BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, recently made headlines by using its Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) division to strike a deal with Italy’s energy giant Eni. Through this transaction, GIP agreed to acquire a 49.99% stake in Eni’s carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) business. The unit—called Eni CCUS Holding—is valued at around €1 billion, or roughly $1.2 billion.
The deal reflects growing global interest in climate technologies. It also shows how asset managers and oil majors are working together to scale next-generation clean energy solutions.
Carbon capture is increasingly seen as a critical part of reducing emissions from hard-to-abate industries such as cement, steel, and refining.
How Carbon Capture Works—and Why the World’s Betting on It
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage—known as CCUS or CCS—is a process that reduces carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from power plants, factories, and even directly from the atmosphere.
First, the CO₂ is captured at its source before it escapes into the air. Then, it is either transported and stored underground in rock formations or reused in other products like fuels, concrete, or chemicals. Sites used for storage include depleted oil and gas reservoirs or deep saline aquifers.
Globally, CCUS is gaining traction. According to the International Energy Agency, there are now over 40 commercial projects either operating or under development. By 2030, carbon capture facilities could remove more than 1 billion tonnes of CO₂ per year—up from about 50 million tonnes today.

Eni’s portfolio is part of this growing movement. The company’s CCUS assets include:
-
Hynet North West and Bacton Thames NetZero projects in the UK.
-
L10CCS in the Netherlands
-
The large-scale Ravenna site in Italy
Ravenna is Italy’s first CO₂ capture and storage project, which aims to scale from 25,000 tonnes annually to become a major carbon storage hub for Southern Europe by 2030. The company has the following CCS goals:

Together, the projects could capture and store up to 29 million tonnes of CO₂ per year by 2030—roughly equal to taking 6 million gas-powered cars off the road annually.
Why the World’s Largest Asset Manager Went All-In on CCUS
BlackRock’s investment in Eni’s carbon business came just months after it acquired GIP for $12.5 billion. GIP brought in about $100 billion in infrastructure assets covering energy, transport, and utilities. Now part of BlackRock, GIP is being positioned as a key player in building clean energy and decarbonization projects.
By buying into Eni’s CCUS unit, BlackRock signals its belief that carbon capture will play a major role in meeting global net-zero targets. It also shows that carbon management is no longer just a policy tool—it’s becoming a commercial opportunity for investors.
The deal gives BlackRock access to long-term, inflation-protected revenue linked to decarbonization goals. For Eni, the partnership brings in capital to expand its CCUS business faster while keeping control of day-to-day operations.
Eni’s Clean Energy Playbook: Spin It Off, Scale It Up
Eni has adopted a satellite business model to accelerate its clean energy transition. This means it creates separate business units for renewables, biofuels, and now CCUS, and brings in outside investors to help fund growth. By doing so, Eni can access capital while spreading the financial risk of entering new markets.
The CCUS spin-off fits into Eni’s broader sustainability plan. The company has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 across its operations and products.

Eni now manages more than 2 gigawatts of renewable energy via Plenitude. It is also expanding into solar and wind projects in Italy, North Africa, and Spain. It’s also increasing biofuel production using waste oils and agricultural residues.
By spinning off its CCUS unit, Eni can grow these solutions faster without sacrificing its core business in oil and gas.
Carbon Capture Gets Real: What This Deal Signals for the Market
The BlackRock-Eni deal has broad implications for both the energy industry and the carbon removal space.
CCUS Gains Credibility and Investment
Once considered too expensive and uncertain, CCUS is now entering the mainstream. Market forecasts expect the global CCUS industry to grow from $3.2 billion in 2023 to over $18 billion by 2032. In terms of capacity, CCS could reach up to 1,300 Mt per year by 2050.

The U.S. 45Q tax credit pays up to $85 per tonne of CO₂ captured, while the EU’s Innovation Fund provides billions in grants. With policies like these, CCUS projects have the support they need to grow.
Private Capital Joins the Fight
BlackRock’s move marks a shift in climate finance. Institutional investors are now targeting hard-to-abate sectors, not just wind and solar. GIP’s involvement shows that CCUS can offer stable, long-term returns tied to carbon prices or industrial contracts.
Energy Firms Adopt New Funding Models
Eni’s approach offers a model for other oil majors looking to decarbonize. By creating new business units and selling part of them, companies like Shell, TotalEnergies, or Chevron can fund clean energy projects while keeping their core assets intact. This lowers financial risk and attracts ESG-focused investors.
Supply Chain and Technology Development
Large-scale carbon capture projects need more than funding. They need CO₂ pipelines, storage infrastructure, capture equipment, and skilled labor. The BlackRock–Eni deal is expected to help build all of these. It will also support jobs and economic development in regions that depend on heavy industry.
Will This Billion-Euro Bet Spark a CCS Boom?
Several things will shape what comes next for CCS. The deal is expected to close by late summer 2025. After that, Eni and BlackRock will begin developing the CCUS pipeline further.
BlackRock’s billion-euro bet on Eni’s carbon capture business shows that CCUS is no longer a niche solution. It’s a growing part of global climate strategy—and a real investment opportunity.
For Eni, the deal unlocks growth while allowing it to lead in decarbonization. For BlackRock, it opens the door to long-term returns tied to climate impact.
The success of their partnership will depend on policy support, technology performance, and industry momentum. But if all goes well, this deal could inspire a new wave of investment into the infrastructure needed for a net-zero world.
The post BlackRock and Eni’s $1.2 Billion Deal to Push Carbon Capture appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

