Sponsored content
The energy industry is changing fast. More people and businesses want cleaner and more sustainable energy to fight climate change. Countries are setting rules to cut pollution, and investors are putting money into green energy projects. This push is making oil and gas companies look for ways to reduce their impact on the environment.
Fossil fuels make up around 81.5% of the world’s total energy supply, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Many industries, such as transportation and manufacturing, still depend on oil and gas.
However, these industries are under pressure to cut emissions, and oil and gas companies must adapt. Some are shifting toward natural gas, which burns 50% cleaner than coal. Others are investing in technologies that reduce emissions while maintaining production.
How Oil and Gas Companies Are Becoming Greener
The renewable energy market was worth $1.21 trillion in 2023 and is expected to grow by 17.2% each year until 2030, according to Grand View Research. While renewables like wind and solar are growing, oil and gas companies are also finding ways to be more sustainable.
Some major oil and gas companies are working on reducing their carbon emissions. They are using new technologies, improving efficiency, and investing in cleaner energy sources. Here are some examples:
- ExxonMobil is investing in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology to trap carbon before it reaches the air. It has pledged to invest $17 billion in lower-carbon initiatives by 2027 and is also exploring hydrogen energy, which can be a cleaner fuel.
- Chevron is funding projects on hydrogen energy and carbon capture to lower its emissions. It plans to cut methane emissions by 50% by 2028 and is improving energy efficiency at production sites.
- Occidental Petroleum (Oxy) is using direct air capture (DAC) technology to pull carbon dioxide from the air. It aims to capture and store up to 1 million metric tons of CO2 per year through its DAC facility in Texas.
- BP (British Petroleum) is working to cut emissions by 40% by 2030 and investing $5 billion annually in low-carbon energy projects like wind, biofuels, and sustainable aviation fuel.
These companies are proving that oil and gas can still play a role in energy while reducing their environmental impact. They are finding ways to lower emissions without completely stopping oil and gas production. Another company is making waves in the quest for sustainable energy. Let’s find out how.
Prairie’s Efforts in Sustainable Energy
Prairie Operating Co. (NASDAQ: PROP) is actively pursuing sustainability efforts in its oil and gas operations, with a focus on reducing emissions and implementing innovative technologies.
Prairie works to reduce methane emissions, use water more efficiently, and invest in cleaner technologies. It follows strict safety rules and uses advanced methods to drill in ways that limit harm to the environment. The company is also looking into carbon capture and storage to cut emissions and help the industry go greener.
Prairie is also working to increase efficiency in its operations. By using digital monitoring tools, it can detect gas leaks, improve fuel use, and reduce waste. This not only lowers costs but also reduces pollution. The company is exploring partnerships with technology providers to further improve sustainability efforts.
The company has taken significant steps to enhance its environmental performance and produce sustainable energy:
Electrified Operations: Prairie is actively working towards fully electrified operations throughout its production process:
- Electric Frac Fleet: The company has partnered with ProFrac Holding Corp. to implement an electric frac fleet for operations in Colorado. This includes:
- 25 advanced 3000 HHP Single E-Pumps for fully electrified hydraulic fracturing and pump-down operations
- Electric Blender units, hydration systems, and chemical additive units powered by 100% natural gas
- State-of-the-art turbine generators, including two Solar – SMT130 Mobile Gas Turbines, each capable of generating 16.5 MWe ISO
- Shelduck South Development: Prairie has implemented electrified drilling and completion technologies at its eight-well Shelduck South pad in the DJ Basin.
Emissions Reduction: The company is dedicated to upholding Colorado’s stringent emissions standards:
- The Solar – SMT 130 Mobile Gas Turbines are expected to significantly reduce emissions across key metrics and stay below the Air Quality Control Commission’s stated NOx targets.
- Prairie is using Precision’s E-rig 461, powered by natural gas generators with battery backup, demonstrating its commitment to reducing environmental impact.
Efficient Infrastructure: The company is focusing on minimizing its development footprint while maximizing infrastructure efficiencies. This includes:
- Developing up to 42 three-mile lateral wells using a single, fully electrified production facility in their Genesis II OGDP
- Implementing three-phase takeaway for produced oil, gas, and water
Sustainable Development: Prairie places sustainable development at the heart of its projects and operations. The company is dedicated to developing affordable, reliable energy to meet growing demand while protecting the environment.
These efforts demonstrate Prairie Operating Co.’s commitment to reducing its environmental impact while maintaining operational efficiency in the oil and gas sector.
Why Sustainability Matters in Oil and Gas
The oil and gas industry is one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In 2023, the sector was responsible for nearly 15% of global energy-related CO2 emissions, according to the IEA. In the same year, coal accounted for roughly 35.5% of global electricity production, while natural gas contributed about 23%.
Methane emissions from oil and gas operations also remain a major concern, contributing to 30% of global warming since pre-industrial times. The oil and gas industry emitted around 120 million metric tons of methane in 2023 alone, according to the Global Methane Tracker.

To address this, companies are scaling up efforts in carbon capture, methane leak detection, and renewable energy integration to lower their environmental impact. Governments worldwide are also pushing for stricter regulations, aiming for a 40% reduction in methane emissions by 2030 to align with global climate goals.
Thus, there is growing pressure on oil and gas companies to reduce emissions. Investors, regulators, and customers are all looking for businesses that prioritize sustainability. Companies that fail to adopt green strategies could face financial and reputational risks.
On the other hand, companies that focus on sustainability can benefit. By improving efficiency, reducing waste, and investing in cleaner technologies, they can lower costs and attract environmentally conscious investors. Many governments are also offering incentives for companies that invest in carbon reduction programs.
Can Oil and Gas Be Sustainable?
Even though renewables are growing, oil and gas are still needed. The key is making them cleaner. Companies are adopting new strategies to produce energy while lowering their environmental impact. Here’s how major companies are making energy production more sustainable:
- Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): This technology traps carbon before it reaches the air, reducing pollution. Many oil and gas companies are building CCS facilities to store carbon underground. The global CCS market is projected to reach over $5 billion by 2030.

- Lower Methane Emissions: Methane is a strong greenhouse gas. Companies are using leak detection systems and better equipment to stop it from escaping. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is introducing stricter rules to cut methane leaks from oil and gas operations by 80%.
- Better Water Use: Extracting oil and gas uses a lot of water. Companies are improving recycling processes to reuse water instead of wasting it. Some firms, like Shell, have reduced freshwater use by 60% at specific production sites.
- Cleaner Equipment: Many companies are switching to electric or hybrid-powered drilling rigs. These use less fuel and create fewer emissions. The oil and gas industry is expected to invest over $20 billion in electrification projects by 2030.
- Mixing in Renewables: Some oil and gas companies are using wind or solar power at their sites. This helps reduce reliance on fossil fuels for operations. For example, TotalEnergies has installed solar panels at multiple refinery locations to cut emissions.
Governments are also playing a role in making oil and gas more sustainable. Many countries have introduced carbon taxes or incentives for companies to cut emissions. The European Union’s carbon price reached a record high of €100 per metric ton of CO2 in 2023, pushing companies to invest in cleaner technologies.
Prairie’s Future Vision
Prairie is working to stay ahead in the changing energy industry. It wants to reduce emissions, improve efficiency, and find greener ways to operate. The company is committed to staying competitive while also being environmentally responsible.
The future of energy is not just about switching to renewables. It’s also about making the oil and gas industry cleaner and more responsible. Prairie Operating Co. is showing that it is possible to produce energy in a sustainable way that protects the planet.
As the industry moves forward, Prairie is committed to delivering energy safely, efficiently, and responsibly. It proves that sustainability and energy production can go hand in hand.
- READ MORE: The “Northern Lights” Shines: Shell, Equinor, and TotalEnergies JV Powers the Norway CCS Project
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: PROP.
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post Prairie Operating Co. and the Oil Industry’s Shift Toward Sustainable Energy Practices appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Climate Change12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

