Sponsored content
The energy industry is changing fast. More people and businesses want cleaner and more sustainable energy to fight climate change. Countries are setting rules to cut pollution, and investors are putting money into green energy projects. This push is making oil and gas companies look for ways to reduce their impact on the environment.
Fossil fuels make up around 81.5% of the world’s total energy supply, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Many industries, such as transportation and manufacturing, still depend on oil and gas.
However, these industries are under pressure to cut emissions, and oil and gas companies must adapt. Some are shifting toward natural gas, which burns 50% cleaner than coal. Others are investing in technologies that reduce emissions while maintaining production.
How Oil and Gas Companies Are Becoming Greener
The renewable energy market was worth $1.21 trillion in 2023 and is expected to grow by 17.2% each year until 2030, according to Grand View Research. While renewables like wind and solar are growing, oil and gas companies are also finding ways to be more sustainable.
Some major oil and gas companies are working on reducing their carbon emissions. They are using new technologies, improving efficiency, and investing in cleaner energy sources. Here are some examples:
- ExxonMobil is investing in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology to trap carbon before it reaches the air. It has pledged to invest $17 billion in lower-carbon initiatives by 2027 and is also exploring hydrogen energy, which can be a cleaner fuel.
- Chevron is funding projects on hydrogen energy and carbon capture to lower its emissions. It plans to cut methane emissions by 50% by 2028 and is improving energy efficiency at production sites.
- Occidental Petroleum (Oxy) is using direct air capture (DAC) technology to pull carbon dioxide from the air. It aims to capture and store up to 1 million metric tons of CO2 per year through its DAC facility in Texas.
- BP (British Petroleum) is working to cut emissions by 40% by 2030 and investing $5 billion annually in low-carbon energy projects like wind, biofuels, and sustainable aviation fuel.
These companies are proving that oil and gas can still play a role in energy while reducing their environmental impact. They are finding ways to lower emissions without completely stopping oil and gas production. Another company is making waves in the quest for sustainable energy. Let’s find out how.
Prairie’s Efforts in Sustainable Energy
Prairie Operating Co. (NASDAQ: PROP) is actively pursuing sustainability efforts in its oil and gas operations, with a focus on reducing emissions and implementing innovative technologies.
Prairie works to reduce methane emissions, use water more efficiently, and invest in cleaner technologies. It follows strict safety rules and uses advanced methods to drill in ways that limit harm to the environment. The company is also looking into carbon capture and storage to cut emissions and help the industry go greener.
Prairie is also working to increase efficiency in its operations. By using digital monitoring tools, it can detect gas leaks, improve fuel use, and reduce waste. This not only lowers costs but also reduces pollution. The company is exploring partnerships with technology providers to further improve sustainability efforts.
The company has taken significant steps to enhance its environmental performance and produce sustainable energy:
Electrified Operations: Prairie is actively working towards fully electrified operations throughout its production process:
- Electric Frac Fleet: The company has partnered with ProFrac Holding Corp. to implement an electric frac fleet for operations in Colorado. This includes:
- 25 advanced 3000 HHP Single E-Pumps for fully electrified hydraulic fracturing and pump-down operations
- Electric Blender units, hydration systems, and chemical additive units powered by 100% natural gas
- State-of-the-art turbine generators, including two Solar – SMT130 Mobile Gas Turbines, each capable of generating 16.5 MWe ISO
- Shelduck South Development: Prairie has implemented electrified drilling and completion technologies at its eight-well Shelduck South pad in the DJ Basin.
Emissions Reduction: The company is dedicated to upholding Colorado’s stringent emissions standards:
- The Solar – SMT 130 Mobile Gas Turbines are expected to significantly reduce emissions across key metrics and stay below the Air Quality Control Commission’s stated NOx targets.
- Prairie is using Precision’s E-rig 461, powered by natural gas generators with battery backup, demonstrating its commitment to reducing environmental impact.
Efficient Infrastructure: The company is focusing on minimizing its development footprint while maximizing infrastructure efficiencies. This includes:
- Developing up to 42 three-mile lateral wells using a single, fully electrified production facility in their Genesis II OGDP
- Implementing three-phase takeaway for produced oil, gas, and water
Sustainable Development: Prairie places sustainable development at the heart of its projects and operations. The company is dedicated to developing affordable, reliable energy to meet growing demand while protecting the environment.
These efforts demonstrate Prairie Operating Co.’s commitment to reducing its environmental impact while maintaining operational efficiency in the oil and gas sector.
Why Sustainability Matters in Oil and Gas
The oil and gas industry is one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In 2023, the sector was responsible for nearly 15% of global energy-related CO2 emissions, according to the IEA. In the same year, coal accounted for roughly 35.5% of global electricity production, while natural gas contributed about 23%.
Methane emissions from oil and gas operations also remain a major concern, contributing to 30% of global warming since pre-industrial times. The oil and gas industry emitted around 120 million metric tons of methane in 2023 alone, according to the Global Methane Tracker.

To address this, companies are scaling up efforts in carbon capture, methane leak detection, and renewable energy integration to lower their environmental impact. Governments worldwide are also pushing for stricter regulations, aiming for a 40% reduction in methane emissions by 2030 to align with global climate goals.
Thus, there is growing pressure on oil and gas companies to reduce emissions. Investors, regulators, and customers are all looking for businesses that prioritize sustainability. Companies that fail to adopt green strategies could face financial and reputational risks.
On the other hand, companies that focus on sustainability can benefit. By improving efficiency, reducing waste, and investing in cleaner technologies, they can lower costs and attract environmentally conscious investors. Many governments are also offering incentives for companies that invest in carbon reduction programs.
Can Oil and Gas Be Sustainable?
Even though renewables are growing, oil and gas are still needed. The key is making them cleaner. Companies are adopting new strategies to produce energy while lowering their environmental impact. Here’s how major companies are making energy production more sustainable:
- Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): This technology traps carbon before it reaches the air, reducing pollution. Many oil and gas companies are building CCS facilities to store carbon underground. The global CCS market is projected to reach over $5 billion by 2030.

- Lower Methane Emissions: Methane is a strong greenhouse gas. Companies are using leak detection systems and better equipment to stop it from escaping. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is introducing stricter rules to cut methane leaks from oil and gas operations by 80%.
- Better Water Use: Extracting oil and gas uses a lot of water. Companies are improving recycling processes to reuse water instead of wasting it. Some firms, like Shell, have reduced freshwater use by 60% at specific production sites.
- Cleaner Equipment: Many companies are switching to electric or hybrid-powered drilling rigs. These use less fuel and create fewer emissions. The oil and gas industry is expected to invest over $20 billion in electrification projects by 2030.
- Mixing in Renewables: Some oil and gas companies are using wind or solar power at their sites. This helps reduce reliance on fossil fuels for operations. For example, TotalEnergies has installed solar panels at multiple refinery locations to cut emissions.
Governments are also playing a role in making oil and gas more sustainable. Many countries have introduced carbon taxes or incentives for companies to cut emissions. The European Union’s carbon price reached a record high of €100 per metric ton of CO2 in 2023, pushing companies to invest in cleaner technologies.
Prairie’s Future Vision
Prairie is working to stay ahead in the changing energy industry. It wants to reduce emissions, improve efficiency, and find greener ways to operate. The company is committed to staying competitive while also being environmentally responsible.
The future of energy is not just about switching to renewables. It’s also about making the oil and gas industry cleaner and more responsible. Prairie Operating Co. is showing that it is possible to produce energy in a sustainable way that protects the planet.
As the industry moves forward, Prairie is committed to delivering energy safely, efficiently, and responsibly. It proves that sustainability and energy production can go hand in hand.
- READ MORE: The “Northern Lights” Shines: Shell, Equinor, and TotalEnergies JV Powers the Norway CCS Project
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: PROP.
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post Prairie Operating Co. and the Oil Industry’s Shift Toward Sustainable Energy Practices appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

