions reporting. The company will clearly distinguish between its gross operational emissions and net emissions while also disclosing the volume and type of carbon credits used.
Advancing Carbon Capture and Mineralization Technologies
Rio Tinto is actively developing innovative ways to capture and store carbon emissions from fossil fuel use. In 2024, the company focused on identifying the most effective methods to capture low-concentration CO2 from aluminum smelters’ flue gas.
This effort includes adapting direct air capture for higher CO2 levels and modifying point-source technologies for lower concentrations, though both approaches remain in early development stages.
In early 2025, Rio Tinto partnered with Hydro to evaluate carbon capture technologies for aluminum emissions. Additionally, its collaboration with Carbfix is in the pipeline. They plan to begin CO2 mineralization at the ISAL site by 2028.
Meanwhile, at the Tamarack project in Minnesota, Rio Tinto recently completed a 1,137-meter exploratory well to assess the mineralization potential of local rock formations.

By investing in sustainable solutions and advanced technologies, the company is paving the way for a low-carbon future. Lastly, when the market rebounds, Rio Tinto will be ready to meet rising demand with a stronger and more diverse lithium portfolio.
The post Rio Tinto’s $6.7B Arcadium Deal—Is It a Smart Move Amid Falling Lithium Prices? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测



