Connect with us

Published

on

With this blog post, we would like to introduce and launch our new cooperation with FYORD! FYORD is a joint network by CAU and GEOMAR initiated to connect and support Early Career Researchers of the marine sciences from Master’s to PostDoc level. After occasional exchanges in the past (see our blog here), we are very happy to establish a closer, long-term cooperation with FYORD.
One example of the support provided by FYORD is the Travel Grant. Any FYORD member can apply for funding to travel to conferences, workshops, and summer schools, or visit project partners or institutes. After returning from a funded trip, the FYORD members provide a short report about the event they participated in, to inspire and motivate others and share their experiences. As part of the newly established cooperation, OceanVoices will publish these reports on behalf of FYORD. Below you can find the first two reports, where Helene, Sayoni, and Xiaoqi share their experiences at the largest European geoscientific conference. Enjoy!


My experience of participating in the EGU assembly for the first time

I am Xiaoqi Xu, an exchange PhD student in GEOMAR, from the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. My major is meteorology, and my research is about the atmosphere-ocean-sea ice interaction over the Southern Ocean as well as the development of an ocean-sea ice coupled model.

Since starting my PhD studies, I have believed that academic communication is a crucial part of scientific research. With the scholarship supported by the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, I had an opportunity to go to GEOMAR for a one-year exchange program. Under the guidance of Torge Martin, a scientist in the Ocean Dynamics group in GEOMAR, I am studying the mechanism of the atmospheric response to freshwater input around Antarctica based on FOCI (the fully coupled climate model developed by GEOMAR).

I am delighted to have received funding from FYORD and was pleasantly surprised that guest students like me are eligible for the same benefits. I applied for funding to participate in the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU). EGU General Assembly is a fantastic event in the geoscience community, held annually in Vienna. This year, the conference featured 18,896 presentations, with early-career scientists accounting for 57%, making it an excellent platform for young researchers. Six months before the conference, I decided to organize my research with Torge and present it at this international event to promote our work. Since we didn’t have project funding related to this topic at the time, I learned about FYORD and applied for funding with the help and advice of colleagues, receiving a positive response quickly, which was a pleasant surprise.

A month before the conference, I spent a lot of time and effort perfecting my presentation. The EGU venue is vast, with a lot of sessions and a tight schedule, so to attend the talks of interest, it’s essential to plan and bookmark them in advance. I gave an 8-minute oral presentation (plus 2 minutes for discussion), requiring careful management of my content due to the time constraints. Oral presentations provide an opportunity to systematically convey my research and enhance my presentation skills. For researchers, it’s crucial not only to conduct research but also to articulate it logically.

In addition to oral presentations, the poster sessions were a pleasant surprise for me because they allowed for more extended discussions (1-2 hours) with other scientists in similar fields. If given the chance, I would consider presenting a poster in the future.

During the conference, my days were filled with attending talks and visiting the poster sessions, where I could chat over coffee. This intense exchange of ideas, both giving and receiving, is a highlight. Although we cannot remember every detail of each talk, the main goal of such conferences is to know about what scientists worldwide are working on and what improvements are needed. Additionally, it’s a large social platform where you can meet your old friends, make new ones, and learn about various institutions, which can help in future career decisions.

The overall experience of the conference was very positive, and the venue was modern and well-organized. I highly recommend attending EGU. Of course, one small gripe is that lunchtime can be extremely crowded, with lines for food stalls exceeding 40 minutes, so bringing your own lunch might be a good idea to avoid missing out on sessions.

Xiaoqi Xu


Sayoni’s experience at EGU 2024

Hello, I am Sayoni Bhattacharya and I am currently working as a Ph.D. student in GEOMAR, Kiel. My topic of research is to develop an autonomous sensor for measuring Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) in seawater.

I applied for a travel grant from FYORD to attend the EGU 2024 conference. The conference was held in Vienna, Austria from 14-19th April 2024. EGU is considered one of the biggest conferences in Europe in the field of Earth Science.  According to this year’s survey, almost 20,000 people attended from all over the world. EGU is a successful concoction of ocean, land, and space science, where curious scientists can develop a network with peers from similar expertise, or they can expose themselves to other genres of science to get a new flavour. There were parallel sessions of talks and posters for consecutive days. With the help of the EGU24 app, a curious person can navigate through all the sessions and choose to attend specific sessions. Moreover, several companies, and publishing houses e.g., Pyroscience, ThermoScientific, and Elsevier showcased their products in company booths. I was particularly interested in sensors which were commercially available to measure gases or liquids using different working principles. 

In EGU 2024, I applied for a short talk but in the end, my abstract was selected for a poster presentation and I presented my Ph.D.-related work. I communicated with many scientists, from early career scientists like myself to well-known professors. In each interaction, I felt that I explored a new way of thinking about my own work and I can translate that idea to my next discussion. I felt that the poster sessions were more active and dynamic than talks. 

My overall feeling about EGU 2024 is bittersweet. I like the idea of connecting scientists of different backgrounds from any corner of the world and making it a successful event without any visible problems. On the other hand, it felt robotic, as from getting the ID badge to hovering around a session is all done without any human interaction. Finally, from my very personal feeling, I would like to say that the cost to attend EGU is very expensive and no food was served (except for drinks at a few specific times).

Sayoni Bhattacharya


A short report on visiting Europe’s largest geoscience conference

My name is Helene-Sophie Hilbert and I am a doctoral researcher at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel. My research belongs to the field of marine geophysics, a discipline which studies the physical processes and the physical properties of the Earth within the marine environment. My main work focuses on the back-arc basin and active volcanic island arc in the Mariana Subduction zone in the north-western Pacific. I am fascinated by these geologic settings because they are regarded as highly dynamic regions encompassing oceanic and continental domains. While island arcs are considered prime locations for the growth of continental crust, back-arc basins play a major role in the opening and closure of ocean gateways. To gain information about the structures in the crust and upper mantle in the Marianas, I use ocean bottom seismometers that record seismic signals on the seafloor and analyse these signals by generating a seismic tomography (a bit more abstract version of computer tomography, you may know from your doctor).

From 14-19 April 2024, I now had the opportunity to present my research about the youngest back-arc basin, the Mariana Trough, at the European Geoscience Union (EGU) General Assembly in Vienna. The EGU General Assembly is Europe’s largest and most prominent geoscience event with more than 20,000 participants this year from all over the world. I presented my research results in the form of a scientific poster in a session focusing on the geological processes inside subduction zones during their initiation and later evolution. This presentation format gave me the chance to have in-depth discussions with other experts on the individual aspects of my interpretation. Due to the nearly 19,000 presentations during the EGU General Assembly, it was possible to get a wide overview of the current hot topics in the geoscience community and to meet scientists from all kinds of disciplines and institutes. Although the programme was very tightly scheduled, there was still plenty of time for networking. For me personally, it was quite extraordinary and sometimes overwhelming due to the sheer flood of information. But I would still recommend to every geoscientist to have this experience and benefit from the direct exchange with the community. I am therefore grateful that I was given this opportunity thanks to the support in the form of the FYORD Travel Grant.

Helene

FYORD Travel Grant Reports: Impressions from the largest European geoscientific conference

Ocean Acidification

FYORD Travel Grant Reports: November 2025

Published

on

Hi! I am Riel Carlo O. Ingeniero from the Chemical Oceanography Department at GEOMAR. I recently had the opportunity to attend ICON 9 (International Conference on Nitrification and Related Processes) last July 2025, one of the leading conferences focused on advances in the nitrogen cycle. It was an honour to be selected to present my research twice – first during the Early Career Workshop on the opening day, and then through a poster presentation on the second day of the main conference.

ICON 9 brought together many of the most prominent names in marine nitrogen cycle research. I was fortunate to meet and engage with inspiring scientists, including Dr. Boran Kartal, Dr. Hanna Marchant from the Max Planck Institute in Bremen, Dr. Claudia Frey from the University of Vienna, Dr. Scott Wankel from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Dr. Bo Thamdrup from the University of Southern Denmark, and Dr. Qixing Ji from HKUST. I also had the chance to see Dr. Bess Ward in person, someone whose work I’ve long admired.

The conference was hosted by the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Bremen, a place that holds deep personal significance. I first visited it 13 years ago during a DAAD International Summer School Biodiversity: Diversity of Ecosystems, Genes, and Species at the University of Osnabrück. That visit, including a tour of the Max Planck Institute and MARUM led by Prof. Dr. Rudolf Amann, played a pivotal role in my decision to pursue a career in marine science.

I recently completed my doctorate at Kiel University in June this year, and I am incredibly grateful for the excellent education and world-class research environment that Germany offers. Under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Hermann W. Bange and funded by the DAAD Research Grants – Doctoral Programmes in Germany and the SO305-BIOCAT-IIOE2 project, I have had the opportunity to work on cutting-edge research in marine biogeochemistry, with a particular focus on nitric oxide (NO) dynamics in the ocean.

Presenting in front of over 100 participants during the ICON 9 was not only a rewarding experience but also excellent preparation just days before my doctoral defense and oral examination. Overall, ICON 9 was a meaningful and inspiring milestone, a full-circle moment in my scientific career. 

Special thanks to FYORD and Kiel Marine Science for supporting my growth as an early-career marine scientist.

Riel Carlo


ICP is a conference with a unique size and structure. It takes place only every three years, and everyone in the field is looking forward to the meeting – indeed, it rather feels more like a “big get-together” than a conference. The program is linear, with one topic per day and no parallel sessions. This allows for focus and provides more room for discussions. I also had the feeling that this format is more comfortable for Early Career Scientists. You don´t have to plan a lot in advance, and you never feel like you´re missing out on anything. But perhaps the best way to capture the spirit of ICP is to take you on a walk through a typical day:

The days started with a short ride in one of the green-yellow tuk-tuks to the conference venue, which was located in one of the few green spots of the city on the campus of the Indian Institute of Science. The mornings were covered by talks by invited speakers. Actually all talks at ICP are only given by invited speakers, and you can only be selected for a talk once in a lifetime! Accordingly, we were able to enjoy some excellent presentations. Before lunch, there was a long plenum discussion with the five speakers from the morning. It was not only a great opportunity to hear different opinions on specific sub-topics, but also to show the connections between different talks, highlighting the most urgent research topics and gaps different groups are currently working on.

During lunch break, we could choose between a variety of typical Indian foods. Even though the chefs took care that the food was not too spicy for the foreign wimps, you never knew if you would sweat after the next bite. The highlight was definitely the daily Dosa, a South Indian speciality: It´s a thin, savory and crispy fried pancake made from fermented dough served with chutneys and sambars.

Long poster-sessions took place in the afternoons. All posters were put up during the whole week, which is also a big difference from huge conferences, where you usually just have a slot of one day or a few hours. It was enough time to look at the other posters, get inspired and exchange ideas. I also presented a poster with the results of the first two years of my PhD, in which I investigate climatically controlled changes in sedimentation at a site in the Southern Ocean close to Antarctica. We were able to link these changes on glacial-interglacial time scales with the ocean circulation and gain insights into the evolution of deep-water formation during times of rapid warming. Onall days, I had fruitful discussions about my work with experts in the field.

Each day was concluded with a perspective lecture by leading scientists fromthe different fields. These lectures were inspiring and an amazing summary, as they provided a broader context and deep insights into challenges and directions of palaeoceanographic research.

With the end of the scientific program, networking was not over yet, but had just started. The evenings offered a great opportunity to approach people and get into contact in a casual atmosphere. Whether at the icebreaker, conference banquet or at the Palaeomusicology Concert – another ICP tradition, which goes back to Nicholas Shackleton, paleoceanographer and skilled clarinet player. It´s an evening where the musical ones among the scientists show their skills. Singing, bagpipes, and even a small spontaneously formed band made the evening unforgettable!


My name is Igor Duarte, and I am a third-year PhD student at the Marine Symbiosis Lab, where we explore the origins and molecular novelties of close associations between bacteria and marine animals. The partnership I am mostly focused on in my PhD is between a free-living, mouthless flatworm from the genus Paracatenula, and the chemosynthetic bacteria from the genus Candidatus Riegeria that live inside its cells. In this system where no mouth is present to let nutrients in, the bacteria and are chemosynthetic, which means. After hundreds of millions of years of coevolution, this highly specialised symbiosis is now the only way by which each of these organisms can survive, and a topic of high interest to understand the evolution of such longstanding partnerships.

The FYORD Travel Grant programme supported my participation in the Gordon Research Conference (GRC) in Animal-Microbe Interactions, which this year took place in Portland, Maine, USA. Throughout the five days of the Conference, about 180 attendees from all over the world shared their main findings from the field of symbiosis, including the topics microbiome, intracellular microorganisms, parasitism, and evolution and molecular novelties of symbiotic associations. Additionally, the event was combined with a Gordon Research Seminar, which allowed early-career researchers to network more freely and exchange experiences from each one’s PhD and postdoctoral trajectories. I had the opportunity to present a poster entitled “Clade-specific genome evolution of Ca. Riegeria, the obligatory endosymbiont of a mouthless flatworm”, where I summarised the latest results from my PhD project.

What I liked most about participating in this conference was how nicely it was conceptualised, with the goal of creating a relaxed environment to foster relevant connections between new and veteran attendees. In such a set-up, not only was I introduced to cutting-edge methods which are being used to answer relevant questions from the field, but I also had the opportunity to discuss them directly with the authors. Another positive aspect was that the speakers were encouraged to share problems that they faced during their experiments to show what real science looks like and to showcase how such issues can be overcome. Overall, I believe the conference was a game-changer for my PhD as I could get to know the main researchers in the field, whom I had so far only read about, and build the feeling of being part of a diverse community of symbiosis-enthusiasts.

Igor

FYORD Travel Grant Reports: November 2025

Continue Reading

Ocean Acidification

Drifting in the Post-PhD Current

Published

on

Delivering

Five years into my PhD and I still wasn’t done. To be fair, I hadn’t exactly had an easy ride, starting just weeks before COVID lockdowns were announced, becoming a mother in my second year, and trying to build a new model system from scratch (Pipefish and their male pregnancy are adorable, but they don’t always make life easy). My work was trial and error, and it took me more than a year just to find a story worth telling. But eventually, the words came together. I had a draft for my first chapter. It was written! Only… was it enough? Basic research with no direct application, no flashy headline — just curiosity-driven science. Many of us know that creeping voice: does this even matter?

So, instead of calling it finished, I dove into one more dataset. In a rush of determination, I moved back into my old childhood bedroom at my parents’ house, spending days and nights analysing, writing, rewriting. By mid-November I had a plan: “Done by Christmas.”

Of course, life had other ideas. A hand surgery in between (note to future PhDs: don’t do that with a deadline). But somehow, even with one hand and one finger sticking out of a cast, I wrote. Introduction. Synthesis. Outlook. Acknowledgements.

By Christmas I wasn’t done, but close. My mother stepped in to take care of my daughter while I revised paragraph after paragraph under the Christmas tree. And then, in early January 2025, the moment came: university reopened, I submitted my dissertation, and it was gone. Done. Crazy. For two days, I let myself breathe and celebrate. Then reality hit: only six weeks until my defence.

Defending

Days passed and my defence presentation kept growing. Twenty slides, then thirty, then sixty. Every time I thought it was enough, I added more — extra data, backup information. Not because I wanted to show it all, but because I wanted to be ready for those tough questions. At the same time, I knew this wasn’t just about surviving the defence. I wanted to celebrate it. I booked a big conference room, reserved a restaurant table, and sent out invitations. And suddenly it felt real: my family travelling in from far away, a friend making the trip from abroad, old classmates and colleagues all saying yes. That was overwhelming in the best way. Practising my talk became part of my daily routine. Alone in my office and in front of colleagues or friends. I have to admit: I’ve always liked presenting more than drowning in raw data, so this part was actually… fun.

The morning of the defence, I woke up to an email that made my heart stop: Water pipe leakage at university. All buildings evacuated. No exams allowed. Seriously? After weeks of preparing, was it all about to fall apart? What I hadn’t expected was the incredible support around me. Within minutes, my PI had secured a new venue. Huge shout-out to the Marine Science Campus for stepping in and hosting me! And somehow, despite the last-minute chaos, everyone showed up. 

During the defence itself, my brain switched to autopilot. Over forty pairs of eyes were on me, waiting for me to present and defend five years of work. The questions that followed were tough and sometimes tricky, but also sparked real conversations. Ninety minutes passed in a blur. Then it was done. I was done. A doctor of natural sciences – me? Hell yeah. The rest of the day was exactly what I had dreamed of: celebrating, telling stories, reliving the journey with the people who had been part of it. Finally enjoying this thing, I had worked toward for over five years. Relief and happiness like I had never felt before. And, as the cherry on top, I got the nicest doctoral hat that I could have imagined – with a glowing giant microbe and two crocheted guinea pigs perched proudly on top.

The great relieve, successfully defended!

Drifting

The night of my defence, I went to bed expecting to wake up reborn – full of joy, energy, freedom. Instead, I woke up tired. Deeply tired. And strangely quiet inside. There was still paperwork to finish before I could officially call myself a doctor, and manuscripts waiting for submission. But the constant pressure, the expectations, the dependence on PIs, the weight of proving myself worthy of a title that even shows up in your passport, was suddenly gone. In its place came exhaustion, but also a growing sense of lightness. I gave myself a week to move slowly: sleeping, recharging, joining a retreat with my colleagues. Bit by bit, relief started to settle in. I really made it.

And the moment it truly sank in wasn’t the defence or the party, but a few weeks later. Walking out of the administration building at Kiel University with my PhD certificate in hand – that was the moment it felt real. 

Kim

Drifting in the Post-PhD Current

Continue Reading

Ocean Acidification

How are Sharks Affected by Plastic Pollution?

Published

on

It’s one of the best weeks of the year: Shark Week. As our finned friends get a lot of extra attention this week, I am reflecting on my love of sharks and the threats they’re facing. In fact, before I was an ocean plastics guy, I was a shark guy. And sadly, on a perfect sunny day in the tropics while searching for sharks, I also found plastics.

Two decades ago, I was researching these magnificent animals in the crystal-clear waters of the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI) at the School for Field Studies. Each day, we’d take our research boats out in hopes of tagging juvenile lemon sharks to better understand their movements, site fidelity and nursing habitats in the shallow waters surrounding South Caicos. Every interaction with these animals was exhilarating, and quite often we’d get the bonus of spotting or tagging other species like bonnethead sharks, Caribbean reef sharks and even the awe-inspiring tiger shark—my personal favorite!

While out on shark patrol one Sunday afternoon along the eastern reef of South Caicos, I first encountered plastic pollution on a magnitude I had never previously seen. Due to the steep cliffs that backed the beach and the shallow reefs that protected it seaward, piles of plastics and debris that drifted over the reef and onto the sand remained stranded. And with little to no human access to these beaches in the early 2000s, the accumulations grew with each passing day.

Sharks are increasingly threatened by plastic pollution, primarily through entanglement and ingestion. At least 34 species have been reported entangled in plastic debris, although actual numbers are likely much higher due to underreporting. The most common item causing entanglement is abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear (also known as “ghost gear”), though plastic strapping bands also pose a major risk. Looped plastics like strapping bands can constrict sharks, interfering with feeding and breathing.

Sharks are at risk from eating plastics, too. Plastic bags, plastic packets and even a boot have been found inside shark stomachs. And scientists believe microplastics may pose a particular risk to filter-feeding species like whale sharks, although hundreds to thousands of microplastics have been documented inside individual tiger and hammerhead sharks as well. There is still much more to learn and understand about the interactions and effects of plastics on sharks, but what is known raises concerns about the long-term impacts of plastic ingestion on shark health and ocean health more broadly.

Never Miss An Update

Sign up for Ocean Conservancy text messages today.

This field is hidden when viewing the form

Name(Required)







By providing your mobile number you consent to receive recurring text messages from Ocean Conservancy from 52551 for donations to protect our ocean from today’s greatest global challenges. Message and data rates may apply. Reply HELP for more information or STOP to cancel. Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

This field is hidden when viewing the form
SMS Opt-in: Selected(Required)

It was on that same reef in South Caicos in 2006, during a break from shark patrol and long before joining Ocean Conservancy where I first participated in the International Coastal Cleanup® (ICC). And like the millions of ICC volunteers around the world who participate each year, I too collected data on every item I picked up. And with each item, I was more and more curious, asking the questions: “Where did these plastics come from? “How the heck did they end up here?” and “This can’t be good for ocean animals, can it?”

I would later learn that the piles of debris that littered that stretch of coast came from all over the Caribbean. This was also my first glimpse of how the brands and languages on plastics provide valuable information to trace where trash comes from, an approach I still use to this day in fieldwork around the world. Further, it showcased the interconnectedness of the waters and people throughout the Caribbean Sea and North Atlantic Ocean.

These early, formative encounters with ocean plastics have stuck with me over the past 20 years, as have the sights of sharks effortlessly navigating their natural environments in those TCI waters. It is something that is forever lodged in my memory, something I never forget or tire of. Sharks have existed in our ocean for more than 400 million years, and over this time, they have perfected every aspect of their design. However, sharks were never meant to contend with the plastic pollution that now overwhelms every dimension of their marine environment.

Today, the most harrowing fact this Shark Week is that the plight of sharks has never been greater. And the scariest thing in the ocean isn’t a shark, it’s plastic pollution. Join Ocean Conservancy for Plastic Free July and beyond and call on your elected leaders to phase out wasteful, harmful single-use plastics.

The post How are Sharks Affected by Plastic Pollution? appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

How are Sharks Affected by Plastic Pollution?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com