By: Annika Barth, Ellie Potter
November 6, 2023
What is the Transmission Needs Study and Why Does it Matter?
The U.S. grid needs to significantly expand its regional and interregional transmission capacity to meet future electricity demand, improve overall grid reliability and resilience, alleviate system congestion, and connect cleaner energy resources, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) concluded in its final National Transmission Needs Study released on Oct. 30, 2023. The Needs Study is an assessment of more than 120 reports on current and anticipated future needs of the electricity grid. It helps inform regional and interregional planning and the use of DOE’s various authorities and funding streams, such as those included in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).
The DOE projected that regional transmission capacity will need to more than double by 2035 while interregional capacity must grow by more than fivefold to realize the full economic benefits and clean energy potential of the IRA. As shown in the figure below, for this analysis, the DOE assessed projected needs based upon multiple drivers, including improving reliability, reducing congestion, alleviating interregional transfer limits, and accessing lower-cost generation.

Source: U.S. Department of Energy’s Grid Deployment Office
Yet transmission investments have slowed considerably since 2015 in various regions. On average, the U.S. energized only 70 circuit miles of interregional transmission annually from 2011 to 2020, out of a total of 3,300 circuit miles.
What Stakeholders Need to Know
Regional Need
Regional transmission capacity will need to increase 20% by 2035 to accommodate a future with moderate load and clean energy growth. However, under scenarios with high clean energy growth – which most closely align with anticipated sector needs given state and federal policies – these regional needs increase to 64%. Accounting for the high load growth likely to occur under an expansion of building electrification, electric vehicle adoption, and other drivers, would require more than double the existing regional system, a 128% increase.
Scenarios with moderate load and high clean energy growth by 2035 forecast significant capacity growth needs compared to the 2020 system in specific geographic areas: 140% in Texas, 119% in the Plains, 112% in the Midwest, 90% in the Mountain region, and 77% in the Southeast. The needed increase for this timeframe under a high load growth scenario is even greater: 408% in the Plains, 231% in the Delta, 174% in the Midwest, and 173% in the Mountain regions.
Source: U.S. Department of Energy’s Grid Deployment Office
Interregional Need
The capacity needed for two regions to transfer power between one another is expected to increase significantly in the coming years, particularly under scenarios with high load growth or large additions of clean energy sources. Existing interregional transfer capacity must double to meet moderate load and high clean energy growth and quintuple to meet high load and clean energy growth futures by 2035.
Compared to 2020, the DOE projects that by 2035 interregional transfer capacity will need to grow by 414% between the Delta and Plains regions; 255% between New England and New York; 175% between the Midwest and Plains; and 156% between the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest to accommodate moderate load and high clean energy growth future scenarios.
Source: U.S. Department of Energy’s Grid Deployment Office
What’s Next for DOE
National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor (NIETC) Designation
Findings in the Needs Study will help inform the DOE’s designation of NIETCs, which will be critically important to alleviating current and anticipated transmission constraints identified in the Study. The Federal Power Act authorizes the DOE to designate a location as a NIETC if the Department finds that current or anticipated transmission capacity constraints or congestion is adversely affecting consumers. DOE designation of NIETCs can catalyze transmission development through several means. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may grant permits for transmission lines sited within NIETCs if states do not have authority to site the line, have not acted on an application in over a year, or have denied an application. A NIETC designation also enables transmission projects to be eligible for public-private partnerships under the Transmission Facilitation Program and for loan support under the Transmission Facility Financing program.
The DOE’s designation process for NIETCs is still underway. In May 2023, the Department issued a Notice of Intent and Request for Information (RFI) on a proposal to evaluate the designation of NIETCs on an applicant-driven, route-specific basis. This approach would allow developers to weigh the benefits and risks of applying for such a designation and potentially limit local opposition. The DOE will release guidance on the NIETC designation process after reviewing comments on the RFI, which were submitted in July 2023.
Grid Deployment Office Funding Opportunities
The Needs Study will also help inform implementation of the DOE’s funding programs for transmission, authorized through the IRA and IIJA. Two of these programs include the Transmission Facilitation Program (TFP) and Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership Program (GRIP).
Under the TFP, the DOE is authorized to borrow up to $2.5 billion to support the construction or upgrade of interregional transmission lines. In addition to releasing the Needs Study on Oct. 30, the DOE announced the first round of TFP funding, totaling $1.3 billion for three selected applicants. The projects include Cross-Tie, planned by TransCanyon, a joint venture between ACORE member Berkshire Hathaway and Pinnacle West Capital subsidiaries, that will connect Nevada and Utah; Southline, developed by Black Forest Partners and GU Southline LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ACORE member Grid United, that will connect Arizona and New Mexico; and Twin States Clean Energy Link, planned by National Grid, which will run between Vermont and New Hampshire. Southline and Cross-Tie addressed critical regional needs identified by the Needs Study. The DOE anticipates releasing a second round of TFP funding in the first half of 2024.
The DOE also recently announced a total of $3.46 billion in GRIP funding for 58 projects, including the Joint Targeted Interconnection Queue projects that would connect MISO and SPP. GRIP funding is intended to enhance grid flexibility and resilience during extreme weather events, which the DOE expects to become more frequent and severe in the coming years. The Needs Study finds that extreme weather necessitates planning beyond the footprint of individual utilities and regions to assure reliable delivery of power. The DOE expects the next round of GRIP funding to open to applications at the end of 2023.
Conclusion
Having reviewed 120 public reports released in recent years on the issue, the Needs Study authors determined that considerable regional and interregional transmission development is required to meet increased electricity demand and public policy goals across the nation now and in the future. Its release comes just months after the passage of the debt ceiling deal that directing the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to FERC on the need for more interregional transmission, followed by another year for FERC to make recommendations on any rule changes. But given the DOE’s findings, we clearly cannot afford for FERC to wait so long to take action. We need FERC to act as quickly as possible to ensure there is comprehensive multi-value regional and interregional transmission planning. It is clear that FERC must also establish a minimum interregional transfer capacity standard to spur development of the interregional lines critical to ensuring affordable, reliable power.
It’s time to shift the nation’s focus from studying these lines to building them.
The post Need for Speed: Connecting the Nation with Transmission appeared first on ACORE.
Renewable Energy
Empire Wind Resumes, Ørsted Eyes Chinese Turbines
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Empire Wind Resumes, Ørsted Eyes Chinese Turbines
Allen covers court victories allowing Empire Wind and Revolution Wind construction to resume, while Vineyard Wind joins the legal fight. In the UK, EnBW walks away from Mona and Morgan with a $1.4B write-off, even as KKR and RWE announce a $15B partnership for Norfolk Vanguard. Plus Ørsted’s leaked “Project Dragon” reveals the offshore giant is considering Chinese turbines, and Fortescue breaks ground on Australia’s Nullagine Wind Project using Nabrawind’s self-erecting tower technology.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Last week I told you about Equinor’s ultimatum. Resume construction by January sixteenth… or cancel Empire Wind forever. Well… the courts have spoken.
Last Thursday, Judge Carl Nichols issued his ruling. Empire Wind can resume construction. The harm from stopping, he said, outweighs the government’s concerns. One day earlier, Ørsted won the same relief for Revolution Wind. And now Vineyard Wind has joined the fight in Massachusetts. Three projects. Three courtrooms. Two victories and one victory yet to come.
Meanwhile in Britain… a different kind of drama. German utility EnBW announced Thursday it is walking away from two major UK projects. Mona and Morgan. Three gigawatts of potential capacity. The cost of leaving? One point four billion dollars in write-offs. Eight hundred forty million pounds already paid… gone. Rising costs. Lower electricity prices. Higher interest rates. Their partner, Jera Nex BP, says they still see good pathways forward. But EnBW has had enough.
Yet in the very same week… Investment giant KKR and German utility RWE announced a fifteen billion dollar partnership. Norfolk Vanguard East and West. Three gigawatts. One hundred eighty-four turbines. Power for three million British homes. Big winners and losers. In the same market. In the same week.
Danish media outlet Berlingske obtained a confidential report from Ørsted’s procurement department. The world’s largest offshore wind developer… is exploring whether to buy turbines from China. They call it Project Dragon. The plan covers twenty-twenty-six through twenty-twenty-eight. CEO Rasmus Errboe told reporters they continuously evaluate all technologies and suppliers. Quality. Technical capabilities. Commercial conditions. He did not deny the report. For years, European developers have resisted Chinese turbines. Fear of losing their industry to China… just like they lost solar manufacturing a decade ago. But Ørsted is under pressure.
In Australia, Fortescue has broken ground on its first wind project in the Pilbara. The Nullagine Wind Project. One hundred thirty-three megawatts. Seventeen turbines. But here is what makes it special. Nabrawind’s self-erecting tower technology. Hub height of one hundred eighty-eight meters. A new global benchmark for onshore wind. No giant cranes required. Fortescue plans two to three gigawatts of renewable energy across the Pilbara by twenty-thirty. Wind. Solar. Batteries. To power their mining trucks. Their drills. Their processing plants.
Last week we talked about Equinor’s deadline. About Ørsted losing one and a half million euros every single day. About billions in limbo. This week… the courts stepped in. Empire Wind resumes. Revolution Wind continues. Vineyard Wind fights on. All while the North Sea quietly crossed a milestone. One hundred one operational wind farms. Thirty gigawatts of clean power. More than any body of water on Earth. Some companies are walking away. Others are doubling down with fifteen billion dollar bets. The wind industry is evolving very quickly.
And that’s the state of the wind industry for the 19th of January 2026. Join us tomorrow for the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.
Renewable Energy
The “Plandemic”
It wasn’t too long ago that crackpots spewing nonsense like this with no supporting evidence were ostracized by society. Now, our Republicans elect them to the U.S. senate.
You’d have to believe that “the elites” a) conspired with the top people in the other 200+ countries on Earth, b) had a motive to kill over 7 million people worldwide, c) wanted of cripple the world economy, and d) didn’t mind watching their loved one die agonizing deaths.
Renewable Energy
Trump’s Suggestion for New Voting Rules
Donald Trump is suggesting something that does anything but benefit him? Are you kidding?
-
Greenhouse Gases5 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change5 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
