ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), one of the world’s largest oil and gas producers, is once again in the public eye. Last week brought big news for the oil major. There was a new gas find offshore in the Mediterranean. Moreover, a key legal ruling was issued regarding old refinery pollution in Texas. Adding to the headlines, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also proposed key carbon storage permits for the company’s growing low-carbon ventures.
These events show how ExxonMobil balances new energy projects with scrutiny over its environmental record. The gas company is feeling pressure from climate change demands. Its actions reveal both the opportunities and the challenges it faces in the evolving energy landscape.
Cyprus Gas Discovery Strengthens Global Portfolio
The first big development came from the Eastern Mediterranean. On July 7, ExxonMobil and QatarEnergy announced they had found a large natural gas reservoir off the coast of Cyprus. The find, located at the Pegasus-1 well in Block 10, revealed more than 350 meters of gas-bearing rock at a depth of about 1.9 kilometers.
This is the second major find for ExxonMobil in Cypriot waters, following the Glaucus-1 discovery in 2019. These discoveries are big wins for Europe. The region wants to find new natural gas sources and lessen its reliance on Russian energy.
The Eastern Mediterranean is becoming a key energy hub. Pegasus-1 adds important reserves to ExxonMobil’s global gas portfolio. It could help boost liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. This would supply cleaner fuels in areas trying to move away from coal.
Pollution Comes at a Price: Baytown Fine Stands After Supreme Court Snub
The same day ExxonMobil celebrated its discovery off Cyprus, it also faced a legal setback at home. The U.S. Supreme Court chose not to review a lower court’s decision. That ruling upheld a $14.25 million civil penalty for long-term air pollution violations at the Baytown refinery complex in Texas.
Environment Texas and the Sierra Club filed a case against the company. They claimed it broke the Clean Air Act by releasing harmful pollutants like nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide for years. These emissions can contribute to respiratory issues, smog, and other environmental harm.
This decision ends a decade-long legal battle and marks one of the largest citizen-led environmental fines under the said law. It also highlights growing public and legal accountability for emissions from major energy facilities.
EPA Backs Exxon’s Texas Carbon Storage Ambitions
Amid legal challenges, ExxonMobil continues to invest in low-carbon technology. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed three Class VI carbon storage permits for ExxonMobil’s Low Carbon Solutions Onshore Storage LLC. This move could shape the company’s future in climate solutions in Jefferson County, Texas.

These permits back ExxonMobil’s “Rose” project seen in the map above. It’s a carbon capture and storage (CCS) site. The project aims to inject up to 5 million metric tons of CO₂ each year into deep underground rock formations.
The EPA’s proposal opens a 30-day public comment period, with a virtual hearing scheduled for July 31, 2025. EPA officials say early reviews show the project won’t risk underground drinking water. If approved, this would allow ExxonMobil to store CO₂ emissions from clean hydrogen and ammonia plants.
This CCS effort is part of a larger federal shift to expand carbon storage across the country. The EPA is also working to give permitting power to the Texas Railroad Commission. This puts Texas alongside states like Louisiana, North Dakota, and Wyoming. These states aim to speed up approvals for carbon storage projects.

CCS is vital for hard-to-decarbonize sectors like steel and cement. According to a DNV report, global CCS investment could reach $80 billion by 2030, enabling the capture of 270 million tons of CO₂ per year—a major tool in the climate transition.
By investing in CCS, ExxonMobil aims to position itself as a leader in technologies that can reduce industrial emissions—key to meeting its long-term climate targets.
ExxonMobil’s Climate Strategy: Progress and Pressure
These three developments—exploration success, legal accountability, and carbon storage expansion—reflect ExxonMobil’s evolving role in the energy transition.
The oil major is advancing its climate strategy. The goal is to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions from its operated assets (Scope 1 and 2) by 2050. The company has laid out interim goals to cut upstream emissions intensity by 40–50%, methane by 70–80%, and flaring by 60–70% by 2030, based on 2016 levels.

In the Permian Basin, ExxonMobil targets net-zero emissions from its unconventional operations by 2030. The company has installed more than 6,000 low-emission pneumatic devices. It has also eliminated routine flaring, added electric compressors, and started using wind-sourced electricity.
ExxonMobil’s Low Carbon Solutions division will invest more than $20 billion by 2027. This funding will support technologies such as carbon capture, clean hydrogen, and biofuels. This includes the $5 billion acquisition of Denbury Inc., adding to its CO₂ pipeline and storage network.
ExxonMobil has captured over 120 million metric tons of CO₂. Right now, it captures about 9 million tons each year. This makes the company a leader in industrial carbon capture worldwide. Projects like the Baytown low-carbon hydrogen facility aim to capture 7 million metric tons of CO₂ annually.
The company also plans to produce 1 billion cubic feet per day of hydrogen and 1 million metric tons of ammonia using CO₂ capture technologies. Globally, ExxonMobil is involved in CCS and hydrogen projects in Europe, the U.S., and the Middle East.
In summary, here’s the company’s climate targets:
- Cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity from its oil and gas production by 40% to 50% by 2030 (vs. 2016 levels).
- Achieve net-zero emissions from its operated assets (Scope 1 and 2) by 2050.
- Invest $20 billion through 2027 in low-carbon projects globally.
Despite progress on Scope 1 and 2 goals, ExxonMobil has not set targets for Scope 3 emissions, which account for customer use of its products. This remains a point of pressure from environmental groups and ESG investors.

ExxonMobil focuses on exploration and production. But it is also creating a new strategy to tackle emissions. This shift helps meet rules and investor expectations.
Can ExxonMobil Stay on Track Toward Net Zero?
ExxonMobil had a week of mixed headlines. This shows the clash between old fossil fuel practices and the needs of a climate-aware future. The company is working to expand its carbon capture efforts and find new gas sources.
This reveals its plans for two things: keeping energy supplies strong now and creating lower-carbon resources for the future.
With this, ExxonMobil’s future will likely hinge on three key factors: growth, environmental responsibility, and investor pressure. As regulations tighten and clean energy competition rises, finding the right balance will be crucial.
- INTERESTING READ: Big Oil’s Showdown: How Shell, Chevron & ExxonMobil Balance Big Profits with Net Zero?
The post ExxonMobil’s (XOM Stock) Wild Ride: Gas Discovery, $14M Pollution Fine, and Carbon Storage Push appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


