A recently published report from CarbonBrief explained that China’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions have shown signs of stabilization for the past 18 months, from March 2024 through the third quarter of 2025. This marks a major shift for the world’s largest emitter, as strong renewable energy growth and electric vehicle (EV) adoption begin to offset emissions from heavy industry.

China’s Renewable Boom Drives a Historic Emissions Slowdown
The global renewable boom adds further momentum. International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Renewables 2025 report shows that the world added over 510 GW of renewable capacity in 2024 — the fastest pace in history. Another 520 GW is expected in 2025, with solar making up nearly 75% of new installations.
China alone contributes nearly 60% of the world’s renewable capacity — around 1,400 GW in total. Renewables now supply over 35% of China’s electricity, up from 27% in 2020.
Notably, China’s emissions have remained flat or slightly fallen for six consecutive quarters — a remarkable change after decades of growth. The key driver behind this trend is the country’s unprecedented expansion of renewable energy capacity.
- According to the IEA, in 2025 China added about 240 gigawatts (GW) of solar and 61 GW of wind capacity in the first nine months alone, setting a new global record.
Solar power generation rose 46% year-on-year, while wind increased by 11%. These clean energy gains allowed China to meet rising electricity demand — which grew by 6.1% in Q3 2025 — without increasing fossil fuel use.

Furthermore, power-sector CO2 emissions held steady in the third quarter, supported by renewable growth and small boosts from nuclear and hydropower. As renewables continue to expand, they are covering nearly all of the new electricity demand in China.
Electric Vehicles Cut Transport Emissions
The rapid growth of electric vehicles has been another key factor in flattening China’s emissions curve. The CarbonBrief report highlighted that in the third quarter of 2025, transport fuel emissions dropped by 5% year-on-year, as more drivers switched from gasoline and diesel cars to EVs.
This trend also highlights China’s policy success in electrifying its vehicle fleet. The country leads the world in EV production and adoption, supported by strong government incentives and expanding charging networks.
However, emissions from other oil-consuming sectors rose by 10%, driven mainly by a surge in chemical and plastics production. This increase in industrial demand offset the transport sector’s emission gains and kept total oil-related emissions slightly higher.

Industrial Emissions Paint a Mixed Picture
While China’s renewable and EV progress is impressive, heavy industries continue to weigh on its emission profile. In the third quarter of 2025:
- Cement and building materials emissions fell 7%, reflecting a prolonged real estate slowdown.
- Steel sector emissions declined 1%, even as output dropped 3%.
Interestingly, lower demand in steelmaking was absorbed mostly by electric-arc furnace (EAF) producers, who are less carbon-intensive. Yet, China’s transition toward cleaner steelmaking remains slow due to entrenched coal-based production and limited policy enforcement.
Meanwhile, chemical industry emissions surged, with both coal and oil consumption rising sharply in 2025. This sector has become a major emissions hotspot, offsetting gains in construction and power generation.
Gas demand also grew modestly — 3% overall — with power sector consumption up 9%. While natural gas emits less CO2 than coal, its rising use still adds to total emissions.

2025 Emissions: A Fine Balance
- As of late 2025, China’s total CO2 emissions stood around 15.1–15.2 gigatonnes, making up roughly 30–35% of global emissions.
That’s about the same level as last year, showing a fine balance between sectors reducing emissions and others increasing them.
September 2025 provided a positive signal: emissions fell about 3% year-on-year, raising the likelihood that the full-year total will show a slight decline. Since electricity demand — and thus emissions — usually peak during hot summer months due to air conditioning, the fourth quarter will determine whether 2025 records an actual drop.
CarbonBrief also analysed that even a 1% decrease or increase would hold major symbolic value. China’s policymakers have repeatedly said that emissions can still grow before 2030, leaving the exact “peak year” undefined. A small drop in 2025 could signal that the country’s emissions have already plateaued ahead of schedule.
Despite its renewable energy boom, China is set to miss its 2025 carbon intensity target, which aimed to reduce CO2 emissions per unit of GDP by 18% compared with 2020 levels. Current data suggests that only about a 12% reduction has been achieved.

China’s Long-Term Climate Strategy: The Path to 2030
To meet its 2030 goal — a 65% reduction in carbon intensity from 2005 levels — China will now need a much steeper 22–24% cut over the next five years. This will require stronger emission control measures, industrial efficiency improvements, and faster deployment of low-carbon technologies.
The shortfall also raises the stakes for China’s 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030), which will likely set a more ambitious emissions reduction framework.
President Xi Jinping’s announcement in September 2025 introduced a new 2035 greenhouse gas target — to cut total emissions by 7–10% below peak levels. However, since the peak year remains undefined, the level of that peak will directly determine how steep future reductions must be.
If China’s emissions peak closer to 2030, achieving the 2035 target would require more drastic cuts. But if the peak already occurred around 2024–2025, the path toward carbon neutrality becomes smoother.
In conclusion, China’s next few years will define its climate legacy. The nation’s renewable leadership has already reshaped global clean energy markets. The next challenge lies in translating that power into sustained, absolute emission reductions — a crucial step toward a genuine net-zero future.
- FURTHER READING: Renewables 2025: How China, the US, Europe, and India Are Leading the World’s Clean Energy Growth
The post China’s Renewables Soar: 18 Months of Stable Emissions Mark Turning Point appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

