A recent exclusive from Reuters revealed that the Trump administration is aiming to secure a 10% stake in Lithium Americas (NYSE: LAC). This move is part of ongoing negotiations to revise a $2.3 billion Department of Energy loan, which backs the Thacker Pass lithium project in Nevada—developed in partnership with General Motors.
The move shows Washington’s increasing readiness to take charge of key mineral projects. This aims to protect national security and lessen dependence on China.
Trump Targets Lithium Americas Equity
This proposed deal reflects a larger trend. Trump officials have pursued stakes in Intel, MP Materials, and other key tech firms. Washington’s push for direct equity in Lithium Americas shows that taxpayer-backed financing needs real returns. This is vital for sectors important to the clean energy transition.
The same Reuters report revealed what a White House official told the news agency. He said, “President Trump supports this project. He wants it to succeed and also be fair to taxpayers. But there’s no such thing as free money.”
Loan Backdrop: A $2.26 Billion Bet
In October 2024, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office (LPO) approved a $2.26 billion loan for Lithium Nevada Corp., part of Lithium Americas. This loan includes $1.97 billion in principal and $289.7 million in capitalized interest. It’s one of the largest federal investments in U.S. lithium production.
The loan lasts for 24 years and has an interest rate tied to the U.S. Treasury rate. It will fund facilities to produce lithium carbonate for lithium-ion batteries.
Thacker Pass: America’s Lithium Powerhouse
Thacker Pass is in Humboldt County, Nevada, about 25 miles south of the Oregon border. It aims to be the largest lithium source in the Western Hemisphere. Construction has been underway for nearly a year, with over 600 contractors currently active on-site.
The project is massive in scale:
- Phase 1 output: 40,000 tonnes of battery-grade lithium carbonate annually.
- Enough material to power up to 800,000 electric vehicles (EVs) each year.
- Backed by the world’s largest measured lithium resource, enabling the development of a full lithium district in northern Nevada.
Slated to open in 2028, Thacker Pass is seen as a cornerstone of America’s clean energy strategy, promising to cut foreign dependence while fueling the EV boom.
Economic Impact for Nevada Communities
The Thacker Pass project also carries major local economic benefits. During construction, it is expected to create 1,800 jobs, with 360 permanent positions once operational. These jobs range from chemical processing specialists to management roles, providing new opportunities for rural Nevada.
The Biden administration earlier emphasized that the project aligns with its pledge to ensure the energy transition generates prosperity in communities that have historically been left out of economic growth.
- SEE ALSO: Live Lithium Prices Today
Why Trump Wants a Bigger Piece
Despite bipartisan support, the Trump administration has raised concerns about loan repayment amid a slump in lithium prices caused by Chinese overproduction. The fear: Lithium Americas might struggle to repay the DOE loan, potentially putting taxpayer dollars at risk.
Trump officials are demanding stronger safeguards, including:
- Equity Warrants: No-cost warrants that could give Washington 5%–10% ownership of Lithium Americas.
- GM Guarantees: A binding commitment that General Motors (GM) will purchase lithium from Thacker Pass for decades.
- Project Oversight: Pressure on GM to relinquish parts of its project control to the federal government.
GM’s $625 Million Bet on Lithium
GM invested $625 million in Thacker Pass in 2024, securing a 38% stake and long-term supply rights. The automaker locked in access to all lithium from the mine’s first phase and part of the second phase for 20 years, making the project essential to GM’s EV strategy.
A GM spokesperson stressed: “We’re confident in the project, which supports the administration’s goals. The loan is a necessary part of financing to commercialize this important national resource.”
For GM, Thacker Pass is a supply lifeline as it ramps up EV production under its electrification roadmap.
- SEE DETAILS: General Motors Invests $625M in Lithium Americas to Boost Nevada’s Thacker Pass Lithium Project
A Tightrope Over Loan Restructuring
Lithium Americas had sought a modification in the loan’s amortization schedule—shifting when certain payments are due, though not altering the overall repayment timeline or interest owed.
In exchange, the company offered no-cost equity warrants equal to 5–10% of its common shares and funds to cover the administrative costs of restructuring.
But as we understand, Trump officials want more. They see the deal as a chance to ensure taxpayers capture upside from any future rise in lithium prices and to cement federal influence over a strategic resource.
Even under the existing loan agreement, Washington holds protections. Reuter explained that clauses in the contract allow the government to seize control of the project if it faces significant delays or cost overruns. That safeguard reflects how seriously the U.S. views critical mineral projects in its broader economic and defense strategy.
Lithium Supply: America’s Weak Spot
Currently, the U.S. produces less than 5000 tonnes of lithium per year, less than 1% of global supply. By contrast, Australia, Chile, and China dominate mining, while China refines over 75% of the world’s battery-grade lithium.
Latest lithium data from USGS shows:
- U.S. reserves: ~1.8 million tonnes.
- Geological resources: ~19 million tonnes.
- Global production (2024): 240,000 tonnes.
That imbalance leaves the U.S. heavily exposed. Overreliance on foreign supply chains poses risks to defense capabilities, infrastructure, and technology development. With minerals traveling an average of 50,000 miles before being assembled into batteries, the carbon footprint of global lithium supply is also a concern.
Thacker Pass promises to change the equation by establishing a domestic EV battery supply chain, reducing emissions, and enhancing economic security.
China’s Grip on Lithium
China may not be the top miner of lithium, but its control of refining capacity is unrivaled. The country processes 60–75% of the global supply, turning raw ore into the high-purity lithium carbonate and hydroxide required for EV batteries.
That dominance has raised concerns in the U.S., which views domestic lithium production as crucial for both the energy transition and national security. Direct U.S. ownership in Thacker Pass would send a clear message: America is ready to compete.
Lithium Americas Stock (NYSE: LAC) Jumps
This announcement fueled a dramatic rally in Lithium Americas’ stock. Shares closed at $3.07, then soared pre-market to $5.23 – a remarkable jump of nearly 71%. After markets opened, the price surged even higher, reaching $6.30 intraday. The rally sent the company’s market capitalization above $1.39 billion, highlighting how direct government involvement can rapidly transform investor confidence and reshape valuation.
Other U.S. lithium developers—including ioneer (ASX: INR), Standard Lithium (TSX-V: SLI), and even Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM), which has entered lithium projects—are closely watching. If Washington pursues direct ownership across the sector, project financing and timelines could shift overnight.
By seeking a stake in Lithium Americas, the Trump administration is reshaping how the U.S. approaches critical mineral projects. It’s now about equity and control.
A Turning Point for U.S. Lithium
Thacker Pass is becoming the test case for America’s resource nationalism. With Trump pushing for equity, and GM relying on its output for EV production, the project sits at the intersection of energy security, industrial policy, and the clean energy future.
Additionally, analysts are also considering a reduction in the volatility of lithium prices with this deal. Notably, SMM data shows battery-grade lithium carbonate prices are approximately $9,165 per metric tonne (USD) and battery-grade lithium hydroxide around $9,200 to $9,800 per metric tonne.
If successful, Thacker Pass could anchor a new domestic lithium district and accelerate the U.S. energy transition. But with Washington demanding a slice of ownership, the deal could redefine how America funds and controls its most critical resources. However, it’s marking a new era in the race for clean energy minerals.
The post Lithium Americas (LAC) Stock Rockets 95% as Trump Seeks Government Equity in Nation’s Largest Lithium Mine appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Continue Reading
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
What replaced the cheap REDD credit on the boardroom slide deck, and why procurement is leading the rewrite.
Three years ago, a corporate slide showing a portfolio of cheap REDD+ credits could carry a board meeting. The number was big, the price was low, and the press release wrote itself. Today, that same slide gets sent back with questions. The questions are uncomfortable, the answers are unclear, and your general counsel is suddenly in the room.
Conventional carbon offsets are not dead. The voluntary carbon market retired 202 million tonnes in 2025, and the Morgan Stanley Institute for Sustainable Investing survey published in January 2026 confirmed that interest from corporate buyers remains substantial. What changed is the credibility threshold. The integrity floor has risen, the disclosure scrutiny has tightened, and the buyer profile has shifted. This article tracks what changed, what sophisticated buyers now ask before signing, and what serious corporates are putting on the board slide instead.
What boards used to buy, and why it stopped working
The 2020 to 2022 model was simple: buy a large tranche of avoidance credits at low single-digit prices, retire them against the company footprint, announce the carbon-neutral claim, and move on. Most of those credits came from REDD+ projects, renewable energy installations in countries where the renewable energy was already economic, or methane projects with thin documentation.
Several things broke that model. Academic research published in 2023, including a widely cited Science paper, found that the majority of REDD+ credits issued under the most common methodologies did not represent additional reductions when tested against rigorous counterfactuals. The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative published its Claims Code of Practice, which sets requirements for what companies can credibly claim from credit use. The European Union finalised its Green Claims Directive, restricting how companies can describe products as climate-neutral. France’s Décret 2022-539 already restricts carbon neutrality advertising. California’s AB 1305 imposes disclosure requirements on any company making net-zero or carbon-neutral claims while doing business in the state.
The collective effect: the cheap credit no longer buys the announcement, and the announcement now carries litigation risk.
The integrity reset: ICVCM, VCMI, and what changed
The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market published the Core Carbon Principles in 2023 and began assessing methodologies against them in 2024. The first methodologies received the CCP label later that year. The point of the label is to give corporate buyers a defensible quality screen they can cite in disclosure.
The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative complements this on the demand side. Its Claims Code of Practice defines what a buyer can say (Silver, Gold, or Platinum claims, with associated requirements) based on the quality of credits used and the underlying decarbonisation strategy. Together, CCP and VCMI build a quality stack: CCP on the supply, VCMI on the claim, with the science-based target sitting underneath both.
The reset is not a ban on offsets. It is a ratchet. Credits that meet the new bar continue to clear; credits that do not, do not. The Morgan Stanley survey found that 61% of current buyers like the CCP label concept but that supply of labelled credits remains limited. That supply constraint is now visible in pricing.
What sophisticated buyers ask before they sign
The questions on the procurement scorecard have changed. A 2022 buyer might have asked about price, vintage, and project type. A 2026 buyer asks five different questions before any of those.
- What does the counterfactual look like, and who validated it.
- What is the permanence regime, and what is the buffer pool exposure.
- What is the leakage risk, and how is it mitigated.
- What rating has the project received from the independent ratings agencies (Sylvera, BeZero, Calyx Global), and what was the rationale.
- What is the documentation discipline that survives an audit four years from now when the procurement team that signed the contract has moved on.
If the vendor cannot answer those five questions on a first call, the conversation ends. Conversely, if the vendor can answer them with documented specificity, the conversation often expands beyond a single transaction toward a multi-year engagement.
Where this leaves your near-term commitments
You probably have near-term commitments that pre-date the integrity reset. Public targets to be carbon neutral by 2025 or 2030. Product-level claims that ran in last year’s marketing. Disclosed reduction trajectories that assumed continued access to cheap credits.
You have three workable paths. The first is to re-baseline your strategy, replacing the most exposed credits with higher-quality alternatives and adjusting the public language to match what you can defend. The second is to shift the underlying spend from offsetting outside your value chain to investing inside your value chain, where reductions count against Scope 3 directly and the audit trail is cleaner. The third is to keep the strategy and absorb the risk, which is increasingly the most expensive option once you price in litigation, restatement, and reputational exposure.
Most serious buyers are choosing the second path. It moves the carbon spend from a compliance cost to a procurement and resilience investment, and it removes the central failure point of the legacy model: the disconnect between where the emissions occurred and where the reductions sat. Nature-based supply chain investments, structured under the GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard and aligned to the SBTi FLAG Guidance, are the asset class that fits this brief. They generate inventory-grade reductions, they produce audit-grade documentation, and they survive the new claim restrictions because the carbon math sits inside the value chain that the disclosure already covers.
If you are reassessing a carbon strategy under the new integrity bar, or rebuilding a board narrative that has to survive a more skeptical audience, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help. The Dual-Value Model gives you a defensible alternative to legacy offset purchases, with the documentation and operational integration that survives the procurement scorecard and the audit. Schedule a consultation.
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测