Microsoft has signed the world’s largest biochar carbon removal agreement with Bolivia-based Exomad Green. The 10-year deal will permanently eliminate 1.24 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, equal to the yearly emissions of over 260,000 cars.
This marks a significant step in Microsoft’s push to become carbon negative by 2030 and remove its historical emissions by 2050.
By locking in high-durability carbon removals, Microsoft is demonstrating a long-term commitment to verifiable climate action. The deal is also one of the largest ever in durable carbon dioxide removal (CDR), putting biochar on the map as a serious climate solution.
Why Exomad Green’s Biochar Project Stands Out
Exomad Green’s biochar project offers a powerful, long-term carbon removal solution—while also benefiting local communities and the environment.
Biochar is made by heating biomass without oxygen, locking carbon into a stable form that remains in soil for hundreds of years. It not only traps emissions but also enriches the soil, helping crops grow better with fewer chemicals.
In this project, Exomad Green converts sawmill waste or wood scraps that would normally be burned into biochar.
So, instead of sending harmful smoke into the air, the company puts that carbon to good use by distributing biochar to local farmers. This helps improve soil quality, reduce air pollution, and lower the risk of fires in surrounding areas.

Local Impact with Global Potential
Exomad Green’s approach supports rural and Indigenous communities by giving them access to biochar for use in farming. This helps:
-
Improve soil fertility and crop productivity
-
Reduce health risks from open burning
-
Prevent wildfires caused by unmanaged wood waste
The result is a carbon removal project that benefits both people and the planet.
Setting a New Standard in Carbon Removal Deals
This 10-year agreement isn’t just large—it’s groundbreaking. It brings new industry benchmarks in traceability, transparency, and quality.
-
Biomass traceability: Exomad runs a Forest Monitoring Center that tracks every batch of biomass used. This ensures all raw materials meet strict sustainability standards.
-
High product quality: Regular testing guarantees the biochar meets top international standards, making it effective both for carbon storage and soil health.
Exomad’s production process is certified under Puro.earth’s Biochar Methodology, ensuring full compliance with global best practices.
How Does This Impact Microsoft’s Climate Strategy?
Microsoft aims to be carbon negative by 2030 and to cut all its past carbon emissions by 2050. To achieve this, it also needs reliable ways to remove carbon from the atmosphere. This is one of the main reasons behind the tech giant’s partnership with Exomad Green.
Significantly, this deal adds trusted, long-lasting carbon removal to Microsoft’s climate strategy, using biochar that stores carbon for centuries.
Additionally, it also boosts Microsoft’s image as a leader in corporate sustainability. By choosing verified biochar over less reliable offset methods, the company builds trust with investors, employees, and business partners.

In 2024, Microsoft made up 63% of all carbon dioxide removal (CDR) purchases, securing about 5.1 million metric tons of durable CDR credits.
As rules around carbon reporting become stricter, Microsoft’s clear and high-quality approach to carbon removal gives it a strong advantage.
What Is the Environmental Impact of This Deal?
Removing 1.24 million tonnes of carbon dioxide over ten years is a big step in fighting climate change while also improving land use. The biochar made in this project stores carbon in the soil for hundreds of years.
It also helps reduce harmful smoke and greenhouse gases that would normally come from burning leftover wood in Bolivia’s forests.
When added to soil, biochar brings many benefits. It boosts soil fertility, helps soil hold more water, and supports healthy microbes. This increases crop yields, especially in poor-quality farmland. So, naturally, these gains are helpful for farmers near Exomad’s facilities, giving them stronger harvests and better income.
This deal shows how large-scale carbon removal can work in real life. Thus, extending beyond reducing carbon dioxide, this deal also supports local communities.
More than 250,000 people in Concepción, Riberalta, and nearby areas in Bolivia are expected to benefit from the project’s social and environmental impact.
How This Deal Fits into the Carbon Credit Market
The carbon credit market is changing. It’s moving away from short-term solutions and focusing more on long-lasting carbon removal. Companies and governments now prefer projects that can clearly prove they store carbon for a long time. This shift is driven by global net-zero goals, and biochar is becoming a key part of that future.
By partnering with Exomad Green, Microsoft is backing a trusted, nature-based method for carbon storage. This deal shows that large-scale biochar projects can reduce carbon emissions while also creating jobs, cleaning the air, and helping farmers grow more. These added benefits make the deal more valuable for investors, communities, and regulators.
What the Market Trends Reveal
Experts predict the voluntary carbon credit market will grow to $200 billion by 2030. There’s a growing demand for carbon removal projects that show real, lasting impact. Microsoft’s agreement with Exomad Green is a strong example of this shift.

Biochar stands out in the market because it does more than just cut carbon. It also improves soil health, helping farmers grow better crops. This win-win makes it easier to adopt and lowers the cost of carbon removal over time.
Carbonfuture’s MRV
Buyers also want credits they can trust. Projects that have solid tracking and third-party checks are seen as more reliable. Exomad Green uses Carbonfuture’s MRV+ system to follow every step, from collecting waste to registering the carbon removed. This level of transparency is key for scaling up carbon removal across industries.
Is Biochar the Future of Carbon Removal?
Microsoft’s support and Exomad Green’s growing capacity show that biochar is ready for big-scale climate solutions. Their facility in Concepción, Bolivia, plans to remove up to 1 million tonnes of CO₂ per year by 2027. That puts it among the world’s largest carbon removal projects.
If more companies copy this model, biochar could become a regular part of business and land management strategies. As rules around carbon get stricter and the public demands real action, companies will need to show real results.
This partnership sets a strong example. It proves that climate goals can be met while helping local communities and protecting the environment. Thus, Microsoft’s betting on biochar deals shows a major transition in the fight against climate change.
The post Microsoft’s Major Biochar Deal Aims to Offset 1.24M Tonnes CO2 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

