Google signed a $3 billion, 20-year hydropower deal with Brookfield Asset Management. This agreement will provide up to 3 gigawatts (GW) of carbon-free electricity. It is the largest corporate hydropower deal in history.
The deal starts with 670 megawatts (MW) from Pennsylvania’s Holtwood and Safe Harbor dams. This move helps Google meet its growing energy demands, which come from fast data center and AI growth on the PJM grid.
Amanda Peterson Corio, Head of Data Center Energy, Google, stated:
“This collaboration with Brookfield is a significant step forward, ensuring clean energy supply in the PJM region where we operate. Hydropower is a proven, low-cost technology, offering dependable, homegrown, carbon-free electricity that creates jobs and builds a stronger grid for all.”
How Water Powers Google’s Clean Energy Strategy
While solar and wind are widely used in clean energy, they’re not always available when needed. Google’s AI-driven services require power 24/7, and hydropower offers a stable, renewable energy source that can meet this demand. It provides reliable electricity both day and night, which is important for powering energy-heavy data centers.
Hydropower also responds quickly to electricity needs, helping balance the grid during demand spikes. This is very important in places like the PJM Interconnection, where Google is growing its operations. The company’s agreement with Brookfield Renewable ensures up to 3 gigawatts of hydropower, which also supports Google’s clean energy goals in important U.S. areas.

Another reason for this shift is policy support. New U.S. laws have extended hydropower tax credits until 2036. Meanwhile, solar and wind incentives will begin to phase out in 2027. This gives Google more long-term certainty for its infrastructure plans.
Hydropower’s low emissions also support Google’s broader climate targets. The company plans to use only carbon-free energy by 2030. Clean baseload power, such as hydropower, is key to this goal.
- RELATED: Google Rides the Wind: First Offshore Wind Deal in Asia Pacific For 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy
Scaling AI Responsibly: From Deal to Data Centers

Google’s energy deal closely aligns with its $25 billion U.S. data center expansion across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland. These new facilities will help Google’s expanding AI and cloud services. They need a lot of energy all the time.
Hydropower provides the carbon-free electricity needed to operate these centers without increasing emissions. AI workloads consume huge amounts of energy, and powering them with fossil fuels would worsen climate impacts. By pairing clean energy with digital growth, Google is working to scale AI responsibly.

This move reflects a broader industry shift. At a recent summit, Blackstone and CoreWeave announced they’re investing $90 billion. This funding will go toward AI and clean energy projects. Like Google, they see the need to tie digital growth with firm renewable power sources.
Google’s deal also sets a model for long-term clean energy planning. Instead of buying short-term carbon offsets, it’s investing in physical power assets with 20-year contracts. This ensures energy reliability, better emissions tracking, and real climate impact.
Environmental Upside and Responsible Dam Upgrades
Brookfield and Google will upgrade the Holtwood and Safe Harbor plants. This will boost turbine efficiency, improve fish passage, and ensure sustainable water flow. These relicensing efforts will depend on environmental impact assessments and local stakeholder engagement.
Brookfield Renewable Partners is one of the world’s largest platforms for renewable power and sustainable solutions. It has the following portfolio:

Unused hydropower will be fed into PJM’s grid, supporting energy pricing and supply stability. The initiative creates local jobs during both construction and operation. This brings economic benefits to nearby communities.
The Broader Picture: Clean Power, AI Growth, and PPA Boom
Google’s clean energy deal with Brookfield reflects a couple of industry trends, such as the following:
Hydropower and Energy Mix Forecasts
Hydropower remains a key renewable base for utilities. The U.S. Energy Information Administration expects hydropower output to rise by 7.5% in 2025. However, it will still make up about 6% of total U.S. electricity, which is a small drop from long-term averages.

The global hydropower market is set to grow. It’s expected to rise from $265 billion in 2025 to $381 billion by 2032. This growth represents a 5.3% annual rate. The main drivers are decarbonization and the need for grid flexibility.
Corporate PPA Market Expansion
Corporate Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) are booming. In 2023, the PPA market was about $35 billion and would grow at a 37% annual rate until 2032. This could push the market to around $200 billion. The IT sector alone accounted for 30% of PPA capacity in 2024, nearly 3.8 GW of projects.
AI-Driven Grid Demand Surge
The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that electricity use in data centers will more than double. By 2030, it will reach about 945 TWh. This increase is due to AI workloads, which are expected to grow fourfold. In the U.S., data centers are expected to drive nearly 50% of electricity demand growth, and could account for 12% of U.S. electricity by 2028.

Analysts warn that AI-driven electricity demand could strain the grid. This is especially true without clean energy sources. For example, PJM capacity auction prices have soared by 800%, highlighting infrastructure challenges.
Smarter Grids: AI, PJM, and Smooth Integration
Google is working with PJM Interconnection, the largest grid operator in the U.S. They are using AI tools to speed up clean energy integration. These tools can reduce grid interconnection times—a major bottleneck for renewables.
Together with better forecasting and automation, this innovation can boost grid reliability, avoid cost spikes, and help speed up clean energy projects.
Despite these milestones, however, hurdles remain, such as:
- Grid constraints: PJM has only added 5 GW while AI and data center demand is forecast to rise 32 GW by 2030, triggering concerns of limited capacity and regional rate hikes.
- Regulatory delays in grid approvals and infrastructure planning may cause project bottlenecks .
- Environmental due diligence during dam modernization must meet community and wildlife protection standards.
A Blueprint for Clean Tech Expansion
Google’s hydropower commitment shows that scaling AI infrastructure responsibly is feasible. By locking in inexpensive, baseload renewable power while modernizing existing hydro assets, Google positions itself as an ESG frontrunner.
In doing so, the company aligns with broader industry and grid forecasts. As AI energy demand grows and PPAs rise, Google’s approach stands out. They combine clean energy buying, dam upgrades, and smart grid integration. This model is a useful guide for expanding sustainable tech.
As data center electricity use nears 1,000 TWh by 2030 and hydropower output slowly grows, this deal exemplifies how bold energy procurement can simultaneously power innovation and protect the environment. Google’s strategy is more than a contract; it’s a roadmap for climate-aligned growth in the digital age.
The post Google Inks World’s Largest Hydropower Deal with Brookfield at $3B to Power AI Growth appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

