Connect with us

Published

on

Nitrogen fertilisers, manure and other agricultural sources drove almost three-quarters of human-caused nitrous oxide emissions in recent years.

That is according to the Global Carbon Project’s second “global nitrogen budget” – an assessment of the origins and climate impacts of the world’s nitrous oxide emissions.

The research, published in Earth System Science Data, finds that nitrous oxide emissions from human activities rose by 40% over the past four decades, partly driven by growing global demand for meat and dairy. 

Nitrous oxide emissions over the past decade exceeded even the highest projected levels in emissions pathways, the research finds.

Continuing to emit the greenhouse gas at current rates would “really affect” the world’s ability to achieve the long-term goal of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to “well below” 2C, the lead author of the study tells Carbon Brief.

One expert, who was not involved in the research, says the findings show “all too clearly” that nitrous oxide emissions “are still going rapidly in the wrong direction”.

Potent greenhouse gas

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a long-lasting greenhouse gas that is around 270 times more potent than CO2. It is the third-largest contributor to climate change, after CO2 and methane. 

Various natural sources generate nitrous oxide, including tiny organisms in the world’s oceans and soils. These natural emitters accounted for 65% of all nitrous oxide emissions over 2010-19.  

Human activities caused the remaining 35% of emissions, particularly nitrogen fertiliser use and manure management in agriculture. The burning of fossil fuels and biomass also produce nitrous oxide, but to a lesser extent. 

The new study assesses both natural and human-caused sources of nitrous oxide to see how they have changed over time and how they are contributing to climate change.

It divides the sources and sinks into 21 categories, such as direct emissions from nitrogen use in agriculture and the exchange of CO2 between the land and atmosphere .

The researchers use a range of satellite data, models, algorithms and inventories to assess emissions over time.

The study finds that human-caused nitrous oxide emissions “significantly increased” from 1980 to 2020, growing by 40% during this time period. This rise was spurred on, in part, by growing demand for meat and dairy.

This is a jump of 10% in these human-caused emissions from the last nitrous oxide assessment, which covered data over 1980-2016.  

However, the new study includes more categories than the previous global assessment, including emissions from microbe activity in the shallow waters over continental shelves. The researchers in the study say this explains some of the higher estimates in the new report.

Concentrations of the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere have also risen faster in the past three years than any other time since 1980.

Prof Hanqin Tian is the lead author of the study and an environmental sciences professor at Boston College. He tells Carbon Brief that nitrous oxide emissions continuing at current rates would “really affect the Paris climate agreement” goals. 

Natural nitrous oxide emissions, on the other hand, were “relatively stable” over the period covered by the research. Tian explains:

“In terms of the total number, natural emissions are very high. But over long time periods, they stay stable. So natural emissions do not really contribute to climate change from pre-industrial times to now.”

Human-caused emissions have increased significantly. The below infographic outlines the changes in different nitrous oxide emissions sources from 2010 to 2019.

Assessments of different nitrous oxide sources and sinks from 2010-19.
Assessments of different nitrous oxide sources and sinks from 2010-19. Different coloured arrows represent nitrous oxide fluxes in teragrams of nitrogen per year (TgN/yr): direct emissions from nitrogen used in agriculture (red), emissions from other direct human sources (orange), indirect emissions from human-caused nitrogen use (maroon), perturbations due to changes in climate, CO2 or land cover (brown), and emissions from natural sources (green). Source: Tian et al. (2024).

Prof Dave Reay, the chair in carbon management and education at the University of Edinburgh, who was not involved in the study, says that the research is “really significant” for both scientists and policymakers. He tells Carbon Brief: 

“Nitrous oxide’s importance can sometimes be obscured by the larger climate forcing effects of CO2 and methane, yet every missed opportunity to cut nitrous oxide emissions drags the world still further away from achieving the Paris climate goals.”

The researchers highlight that human-caused nitrous oxide emissions need to be cut by at least one-fifth by 2050 to help limit long-term warming to 2C, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 

Reay says this study shows “all too clearly” that these emissions are “still going rapidly in the wrong direction”.

Agricultural emissions

Agriculture was the “major driver” of increased human-caused nitrous oxide emissions over the past four decades, the study says. In total, the researchers find that the sector was responsible for 74% of these emissions over 2010-19.

While agricultural emissions increased over time, other human-caused nitrous oxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry decreased slightly between 1980 and 2020.

Cutting nitrogen use in agriculture is a “quite complex issue related to food production, food security” and a range of other issues, Tian says.

Requirements to cut nitrous oxide emissions, particularly from livestock, have been a major political issue in the Netherlands and other countries. Nitrous oxide emissions are “expected to continue rising” over the next few decades due to the growing demand for food, the study says. 

A tractor spraying nitrogen fertiliser on winter wheat.
A tractor spraying nitrogen fertiliser on winter wheat. Credit: Tim Scrivener / Alamy Stock Photo

Reay says that reducing nitrogen use in agriculture “can yield benefits not just for climate change mitigation, but for food production, air and water quality and biodiversity, too”. He adds:

“The array of strategies to address these losses – primarily through improving so-called nitrogen use efficiency across our food systems – are already showing positive results in some areas of Europe and south-east Asia.”

An excess of nitrogen used on the land can wash into lakes, rivers and oceans. This run-off causes damage to plants, animals and humans and spurs on toxic algae. Nitrous oxide also contributes to depletion of the ozone layer. 

Top-emitting countries

The study also examines emissions in 18 different regions, finding that they grew in some countries and decreased in others over the past four decades.

China, India, the US, Brazil and Russia were the five biggest nitrous oxide emitters in 2020, the study findings show.

Human-caused emissions increased by 157% in India, 135% in China and 131% in Brazil over 1980-2020.

China alone made up 40% of the overall increase in global human-caused nitrous oxide emissions between 1980 and 2020.

Although the country remains the biggest emitter, China’s nitrous oxide emissions have decreased in recent years as a result of efforts to use nitrogen fertilisers more efficiently, Tian says.

Rice terraces in Yunnan province in China.
Rice terraces in Yunnan province in China. Credit: Fabio Nodari / Alamy Stock Photo

Nitrous oxide emissions have reduced in several parts of the world since 1980: Europe, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Korea.

Europe – the biggest nitrous oxide emitter in 1980 – has seen the most significant drop in the four decades since. Emissions fell by one-third (31%) during this time, largely due to fossil fuel and industry emissions cuts in the 1990s.

Agriculture-related nitrous oxide emissions also decreased in Europe during this time, but the drop has levelled off since the 2000s, the study notes.

Exceeding future projections

The scientists also explore how current nitrous oxide emissions compare with those from scenarios of future projections of climate change.

The charts below show how global nitrous oxide concentrations in the atmosphere (black line) compare with projections under the “Representative Concentration Pathways” (RCPs, left) and the “Shared Socioeconomic Pathways” (SSPs, right). 

The charts highlight that atmospheric concentrations of the greenhouse gas over the past decade have exceeded even the projections under the very-high-emissions trajectory, RCP8.5 (red dashed line).

Two different pathways focusing on concentrations of nitrous oxide in the atmosphere, measured in parts per billion (ppb).
Two different pathways focusing on concentrations of nitrous oxide in the atmosphere, measured in parts per billion (ppb). Chart A (left) shows the measured levels of nitrous oxide (black line) compared to the four RCPs used in the IPCC fifth assessment report. Chart B shows the seven SSPs used in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP) models used in the IPCC sixth assessment report. Source: Tian et al. (2024).

The researchers outline some “major uncertainties” with their findings and the scientific understanding of where nitrous oxide comes from.

These include the understanding of emissions from soils in tropical ecosystems in the Amazon Basin, the Congo Basin and south-east Asia, alongside areas using high levels of fertilisers, such as the US “corn belt”. 

The study also mentions uncertainties around estimates for the impact of deforestation on nitrous oxide emissions.

The researchers propose setting up a global network to better monitor and model nitrous oxide emissions. Reay says that this is a “very timely suggestion”, adding:

“With all nations needing to submit their updated national plans for climate action in the run up to COP30 in Brazil next year, better measurement of nitrous oxide emissions holds the promise of better reporting and, crucially, better efforts to cut them.” 

The post Agriculture ‘major driver’ of rise in nitrous oxide emissions over past 40 years appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Agriculture ‘major driver’ of rise in nitrous oxide emissions over past 40 years

Continue Reading

Climate Change

FLIP OFF WOODSIDE TO SAVE SCOTT REEF: Greenpeace, Michael Caton, Thinkerbell mobilise Australia to challenge gas project at Scott Reef

Published

on

6 November 2026

Greenpeace Australia Pacific has joined forces with Thinkerbell and iconic Australian actor Michael Caton on a major public movement and behaviour change initiative to save Scott Reef, calling on Australians to “flip off” gas corporation Woodside. The company plans to drill for gas at Australia’s largest oceanic reef, home to vulnerable green sea turtles, endangered pygmy blue whales, and thousands of marine species, off the coast of Western Australia. 

WATCH THE FULL VIDEO HERE

Thinkerbell x Greenpeace join collaborate to flip off Woodside

At the heart of the collaboration is somebody who knows a thing or two about fighting off corporations to protect a home: Michael Caton. Set in a courtroom, Caton gives his voice to a voiceless inhabitant, a green sea turtle, and together they invite the public to show their support to save Scott Reef.  

Designed to shift public behaviour and drive national debate, the movement asks the public to tag their MPs – applying direct political pressure on Environment Minister Murray Watt and Prime Minister Albanese Albanese to “flip off” Woodside’s dirty gas project, which would see up to 57 toxic wells drilled around Scott Reef off the coast of Western Australia.

Voiced by Michael Caton and set to a soundtrack provided by Radiohead, the narrative centres on our hero turtle defending her home from corporate overreach in a courtroom showdown. As the turtle defiantly flips her flippers at Woodside, Michael Caton calls on everyday Australians to take a stand and help save her home.

Michael Caton said: “I’m proud to lend my voice to Greenpeace to help save Scott Reef. The marine life out there can’t speak up, so we need to. Some things are too precious to risk.”

Glenn Walker, Head of Nature at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, added: “Woodside’s dirty gas project at Scott Reef, Australia’s largest oceanic reef, is an environmental disaster waiting to happen, threatening thousands of species, including the extremely vulnerable green sea turtles that nest there. By literally flipping off Woodside and Big Gas, Aussies are cutting through corporate spin and sending an unignorable message to Environment Minister Murray Watt and the Albanese government: save Scott Reef.”

Adam Ferrier, co-founder of Thinkerbell, said: “You can fight a corporation in the courtroom forever, but the real power to deliver lasting protection rests in parliament. Right now, our MPs hold an extraordinary opportunity to safeguard Scott Reef for generations to come. I’m proudly from WA, and I know how much the natural environment means to the people and economy of Western Australia. I’m also sure Woodside wants to do the right thing, and with enough public support and government action we’ll together save Scott Reef.

Paul Swann, Chief Creative Tinker at Thinkerbell notes: “When the stakes are this high, polite ads don’t work. You need an unignorable provocation that galvanises people and puts the pressure squarely where it belongs, on our leaders in Canberra. This isn’t just about protecting a reef; it’s about holding power to account.”

Thinkerbell x Greenpeace advertisements will roll out across the country

Greenpeace has been campaigning to stop Woodside’s dirty gas plans for years, increasing pressure on the Australian government to save Scott Reef from becoming an industrialised gas zone. From actions aboard Woodside’s gas platform to cinemas across Australia, Greenpeace isn’t backing off in their advocacy to save Scott Reef.

Rolling out across OOH, digital, social and cinema with an interactive landing page, this project will be amplified by high-profile figures urging Australians to take action, tag their MPs, and defend Scott Reef. The movement combines cinematic storytelling with organic social mobilsation and earned media, planned via Thinkerbell’s Alchemy model to drive real behaviour change and impact.

Marking their first Australian tour in 15 years, English rock band Radiohead will play 16 arena shows across Perth, Melbourne and Sydney in May and June 2027. A $2 donation is included in every ticket price with proceeds going to Greenpeace Australia Pacific and the Australian Marine Conservation Society. Radiohead will match the final amount raised.

ENDS

WATCH NOW:

FOR ASSETS OR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

Adam Ferrier | 0413 633 344 | adamferrier@thinkerbell.com

Kimberley Bernard | 0407 581 404 | kbernard@greenpeace.org

ABOUT THINKERBELL

Thinkerbell is a 9-year-old independent creative company. We practise Measured Magic – the coming together of marketing science and hardcore creativity – to help our clients build their brands and change behaviour.

ABOUT GREENPEACE

Greenpeace Australia Pacific is a global independent campaigning organisation that uses peaceful protest and creative confrontation to expose environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.

FLIP OFF WOODSIDE TO SAVE SCOTT REEF: Greenpeace, Michael Caton, Thinkerbell mobilise Australia to challenge gas project at Scott Reef

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Jimmy Barnes, King Gizz lead Aussie music supergroup on new release to save Scott Reef

Published

on

SYDNEY, Monday 9 November 2026 — Australian music icons Jimmy Barnes AO, King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard, Fred Leone, Gordi & Montaigne are among the more than 20 Australian artists who have joined forces to release a new song with an urgent message: save Scott Reef.

  • Photos can be found here, and lyrics and credits sheet here.

Released today, “If Not Now” is a reimagining of King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard’s Environmental Music Prize-winning song “If Not Now, Then When?”, and is a collaboration between Greenpeace Australia Pacific, Green Music Australia, and p(doom) Records.

Scott Reef is a 15-million-year-old ancient coral reef located 270 kilometres off the Kimberley coast of Western Australia. It is Australia’s largest oceanic reef and is home to thousands of marine animals and endangered species, but fossil fuel corporation Woodside plans to drill up to 57 toxic wells under and around the reef, threatening to turn it into an industrial gas zone.

“If Not Now” is the reef’s first and only release, out on all digital platforms and on limited edition 7” vinyl. The song is accompanied by cover art and visualiser from acclaimed Australian artist and ARIA-winning music video director Jonathan Zawada (Flume, The Avalanches).

Cover art and visualiser by acclaimed Australian artist and ARIA-winning music video director Jonathan Zawada, for Scott Reef anthem 'If Not Now' by Australian music supergroup.

Australian music icons Jimmy Barnes AO, King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard, Fred Leone, Gordi & Montaigne are among the 20+ Australian artists who have joined forces to release a new song with an urgent message: Save Scott Reef.

The track, 'If Not Now', is a reimagining of King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard’s Environmental Music Prize-winning song, and is a collaboration between Greenpeace Australia Pacific, Green Music Australia, and p(doom) Records.
© Greenpeace / Jonathan Zawada

Speaking about the track, Stu Mackenzie (lead singer, King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard) said: “Why are we still digging up coal and gas? Why are we allowing this? Why is the Australian government so hell-bent on destroying our beautiful wild and untouched places? I’m proud that a King Gizz song was chosen to represent a growing movement of people who are asking these questions and applying pressure. Let’s shut it down and keep it beautiful.”

Rock legend Jimmy Barnes AO said: “Scott Reef is one of the few pristine reefs left in the world and it happens to be on our doorstep. We’re custodians of it — we’re supposed to be looking after it. It’s ridiculous. We must protect our country and look after what we value most, which is the nature and the beauty of this country.”

Hannah Schuch, Senior Campaigner for Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “I’m filled with hope by the incredible musicians and artists who are using their voices and skills to amplify the voices of half a million Australians who are calling on the government to stop Woodside’s nature and climate-wrecking gas plans and save Scott Reef. Australian music has long been a powerful catalyst for change, so saving Scott Reef is a no-brainer for Australian music lovers.”

Contributing artists (in alphabetic order):

  • Alex Lahey
  • Brinkley Davies (marine biologist/freediver)
  • Birdland
  • Close Counters
  • DOBBY
  • Fred Leone (Artist of the Year at the 2026 NIMAs, singing in Butculla)
  • Gordi
  • John Butler
  • Jimmy Barnes
  • King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard
  • Leah Senior
  • Mahalia Barnes
  • Montaigne
  • Ngaiire
  • NIDALA
  • Peppa Lane (Spacey Jane)
  • Ruby Rodgers (2026 Environmental Music Prize winner)
  • Terry Guyula (Drifting Clouds, singing in Yolgu Matha)
  • Tom Mahler (The Moving Stills)
  • Urthboy

Production cast:

  • Becki Whitton (G Flip, Allday, Stella Donnelly)
  • Stu McKenzie (King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard)
  • Tay Blunt (FVNERAL)
  • Tim Shiel (Green Music Australia)

Three generations of the Barnes family, Jimmy Barnes, his daughter, Mahalia Barnes and granddaughter Ruby Rodgers, contributed to the track.

The release comes amid growing national pressure on the Federal Government to save Scott Reef from Woodside’s gas drilling plans.

Last week, a leaked letter from WA’s environmental watchdog to Woodside revealed the agency deemed drilling risks to Scott Reef ‘serious, significant and irreversible’, while Greenpeace Australia Pacific activists occupied a major Woodside gas platform, and Perth communities delivered one of the biggest environmental petitions in Australia’s history to Woodside HQ.

The Federal Government is expected to make a decision on Woodside’s Scott Reef drilling plans in the coming months.

-ENDS-

Media contact

To arrange an interview or for more information, contact Emma Sangalli on 0431 513 465 or emma.sangalli@greenpeace.org 

High res images and footage of Scott Reef can be found here (NEW) and here.

Jimmy Barnes, King Gizz lead Aussie music supergroup on new release to save Scott Reef

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Climate Education as Stewardship, Part 2: A High-School Course for the World Ahead

Published

on

What might a high-school course look like if it helped students understand climate change—and see a place for themselves in responding to it?

Not simply a course about emissions or environmental problems. A course that connects science with the places students know, the decisions their communities face, and the work they might one day do.

Canadian schools already teach climate change and environmental responsibility, including through required curriculum expectations. Ontario’s Grade 9 science course, for example, asks students to assess climate change’s effects on ecosystems and communities, including First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities. Across Canada, however, the depth and placement of climate learning vary, and opportunities for more specialized study often sit within elective courses.

Part 1 explored how we could build on that foundation through sustained learning from elementary school onward, shaped with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis governments, educators, and education authorities.

One next step worth considering is a required senior-secondary course that brings these threads together. Imagine a course called Climate, Land, and Future Economies: a place to explore climate evidence, community resilience, Indigenous governance, practical solutions, and the possibilities of a changing world.

The idea is not to turn every student into a climate scientist. It is to give every student a stronger foundation for the choices ahead—whether their path leads to university, college, an apprenticeship, employment, entrepreneurship, public service, or work within their own Nation or community.

Start with the science—and make room for questions

A meaningful course would begin with sound science: how the greenhouse effect works, how carbon moves through living systems, how energy choices affect emissions, and how scientists study a changing climate.

But the learning could become more engaging when students have an opportunity to investigate questions close to home.

What can local weather records tell us? How do we distinguish a single unusual season from a longer-term trend? What does a climate projection mean for a community planni